Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Mutations in this mouse embryos noncoding DNA likely caused it to grow extra ribs.
R. Aires, et.al.DevelopmentalCell, 38, 2 (29 July 2016) Elsevier Inc.
74
Why does a snake have 25 or more rows of ribs, whereas a mouse has only 13? The answer,
according to a new study, may lie in junk DNA, large chunks of an animals genome that
were once thought to be useless. The ndings could help explain how dramatic changes in
body shape have occurred over evolutionary history.
Scientists began discovering junk DNA sequences in the 1960s. These stretches of the
genomealso known as noncoding DNAcontain the same genetic alphabet found in genes,
but they dont code for the proteins that make us who we are. As a result, many researchers
long believed this mysterious genetic material was simply DNA debris accumulated over the
course of evolution. But over the past couple decades, geneticists have discovered that this
socalledjunkisanythingbut. It has important functions, such as switching genes on and
o and setting the timing for changes in gene activity.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/junk-dna-tells-mice-and-snakes-how-grow-backbone
1/10
10/12/2016
as this
5KSnakes,
1 Gaboon
such
74viper, have can have more than 100 pairs of ribs.
Stefan3345/Wikimedia Commons
The research team traced the extra ribs to a mutation deactivating a gene called GDF11,
which puts the brakes on another gene that helps stem cells retain their ability to morph into
many cell types. Without GDF11 to slow down that second geneOCT4the mice grew extra
vertebrae and ribs. But GDF11 seemed just ne in snakes. So what was regulating vertebrate
growth in snakes? The researchers decided to look at the DNA surrounding OCT4 to see
whether something else was going on.
The OCT4 gene itself is similar in snakes, mice, and humans, but the surrounding noncoding
DNAwhich also plays a role in slowing down OCT4looks dierent in snakes. To see
whether this junk DNA gives snakes a longerlasting growth spurt, Mallo and his colleagues
spliced noncoding snake DNA into normal mouse embryos near OCT4. The embryos grew
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/junk-dna-tells-mice-and-snakes-how-grow-backbone
2/10
10/12/2016
DianaCrow
Twitter
MorefromNews
BeardogsoncelivedinsouthernTexas
Hownakedmoleratsconqueredpainandwhatitcouldmeanforus
Alienlifecouldfeedoncosmicrays
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/junk-dna-tells-mice-and-snakes-how-grow-backbone
3/10
10/12/2016
Pleasenotethat,inaneorttocombatspam,commentswithhyperlinkswillnotbepublished.
15 Comments
Science
Recommend 2
Share
Login
Sort by Best
No knowledgeable scientists ever said that all noncoding DNA was junk. Please stop
spreading this false information. Scientists have known about functions in noncoding DNA for
over half a century. They've known about regulatory sequences since the 1960s. The idea
that changes in regulatory sequences could change phenotypes has been known for almost
as long. Stephen Jay Gould wrote a book about it in 1977 ("Ontogeny and Phylogeny") where
he explained how small changes in regulation could aect evolution. Work on developmental
biology in the 1980s (mostly with Drosophila) proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt. Sean B.
Carroll explains it in "Endless Forms Most Beautiful" (2005).
This study shows that expression of OCT4 is controlled by regulatory sequences that don't
code for proteins (i.e. noncoding DNA). That's hardly news, is it?
SCIENCE is supposed to be one of the leading journals so how could an article like this get
published? It grossly distorts the important conclusions of the study and misrepresents the
modern state of knowledge of genes, genomes, and developmental biology.
5
Reply Share
'Junk DNA' is not synonymous with non-coding DNA as implied in this article. This verges on
tabloid journalism.
4
Reply Share
The assumption that because most DNA didn't code for protein it was junk and just left over
evolutionary garbage, was junk science. Good science tries to falsify it's own hypothesis, not
impose it on everything. Sadly now if you don't uncritically accept the current dogma and
sing in tune you are excluded.
2
Reply Share
NoQuarter > Jim Bowman 2 months ago
Can you point to me where in the scientic literature, junk DNA proponents have
assumed that a sequence that doesn't code for a protein must be junk?
2
Reply Share
It is ironic that you write this, since it is not true that what you wrote was the
assumption.
Reply Share
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/junk-dna-tells-mice-and-snakes-how-grow-backbone
4/10
10/12/2016
ts 2 months ago
Are these "junk DNA" sequences the same thing in other species as "human accelerated
regions?" They seem to have similar functions, i.e. dening major anatomical dierences
between species.
1
Reply Share
" Mallo and his colleagues spliced noncoding snake DNA into normal mouse embryos near
OCT4. The embryos grew large amounts of additional spinal cord, suggesting that this junk
DNA does indeed play a role in body shape regulation, the team reports this month in
Developmental Cell"
I read the paper and the authors never performed that key experiment. Please x
1
Reply Share
No such thing as junk DNA. DNA should be viewed as a historical record of pass generations.
The only question in my mind is just how far back can it go?
Reply Share
Laurence A. Moran > joseph2237 2 months ago
Reply Share
linzel > Laurence A. Moran 2 months ago
Larry, even here you shouldn't waste your time trying to educate the trolls.
Reply Share
joseph2237 > Laurence A. Moran 2 months ago
And the Egyptians threw out the brain because they thought it was useless too.
Nature does not create junk. Lets face ,it how many generations can we go
back, mom and dad, seven, ten, thousand generations. You can't make your
own RNA to DNA, you can't make a human from four chemicals so until you
can don't try to bualo people you know know everything DNA.
Reply Share
Nick G > joseph2237 2 months ago
He isn't. But you're trying to pretend you know anything about it.
Reply Share
joseph2237 > Nick G 2 months ago
Your right one of us is pretending. The point of view of the writer and
you is a narrow one that E Hubble proved in 1925 that most of the stars
in the sky are actually galaxies and limiting our perspective isn't health
for researchers.
Reply Share
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/junk-dna-tells-mice-and-snakes-how-grow-backbone
5/10
10/12/2016
That's what it is, an evolutionist: a mask perpetually changing its shape and form, always
looking to t, to adapt anything into something according to his ideas. Before, evolutionists
talked about junk DNA, as debris accumulated during "evolution". Now that we know that
evolutionists are wrong (not only in this, but in everything they believe), what do they do?
Well, they will always nd hypocrite ways to adapt, and to continue their attempts of the
impossible: their hypothesis that God does not exist and that everything is just a result of
random; obviously, they have never been able to do that, and never will, because they are
utterly wrong. Glory be given to Jehovah, God Almighty, the Creator of the Universe, the
visible and the invisible to our eyes, in Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the world. Amen.
Reply Share
Nick Chevance > Max DeVraie 2 months ago
Thanks for the sermon, Reverend. But, can we get back to the science?
Larry Moran is correct. I'm not a biologist but I've read enough to know this isn't news.
Odd that Science has decided to publish this "Gosh, gee whiz" article about
something that seems to be common knowledge. And it's this type of article in a
publication like Science that will bring out the "Maxei"'s of the world who think we're
all heathens, our working hypothesis is there is no God, and other similar inanities.
Reply Share
ALSO ON SCIENCE
FOLLOWNEWSFROMSCIENCE
ScienceInsider
Weneedtolearnalotmoreaboutwhatsstressingwhales,studyemphasizes
By Virginia Morell
RussiasuspendsnuclearR&DpactwithUnitedStates
By Richard Stone
Oct. 7, 2016
ESO ndsgenderbiasinawardingtelescopetime
By Maggie Kuo
Oct. 7, 2016
U.S.andU.K.planThwaitesinvasioninAntarctica
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/junk-dna-tells-mice-and-snakes-how-grow-backbone
6/10
10/12/2016
By Paul Voosen
Oct. 6, 2016
Whyarepeople ghtingoverapromisingtreatmentforafatalchildhooddisease?
By Meredith Wadman
Oct. 6, 2016
MoreScienceInsider
Sifter
Climatechangehasdoubledforest resinwesternUnitedStates
Oct. 11, 2016
Eelsmysteriousmigrationroutesmappedatlast
Oct. 6, 2016
MenbornfromIVFtechniquehavelowerfertility
Oct. 6, 2016
SubsurfaceoceandiscoveredonSaturnsmoonDione
Oct. 4, 2016
Politicalparty,notscienti cbackground,shapesAmericansviewofclimatechange
Oct. 4, 2016
MoreSifter
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/junk-dna-tells-mice-and-snakes-how-grow-backbone
7/10
10/12/2016
Tweets by @NewsfromScience
News from Science
@NewsfromScience
If we want to save the whales, we need to do more to understand what's harming them:
scim.ag/2ecPshe
We need to learn a lot more about whats stressing whales, study emphasizes
Ocean noise, pollution, and climate change may interact in complex ways
sciencemag.org
17h
News from Science
@NewsfromScience
Embed
View on Twitter
Science
7October2016
Vol 354, Issue 6308
PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY
Rescuingtheguardianofthegenome
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/junk-dna-tells-mice-and-snakes-how-grow-backbone
8/10
10/12/2016
EVOLUTION
FirstPolynesianslaunchedfromEastAsiatosettlePacic
SCIENCEANDBUSINESS
U.S.chargesjournalpublisherwithmisleadingauthors
BIOCHEMISTRY
EuropeanXFELtoshineasbrightest,fastestxraysource
PHYSICS
TriowinsNobelforeectsoftopologyonexoticmatter
CELLBIOLOGY
Nobelhonorsdiscoveriesinhowcellseatthemselves
TableofContents
SubscribeToday
Receive a year subscription to Science plus access to exclusive AAAS member resources, opportunities, and
benets.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
SubscribeToday
GetOurNewsletters
Enter your email address below to receive email announcements from Science. We will also send you a newsletter
digest with the latest published articles. See full list
Email address
Signuptoday
Aboutus
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/junk-dna-tells-mice-and-snakes-how-grow-backbone
9/10
10/12/2016
Journals
Leadership
Teammembers
WorkatAAAS
Advertise
Advertisingkits
Custompublishing
Forsubscribers
Sitelicenseinfo
Formembers
International
Chinese
Japanese
Help
Access&subscriptions
Reprints&permissions
Contactus
StayConnected
2016 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights Reserved. AAAS is a partner of HINARI, AGORA,
OARE, PatientInform, CHORUS, CLOCKSS, CrossRef and COUNTER.
TermsofService
PrivacyPolicy
ContactUs
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/junk-dna-tells-mice-and-snakes-how-grow-backbone
10/10