Sei sulla pagina 1di 3

F/QAP/021/004

Caledonian College of Engineering


Course Work 3
Name of the programme BSc (GCU) CAME, MT, POM, EE, CO, EPE, TE
Name of Module with Code Research Methodology MHH120950
Name of the Module
Dr. Nagaraj and Dr. Suresh Manic
Leader/Tutor
Name of the course work Presentation
Assessment weightage 25%
Date of submission December 18, 2016

Aim To assess the students technical understanding and


presentation skills.
Objective To evaluate students understanding of project and
knowledge gained through presentation and to assess
his\her confidence through defense of project
presentation.
General Instructions
Each student must give a presentation of the project, covering the project planning,
management, critical evaluation of literature and preliminary test / experimental setup and
findings. The student must also defend his presentation before a panel of experts. The
maximum duration of presentation will be for 12 minutes followed by defense for another 3
minutes.
Assessment methodology
PPT presentation will be carried out before a panel of up to 3 experts, including the module
tutor, students project supervisor, and another subject expert. Evaluation will be based on
general presentation skills, exhibition of technical understanding through presentation, followed
by a viva-voce.

Evaluation Scheme
Detailed evaluation scheme is given in annexure

Rev: 00

1|P a g e

F/QAP/021/004

TASK: Each student must give a presentation of the project, covering the project planning,
management, critical evaluation of literature and preliminary test / experimental setup and
findings. The student must also defend his presentation before a panel of experts.
(Please note Coursework -2 Submission is mandatory for attending Coursework-3 presentation and defence)

Grading of Course work


BSc (GCU)
Programmes
Excellent
contribution

70% and
above

Good
Contribution

60% - 69%

Average
Contribution

50% - 59%

Adequate
Contribution

40% - 49%

Inadequate
Contribution

30% - 39%

Not meeting the


outcomes

Less than
30%

Further / Directed- Reading List:


Kothari, C.R., 2010. Research Methodology, Methods and Techniques. 2nd Edition. India: New
Age International Publishers.
Sharp, J.A., Peters, J. & Howard, K., 2002. The Management of a Student Research Project .3rd
Edition. USA: Gower Publishing Limited.

Name and Signature of Module leader


Dr. Nagaraj
Date: 26 06 2016

Rev: 00

2|P a g e

F/QAP/021/004

Research Methodology Coursework 3


PPT Presentation and Defense Evaluation Sheet (25%)
(Please note Coursework -2 Submission is mandatory for attending Coursework-3 presentation and defense)

STUDENTS NAME__________________________________________________________________
STUDENT NO: _________________ PROGRAMME: ____CAME/MT/POM______________________
PROJECT TITLE: ___________________________________________________________________

MARKS

(<30)%

NO REAL

CONTRIBUTION

INADEQUATE
(30-39)%

ADEQUATE
(40-49)%

AVERAGE
(50-59)%

CRITERIA

GOOD
(60-69)%

EXCELLENT
(70+)%

* Please the option and assign the marks appropriately in the Marks column.

RESEARCH PROBLEM DEFINITION


5

(The understanding and description of the research


problem, objectives, scope and its selection.) (5 marks)

LITERATURE ANALYSIS
15

(Acquisition and critical evaluation of relevant literature,


Options and alternatives evaluation) (15 Marks)

RESEARCH APPROACH
(The methodology of research and its aptness to the
project, such as Descriptive, empirical qualitative,
quantitative, theoretical or conceptual) (15 Marks)

15

PRE-DESIGN
(The basic research design, activity plan and
sequencing, Project development, honours challenge
etc.) (10 Marks)

10

CONCLUSIONS
5

(The conclusion based on the research and literature


survey till date and future work identification) (5 Marks)

TOTAL M ARKS

50

COMMENTS:
__________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

NAME AND SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR WITH DATE:


______________________________________________
Rev: 00

3|P a g e

Potrebbero piacerti anche