Capital Structure: An Empirical Study of Indian Manufacturing Companies Financial Management II Report
Determinants of Capital Structure: An Empirical Study
of Indian Manufacturing Companies Introduction Companies have been struggling with capital structure for more than four decades. Despite decades of intensive research, and hundreds of papers after Modi gliani and Millers seminal work, surprisingly there is lack of consensus ev en today among the finance experts on this basic issue of corporate financ e. In practice, it is observed that finance managers use different combinati ons of debt and equity. Academicians and practitioners alike have found it difficult to find out how a firm decides its capital structure in the perfect ca pital markets the west as well as in the imperfect capital markets, as in India. This has l ed to an upsurge in research on company finance, particularly aimed at un derstanding how companies finance their activities and why they finance their activities in these specific ways. A practical question therefore is: What determines the capital structure? This report undertakes study of firm level data of nearly 200 major manufacturing companies listed in BSE, taken from 6 different sectors and attempts to identify main determinants of capital structure for the period of one year. Our purpose of this exercise is to verify whether any particular theory can characterize Indian corporate behaviour in determining capital structure. The central issue we will address is to examine empirically the existence of inter-firm and inter-industry differences in the capital structure of Indian firms and identify the possible source of such variation in capital structure. Efforts will be made to find out the factors that determine the financing pattern of capital structure of Indian manufacturing companies Capital structure represents the proportion in which various long-term capital components are employed. Over the years, these decisions have been recognized as most important decisions that a firm has to take. This is because of the fact that capital structure affects the cost of capital, net profit, earning per share, and dividend payout ratio and liquidity position of the firm. These variables coupled with a number of other factors determine the value of a firm. So, capital structure is a very important determinant of the value of the firm. Modigliani and Miller were the first people to try to determine the ideal capital structure and value of firm.In their research they concluded that the value of the firm is self-determining of capital structure and that the value of an unlevered firm is equal to that of a levered firmbased on the assumption of absence of taxes. This assumption was considered
Determinants of Capital Structure: An Empirical Study
of Indian Manufacturing Companies unrealistic and in their subsequent research Modigliani and Miller took tax into consideration and concluded that because of tax shield on debt as a factor, the value of a levered firm was more than the value of an unlevered firm and that this value was equal to the value of the tax shield. According to Jensen and Mackling, the optimal capital structure is obtained by trading off the agency cost of debt against the benefit of debt. Here, Jensen and Mackling first identified disputes between shareholders and managers because of managements ownership being less than 100% of the equity. Jensen proposed that this problem could be reduced by increasing the percentage of shares owned by the manager or by increasing debt in the capital structure. This would result in the reduction of the amount of unused cash available to managers. This would eventually benefit debt financing. Agency models have shown a positive relation between leverage and firm value, regulatory abidance, probability of defaults, value at the time of liquidation, freely available cash flows and the significance of managerial reputation. Leverage is expected to be negatively correlated with interest coverage, growth opportunities, and possibility of reorganization following default. Besides, a lot more work has been done on this problem till now, but a formal model, showing the mechanism for determining an optimal structure in an imperfect market, is yet to be developed. Research methodology Scope of the study The proposed research is intended to examine the trend and pattern of financing the capital structure of Indian companies. The central issuewe will address is to examine empirically the existence of interfirm and inter industry differences in the capital structure of Indian firms andidentify the possible sources of such variation in capital structure in order to find out the factors that determine the financing pattern of capitalstructure of Indian companies, particularly in the private sector. Source of the data For our study purpose, only secondary data is used which is sourced from the website www.moneycontrol.com. Techniques used for Analysis The data collected from the financial statements of the companies are analysed with the help of the correlation analysis.
Determinants of Capital Structure: An Empirical Study
of Indian Manufacturing Companies Limitations of the study Some of the limitations of this study are that we took only data of one year and we assumed that the nearly 200 companies across 6 sectors are representative of whole Indian companies. Determinants of capital structure Capital structure of a firm is determined by various internal and external factors. External factors that affect the capital structure of a firm include taxpolicy of government, inflation rate, and capital market condition. In thissection we discuss some of the internal factors that we consider to affect the capital structure of a firm with reference to capital structure theories. Current Ratio: The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures company's ability to pay short-term and long-term obligations. Current ratio considers the total assets of a company (both liquid and illiquid) relative to that companys total liabilities. The formula for calculating a companys current ratio is: Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities The current ratio is called current because it incorporates all current assets and liabilities. The current ratio is also known as the working capital ratio. Debt to Equity Ratio: Debt to Equity Ratio is a debt ratio used to measure a company's financial leverage. It is calculated by dividing a companys total liabilities by its stockholders' equity. The Debt to Equity ratio indicates how much debt a company is using to finance its assets relative to the amount of value represented in shareholders equity. The formula for calculating Debt to Equity ratios is: Debt to Equity Ratio = Total Liabilities / Shareholders' Equity Long term debt to Equity Ratio: Long term Debt to Equity ratio is a way to determine a company's leverage in risk analysis. It is calculated by taking the company's long-
Determinants of Capital Structure: An Empirical Study
of Indian Manufacturing Companies term debt and dividing it by the total value of its preferred and common stock. The greater a company's leverage, the higher the ratio. The formula for calculating Long term Debt to Equity Ratios is: Long term Debt to Equity Ratio = Long-term debt / (Preferred stock + Common stock) Operating Income: Operating income is the amount of profit realized from a business's operations after taking out operating expenses. Operating expenses includes cost of goods sold (COGS) or wages and depreciation. Operating Income is synonym for earnings before interest and taxes. The formula for calculating Operating income is: Operating Income = Gross Income - Operating Expenses - Depreciation& Amortization Net Debt: Net Debt is the sum of all short term debt, and notes payables, Long Term debt and preferred equity minus the total cash and equivalents and short term investments Cost of debt (COD): Cost of debt is the effective rate that a company pays on its current debt. Cost of debt can be measured by either before- or after-tax returns. Cost of debt is one part of the companys capital structure, which also includes the cost of equity. Data analysis We started the analysis of the collected data by grouping them into respective industries. As different industries behave differently this would give better results. Next we tried to establish correlation between capital structures (Current ratio, Long term debt to equity ratio, and debt to equity ratio) with its determinants which were explained above. An attempt has been made to analyse and interpret the trend and pattern structure of each group of sample companies. The required data is obtained by aggregating the data ofsample companies belonging to a particular group. Log functions are taken to account for the differences in the small ratios and large investment and debt amounts. Findings & observations
Determinants of Capital Structure: An Empirical Study
of Indian Manufacturing Companies It is found that there is a strong correlation on operating income and total assets on Debt to Equity ratio, Long term Debt to Equity ratio. The cost of debt has also high correlation with Debt to Equity ratio as well as Long term Debt to Equity ratio. It has a significance level of 99% in some cases. These are the some of the major correlations that are found in the analysis. The other results are attached in the excel files. Conclusion Barring to a few exceptions,it was found that companies mostly prefer internal funds as compared to external funds. When it comes to external funds, the companies seemed to raise more funds through debt capital as compared toequity, may be due to the reason of easy and availability of cheap debt capital. The debt to equity ratio is observed to be different for different industries, which is to be expected considering the different types of business risk associated. To sum up, Indian companies prioritize their sources of financing(from internal financing to equity) according to the law of least effort, or of least resistance, preferring to raise equity as a financing means oflast resort. Hence internal funds are used first, and when that is depleted debt is issued, and when it is not sensible to issue any more debt,equity is issued. Equity capital as a source of fund is not preferred across the board. This shows that somewhere or other, the financing patternof Indian private sector companies is in line with the packingorder theory. References 1. Brealey, and Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance, 6th ed., McGraw Hill. 2. A study on determinants of capital structure in India AnshuHandoo, Kapil Sharma. 3.Jagannath Panda, andAshok Kumar Panigrahi,Determinants Of Capital Structure: An Empirical Study Of Indian Companies.