Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
81
Papri Nag
I.
INTRODUCTION
978-1-4799-2044-0/14/$31.002014IEEE
82
II.
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
83
(a)
the length of the FIR filter was 64, the filtered signal was
shifted forward by 32 sampling intervals to maintain the time
information. After filtering, the mean value of this signal was
obtained as one of the galvanic skin response features. Figure
6 shows raw galvanic response signal before filtering and
processed signal after filtering for subject SB-M12 for various
stress conditions.
For different subjects the skin conductance is different, so
here the main aim is to find the changes of skin conductance
from relax position to stressed position. Individuals of
different age groups are randomly selected as subjects for the
validation of the virtual instrument. They are subjected to
vigorous physical activity as a measure of stress. Galvanic
skin response signals are measured and recorded as skin
conductivity. The signals are recorded for 10 seconds duration
each for before, during and after stress conditions. Recorded
signals are then imported and analyzed for calculation of mean
and standard deviation.
TABLE I.
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Figure 6:
Raw galvanic skin response signal before filtering for (a) before stress
condition (c) during stress condition and (e) after stress condition
Processed galvanic skin response signal after filtering for (b) before
stress condition (d) during stress condition and (f) after stress
condition
84
Subject.
SBM1
SBM2
SBM3
SB-F4
SBM5
SBM6
SBM7
SBM8
SB-F9
SBF10
SBM11
SBM12
SBM13
SBM14
Age
RESULT OF EXPERIMENT
Before Stress
During Stress
After Stress
22
Mean
7.5515
SD
0.9455
Mean
7.6621
SD
0.9851
Mean
7.5013
SD
0.9312
22
3.1914
0.4866
3.5895
0.4159
3.1200
0.4567
23
7.5210
0.8641
11.9968
1.4325
7.6523
0.8865
25
25
9.0892
5.3542
1.1170
0.7202
9.9715
6.5344
1.2858
0.9013
8.9904
5.4956
1.0351
0.8015
21
1.8674
17.0542
1.9803
5.4956
0.6301
23
11.988
3
8.5070
1.0431
8.1749
0.9146
5.2005
0.5851
21
6.7971
1.0375
4.2517
0.4937
3.4849
0.3949
22
2.2503
12.6999
1.4587
10.5672
1.2376
21
14.430
9
3.0412
0.3675
5.6396
0.7323
4.3749
0.6292
28
6.0481
1.2869
8.2389
1.0218
5.8141
1.0342
26
1.3993
15.4099
1.9150
13.2805
1.9230
26
11.560
1
3.4555
0.3966
4.6873
0.5700
2.2176
0.2490
22
5.7133
0.7780
6.6824
0.9366
4.0574
0.4768
V.
CONCLUSION
[14]
[15]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors acknowledge the all kinds of support from the
Control and Automation Centre (CAC) of Netaji Subhash
Engineering College, Kolkata, India. They are also thanking to
some UG and PG students of the institute and specially Mr.
Supratik Ghosh and Mr.Satyaki Sen who have helped them in
arranging the experimentation.
[16]
[17]
[18]
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[19]
[20]
[21]
85