Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
How to fill
Activity Duration
Predecessor
Name
( Days)
Guess
Formula
Early Start
(SOB)
Early Finish
(COB)
None
12
12
B,C
19
F
G
D,E
D,F
20
24
23
29
LS = LF - d + 1
Formula
Guess
LF - EF
Late Start
(SOB)
Late Finish
( COB)
EF = ES + duration -1
13
19
LS = LF - duration +1
19
Forward Pass
20
23
Backward Pass
24
29
Float = LF - EF
OR
LS - ES
Float
Risk Level
Probability
Very High
High
Medium
Low
Very Low
VH
H
M
L
VL
R=PxI
Threats
Avoid
High
Medium
Low
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.1
=PxI
Opportunities
H
M
L
Impact
Very High
High
Medium
Low
Very Low
VH
H
M
L
VL
0.8
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.05
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Name
Signatures
PV
400
Earned Value
EV
200
Actual Cost
AC
300
Schedule Variance
SV
EV - PV
200-400
-200
Cost Variance
CV
EV - AC
200-300
-100
SPI
EV / PV
0.5
CPI
EV / AC
0.66
Budget At Completion
BAC
Estimate At Completion
EAC
1000
BAC / CPI
1500
1100
1000
EAC - AC
3000
1200
-500
1.14
No
Name
ABDUL RAZZAQUE
Abdul Rehman
ABDULJEMAR LOONG ABDULLA
Ahmad Baqa
Ahmad rasras
Ahmed Majeed
Akbar Ali
1
2
3
10
11
12
24
Ghulam Mujtaba
Hammad Ahmed
hamza ahmad
Ihsanullah Khan
Imran Ali,
Malik Ahsan Bilal
MANSOUR ABDULLAH M QUDHABE
MEER AHMER ALI
MEER TEHWAR ALI
Mian Ammar Musaddiq
Mian Shahrukh
MOHAMED ABD EL MAGED SHAHEEN
Mohammed Abdul Khader
25
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
No
Name
26
27
MOHAMMED SIRAJUDDIN
28
29
30
Muhammad Ali
31
Muhammad Fawad
32
33
34
Musaddiq Asif
35
36
37
38
39
Rehman Ghani
40
Retheesh Panicker
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
Opportunities
Exploit ( Raise P to 100%)
Mitigate ( Reduce
Probability or Impact or Enhance ( Raise P or I to as
both as much as possible) much as possible)
Transfer ( Outsource,
Insurance)
Share
Accept
Accept
Impact (VH/
(H / M / L )VH / H / M / L / VL VH / H / M /
2
NO
Risk Desc.
Severity Probability
Impact
Time
VH
H
0.28
H
0.7
H
0.4
VH
VL
0.045
M
0.08
0.9
VL
0.1
0.05
VH
0.8
4
5
6
7
M
L
M
L
VH
9
10
11
L
H
M
12
13
VL
0.8
VL
0.05
VH
0.8
M
L
VH
VH
VH
H
VL
VH
L
VL
mpact (VH/H/M/L/VL)
1
Cost
Quality
Scope
0.4
0.2
0.4
VL
VL
VL
0.05
0.05
0.05
VH
0.8
VH
0.8
VH
0.8
L
VH
VH
L
VL
VL
L
VL
VL
VL
VH
H
VL
L
L
VL
VL
VL
VL
VL
3.4
0.35
5.6
Horizon
HO
7:30 - 5:00 pm
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
Traffic
School/kids
Sleeping
accidents
Habitual
Breakfast
2000
1000 Late arrivals
300,000
10
300
250
250
10
100
90
Optimistic Est.
Most Likely
Pessimistic Est.
O
M
P
Simple Avg =
( O+M+P)/3
40
40
40
50
60
60
60
65
65
70
70
70
80
80
80
80
80
80
90
90
40
60
90
63.33333
Weighted Avg =
(O + 4M + P ) / 6
61.66667
(Three Point Est. )
PERT Estimate
( Program Evaluation & Review Technique)
Activity Duration
Eearly Start Early Finish Late Start
Predecessor
Name
( Days)
(SOB)
(COB)
(SOB)
B
None
12
B,C
10
21
13
Float = LF - EF
Activity
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
6
7
3
A
E,G
C,F,H
3
10
17
8
16
19
4
10
17
Late Finish
( COB)
Float
12
12
EF = ES + duration -1
10
LS = LF - duration +1
24
= LF - EF
OR
Late Finish
2
9
16
7
9
16
LS - ES
Float
0
3
3
0
0
1
9
16
19
1
0
0
SAPL - Yanbu
300 Employees
7-4 pm
60%
Days / wk Late
arrivals/
week
5
600
120
48
12
24
6
2
2
26
120
Late
arrivals/
Year
150,000
Loss in
Overlapped
Productivity
Avg. Late every year
Mins
( Man Hours)
10
25,000
Scope Changes
Controlled
UnControlled
Scope Creep
Customer
Contractor
Gold Plating
Integration
Initiating
Planning
Develop P.C
Dev P.M.P
Scope
Time
Cost
Quality
HR
Plan HR Mgmt
Comm.
Risks
Procurement
Stakeholders
Identify S.H
Executing
Controlling
Closing
Close Project
Control Scope
Control Schedule
Control Cost
Control Quality
Control Comm.
Control Risks
Control Procurement
Control Stakholder
Close Procurement
WP-2
Here
Wp-3
wp4
WP-n
Here
Here
Req n
Helps in identifying Missed Requirements and Gold plating
R=PxI
H/M/L
VH/H/M/L/VL
Asim Maqsood
ProjePhysical Sec
No Risk Desc Severity
Probability
R1
Equipment
is faulty
R2
R3
Manufactur
er may go
bankcrupt
R4
0.03
L
0.3
VL
R5
L
0.1
0.1
L
0.1
M
0.2
H
0.2
Compatibili
ty issues
Impact
0.02
Monetory
Inflation
M
0.5
M
0.5
H
0.4
L
0.03
L
0.3
L
0.1
VH/H/M/L/VL
Probability
VH/H/M/L/VL
Impact
R6
Non
redundanc
y
R7
Information
theft
Disaster
R8 recovery
R9 Hacking
R10 Cooling
ProjeBuilding Con Hameed
No Risk Desc Severity
R11 Safety
VL
L
M
VH/H/M/L/VL
Probability
L
VH/H/M/L/VL
L
0.05
Shipment
may be
delayed
VH/H/M/L/VL
Impact
Impact (VH , H , M , L , VL )
Scope
Time
VL
VH
0.05
0.8
VL
VH
0.05
0.8
VH
0.1
0.8
VL
VL
0.05
0.05
0.2
0.2
Impact (VH , H , M , L , VL )
Scope
Time
L
VH
M
H
H
H
Impact (VH , H , M , L , VL )
Scope
Time
VL
M
Equipment
unavailabili
R12 ty
delays in
procureme
R13 nt
environme
R14 ntal factors
R15 Permits
L
VL
M
L
ct (VH , H , M , L , VL )
Cost
Quality RISK SCORE
L
VL
0.1
0.05
VL
0.1
0.05
0.4
0.1
VH
VL
0.8
0.05
VL
0.2
0.05
ct (VH , H , M , L , VL )
Cost
Quality
H
VH
VH
VH
H
VH
L
H
ct (VH , H , M , L , VL )
Cost
Quality
L
L
1.4
1.4
2.6
2.75
1.4
7.3
12.1
7.9
10.3
Buyer
Seller
al spending
tion /Audit)
Project-A
Project-B
Project-C
BCR
1
2
3
CBR
0.6
0.3
0.1
ROR
5%
6%
7%
ROI
5%
6%
7%
EVA
5M
7M
9M
Payback Period
1 year
2 years
3 Years
Present Value
1.42
1.91
2.27
3 States of Deliverables
Pass through QC
( 8.3 )
Deliverables
Verified Deliverables
Pass through
Validate Scope
( 5.5 )
Accepted
Deliverables
Tools
Comparison
Variance Analysis
Outputs
Re Plan
Change Request, PMP -updates
Project Docs Updates
Work Performance Info
Guidelines
OPA
Work Performance Data
Work Performance Information
Work Performance Reports
Doc. Mistakes
OPA-Updates
Outputs
oc. Mistakes
OPA-Updates
"Your_Email"
Standard Deviation
Activity
A
B
C
D
P
M
47
27
89
60
48
44
42
37
226
168
Project Duration
(P+4M+O)/6
O
Pert Est.
14
28.17
41
61.67
39
43.83
29
36.50
123
( Pert Est.)
(P-O)/6
Std. Dev ^2
Std. Dev Variance
5.50
30.25
8.00
64.00
1.50
2.25
2.17
4.69
RITA page
170.17
Project Variance
101.19
10.06
68.2600%
95.4600%
99.7300%
99.9996%
68.26 % confidence
95.46%
RITA page
confidence
227
30
90
730
Simple Average = ( O + M + P ) / 3
283.3333
186.6667
Sample activity
Read PMBOK 5 with understanding ?
Your estimate if you are going to perform this activity
30
31
30
60
60
O
M
P
60
40
60
60
90
80
70
69
120
90
43
75
120
91
60
Average = ( O + M + P ) / 3
Weighted Avg = ( O + 4*M + P ) / 6
PERT ( Three Point Est)
155
107.5
75
60
60
60
5
60
400
Price
Profit Margin
Indirect + Misc Cost
Project Budget = ( WP-Total + Cont Res+Mgmt Res) with Cashflow
Management Reserves
(For Unknown Risks)
Cost Baseline = ( WP_Total + Cont Reserves) withCashflow
Contingency Reserves
(for Known Risks)
Work Pakages Total
31,000
WP1
WP2
WP3
10,000
5,000
16,000
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
6000
4000
3000
2000
10000
6000
5700
3700
2700
1700
8000
5400
Or
Known Risks
Unknown Risks
Funding Limit Reconciliation
Requested
Sponsor
A1
5700
10 Labor 5 days
400 Hours
1 crane
5 days
40 hours
Sand
5 trucks
5,10,10,10,8
5,10,5,10,13
Known-Unknowns
Unknown-Unknowns
20 SR / hr
8000
200 SR/hr
8000
100 SR / tr
500
16500
18000
83000
68,000
28000
15000
0
-40000
20000
48000
5000 (Outside PM-Authority)
43000 (inside PM-Authority)
12000
Or
Known-Unknowns
Cont. Rzrvs
Unknown-Unknowns Mgmt. Rzrvs
conciliation
Contingency Resrvz.
Mgmt. Resrvz.
WP2
WP3
10,000
5,000
16,000
A1
6000
A2
4000
A3
3000
A4
2000
A5
10000
A6
6000
Assignable Cause
Alrarming
340
335
330
Specification
325
320
Control Charts
Rule of seven
ule of seven
Output = Quality Management Plan , Process Improvement Plan, Quality Metrics, Quality C
8.2 Perform Quality Assurance
Execute whatever we decided about QA procedures in Quality Management Plan
8.3 Control Quality
Execute whatever we decided about QC procedures in Quality Management Plan
We were producing 100 items in a day ( 8 hours ) and the rejections by QC were 20 out of every
or
or
Process Improvement ?
a) We are able to produce 120 items in a day , 24 are rejected by QC
b) We are able to produce 100 items in a day , 15 are rejected by QC
c) We are able to produce 100 items in 6 hours , 20 are rejected by QC
Poka Yoke
RCO
ICD
Data Types
Continuous
examples
Discrete
Nationality , Qualification ,
Ages
Who is youngest person in this room ?
68.5714285714
Scatter Diagram
Temp on a Day
15
12
9
6
3
Temp on a Day
20
24
28
32
36
10,000
12,000
14,000
15,000
25,000
Negative Corelation
P.I.P
ge , Height , Weight
24
24.5
25
egative Corelation
ositive Corelation
20
21.75
22.5
25
n(n-1)/2
50(49)/2
1225
3675
61.25
49
147
Rent ?
Yes
Yes
No
Purchase ?
No
Yes
Yes
Lease ?
No
Yes
No
ement Plan)
Verbal Comm
Non Verbal Communication
Spoken / Oral
Written
What portion of PM's Time is spent in communications ?
30
50
70
90
A PM was managing a team of 5 Architects , after 3 months , he hired 3
more architects in the team. How many communication lines were added
because
because of this change
Before Change
15
After Change
New Lines ?
36
21
High
Project - KAFD - Office & ResideMedium
Low
RiskDescription
Severity
R1 Weather Conditions
Medium
R2 Lack of Manpower
High
R3 Unskilled / Unqualified Ma High
R4 Delay in delivery of MateriaHigh
R5 No final BOQ
Medium
R6 Unforseen Site Conditions Low
R7 Sudden changes in approveHigh
R8 change orders
High
R9 emergency
Low
Efficiency / productivity
may go down during
R10 summer season
Low
VH / H / M / L / VL
Probability
L
H
H
H
L
L
L
L
L
VH / H / M / L / VL
Impact
VH
H
H
VH
VH
H
VH
H
VH
VH
VH
Time
VH
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Cost
H
VH
H
VH
M
H
H
H
H
Quality
VL
M
VH
L
L
L
L
L
L
Risk Responses
R=PxI
Threats
Avoid
Mitigation
Transfer
Accept
Opportunities
Exploit
Enhance
Share
Accept
Control Risks
New Risks , Evaluate and Replan
Reserve Analysis ( Keep an eye on remaining risks and remaining
reserves)
KPIs ( CPI , SPI ) and Risk Management
Risk Radar
Risk Reassessment
Risk Level
Probability
Very High
High
Medium
Low
Very Low
VH
H
M
L
VL
R=PxI
Threats
Avoid
High
Medium
Low
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.1
=PxI
Opportunities
H
M
L
Impact
Very High
High
Medium
Low
Very Low
VH
H
M
L
VL
0.8
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.05
(VH / H / M / L / VL )
Probability
Medium
High
M
H
High
Low
High
High
High
Low
L
M
M
L
VH
High
Medium
Medium
High
Low
High
Low
H
H
L
H
M
Medium
High
Medium
H
L
ID Risk Desc
4
5
6
7
8
Delays due to
miscommunications
Escalation Costs
Safety and Security Risks
Possibility of Hacking
Inflation
Impact
Imapct ( VH / H / M / L / VL )
Scope
Time
Cost
Quality
H
VH
VL
VL
VH
VH
H
L
H
L
VH
VL
VH
M
H
VH
VH
L
L
M
L
L
VL
M
H
L
L
VL
M
VH
L
VH
VH
VL
M
H
VH
M
VH
VH
VL
VH
VL
H
M
M
M
H
H
VL
VH
VH
M
H
H
VH
H
M
M
H
H
M
M
H
VL
H
M
H
H
H
M
H
M
H
M
M
VL
ID Risk Desc
Possibility of damage of material
1 during transportation
2 Delay in custom clearance
(VH / H / M / L / VL )
Probability
H
0.4
M
0.07
M
0.5
H
0.7
M
0.1
M
0.5
L
0.015
H
0.2
L
0.025
L
0.015
H
0.18
L
0.3
M
0.5
M
0.5
L
0.3
VH
0.9
Impact
10
8
20
Imapct ( VH / H / M / L / VL )
Scope
Time
Cost
5
Quality Risk Score
VH
0.8
L
0.1
VH
0.8
VL
0.05
VH
0.8
VH
0.8
VH
0.8
L
0.1
VH
0.8
L
0.1
M
0.2
VL
0.05
VH
0.8
H
0.4
H
0.4
VL
0.05
H
0.4
VL
0.05
VL
0.05
M
0.2
L
0.1
M
0.2
L
0.1
VL
0.05
VL
0.05
M
0.2
H
0.4
L
0.1
VL
0.05
VL
0.05
M
0.2
VH
0.8
L
0.1
VL
0.05
VH
0.8
VL
0.05
M
0.2
H
0.4
VL
0.05
M
0.2
34.4
9.4
16.9
6.85
22.2
5.8
2.15
17.9
EF = ES + d -1
How to fill
Activity
Name
Guess
Duration
Predecessor
( Days)
Formula
Early Start
(SOB)
Early Finish
(COB)
5000
None
6000
None
4000
3000
F
G
E
D,F
7
11
10
B,C
G,H
10
25
21
26
H
I
14
12
2
24
Guess Formula
Activity
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
LS = LF - d + 1
Formula
Guess
LF - EF
Late Start
(SOB)
Late Finish
( COB)
Float
12
12
EF = ES + duration -1
10
LS = LF - duration +1
Forward Pass
10
Backward Pass
11
24
0
0
13
25
24
26
3
0
Float = LF - EF
OR
LS - ES
Formula
Guess
Late Start
1
6
10
3
8
11
4
10
17
Late Finish
2
9
16
7
9
16
9
16
19
Float
0
3
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
Dinner
1.1 Soup
R1
R2
R3
1 Appetizer
1.2 Salad
2. Main Course
2.1 Biryani 2.2 Karahi
3. Sweetdish
3.1 Halwa
3.2 Kunafa
{ Work Packages}
Schedule
On Schedule
Ahead of Schedule
Behind Schedule
ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Budget
On Budget - ( As plan)
Under Budget (Saving)
Over Budget ( Over spending)
Possible Combinations ?
On Schedule
On Budget
On Schedule
Under Budget
On Schedule
Over Budget
Ahead of Schedule
On Budget
Ahead of Schedule
Under Budget
Ahead of Schedule
Over Budget
Behind Schedule
On Budget
Behind Schedule
Under Budget
Behind Schedule
Over Budget
Y/N?
G1
G2
G3
G4
Changes
Controlled Change
UnControlled Change
Scope Creep
Gold Plating
What are the possible reasons for giving something beyond agreed scope?
( Gold plating)
a) Good relations
b) Market Repute
c) More business
d) Show the flexibility
e) Cover another mistake
f) enhancement ( good idea)
SV=
CV=
SPI=
CPI=
If
If
If
If
If
If
EV
EV
EV
EV
"-"
"-"
"/"
"/"
PV
AC
PV
AC
Project-A
Project-B
Project-C
Project-D
Project-E
Project-F
Project-G
Project-H
SV
CV
-400
300
400
0
300
400
-500
0
SPI
CPI
1.4
0.4
0.5
1
4.1
0.9
1.3
1