Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
School of Electrical Engineering, Shandong University, 73 Jing Shi Road, Jinan, 250061 Shandong Province, China
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, 2 Bei Nong Road, Chang Ping District, Beijing 102206, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 13 September 2011
Received in revised form 14 June 2012
Accepted 5 July 2012
Available online 14 August 2012
Keywords:
Energy storage
Microgrid
Power electronics interface
Control strategy
Trends and challenges
a b s t r a c t
Microgrid (MG) is the indispensable infrastructure of nowadays smart grid, however, uctuation and
intermittence resulted from unstable micro-sources and nonlinear loads will execute considerable
impacts on normal operation of the MG. Energy storage technology presents a preferable solution to
the above issue. The paper gives a full scope review of the principal energy storage technologies being
developed so far, and the features and benets of energy storage systems (ESSs) within the MG are analyzed in details including ESS conguration and topologies, power electronics interfaces, ESS control
schemes for charging/discharging, control strategy of hybrid ESS as well as optimization of the renewable
sources and ESS. The future trends and challenges of ESS are also fully accounted, with a view to proposing smart ESS as the promising technology in the future for MG and smart grid.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The concept of Microgrid (MG) is proposed by the Consortium
for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions (CERTSs) so as to enhance the local reliability and exibility of electric power systems,
which may consist of multiple distributed energy resources (DERs),
customers, energy storage units, and can be further dened as a
small electric power system being able to operate physically
islanded or interconnected with the utility girds [1,2]. Due to
increasing shortage of the fossil fuel and the impelling pressures
from environmental protection, new generation sources of high
efciency such as fuel cell and microgas turbine, as well as renewable energy sources (RESs) such as wind and solar power, are
becoming the most important DERs nowadays. The distributed
and renewable energy sources will see a remarkably increasing
portion in the whole electric power generation. For example, RES
generation is compulsorily required to occupy 20% by 2017 in California, USA, while a 15% proportion of the RES generation will be
achieved by 2020 in China according to the government report, and
in Germany the wind power generation will amount to 60% by
2020 [3].
A MG combined with RES and distributed generation sources
(DGs) can be a preferable solution to the raised energy crises as
well as a complement to nowadays centralized modern power
grids [4]. However, due to relatively small capacity, the normal
operation of MGs may be vulnerable to random power exchange
between the supplier and the loads, and hence the operational
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: lqmeee@ncepu.edu.cn (Q. Li).
0142-0615/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.07.015
180
leading battery technologies, NaS battery shows much more attractive energy density (four times that of lead-acid battery) and much
lower cost. NaS battery also has a long cycle capability (2500 plus
cycles upon 90% depth of discharge, or several hundred thousand
cycles at 10% depth of discharge) and a millisecond response for
full charging and discharging operation, which presents good
potentials to be applied in MG for power regulations.
This technology is widely recognized for high cell efciency up
to 89% without self-discharge, minimal maintenance and long cell
life up to 15 years. NaS batteries are made of abundant low cost
materials that are suitable for high volume mass production. Modular fabrication potentially yields high power and energy capability, which also reduces the construction intervals [8]. However,
large capacity in a single cell and reliable operation at high temperature of 300 centigrade are still the main obstacles in manufacturing process.
NaS battery can be widely used in aggregated energy storage.
China has recently declared an installation of the rst industrial
NaS battery station (100 kW/800 kW h) in the world Expo 2010
Shanghai, as shown in Fig. 2, and hence becomes the second country who has mastered the large scale manufacturing technology for
industrial applications.
2.3. Flywheel energy storage (FES)
A FES unit stores electrical energy in the form of rotational kinetic energy. It makes use of electrical energy to rotate a rotor at
a very high speed preferably for providing short term energy boost
(1030 s), as shown in Fig. 3.
In addition to a much higher power density than the other technologies, a ywheel energy storage system (FESS) is also attractive
in other aspects: FES is environmentally friendly and can be used
with almost unlimited number of charging cycles. A high-speed
FESS rated 1000 kW (15 min) or even larger is being deployed in
the USA power grid for frequency regulation, and research on some
micro-scale FESS (MFESS) is also underway so as to be used as auxiliary power sources [9].
The disadvantages of a FESS lie in difculty in storage expansion, large dimension size, low energy density and high standby
loss.
2.4. Supercapacitor
Supercapacitor is also named ultracapacitor or electric double
layer capacitor (EDLC). It stores energy in the two series capacitors
of the electric double layer (EDL), which is formed between each of
181
182
Table 1
Comparison of several typical ESSs [1317].
Type
Efciency (%)
Cost ($/kW h)
Battery
SMES
Flywheel
SuperCap
NaS
6080
9598
95
95
70
20200
30100
550
<50
120
251000
1e41e5
1e35e3
4000
120
30
5
5
5
<100
2002000
1e6
>20,000
>50,000
2000
1501300
High
3802500
250350
450
as to maintain a high power factor and suppress the harmonics distortion, etc.
ESS plays more important role than even before in improving
power quality of the MG. Controlled by power electronics-based
interfaces, ESS works like a power quality regulator to output specied active or reactive power for customers. Some ESS of instantaneous response, such as supercapacitor or FESS, can quickly absorb
or release energy of high density, suitable to tackle transient issues
like instantaneous outage caused probably by system failures, sudden voltage swells or sags. Some large capacity ESS like Lead-acid
battery can be used to compensate instant power shortage to
soothe voltage uctuations [25].
3.6. Ancillary services
Ancillary services normally cover load following, operational reserve, frequency regulation and 15 min fast response. Most ancillary services are provided by power plants or large pumpedhydro energy storage. With rapid development of renewable generation, a MG composed of large DERs such as wind turbine and/
or PV, may implement ancillary services with the integration of
large ESS.
As is well known, the key contribution to grid stability is from
control power (CP) [26], which is mainly supplied from conventional power plants. With high penetration of renewable energy,
some large conventional power plants will be shut down, so there
needs something to take over this responsibility. To deliver positive CP, the ESS in a MG can discharge and supply energy to the
grid. If the ESS absorbs energy from the grid and charges itself, then
the MG is delivering negative CP. From market point of view, a
storage management system (SMS) is needed in the MG to monitor
the stream of energy storage.
4. ESS access technology to mg
4.1. Energy storage system conguration
There are two typical congurations of ESS in a MG, the aggregated and the distributed, as shown in Fig. 6. For the rst type, all
ESSs are aggregated as one ESS and connected to the MG terminal,
while the power ow from DERs to the PCC (point of common connection) bus can be kept at a specied value.
All the capacity of an aggregated ESS can be used to soothe
power ow uctuations [27,28]. The aggregated ESS is partly approved to have a superior performance to the distributed ESS at
the same capacity.
The aggregated ESS conguration is usually connected to the AC
bus of a MG, where a DC/AC converter becomes necessary to interface with the AC system. For a FES unit charging and discharging
power by an induction machine at a variable speed, an AC/DC/AC
converter interface is thereby compulsory, while for a SMES unit
183
or capacitor storage, a DC/DC chopper is required before the voltage source converter (VSC).
If the energy storage capacity increases, both manufacture and
control of the ESS become difcult and cost ineffective. It is then
possible to use small-scale and distributed energy storage to
achieve exible and efcient power regulation.
For the distributed ESS conguration, ESS units are directly coupled to individual DERs with various interfaces. For wind turbine
generators (WTGs) at variable speed, a full rated AC/DC/AC interface is necessary with regard to the permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM), while a DC/DC interface will work for the
variable speed doubly fed induction machine (DFIG). Generally, a
DC/DC chopper is simpler and cheaper than a DC/AC converter.
An advantage of separately connecting each pair of DER and ESS
to the grid lies in that, power electronics interface in each pair can
be optimized to reduce the cost and maximize the efciency. These
systems tend to be simple since they only have to deal with a single type of source. One disadvantage of the distributed conguration is that, the power produced by the DERs has to be carried by
the transmission lines before being stored by the ESS, which negates the reduced power ows on the line as well as the new line
construction deferral advantages. However, though the power
electronics interfaces for both DER and ESS can be individually
optimized, the storage process still suffers losses for both interfaces as well as for the line impedances between the two facilities.
In future MG, a mixture of the aggregated and distributed ESS
might be a preferable solution.
4.2. Power electronics interface for ESS
Unlike other converters that operate only when the primary
source is available, the interface for ESS will operate continuously
to support the MG for a long period. Therefore, reliability and efciency are the key issues to be considered in choosing topologies of
the converters.
There are usually three types of MG, namely line frequency MG,
high frequency MG and DC MG, which correspondingly needs different ways to ESS access. As most ESSs have a DC link or can be
transformed to DC, all ESSs below are assumed to be DC sources
for convenience.
4.2.1. Interface for line frequency MG
With regard to different transformer, two typical ESS interfaces
may be adopted [29]. The rst case is shown in Fig. 7, where a bidirectional DC/DC converter accomplishes the power ow between
the ESS and the DC bus with a high frequency transformer. Due
to complexity of the topology that incorporates both a DC/DC converter and an inverter, the cost of the whole system will increase
considerably. In addition to small size, low weight and high efciency of the topology, the prominent advantage is that, the instantaneous power that ows in the AC side as well as in the battery
side can be controlled separately and therefore a decoupled control
can be realized.
The direct connection of the inverter to the MG implies an inevitable DC current ow, which will increase the thermal stress of
some MG components and loads. Therefore, the inverter control
must include a current loop to reduce the DC component below a
certain level. Also, the inverters DC bus has a bulky capacitor (tens
of thousands of lF) to ensure a very low DC voltage ripple.
The second conguration is shown in Fig. 8, where the ESS is directly connected to the inverters DC bus while a low frequency
(50 Hz) transformer is used to boost up the required voltage level.
The main advantage lies in simplicity of the conguration, however, high cost and low efciency exist because of the transformer
though it is preferred to provide isolation and leakage inductance
for the output lter.
184
ESS
DC<->AC
MG
AC<->DC
HF TRANSFORMER
INVERTER
FILTER
MG
ESS
INVERTER
50Hz TRANSFORMER
and (e) are used for multiple input. These topologies are targeted
at applications with different demands in inputs and outputs. In
actual applications, more modules and exible combinations may
be adopted for special conditions.
5. Control methodology
5.1. Charge/discharge control
185
5.1.2. FESS
The charging/discharging process of a FESS unit is quite different from that of batteries or supercapacitors. A FESS unit is composed of a ywheel, a motor/generator and a power electronics
system. The control of the FESS is just as that of the motors in ywheel, for which many advanced control technology such as vector
control and DTC can be used.
Some hybrid control methods have been studied for charging
control of the FESS. At early stage, maximum torque control is used
to start the motor quickly and the current is also constrained. At
the speed tuning stage, fuzzy and PID control give a good solution.
At the setting stage, minimum power is provided to compensate
the energy loss (such as those from air friction). As regards the discharging process, both voltage and current is regulated in the PI
loop. As power ows out of the ywheel, the voltage will be decreased to stabilize the DC bus voltage, and the converter will be
operated as a boost rectier.
186
The benets of ESS have been veried by both theory and practice, however, there still lacks effective way to optimize ESS conguration especially for MG-based applications. The key issues may
include: how to arrange ESS location and capacity, what kind of
187
ESS is optimal, how to assess the impacts of ESS on the MG, etc.
Generally, to effectively congure an ESS, proper models, tools
and software should be developed.
6.1.1. Model
A report called electrical energy storage systems a mission to
the USA, published in December 2006 by the British Department
of Trade and Industry (DTI), declared many related facts [20].
One of the surprising results of this mission was that, the visited
utilities stated that very little were undertaken on detailed modeling of the integration and impact of energy storage devices on the
network, although several utility-scale demonstration systems are
currently being appraised. Instead, the utilities relied on the vendor (i.e. the ESS manufacturer or a third-party system integrator)
to undertake such studies and provide assurances that the ESS
would meet a performance specication produced by the utility.
It is critical to develop models that can be used to conduct a
strategic, wide-area analysis of storage systems to investigate the
effects and value of energy storage for use in grid applications.
These models should assess the impact of energy storage on generation, transmission, distribution, and end-use applications and
compare the cost (e.g. installation and maintenance), emissions,
materials availability, efciency, system lifetime, and cycle life of
energy storage to other conventional and advanced solutions. More
importantly, the models need to demonstrate the value of energy
storage under varying load conditions in comparison to other types
of transmission.
Until now, there are both non-commercial and commercial
model available, some typical non-commercial models include:
HOMER; ReEDS; NEMS; RETScreen, and EnergyPlus. Commercial
models include: GE MAPS; the Ventyx-ProMod and System Optimizer; Power World; Energy2020; IPM, and Dynastore [44]. By
comparison, none of models has all of the important characteristics
all in one software package that would allow assessment of energy
storage in the smart grid frame of reference. Additionally, none of
ies
Fig. 16. Control scheme of phase shift PWM in one port of the multi-port composite
ESS.
188
udcref
udc
ESS
i dref +
Power
&voltag
e loop
PI
dq0
iqref
+
P ref
PI
ucd
+
+
ucq
PWM
inverter
abc
Q ref
+ usd
+ usq
- +
dq0
abc
uabc
L L
id
dq0
iabc
iq
abc
A
B
C
Fig. 17. The principle for decoupled power control.
189
190
[25] Wei Huang, Xin Wang, Jiahuan Guo et al. Discussion on application of super
capacitor energy storage system in microgrid. In: International conference on
sustainable power generation and supply; 2009. p. 14.
[26] Voller S, Al-Awaad A-R, Verstege JF. Wind farms with energy storages
integrated at the control power market. In: CIGRE/IEEE.PES joint sympo;
2009. p. 113.
[27] Li Wei, Jos Gza. Comparison of energy storage system technologies and
congurations in a wind farm. In: IEEE power electronics specialists
conference; 2007. p. 128085.
[28] Kook Kyung Soo, McKenzie Keith J, Liu Yilu et al. A study on applications of
energy storage for the wind power operation in power systems. In: IEEE Power
engineering society general meeting; 2006. p. 15.
[29] Serban I, Marinescu C. A look at the role and main topologies of battery energy
storage systems for integration in autonomous microgrids. 12th International
conference on optimization of electrical and electronic equipment; 2010. p.
118691.
[30] Carr JA, Balda JC, Mantooth HA. A survey of system to integrate distributed
energy resources and energy storage on the utility grid. In: IEEE energy 2030;
2008. p. 17.
[31] Zhou Haihua, Bhattacharya Tanmoy, Khambadkone Ashwin M. Composite
energy storage system using dynamic energy management in microgrid
applications. In: International power electronics conference; 2010. p.
116368.
[32] Kwasinski Alexis, Krein Philip T. A microgrid based telecom power system
using modular multiple system using modular multiple-input dc input DCDC
converters. In: 27th International telecommunications conference; 2005. p.
51520.
[33] Tao H, Kotsopoulos A, Duarte JL, Hendrix MAM. Family of multiport
bidirectional DCDC converters. IEE Proc Electric Power Appl
2006;153(3):4518.
[34] Xue Jinhui, Yin Zhongdong, Wu Bingbing et al. Technology research of novel
energy storage control for the PV generation system. In: Power and energy,
engineering conference; 2009. p. 14.
[35] Zhang Yu, Jiang Zhenhua, Yu Xunwei. Control strategies for battery/
supercapacitor hybrid energy storage systems. In: IEEE Energy 2030
conference; 2008. p. 16.
[36] Kawachi S, Baba J, Kikuchi T et al. State of charge control for energy storage by
use of cascade control system for microgrid. In: International conference on
clean electrical power; 2009. p. 37075.
[37] Kawachi S, Baba J, Hagiwara H et al. Energy capacity reduction of energy storage
system in microgrid stabilized by cascade control system. In: 13th European
conference on power electronics and applications; 2009. p. T11-5258.
[38] Leclercq Ludovic, Robyns Benoit, Grave Jean-Michel. Control based on fuzzy
logic of ywheel energy storage system associated with wind and diesel
generators. Mathematics Comput Simul 2003;63:27180.
[39] Strunz K, Brock EK. Stochastic energy source access management:
infrastructure integrative modular plant for sustainable hydrogen-electricgeneration. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31:112941.
[40] Abbey C, Strunz K, Joos G. A knowledge-based approach for control of twolevel energy storage for wind energy systems. IEEE Trans Energy Conversion
2009;24(2):53947.
[41] Yuri Makarov, Pengwei Du, Michael CW Kintner-Meyer, et al. Optimal size of
energy storage to accommodate high penetration of renewable resources in
WECC system. In: Innovative smart grid technologies; 2010. p. 15.
[42] Huang Haihong, Wang Haixin, Gao Ge, et al. Application of phase-shift PWM in
east fast control power supply. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2011;20:16715.
[43] Zhou Haihua, Bhattacharya Tanmoy, Tran Duong, et al. Composite energy
storage system involving battery and ultracapacitor with dynamic energy
management in microgrid applications. IEEE Trans Power Electronics
2011;26(3):92330.
[44] Hoffman MG, Sadovsky A, Kintner-Meyer MC et al. Analysis tools for sizing and
placement of energy storage in grid applications: a literature review. Pacic
Northwest National Laboratory; 2010.
[45] Leou Rong-Cen. An economic analysis model for the energy storage system
applied to a distribution substation. Int J Electrical Power Energy Syst
2012;34(1):1327.
[46] Rodriguez GD. A utility perspective of the role of energy storage in the smart
grid. In: IEEE power and energy society general meeting; 2010. p. 12.
[47] Available from: http://www.sandia.gov/ess/esselect.html.
[48] Available from: http://www.kema.com/services/consulting/etd/es/PLATOS.aspx.
[49] Yeleti S, Fu Yong. Impacts of energy storage on the future power system. In:
North American power, symposium; 2010. p. 17.
[50] Pike research. Energy storage on the grid. Pike Report; 2010.
[51] DOE. Advanced materials and devices for stationary electrical energy storage
applications. DOE Report; 2010.
[52] Available
from:
http://www.technologyreview.com/BizTech/wtr_16673,
296,p1.html.
[53] Georgescu M, Barote L, Marinescu C, Clotea L. Smart electrical energy storage
system for small power wind turbines. In: 12th International conference on
optimization of electrical and electronic equipment; 2010. p. 1191197.
[54] Xingguo Tan, Shan Lu. Study on smart energy storage technology and control
strategy in micro-grid. Lecture notes in electrical engineering. Vol. 138. 2011;
p. 18996.
[55] Hanley C, Peek G, Boyes J et al. Technology development needs for integrated
grid-connected PV systems and electric energy storage. In: 34th IEEE
photovoltaic specialists conference; 2009. p. 183237.
191