Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
NOVICE TRADER
This indicator combines popular technical methods moving averages, support/resistance, and envelopes with
statistical analysis to create a powerful technical analysis
tool. Bollinger Bands, used in combination with the relative
strength index (RSI) to analyze a market, enables us to
develop a method to enter and exit trades and review the
historical results.
by Stuart P. Evens
n a day-to-day basis, markets
trade in a volatile fashion
around the trend. To better see
the trend, traders use moving
averages to filter the price action. This way, traders can
gather important information
regarding how the market is
trading. For example, after a
sharp rise or fall in the trend,
the market may consolidate,
trading in a narrow fashion and crisscrossing above and
below the moving average. To better monitor this behavior,
traders use price channels, which are designed to encompass
the trading activity around the trend.
Bollinger Bands are one such technical tool. Before we
discuss Bollinger Bands, however, lets have a quick look at
some other methods that traders have used.
Some technicians use moving averages with support and
resistance lines to anticipate the price action of a stock. Upper
resistance and lower support lines are first drawn and then
extrapolated to form channels within which the trader expects prices to be contained. Some traders draw straight lines
connecting either tops or bottoms of prices to identify the
upper or lower price extremes, respectively, and then add
parallel lines to define the channel within which the prices
should move. As long as prices do not move out of this
channel, the trader can be reasonably confident that prices are
moving as expected.
J.M. Hursts Profit Magic Of Stock Transaction Timing
described a method of applying support and resistance theory
to the moving average concept. Rather than using fixed points
such as minor tops or bottoms to construct the channels, Hurst
wrote about a method to add and subtract a fixed percentage
of the daily moving average value to the moving average to
create a band around the stock price. This group of indicators
combines the two popular interpretations of stock price, the
ENVELOPES
Envelopes consist of three lines: a middle one that is a moving
average, and two others that form an upper and lower band,
or envelope, around the price bars of a stock when plotted
together on the same chart. The theory behind them is that the
moving average represents the trend of the stock price, and
the upper and lower lines indicate when temporary price
extremes in that stock exist. When prices reach the upper line,
or especially when they exceed the line, a warning is given for
the possibility of a correction in the opposite direction that
is, down. Likewise, when prices reach or exceed the lower
line, an extreme level of selling is indicated, and it is reasonable to expect a movement up in prices.
Different variables are used in constructing envelopes, and
depending on the selection, the amount of price data within
the bands will also vary. Regardless of variables used, all
envelopes start with a moving average, usually of the closing
price of the stock. It can be a simple moving average, an
exponential moving average, or a weighted moving average.
In addition to the method of calculating the moving average, varying the length of the average greatly influences how
it reacts to price changes. A shorter moving average for
example, 20 days is much more sensitive to price changes
than a 200-day moving average. Therefore, if you wanted to
FIBONACCI TRADER
Bollinger
Bands
PATRICK KELLEY
BOLLINGERS BANDS
John Bollingers modification to
envelopes, known as Bollinger
Bands, are a moving average
envelope or trading band that
combines statistics with envelope theory. Bollinger used statistical analysis of stock prices
to calculate his bands because
he felt that the bandwidth should
be correlated to the price action
of the underlying stock instead
of the arbitrary fixed percentage
method for choosing the bandwidth used in Figure 1.
The statistical portion of his
method is that the bandwidth is
two standard deviations away
from the center moving average
line. The significance of two
standard deviations is wellknown in statistics, as 95.5% of
the population data values in a
normal distribution occur within
plus or minus two standard deCopyright (c) Technical Analysis Inc.
FIGURE 4: BOLLINGER BANDS AND RSI. The 20-day RSI is shown below the plot
of prices and Bollinger Bands. We will use the RSI to confirm the indication by
Bollinger Bands that prices are relatively high or low and place hypothetical trades
based on historical prices when these two indicators agree.
METASTOCK FORMULAS
Enter Long:
Low < = BBandBot(C,20,S,2) and RSI(20) < 30
Close Long:
High >= BBandTop (C,20,S,2) and RSI(20) > 70
Enter Short:
High >= BBandTop (C,20,S,2) and RSI(20) > 70
Close Short:
Low <= BBandBot(C,20,S,2), and RSI(20) < 30
FIGURE 5: TRADING RULES. The trading rules used on historical prices in our
examples are shown in Figure 5, written in MetaStock formula language. In each
example, MetaStocks system tester was used to place hypothetical trades using
the above rules during the historical period starting in January 1993 and ending in
December 1998. The rules are based on price relative to Bollinger Bands, confirmed
by the 20-day RSI.
Exit signs
Long
FIGURE 7: DOW CHEMICAL, BUY AND HOLD RESULTS. The historical results for
Dow Chemical using buy-and-hold are shown here. One green arrow at the far left
of the price charts represents the long position, and the equity line shows an
historical profit of 34.713 points.
Enter Long:
Low < or = Bollinger band bottom line, and
RSI(20) < 30
Close Long:
High > or = Bollinger band top line, and
RSI(20) > 70
Enter Short:
High > or = Bollinger band top line, and
RSI(20) > 70
Close Short:
Low < or = Bollinger band bottom line, and
RSI(20) < 30
FIGURE 10: FLUOR-BUY AND HOLD RESULTS. If we had bought Fluor in January
1993 and held the stock until December 1998, we would have received 2.025 points
for our patience. However, we would have had to withstand a drawdown of about
seven points after being up as much as 35 points at one point during the position.
FIGURE 11: FLUOR, BOLLINGER RESULTS. If we had traded Fluor during this same
period using the long and short side of our rules, we would have made 65.075 points
but would have had to withstand an 11-point drawdown. We would have been exposed
to the market for a shorter period using this method, compared with buy and hold.
FIGURE 12: FLUOR, BOLLINGER (LONG ONLY) RESULTS. If we had traded Fluor
during the same period but only from the long side using our Bollinger/RSI rules, we
would have made a historical profit of 31.712 points. However, we would have had to
stomach a 10- or 11-point drawdown on the third and last long position during this period.
FIGURE 13: FAIR ISAAC, BUY AND HOLD RESULTS. Buying Fair Isaac in January
1993 and holding it until December 1998 would have returned 34.90 points, with no
drawdown during this period.
FIGURE 14: FAIR ISAAC, BOLLINGER RESULTS. The Bollinger/RSI rules would
have returned a historical profit of 67.726 points but also would have produced a
nasty 21-point drawdown had we been without stop-loss provisions.
FIGURE 15: FAIR ISAAC, BOLLINGER (LONG ONLY) RESULTS. If we had taken
the long side only of our Bollinger/RSI trading rules, we would have had a historical
profit of 50.663 points during this time. In this case, the account would not have
experienced any negative account equity during this period, though three of the five
trades would have experienced small drawdowns.
FIGURE 16: IBM, BUY AND HOLD RESULTS. The best of the three methods
historically, buy and hold would have returned a profit of 243.46 points with a very
reasonable five- or six-point drawdown early in the position.
buy and hold method. The longer a position is held, the more
likely it is that something will go wrong.
The short side only of our trading rules is shown in Figure
9 with quite a volatile equity line, even though the short side
has a net profit of 12.325 points over this period. However, it
would be very hard to hold these short positions, given the
amount of drawdown shown in the equity line in Figure 9.
Lets look at another example, this time of Fluor during the
same period. Figure 10 shows buy and hold with a net
historical profit of 2.025 points and a maximum negative
equity of about seven points. Figure 11 shows Fluor during
the same period, with trades shown using our Bollinger band/
RSI trading rules. This method had a historical profit of
65.075 points, but there was a negative account equity of
about 11 points, considerably more than buy and hold.
FIGURE 17: IBM, BOLLINGER RESULTS. The trading rules would have returned
a very dismal historical loss of 112.76 points. We can conclude that we do not have
the Holy Grail of trading methods, as the equity line above shows.
FIGURE 18: IBM, BOLLINGER (LONG ONLY) RESULTS. Here, we see the long
side only of our trading rules for IBM, returning a historical profit of 16.663 points.
This is a much smaller profit than buy and hold, but we would have been exposed
to the market only a fraction of the time had we used the buy and hold method.
CONCLUSIONS
Does the fact that our rules didnt produce a profit historically
for IBM imply that a trading method that includes Bollinger
Bands and RSI isnt worth considering? No. There is no
method that is 100% profitable for all stocks during all market
conditions. The goal is to develop the skills to recognize
stocks and market conditions that can be traded profitably
using your method, whatever that may be. Whether or not
Bollinger Bands/RSI is a tool that you can use to trade
profitably depends on many things, including historical testing of the markets you trade, money management, and last but
not least, your own personal trading style.
S&C