Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1 2.Business Prole
2
Tata Motors Limited is India's largest automobile company, with consolidated revenues of
INR 1,88,818 crores (USD 34.7 billion) in 2012-13. It is the leader in commercial vehicles
in each segment, and among the top in passenger vehicles with winning products in the
compact, midsize car and utility vehicle segments. It is also the world's fourth largest
truck and bus manufacturer.
The Tata Motors Group's over 60,000 employees are guided by the mission "to be
passionate in anticipating and providing the best vehicles and experiences that excite our
customers globally."
Established in 1945, Tata Motors' presence cuts across the length and breadth of India.
Over 7.5 million Tata vehicles ply on Indian roads, since the rst rolled out in 1954. The
company's manufacturing base in India is spread across Jamshedpur (Jharkhand), Pune
(Maharashtra), Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh), Pantnagar (Uttarakhand), Sanand (Gujarat) and
Dharwad (Karnataka). Following a strategic alliance with Fiat in 2005, it has set up an
industrial joint venture with Fiat Group Automobiles at Ranjangaon (Maharashtra) to
produce both Fiat and Tata cars and Fiat powertrains. The company's dealership, sales,
services and spare parts network comprises over 3,500 touch points.
Tata Motors, also listed in the New York Stock Exchange (September 2004), has emerged
as an international automobile company. Through subsidiaries and associate companies,
Tata Motors has operations in the UK, South Korea, Thailand, Spain, South Africa and
Indonesia. Among them is Jaguar Land Rover, acquired in 2008. In 2004, it acquired the
Daewoo Commercial Vehicles Company, South Korea's second largest truck maker. The
rechristened Tata Daewoo Commercial Vehicles Company has launched several new
products in the Korean market, while also exporting these products to several
international markets. Today two-thirds of heavy commercial vehicle exports out of South
Korea are from Tata Daewoo. In 2005, Tata Motors acquired a 21% stake in Hispano
Carrocera, a reputed Spanish bus and coach manufacturer, and subsequently the
remaining stake in 2009. Hispano's presence is being expanded in other markets. In 2006,
Tata Motors formed a 51:49 joint venture with the Brazil-based, Marcopolo, a global
leader in body-building for buses and coaches to manufacture fully-built buses and
coaches for India - the plant is located in Dharwad. In 2006, Tata Motors entered into joint
venture with Thonburi Automotive Assembly Plant Company of Thailand to manufacture
and market the company's pickup vehicles in Thailand, and entered the market in 2008.
Tata Motors (SA) (Proprietary) Ltd., Tata Motors' joint venture with Tata Africa Holding
(Pty) Ltd. set up in 2011, has an assembly plant in Rosslyn, north of Pretoria. The plant
can assemble, semi knocked down (SKD) kits, light, medium and heavy commercial
vehicles ranging from 4 tonnes to 50 tonnes.
Tata Motors is also expanding its international footprint, established through exports
since 1961. The company's commercial and passenger vehicles are already being
marketed in several countries in Europe, Africa, the Middle East, South East Asia, South
Asia, South America, CIS and Russia. It has franchisee/joint venture assembly operations
in Bangladesh, Ukraine, and Senegal.
The foundation of the company's growth over the last 68 years is a deep understanding of
economic stimuli and customer needs, and the ability to translate them into customerdesired offerings through leading edge R&D. With over 4,500 engineers, scientists and
technicians the company's Engineering Research Centre, established in 1966, has enabled
pioneering technologies and products. The company today has R&D centres in Pune,
Jamshedpur, Lucknow, Dharwad in India, and in South Korea, Spain, and the UK.
It was Tata Motors, which launched the rst indigenously developed Light Commercial
Vehicle in 1986. In 2005, Tata Motors created a new segment by launching the Tata Ace,
India's rst indigenously developed mini-truck. In 2009, the company launched its globally
benchmarked Prima range of trucks and in 2012 the Ultra range of international standard
light commercial vehicles. In their power, speed, carrying capacity, operating economy
and trims, they will introduce new benchmarks in India and match the best in the world in
performance at a lower life-cycle cost.
Tata Motors also introduced India's rst Sports Utility Vehicle in 1991 and, in 1998, the
Tata Indica, India's rst fully indigenous passenger car.
In January 2008, Tata Motors unveiled its People's Car, the Tata Nano. The Tata Nano has
been subsequently launched, as planned, in India in March 2009, and subsequently in
2011 in Nepal and Sri Lanka. A development, which signies a rst for the global
automobile industry, the Nano brings the joy of a car within the reach of thousands of
families.
Tata Motors is equally focussed on environment-friendly technologies in emissions and
alternative fuels. It has developed electric and hybrid vehicles both for personal and
public transportation. It has also been implementing several environment-friendly
technologies in manufacturing processes, signicantly enhancing resource conservation.
Through its subsidiaries, the company is engaged in engineering and automotive
solutions, automotive vehicle components manufacturing and supply chain activities,
vehicle nancing, and machine tools and factory automation solutions.
Tata Motors is committed to improving the quality of life of communities by working on
four thrust areas - employability, education, health and environment. The activities touch
the lives of more than a million citizens. The company's support on education and
employability is focused on youth and women. They range from schools to technical
education institutes to actual facilitation of income generation. In health, the company's
intervention is in both preventive and curative health care. The goal of environment
protection is achieved through tree plantation, conserving water and creating new water
bodies and, last but not the least, by introducing appropriate technologies in vehicles and
operations for constantly enhancing environment care.
With the foundation of its rich heritage, Tata Motors today is etching a refulgent future.
TM
L
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ashok
Ley
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
(ii) Product development cost are amortised over a period of 36 months to 120 months or
on the basis of actual
production to planned production volume over such period.
(iii) In respect of assets whose useful life has been revised, the unamortised depreciable
amount has been charged
over the revised remaining useful life.
(iv) Depreciation is not recorded on capital work-in-progress until construction and
installation are complete and
asset is ready for its intended use.
(e) Fixed assets
(i) Fixed assets are stated at cost of acquisition or construction less accumulated
depreciation / amortization.
(ii) The product development cost incurred on new vehicle platform, engines, transmission
and new products are recognised as xed assets, when feasibility has been established,
the Company has committed technical, nancial and other resources to complete the
development and it is probable that asset will generate probable future benets.
(iii) Cost includes purchase price, taxes and duties, labour cost and directly attributable
costs for self constructed assets andother direct costs incurred upto the date the asset is
ready for its intended use. Borrowing cost incurred for qualifying assetsis capitalised up
to the date the asset is ready for intended use, based on borrowings incurred specically
for nancing the asset or the weighted average rate of all other borrowings, if no specic
borrowings have been incurred for the asset. The cost of acquisition is further adjusted
for exchange differences relating to long term foreign currency borrowings attributable to
the acquisition of depreciable asset w.e.f. April 1, 2007.
(iv) Software not exceeding `25,000 and product development costs relating to minor
product enhancements, facelifts and upgrades are charged off to the Prot and Loss
Statement as and when incurred.
(f ) Impairment
At each Balance Sheet date, the Company assesses whether there is any indication that
the xed assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the
recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the
impairment, if any. Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of
individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating
unit to which the asset belongs.
As per the assessment conducted by the Company at March 31, 2012, there were no
indications that the xed assets have suffered an impairment loss.
7. Red Flags
The red flags of nancial statement fraud are distinctly different from those of asset
misappropriation. Common general red flags of nancial statement fraud:
1
2
3
4
5
Accounting anomalies.
Unusually rapid revenue and/or prot growth.
Readily noticeable internal control weaknesses.
Noticeably aggressive nancial actions by senior management.
Personality or character flaws of the CEO and/or other C-level executives.
PERSONALITY ALERT
Of these general indicators, top management personality and character are by far the
most compelling with regard to nancial statement fraud. Typically, a senior executive
who is inclined to cook the books possesses low ethical standards, though this trait may
often be difficult to detect prior to the commission of a crime. However, most executives
with ethical weaknesses also exhibit very noticeable signs of aggressiveness in almost
everything they doincluding making critical nancial decisions. Examples:
Overly domineering, disrespectful or abusive management style vis--vis
subordinates.
Actively steering internal and external auditors away from nancial reports that
could reveal the fraud.
Secretive or distinctly evasive attitude regarding critical nancial information.
Detection methods for general nancial statement frauds:
Internal audit is consistently engaged in substantive anti-fraud activities.
Auditors aggressively apply standards.
Frequent and thorough fraud-oriented ratio analysisfocusing in particular on longterm trends and on comparisons between business units.
Surprise audits and/or cash counts.
Implementation of an anonymous, user-friendly tip hotline for use by employees,
vendors and customers.
Data mining using one of the common auditing software applications such as ACL or
IDEA.
SPECIFIC RED FLAGS
As with asset misappropriation, there are also specic red flags of nancial statement
fraud that are present in many of the common varieties of such accounting violations.
Examples:
Complex or unstable organizational structure.
Unusually intricate or confusing nancial transactions with third-party entities.
Sudden or gradual increase in gross margin compared with the companys prior
performance, and with industry averages.
Cash flows that are negative for the rst three quarters and suddenly positive for the
fourth quarternot by just a little, but by more than all losses to date. (This scenario is
exactly what happened at Enron. It is why Sherron Watkins said, after the companys
demise, that if anyone had been paying attention to the cash flows they would have known
that Enron's statements were suspicious and/or fraudulent.)
Signicant sales to companies or individuals whose identity and business track record
are questionable.
Sudden above-average prots for specic quarters.
Executives or board members have direct personal dependence on the companys
performance.
Conspicuously lax board oversight of top management.
FRAUD CATEGORIES
Also similar to asset misappropriation, nancial statement fraud has distinct categories.
Each has its unique red flags and detection methods. Examples
Revenue recognition or timing schemesalso known as improper treatment of sales.
This fraud category is possibly the most common form of nancial statement fraud
usually employed when management seeks to conceal the real numbers for a weak
quarter or two. Red flags:
If a sale is legitimate, but is posted prematurely, the red flag would be a GAAP violation
by early recording of the sale. Similarly, channel stuffingwhere sales are recorded
before theyve actually been madewould be indicated by an excessive number of
subsequent period returns of merchandise, accompanied by an unusual jump in credits.
Fictitious revenue. One of the oldest nancial statement schemes around this
involves posting sales that simply never occurred. Red flags:
-- Unusual increase in assetsthe other side of the entry to mask ctitious revenues.
-- Customer records are missing key data such as physical address and phone
number.
-- Unusual changes in ratio patterns such as a spike in revenues with no
commensurate increase in accounts receivable.
Concealed liabilities. (Improper or under-reporting of expenses and other liabilities).
By shifting expenses from one entity to another or reclassifying liabilities as assets, which
is what got WorldCom into trouble when it improperly reported $3.8 billion in expenses as
capital expenditures, management can make the companys nancial condition appear
much rosier than it is. Red flags:
-- Use of different audit rms for different subsidiaries or business entities.
-- Recurring negative cash flows from operations or an inability to generate cash flows
from operations while reporting earnings growth.
-- Invoices and other liabilities go unrecorded in the companys nancial records.
-- Writing off loans to executives or other parties.
-- Failure to record warranty-related liabilities.
Inadequate disclosures. This tactic is used after a nancial statement fraud has
occurredin an attempt to cover it up. Red flags:
-- Disclosure notes are so complex that it is impossible to determine the actual nature
of the event or transaction.
-- Discovery of undisclosed legal contingencies.
Improper asset valuation. Fraudulently inflating asset valuations is a common form of
prot manipulation. Red flags:
-- Unusual or unexplained increases in the book value of assets such as inventory,
receivables, long term assets, etc.
-- Odd patterns in relationships of assets to other components of the nancial report,
such as sudden changes in the ratio of receivables to revenues.
-- GAAP violations in recording expenses as assets.
DETECTION METHODS
To reduce the risk of having these frauds occuror continue undetected auditors
should use such practices as
Horizontally and vertically analyzing all nancial reports.
Conducting frequent ratio analysis, including assessment of trends over periods of
several years.
Using Beneischs Ratios which pinpoint anomalies in year-to-year measures of gross
margins, sales growth, receivables levels and other key accounting ratios
1
2
3
4
5
7 9. Horizontal analysis
Tata Motors:
Ashok Leyland:
1 10.Ratio Analysis
Quick ratio or acid test ratio has been decreasing constantly
which is a concern for meeting short term liabilities.
Debt to equity has improved over ve years and is well within
standards and reflects companys sound position.
Prot margins has decreased consistently over ve years.
2
3
4 Tata Motors
5 .Key Ratios
TATA MOTORS
Mar '12
Mar '11
Mar '10
Mar '09
Mar '08
Face Value
10
10
10
10
20
15
15
13.16
74.15
70.68
33.52
78.61
170.84
755.69
619.98
499.23
746.24
55.25
287.53
229.67
217.77
182.38
17.53
17.53
19.5
21.64
28.86
7.7
9.81
11.4
6.71
10.53
4.69
6.91
8.38
3.2
8.16
4.74
6.97
8.47
3.3
8.26
6.26
6.94
7.26
6.97
8.13
6.26
6.94
7.26
6.97
8.13
2.26
3.74
6.26
3.77
6.96
2.26
3.74
6.26
3.77
6.96
Profitability Ratios
Operating Profit Margin(%)
10.36
10.19
10.37
6.41
18.96
6.42
9.06
15.15
8.09
25.98
9.44
9.46
9.61
7.45
21.18
60.95
314.93
259.03
240.6
202.54
61.03
315.31
259.46
241.09
203.2
11.49
12.01
12.26
8.89
22.85
0.51
0.53
0.44
0.44
0.64
0.4
0.54
0.44
0.58
0.66
0.57
0.8
1.12
1.06
0.8
0.41
0.52
0.8
0.49
0.5
3.7
2.64
2.61
2.43
6.28
0.57
0.8
1.12
1.06
0.8
3.9
3.7
3.56
3.64
7.19
3.34
3.37
3.74
3.73
6.82
13.37
13.86
13.5
13.47
14.44
20.42
19.2
17.92
19.11
30.08
13.37
13.86
13.5
13.47
14.44
2.65
2.22
1.95
1.88
2.69
2.29
1.35
1.14
1.02
2.06
1.64
1.42
1.24
1.29
2.69
Mar '11
Mar '10
Mar '09
Face Value
1.5
4.72
9.15
5.72
3.56
50.02
85.75
55.9
46.37
9.51
18.25
16.1
14.43
52.34
4.68
4.68
4.68
9.43
10.67
10.23
7.66
6.76
8.3
7.45
4.72
6.78
8.32
7.49
4.77
6.84
7.83
7.69
5.77
6.84
7.83
7.69
5.77
4.24
5.51
5.66
3.04
4.24
5.51
5.66
3.04
17.76
18.6
12.89
8.78
19.57
23.8
18.27
9.05
19.41
23.72
15.99
8.65
10.87
19.94
17.42
15.78
15.8
29.76
27.45
26.04
18.11
18.6
12.89
8.78
0.88
1.09
1.22
1.29
Quick Ratio
0.48
0.53
0.72
0.72
0.83
0.98
0.93
0.8
0.98
0.93
Interest Cover
3.68
5.23
5.83
2.27
0.83
0.98
0.93
5.07
6.65
7.83
3.41
4.6
5.76
7.16
3.34
6.63
5.86
5.11
5.36
11.02
10.34
7.51
9.25
6.63
5.86
5.11
5.36
1.98
1.73
1.25
1.26
2.75
2.19
1.65
1.54
2.01
1.73
1.31
1.46
31.17
42.33
40.15
44.36
35.74
32.96
36.3
41.55
-14.56
11.53
35.64
42.04
72.89
73.69
74.42
73.82
6.79
7.04
7.65
5.37
6.55
6.67
7.68
6.98
12.36
10.31
8.66
15.93
54.63
48.98
54.92
81.91
33.65
34.4
37.06
42.24
44.9
50.87
37.24
14.36
66.17
65.52
59.53
56.79
2.62
2.96
3.97
5.45
Expenses as Composition of
Total Sales
Cash Flow Indicator Ratios
12.DU-PONT Analysis
Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * Equity Multiplier
dupont
PBIDT/Sales(%)
Sales/Net Assets
PBDIT/Net Assets
PAT/PBIDT(%)
Net Assets/Net Worth
R O E (%)
121110987Mar
Mar
Mar
Mar
Mar
Mar
7.04
9.65
13.52
9.61 11.11 11.16
1.55
1.3
1.2
1.11
2.33
2.91
0.11
0.13
0.16
0.11
0.26
0.32
29.82
36.67
43.84 37.09 55.52 54.24
1.95
1.97
2.11
2.08
1.81
1.59
8.27
10.37
11.32
5.34 23.91 30.98
2011
2012
Average
SD
1.87
0.939
0.9
1.3298
0.439
2011
2012
Average
SD
0.53
1.06
1.11
0.818
0.26414
2011
2012
Average
SD
7.62
2.43
2.77
5.258
2.4770
1.7
0.59
7.19
1.24
0.8
6.28
The long term financial stability of the firm may be considered as dependent upon its ability to meet
all the liabilities, including those not currently payable. According to the revelation of the study it is
found that Tata
Motors is not having protected ratio. It has to maintain it financial strength in order to avoid
difficulties. If not then it
will be in trouble during recession and if it continued for a long run then it will hamper the
ordinary shareholder base and company also have to face difficulty while raising new funds
for its futuristic development and growth
The net change in financing activity was outflow of `4,235.59 crores against inflow of `1,648.42 crores for last
year. The Company had raised equity through raising of equity through QIP last year `3,249.80 crores. Further
there
has been an outflow of dividends and interest of `2,944.63 crores (last year `2,197.14 crores). There has
been a net decrease on account of borrowings of `1,290.98 crores as compared to inflow of `592.17 crores in
last year.
3
4
5
6 15.Working Capital Analysis
2
Working Capital is a measure of a company's short term liquidity or its ability to cover short term liabilities. Working capital is defined as the difference between a company's
current assets and current liabilities. That is,
3
4
Analysts use working capital to determine how easily a company can meet its liabilities over a short time horizon. It is also used when calculating other financial metrics like free
cash flow. When management uses working capital as a basis for business decisions their goal is to make sure the company is able to continue its operations in the short term
while covering any near-term debt as well as operating expenses.
The revenue (net of excise duty) increased to `54,306.56 crores in FY 2011-12, as compared to
`47,088.44 crores, representing an increase of 15.3%.
The total number of vehicles sold during the year increased by 10.7% to 926,353 vehicles
from 836,629 vehicles. The domestic volumes increased by 10.9% to 863,248 vehicles from 778,540
vehicles in
FY 2010-11, while export volumes showed an improvement of 8.6% to 63,105 vehicles from 58,089
vehicles I
n FY 2010-11.
Gross revenue from sale of vehicles, including export and other incentives, increased 16.0% to
`54,154.01 crores from `46,692.88 crores in FY 2010-11. Sale of spare parts for vehicles
increased by 8.2% to `2,910.61 crores from `2,689.85 crores in FY 2010-11.
The operating margin decreased mainly due to increase in raw material cost and xed marketing
expenses. The Prot after tax of `1,242.23 crores was lower by 31.4% compared to `1,811.82 crores in
FY 2010-11. The analysis of performance is given below:-
Employee Cost increased by 17.3% to `2,691.45 crores from `2,294.02 crores in FY 2010-11. The
increase is mainly attributable to normal yearly increases, promotions, wage agreements (where
applicable) and increase in head count. In terms of % to net revenue, the employee cost has
marginally increased from 4.9% to 5.0%. The Company continues to focus on measures to manage
employee cost on a long term basis.
Manufacturing and Other Expenses were `8,405.51 crores (`6,738.35 crores for FY 2010-11) and were
15.5% of net revenue in FY 2011-12 compared to 14.3% in FY 2010-11. The increase is primarily due
to inflation, volumes, and freight cost and publicity expenses to promote the new products / variants.
Prot before exceptional Item, Depreciation, Interest and Tax was `4,985.88 crores in FY 2011-12, as
compared to
5,229.34 crores in FY 2010-11. The decrease is mainly due to lower other income and lower operating
margin.
Depreciation and amortization (including product development / engineering expenses written off )
increased by 22.6% to `1,840.99 crores from `1,502.00 crores in FY 2010-11. The increase reflects,
impact on account of additions to xed assets towards plant and facilities for expansion and new
products introduction. Further, there has been an increase in amortization relating to capitalization of
product development cost for products launched in the year.
Finance costs decreased to `1,218.62 crores from `1,383.70 crores in FY 2010-11. The Company has
achieved a reduction in the weighted average borrowing cost and discounting charges.
Exceptional Items:
a) During FY 2011-12, the Company provided `130 crores for the loan given to a subsidiary,
consequent to impairment at the subsidiary triggered by continuous underperformance, mainly
578.43
150
12.42
Bonus history
Year
1995
1982
1979
1977
1967
Book Value(Unit
EPS(Unit
Ratio
Curr)
Curr)
3:05
68.3
14.2
2:05
37.69
8.27
2:05
34.98
5.53
1:05
0
0
1:06
0
0
Splits Summary
Tata Motors had last split the face value of its shares from Rs 10 to Rs 2 in 2011.The share has been quoting on
an ex-split basis from September 12, 2011.
Old FV
New FV
Ex-Split Date
26-05-2011
10
12-09-2011
03-01-1996
100
10
00-00-0000
Maximizing shareholders value is fast becoming the new corporate standard in India. Economic Value
Added (EVA) and Market Value Added (MVA) are appropriate measures which evaluates the manner in
which managerial actions affect shareholders value. These are tools for identifying whether the
management of the company has created wealth or destroyed it.
The basic objective of every organization is to create value for its owners. It must strive to at least
provide dividend in the form of returns to those who have invested their money and expected a reward
for such investment. If the companies are successful in generating value, then not only are the
investors but the whole society at large is benetted. It is the pursuit of value that directs the
resources to be utilized optimally and productively. To assess the companys worth, not only the
resource utilization but also the external performance of a company needs to be looked at. This is
often faced by the outdated performance systems. A district economic evaluation methodology is to be
applied to the different operations of the company. A few such innovations are Economic Value Added
(EVA) and Market Value Added (MVA).*
The above mentioned gure depicts the methodology followed by companies for the purpose of
calculating EVA, information is required regarding the prots, capital, cost of capital, etc.., which are
based on the mission and objectives of an organization. The EVA, in turn, is linked with various plans
formed for each particular action and denes the measures to be applied for achieving the value
creation objective. The measures are dened for each activity: prots, cost, capital and cost of capital.
EVA analysis of the companies:
Economic Value Added (EVA) is a nancial performance method to calculate the true economic prot
of a corporation. EVA can be calculated as net operating after taxes prot minus a charge for the
opportunity cost of the capital invested. EVA is an estimate of the amount by which earnings exceed or
fall short of the required minimum rate of return for shareholders or lenders at comparable risk.
Unlike market based measures, such as MVA, EVA can be calculated at divisional (strategic business
unit) level. Unlike stock measures, EVA is a flow and can be used for performance evaluation over
time. Unlike accounting prot, such as EBIT, Net Income and EPS, EVA is economic and is based on
the idea that a business must cover both the operating costs and capital costs.
EVA=Net Operating Profit After Tax-Weighted Average Cost of Capital.
For calculation of EVA, beta is the one of the most important component to be calculated and for
calculating beta, return is to be calculated on the basis of stock price which is taken from BSE and
correlation between the two returns i.e. return from stock price of the companies and bench mark
return. Then the deviation of both the security and market is calculated for nding the beta. Beta is
calculated by multiplying correlation with standard deviation of the security and dividing it by
standard deviation of market.
Risk free rate of return is obtained from the economic report of the union budget of the last ve years.
Then the cost of capital employed is obtained by the use of above calculated component.
=
=
=
=
=
The Altman Z-Score is meant to be applied only to manufacturing rms that are
near bankruptcy. It was not based on a sample including non-manufacturing rms
(service rms, banks, etc.). Use it at your own risk with those companies, but
beware those bankruptcy probabilities may be misstated.
The Altman Z-Score helps investors to gauge the probability of a company going
bankrupt. Generally, rms with a score above 3.00 have a low probability of
bankruptcy, and those with a Z-Score of less than 1.81 have a relatively high
probability of bankruptcy.
Note that this is a probabilistic model, so it will not classify perfectly.
The score was rst published in a 1968 paper by Edward Altman titled "Financial
Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy."
Altman re-tested the model in a 2000 paper titled "Predicting nancial distress of
companies: Revisiting the Z-score and Zeta models". The paper showed that the
model still had utility for looking at manufacturers, though the number of
misclassications did increase over time.
Z Score
Tat
a
=
S5
u
mF
a
2.19
Oc=
9
ft
o
r
s
First Factor
= 1.2 * (
Working Capital
/
Total Assets )
Second Factor
= 1.4 * (
Retained Earnings
/
Total Assets )
Third Factor
=
3.3 * (
EBITAD
/
Total Assets )
Fourth Factor = 0.6 * (
Market Value of Equity
/
Total Liabilities )
Fifth Factor
=
0.99 * (
Revenue
/
Total Assets )
To calculate Z-Score one would need to know current working capital of the
company, its total assets and liabilities, amount of latest retained earnings as well
as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Score can be used to compare the odds of
bankruptcy of companies in similar line of business or rms operating in the same
industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable
and healthy with low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and
3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area' with scores of less than 1 indicating the high
probability of distress. Z Score is used widely by nancial auditors, accountants,
money managers, loan processers, wealth advisers, as well as day traders. In the
last 25 years many nancial models that utilize z score has been proved to be
successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
Question 21:
Subsidiaries
at more than their recoverable amount (i.e. the higher of fair value less costs to sell and
value in use). With the exception of goodwill and certain intangible assets for which an
annual impairment test is required, entities are required to conduct impairment tests
where there is an indication of impairment of an asset, and the test may be conducted for
a 'cash-generating unit' where an asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely
independent of those from other assets.
Basis of valuation of Current and Non-Current Investments
All companies have classied their assets as current and non-current investments but the
basis of classication is not described, except in case of Patni, Mahindra Satyam and L&T
Infotech. Even in these cases the classication premise is different. While Patni and L&T
Infotech has a rule of classifying all assets which are for less than 1 year are classied as
Current Investments, Mahindra Satyam classies based on their nature / holding
period /Managements intent etc.
Employee Benefits :
External Statutory fund vs. In-house fund
Provident Fund: We noted that while companies like Wipro, Infosys and are managing
their In-house fund for the purpose of contribution to provident fund, companies like are
investing in external statutory funds for management of funds. The valuation of employee
benets may differ due to this. Infosys has its own fund for Provident fund and Gratuity
called Infosys employee benet trust but Wipro has its own trust only for Provident Fund.
Gratuity is managed externally by HDFC, ICICI etc. Mindtree has outsourced its fund
management completely. It does not have any in house fund.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
While companies like TCS, Mahindra Satyam and Patni have dened Cash and Cash
equivalents to include only investments which are less than 3 months, L&T Infotech and
Mindtree have not specied any such stipulation. Hence it may be assumed that Mindtree
and L&T Infotech have included investments more than maturity period of 3 months while
valuing cash and cash equivalents. However, only L&T Infotech has mentioned that
Short term and liquid investments being not free from more than insignicant risk of
change in value, are not included as part of cash and cash equivalents
Goodwill:
Amortisation vs. Impairment
We found two ways of valuing goodwill across companies which are mentioned below:
1. Amortize Goodwill using a rate over a span of time
2. Test for impairment at each year end and impair Goodwill.
TCS and Mastek are amortizing goodwill over its estimated life. However goodwill for TCS
is amortised over 12 years while Mastek amortizes it over 3 years.
Other Companies like Wipro, Infosys, Cognizant etc. assesses at each balance sheet date
whether there is any indication that a non-nancial asset including goodwill may be
impaired.
Assets and Liabilities
WIPRO
Goodwill
The goodwill arising on acquisition of a group of assets is not amortized and is tested for
impairment if indicators of impairment exist.
Tangible assets, intangible assets and Capital work-in-progress - Fixed assets are stated at
historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Costs include expenditure directly
attributable to the acquisition of the asset. Borrowing costs directly attributable to the
construction or production of qualifying assets are capitalized as part of the cost.
Intangible assets are stated at the consideration paid for acquisition less accumulated
amortization.
Cost of xed assets not ready for use before the balance sheet date is disclosed capital
work-in-progress. Advances paid towards the acquisition of xed assets outstanding as of
each balance sheet date is disclosed under long term loans and advances.
Depreciation and amortization
The Company has provided for depreciation using straight line method, at the rates
specied in Schedule XIV to the Companies Act, 1956, except in cases of the following
assets, which are depreciated, based on estimated useful life, which is higher than the
rates specied in Schedule XIV.
Class of Asset Estimated useful life
Buildings 30 - 60 years
Computer equipment and Software (included under plant and machinery) 2 - 7 years
Furniture and xtures 5 - 6 years
Electrical installations (included under plant and machinery) 5 years
Office equipment 5 years
Vehicles 4 years
Fixed assets individually costing Rupees ve thousand or less are depreciated at 100%
over a period of one year.
Assets under nance lease are amortised over their estimated useful life or the lease
term, whichever is lower.
Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful life on a straight line basis.
For various brands acquired by the Company, estimated useful life has been determined
ranging between 20 to 25 years. The Company believes this based on number of factors
including the competitive environment, market share, brand history, product life cycles,
operating plan, no restrictions on title and the macroeconomic environment of the
countries in which the brands operate. Accordingly, such intangible assets are being
amortised over the determined useful life.
Payments for leasehold land are amortised over the period of lease.
Impairment of assets
Financial assets:
The Company assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is any objective evidence
that a nancial asset or group of nancial assets is impaired. If any such indication exists,
the Company estimates the amount of impairment loss. The amount of loss for short-term
receivables is measured as the difference between the assets carrying amount and
undiscounted amount of future cash flows.
Reduction, if any, is recognised in the statement of prot and loss. If at the balance sheet
date there is any indication that if a previously assessed impairment loss no longer exists,
the recognised impairment loss is reversed, subject to maximum of initial carrying amount
of the short-term receivable.
Other than financial assets:
The Company assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is any indication that a
non-nancial asset including goodwill may be impaired. If any such indication exists, the
Company estimates the recoverable amount of the asset. If such recoverable amount of
the asset or the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit to which the asset
belongs to is less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount is reduced to its
recoverable amount. The reduction is treated as an impairment loss and is recognised in
the statement of prot and loss. If at the balance sheet date there is an indication that a
previously assessed impairment loss no longer exists, the recoverable amount is
reassessed and the asset is reflected at the recoverable amount subject to a maximum of
depreciated historical cost. In respect of goodwill, the impairment loss will be reversed
only when it was caused by specic external events of an exceptional nature that is not
expected to recur and their effects have been reversed by subsequent external events.
Employee benefits
Provident fund:
Employees receive benets from a provident fund. The employee and employer each make
Type of asset
Leasehold land and buildings
Freehold buildings
Factory buildings
Leasehold improvements
Plant and machinery
Computer equipment
Vehicles
Office equipment
Electrical installations
Furniture and xtures
Goodwill
Acquired contract rights
Intellectual property / distribution rights
Software licenses
Rights under licensing agreement
Method
Straight line
Written down
Straight line
Straight line
Straight line
Straight line
Straight line
Written down
Straight line
Written down
Straight line
Written down
Straight line
Straight line
Straight line
Straight line
Straight line
Straight line
Straight line
Straight line
value
value
value
value
Rate/Period
Lease period
5.00%
1.63% - 2.50%
10.00%
Lease period
33.33%
10% - 50%
25.89%
9.50% - 33.33%
13.91%
4.75% - 33.33%
13.91%
6.63% - 33.33%
6.63% - 100%
12 years
12 years
24 - 60 months
License period
20% - 50%
License Period
Fixed assets purchased for specific projects are depreciated over the
period of the project.
Leases
Where the Group, as a lessor, leases assets under nance leases such amounts are
recognised as receivables at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease
and the nance income is based on a constant rate of return on the outstanding
net investment.
Assets leased by the Group in its capacity as lessee, where the Group has
substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classied as nance lease.
Such leases are capitalised at the inception of the lease at lower of the fair value
or the present value of the minimum lease payments and a liability is recognised
for an equivalent amount. Each lease rental paid is allocated between the liability
and the interest cost so as to obtain a constant periodic rate of interest on the
outstanding
liability for each year.
Lease arrangements where the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an
asset substantially vests with the lessor, are recognised as operating lease. Lease
rentals under operating lease are recognised in the statement of prot and loss on
a straight-line basis.
Impairment
At each balance sheet date, the management reviews the carrying amounts of its
assets included in each cash generating unit to determine whether there is any
indication that those assets were impaired. If any such indication exists, the
recoverable amount of the assets is estimated in order to determine the extent of
impairment loss. Recoverable amount is the higher of an assets net selling price
and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows
expected from the continuing use of the asset and from its disposal are discounted
to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the current
market assessments of time value of money and risks specic to the asset.
Reversal of impairment loss is recognised immediately as income in the statement
of prot and loss.
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to each of the Groups
cash-generating units expected to benet from the synergies of the acquisition.
Cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated are tested for
impairment annually, or more frequently when there is an indication that the unit
may be impaired. If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less
than the carrying amount of the unit, the impairment loss is allocated rst to
reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the unit and then to the
other assets of the unit pro-rata on the basis of the carrying amount of each asset
in the unit
Investments
Long-term investments and current maturities of long-term investments are stated
at cost, less provision for other than temporary diminution in value. Current
investments, except for current maturities of long term investments, are stated at
the lower of cost and fair value.
Inventories
Raw materials, sub-assemblies and components are carried at the lower of cost
and net realisable value. Cost is determined on a weighted average basis.
Purchased goods-in-transit are carried at cost. Work-in-progress is carried at the
lower of cost and net realisable value. Stores and spare parts are carried at cost,
less provision for obsolescence. Finished goods produced
or purchased by the Group are carried at the lower of cost and net realizable
value. Cost includes direct material and labour
cost and a proportion of manufacturing overheads.
Provisions, Contingent liabilities and Contingent assets
A provision is recognised when the Group has a present obligation as a result of
past event and it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle
the obligation, in respect of which reliable estimate can be made. Provisions
(excluding retirement benets) are not discounted to its present value and are
determined based on best estimate required to settle the obligation at the balance
sheet date. These are reviewed at each balance sheet date and adjusted to reflect
the current best estimates. Contingent liabilities are not recognised in the
nancial statements. A contingent asset is neither recognised nor disclosed in the
nancial statements.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Group considers all highly liquid nancial instruments, which are readily
convertible into cash and have original maturities of three months or less from the
date of purchase, to be cash equivalents
Rights, preferences and restrictions attached to shares
Equity shares
The Company has one class of equity shares having a par value of 1 each. Each
shareholder is eligible for one vote per share held. The dividend proposed by the
Board of Directors is subject to the approval of the shareholders in the ensuing
Annual General Meeting, except in case of interim dividend. In the event of
liquidation, the equity shareholders are eligible to receive the remaining assets of
revenue between TCS and Infosys has been increasing quarter -on-quarter. Now,
lets take note of Cognizant. It was started in the year 1994, a good 13 years after
Infosys in 1981. Growing at a stellar rate, it recently overtook Infosys in terms of
revenue in the June 2012 quarter. A major contributing to this unbelievable feat
was the focus on market share rather than on operating margins. With Infosys
operating on approximately 28% margins, Cognizant merrily operates on
approximately 19% margins. This has led to it cornering a huge chunk of the
market share and in the process it left Infosys behind. Given the current condition,
it is highly unlikely that the situation will improve in the next few quarters. Infosys
should not take this lightly. It should focus on market share and thus be willing to
take a small hit on its above industry average margins, which will surely help it to
regain some lost market share. Thus, its competitors are leaving it far behind in
terms of competition. Further, when the macro economic conditions improve, it can
surely seek to bring its margins back to current levels. However, if it does not act
right now, the lost market share might never be regained later.
Infosys has always been the target of nancial analysts to not make good use of
the huge pile of cash, approximately US$ 4 billion that it is sitting on. Even in the
nancial year 2011-12, it generated around US$ 1 billion of operating cash. Again
comparing to Cognizant, which made 10 acquisitions in the past six years, Infosys
made just three, with the recent one of acquiring of a Switzerland based consulting
rm Lodestone for approximately US$ 350 million. Infosys should pass on a part of
its cash to the Shareholders; a special dividend should denitely help to improve
the sentiment of the investors. Also, Infosys should use its cash reserve to grow
inorganically. This should allow the company to have new avenues of growth in the
challenging circumstances. It should particularly focus on the acquiring rms in
the products and platforms division rather than relying solely on its internal R&D to
come up with new offerings.
Preparing for a top management change. Infosys has always been lead at the top
by one of its co - founders. Though, the skills of Narayana Murthy,
NandanNilekani and the like cannot be discounted, one can doubt on those of
the current management. When S D Shibulal took over as CEO, there was a huge
controversy between Infosys and its most trusted lieutenants Mohandas Pai,
former CFO and director of Infosys Human Resources and Education and Research
at the time of leaving Infosys due to this fallout. Issues of meritocracy being
subordinated to tenure of service were raised, though there were reports of mutual
agreement later on. This did give Infosys a major negative highlight. Still,
considering that Shibulal is doing the best that he can in times of such tumultuous
economic conditions, given that he retires in 2015, Infosys has to make sure that
they have a robust and transparent succession plan in place.
Question 27:
CEO S.D. Shibulal described: In Infosys 3.0, we want to be at the intersection of the
client's business and technology, and that of global trends, and use this knowledge and
expertise to help them transform and move into new directions.
The major drivers behind the change were the changing global business trends. Infosys
enlisted
7 distinct areas where it wanted to enhance its capabilities. These were:
1. Digital consumer (digital products permeating all aspects of life),
2. New commerce (mobile commerce leading to extremely small transactions),
3. Healthcare economy (healthcare becoming more preventive, affordable and inclusive),
4. Sustainable tomorrow (doing things in an environmentally and socially sustainable
way),
5. Smarter organizations (making organizations more adaptable, less complex),
6. Emerging economies (global growth concentrated in these areas) and
7. Pervasive computing (all devices becoming computing devices)
Other than this, Infosys committed to invest heavily in the areas of Innovation and
research. Thus forming Infosys labs as a global network of research labs and innovation
hubs. As Subrahmanyam Goparaju, Senior Vice President and Head of Infosys Labs puts
it: Working together with clients, technology partners, universities and the larger
innovation ecosystem, Infosys Labs focuses on setting up joint innovation centers and
developing solutions to complex business problems.
A large chunk of Investments were also directed towards enhancing capabilities of
some existing and future products like Finacle, Flypp and iEngage.
The Approach
Infosys dened the three pillars of Infosys 3.0 as:
In its third phase of growth, Infosys ambition was to get counted in the league of IBM and
Accenture. Both these companies have very well integrated Consulting arms as IBM
Global Services and Accenture Management Consulting. On the other hand its other
competitors have also started to move in this space. While TCS & Wipro have started their
consulting arms as TCS Global Practices and Wipro Consulting, the only one to pull it off
smartly has been Cognizant. With a wide range of consulting offerings Cognizant
Business Consulting has become a successful and salient brand.
Brand
Dominance: IBM,
Accenture
ToMA: Deloitte, Capgemini
Recallable: Infosys Ltd., Cognizant Business
Consulting
Recognized brands: TCS Global Consulting Practice, Wipro
Consulting etc.
Unknown Brands
Industry Acceptance
Although Infosys has committed a large amount of resources in establishing its new brand
and expects to earn one-third of its revenues from the high-end offerings, the industry as a
whole has not accepted the change. Over the past two years, the newly created Products,
Platforms and solutions business have contributed close to 7% of revenues. There arent
many takers in the market barring a few Telecom companies and a healthcare giant. By
looking at customer responses and market data, it is pretty evident that Infosys is
struggling in recent times. The company gave out an initial guidance of 8-10% for FY 13,
revised this downwards to 5% after their rst quarter results, as it struggled to generate
demand in a volatile environment. It also suspended giving quarterly guidance after the
rst quarter. The 5% guidance is way lower than the Nasscom estimate for the industry,
which is currently the lower end of 11-14%.
In December 2012 Shibulal quoted The dollar revenue guidance of 5% in FY13 could be
under threat due to customer deferrals, ramp downs in a few large projects, delays in
large deal closures and longer than expected client shutdowns due to Hurricane Sandy,
especially in the manufacturing sector. At present, the company thinks that FY13 remains
challenging.
Fig Infosys Stock performance on BSE (Mar-2011 - Feb-2013)
Infosys' struggle also comes at a time when rivals such as TCS and Cognizant have
grown at a fast pace, for the nancial year ending March 31 2012, Infosys grew
revenues by 16% as compared to its closest rival TCS who grew by 31% during the same
period. Although analysts accept the fact that slump in the industrys earning have come
largely due to the slow economy worldwide, in case of Infosys it is more magnied
because of Infosys commitment of not chasing the low-margin business of outsourcing.
The questions that analysts are asking is that is it the right time to adopt a new business
strategy and change in positioning when the world economy is not at all in the favor.