Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Company Guide
Faculty Guide
(HR Executive)
Submitted By
Bhavita Vin (2059)
Radhika Shah (2044)
MBA SEMESTER III
Affiliated to Gujarat Technological University Ahmedabad
2015
Preface
In recent years, the rapidly changing environment has put pressure on the
Human Resource Management to justify its existence. As such the Human
Resource function must demonstrate that it can add value and deliver
results to the organization and its stakeholders.
It means the human resource management practices should and retain
excellent employees who, in turn, will enable a firm to provide high quality
products and services.
However, the contribution of HR management to the firm's performance is
being debated and number of scholars has stressed the need to view
human resource management from strategic perspective.
The emphasis has been on linking Human Resource Management (HRM)
practices on strategy in order to increase the organizational
competitiveness and effectiveness. At present there is a dearth of research
linking human resource practices with firm's performance.
As an attempt to contribute to this area, the present study aims to explore
the impact of high performance human resource practices on turnover,
productivity and financial performance among the corporate in India and
Singapore.
Acknowledgements
We would also like to take this opportunity to express our deepest gratitude
to our director, Dr. Rajesh Khajuria, Director, CKSVIM.
We owe our indebtedness and gratitude to Ms.Dipti Barot (HR Executive)
Mr. Chirag Vispute (Asst. HR), Mr. Anurag Mishra (Personnel Manager)
and to the entire staff of Welcom Hotel for their wonderful support.
We would like to thank Ms. Ranjita Banerjee. (Asst. Prof., CKSVIM) for
her great help and support without her this project would never have taken
this shape.
Bhavita Vin
Radhika Shah
Table of Contents
Sr.
No.
Particulars
Pg.
Nos
Semester
III
21
III
23
III
25
III
6
7
8
9
10
32
33
33
34
III
37
IV
IV
IV
IV
III/IV
60
61
62
63
LIST OF TABLES
Table No.
Title
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
Pg.
No.
14
18
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
appropriately.
11
12
13
14
15
45
46
47
48
49
16
50
17
51
18
19
20
21
52
53
54
55
22
23
24
25
56
57
58
59
5
LIST OF GRAPHS
Graph
Title
No.
1
Direct Contribution of tourism and hospitality to GDP
Organizations HR executives are fully aware of the business needs and
2
strategies.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Pg.
No.
19
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
15
50
16
51
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
PART 1
GENERAL
INFORMATION
CH: 1
ABOUT THE INDUSTRY
A Brief History of India's Hotel Industry
Before World War 11, most hotels in India were developed in locations that
were frequented by the British and Indian aristocracy. This period saw the
development of hotels being undertaken by individual British and Indian
entrepreneurs, with only a few companies owning hotels in India, such as
The Taj Group--Indian Hotel Company (owned by J. R. D. Tata) and
Faletti's Hotel, East India Hotel Oberoi Group.
The important hotels that were built during India's British period were:
The Rugby, Matheran (1876)
The ~aj Mahal Hotel, Mumbai (1900)
The Grand, Calcutta (1930)
The Cecil Hotels, Shimla and Muree (1935)
The Savoy, Mussoorie (1936)
India gained independence in 1947, and the hotel industry had a period in
which no hotel development took place. Upon his return from the NonAligned Movement Conference in 1956, Late Pundit Jawaharlal Nehru,
then Prime Minister of India, recognized that tourism could be an engine for
8
the country's economic growth and was inspired to build quality hotels in
India for visiting foreign dignitaries. This led to the first-ever government
investment in the hotel industry with the building of the Ashoka Hotel in
New Delhi.
The India Tourism Development Corporation (ITDC) was set up in 1966 as
a corporation under the Indian Companies Act of 1956, with the merger of
Janpath Hotel India Ltd. and India Tourism Transport Undertaking Ltd.
Today, ITDC provides a complete range of tourism services, including
accommodation,
catering,
and
entertainment
and
shopping,
hotel
The Taj Mahal Hotel in Bombay was the next to follow this franchising trend
in 1970 when it adopted an Inter-Continental hotel franchise for its new
hotel
in
Bombay.
Simultaneously,the
Oberoi
Tower
Hotel
under
10
Definition of Hotel
The Oxford English Dictionary online defines a hotel as
an establishment providing accommodation, meals and other services
for travellers and tourists, by the night.
A hotel is an establishment that provides paid lodging on a short-term
basis. The provision of basic accommodation, in times past, consisting
only of a room with a bed, a cupboard, a small table and a washstand
has largely been replaced by rooms with modern facilities, including
en-suite bathrooms. Additional common features found in hotel rooms
are a telephone, an alarm clock, a television, a safe, a mini-bar, and
facilities for making tea and coffee. Luxury features include bathrobes
and slippers, a pillow menu, twin-sink vanities, and Jacuzzi bathtubs.
Larger hotels may provide additional guest facilities such as a swimming
pool, fitness centre, business centre, childcare, conference facilities and
social function services.
Size
The global size of the hotel industry is not as easy to quantify as one
might imagine. Data on the size of the global hotel market is scarce,
subjective (with regard to what constitutes a hotel) and is only published
with relative infrequency outside the US.
11
12
13
Sep 13
68.5%
63.5%
77.1%
58.1%
Oct 13
72.5%
64.7%
73.2%
63.1%
Nov 13
72.4%
58%
67.3%
64.6%
Dec 13
66.3%
50.5%
56.5%
59.6%
Jan 14
62.1%
52.5%
52.8%
62%
Feb 14
67.1%
60.6%
60.8%
67.4%
Mar 14
69.2%
65.2%
64.9%
66.9%
Apr 14
68.8%
65.4%
68.3%
67%
May 14
67.6%
66.9%
74%
63.5%
Jun 14
66.4%
71.2%
75.1%
61.3%
Jul 14
70%
73.2%
73.9%
49.3%
Aug 14
72.6%
71.6%
75.7%
64.3%
Sep 14
69.2%
65.7%
79.4%
65.5%
Oct 14
72%
67.7%
74.7%
67.6%
Nov 14
72.2%
59.3%
68.2%
67.4%
Dec 14
67%
52.7%
59.3%
61.9%
Jan 15
64.7%
54.5%
54.4%
62.8%
Feb 15
64.6%
62.3%
62.6%
67.2%
Mar 15
68.7%
66.6%
66.5%
68.7%
Apr 15
69.6%
66.5%
69.5%
66.2%
14
May 15
68.1%
67.1%
74.1%
65.1%
Jun15
66.2%
72.6%
78.1%
56.1%
Jul 15
70.7%
74.8%
77.3%
55.1%
Aug 15
72.7%
70.6%
77.1%
62.9%
Sep 15
68.1%
67.6%
80.7%
64.9%
:-(http://www.statista.com/statistics/206825/hotel-occupancy-ratein-2011-by-region/)
SOURCE
15
16
17
Table: 2
Hotel category
No. of Hotels
No. of Rooms
165
43, 965
4 Star
134
20, 770
3 Star
505
30,100
2 Star
495
22,950
1 Star
260
10,900
Heritage
70
4,200
Uncategorised
7,078
Total
8,707
1,32,885
Restaurants
12,750
(Source :- Shodhganga)
What the future holds:
Despite the global recession, inflation, terrorism and other factors, the
overall outlook for the Indian hospitality market is optimistic and will remain
so says HVS
India remains the second fastest growing economy in the world and the
economic growth of the country is at 7.1% of the GDP as declared by Mr.
Pranab Mukherjee, Finance Minister, India.
The Tourism Ministry, Government of India, has set a target of 10
million tourists to India by 2010
The WTO (World Travel Organisation) predicts that India will receive 25
million tourists by year 2015
18
Graph :-1
19
A Grand Revival
In an ambience steeped in history, complemented by a richness of culture
acquired through centuries, Welcome Hotel, is a leading 5 star hotel in
Vadodara which brings you world class luxury with the warmth of Indian
hospitality in an experience that is unmistakably grand. This 5 star
business hotel presents a range of cuisines, accommodation and
recreation options that are comparable with the best in Vadodara.
Built around the swimming pool in style of the step wells of Gujarat, this
contemporary structure offers modern furnishing and comforts, with the
azure waters of swimming pool cooling environment during the hottest
months. Vadodara, a rapidly developing industrial city, where the past is
still alive in its traditional handicrafts, its culture and legends. WelcomHotel
Vadodara the citys only five star hotel, is located in the heart of the
downtown business and entertainment district.
In Vadodara, just 8 km away from the airport, this majestic 5 star luxury
hotel reaffirms the grandeur and popular architectural styles of Gujarat.
A luxurious business hotel built to capture the essence of Vadodaras rich
history, Welcomhotel Vadodaras building was conceived as an oasis in
20
Refined artistry
Among the most luxurious of Vadodaras 5 star business hotels. The hotel
has some splendid work of art by Indias renowned artist, Anjolie Ela
Menon. Art in general has been important to city as the royal family were
great collectors and patrons of fine art.
This gracious and comfortable hotel exuding warmth from the very first
glimpse. Light heartedly, portraits of a business man and his wife are
encased in window-like frames, reminding visitors that they are indeed in
the state of Gujarat. .
CH: 2
MAJOR PLAYERS IN HOTEL INDUSTRY
The Indian Hotels Company
The Indian Hotels Company and its subsidiaries are collectively known as Taj Hotels
Resorts and Palaces, recognized as one of Asia's largest and finest hotel company.
Incorporated by the founder of the Tata Group, Jamsetji N Tata, the company opened
its first property, The Taj Mahal Palace Hotel, Bombay, in 1903. The Taj, a symbol of
Indian hospitality, completed its centenary year in 2003. Taj Hotels Resorts and Palaces
comprises 59 hotels at 40 locations across India with an additional 17 international
hotels in the Maldives, Mauritius, 76 Malaysia, United Kingdom, United States of
America, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Africa, the Middle East and Australia. The company has
had a long-standing commitment to the continued development of the Indian tourism
and hospitality industry. From the 1970s through the 1990s, the Taj played an important
role in launching several of India's key tourist destinations. Working in tandem with the
Indian government, the Taj developed resorts and retreats while the government
developed roads and railways to India's hidden treasures.
luxury
hotels
in
the
five-star
deluxe
segment.
These
include
InterContinental The Grand hotels in New Delhi, Mumbai, Goa & Srinagar and The
22
Grand Ashok Bangalore, The Grand Laxmi Vilas Palace Udaipur and The Grand
Temple View Khajuraho.
23
CH: 3
PRODUCT PROFILE- SERVICE INDUSTRY
Facilities & Amenities provided on complimentary basis :
Hotel Facilities:
24 hour concierge service
24 hour currency exchange
24 hour room service
Access to Spa, Salon and Health Club
Access to Swimming Pool
Valet and self-parking facilities
In Room Facilities:
Internet usage at the Business Centre for 30 minutes per day
Electronic Safe
Multi-channel television
Daily newspaper
Guest stationary
Bottled mineral water
Tea/Coffee maker
Personal care amenities
24
PART II
PRIMARY
STUDY
25
CH: 3
INTRODUCTION OF THE STUDY
LITERATURE REVIEW
A. V. Ramana Rao (May 1999), in his article mentions that in order to be globally
competitive and successful, Indian organizations will have to practice international
business strategies as well as international human resource strategies because
ultimately it is the human resource that provide competitive edge that is difficult to
imitate. Human aspect of management can contribute substantially to better employee
relations and higher productivity. A. V. Ramana Rao in his article "Higher productivity
through better HRM" (Indian management, May, 1999). He feels that human being is
wanting in nature and human demands are infinite, so an organization needs to analyse
properly which needs of its employees are to be carefully considered and fulfilled.
Organization can ensure its current and continuing profitability byntaking care of its
people.
Mr. R. K. Rao (Oct-Dec 1999) in his article Management by values (personnel today,
vol. xx, no.3, oct-dec; 1999) has mentioned about the importance of ethics in an
organization and management. According to him an organization that follows a set of
guiding beliefs and communicates those ethical values to its employees to follow them
and thus institutionalize as a culture, can win and sustain loyalty of the customers for
longer period of time.Also, such organizational culture has a positive impact on the
performance of its employees.
(Mohanty, 2009).True cost of employee turnover has long been underappreciated and
underestimated by human resource managers and all stakeholders entangled in the
issue .
26
Wolf and Zwick (2008) found that employee involvement and financial incentives and
inducement were often honored as efficient way for increasing the organizational
productivity. They revealed that employee job involvement lifted up the organizational
productivity, but monetary incentive scheme did not do so.
Schneider and Bowen (1993) postulated that by recruiting and selecting right people,
training them to work in the market segment allocated to them, rewarding them
according to the objective achieved by them would get benefits to the organization.
Efficient service deliveries were the result of the quality of employee improvement and
welfare, including environment for work, training and development, job design, and
attention to the employee interests. The outcome of the analysis pointed out that the
service approach reflecting the magnitude of employee development derived employee
outcomes such as efficiency and productivity and employee job satisfaction. The
outcomes of employees due to such activities were significantly correlated with the
customer satisfaction and, thus, with the business performance, but only some
associations to financial performance were significant.
Delaney and Huselid (1996) categorized the human resource management practices
into the factors that improved employee skills, motivated and inspired the employees,
and arrangement design of the workplace. They concluded that at least the following
four human resource management dimensions could be acknowledged in his work,
these were, employee feedback, their training and development, workplace design, and
the employee pay system
According to Khatri (1999), people are one of the most important factors providing
flexibility and adaptability to organizations.
Rundle (1997) argues that one needs to bear in mind that people (managers), not the
firm, are the adaptive mechanism in determining how the firm will respond to the
competitive environment.
Several scholars have noted that managing people is more difficult than managing
technology or capital
27
Barney (1991); Lado and Wilson (1994) are of the opinion that those firms that have
learnt how to manage their human resources well would have an edge over others for a
long time to come because acquiring and deploying human resources effectively is
cumbersome and takes much longer
Wright et al., (1994) believes that HRM can help firms improve organizational behavior
in such areas as staff commitment, competency and flexibility, which in turn leads to
improved staff performance
Koch and McGrath (1996) in their study revealed that in order to develop a sound
HRM system , the organization should have effective Human Resource Management
practices.HRM practices refer to organizational activities directed at managing the pool
of human resources and ensuring that the resources are employed towards the
fulfillment of organizational goals
Schuler & Jackson (1987); Schuler &MacMillan (1984); Wright & Snell, (1991), in
their articles stated that HRM practices may differ from one organization to another and
from one country to another.
Many researches on HRM practices have been conducted from time to time and
researchers have identified different practices by different names.
Kok Jan de et al., (2003), refer to certain sets of HRM practices influenced by the HRM
profession as best practice,or high-performance (Huselid, 1995), formal (Aldrich
and Langton, 1997; de Kok and Uhlaner, 2001; Heneman and Berkley,1999),
sophisticated (Golhar and Deshpande, 1997; Hornsby and Kuratko, 1990; Goss et al.,
1994; Wagner, 1998) or as professional (Gnan and Songini, 2003; Matlay, 1999).
Pfeffer(1994; 1998), argued the most appropriate term is Best HRM Practices .
Chandler and McEvoy (2000) , one of the lingering questions in HRM research is
whether or not there is a single set of policies or practices that represents a universally
superior approach to managing people . Theories on best practices or high commitment
theories suggest that universally, certain HRM practices, either separately or in
combination are associated with improved organizational performance. Researchers
28
have also found that those well-paid, well motivated workers, working in an atmosphere
of mutuality and trust, generate higher productivity gains and lower unit costs
Boxall, 1996; Lowe and Oliver, 1991; Pfeffer, 1994 believe that several attempts have
been made from time to time by different researchers to identify the type of HRM
practices in different sectors.
Pfeffer (1994) identified 16 practices which denote best practice. This was later refined
to the following seven practices:
1. Employment security
2. Selective hiring
3. Self-managed teams/team working
4. High compensation contingent on organizational
performance
5. Extensive training
6. Reduction in status difference
7. Sharing information
Redman and Matthews (1998) identify an HRM bundle of key practices which support
service organizations quality strategies, these being:
1. Careful recruitment and selection, for example, total
quality recruitment, zero defects recruitment, right
first time recruitment.
2. Extensive remuneration systems, for example, bonuses
available for staff willing to be multi-skilled.
3. Team working and flexible job design, for example,
29
30
TVS Rao: Performance management system (PMS) is the heart of any people
management " process in organization. Organizations exist to perform. If people do not
perform organizations don't survive. If people perform at their peak level organization
can compete and create waves.
Armstrong and Baron (1998) defined it as A strategic and integrated approach to
increasing the effectiveness of organizations by improving the performance of the
people who work in them and by developing the capabilities of teams and individual
contributors
(Lockett,). Performance management is The development of individuals with
competence and commitment, working towards the achievement of shared meaningful
objectives within an organisation which supports and encourages their achievement
According to Walters. Performance management is the process of directing and
supporting employees to work as effectively and efficiently as possible in line with the
needs of the organization.
Alford and Beatty, are of the opinion that the evaluation or appraisal of the relative
worth to the company of a man's services on his job
Flippo suggests Performance appraisal is a systematic periodic and impartial rating of
employee's excellence in matters pertaining to his present job and to his potentialities
for a better job."
Kaplan and Nortons (1992)There are various ways in which these performance
measures can be categorized, ranging from
balanced scorecard through to framework of results and determinants. The rationale
underlying this article is that performance measures need to be positioned in a
strategic context, as they influence what people do. Measurement may be the
process of quantification, but its affect is to stimulate action.
Leong et al. (1990) claim that it is widely accepted that the manufacturing task,
and hence the key dimensions of manufacturings performance, can be defined in
31
terms of quality, delivery speed, delivery reliability, price (cost), and flexibility. Despite
this assertion, however, confusion still exists over what these generic terms
actually mean.
32
33
4. To suggest effective strategies to enhance the HR Practices and PMS at Welcom Hotel.
.
34
CH: 5
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
35
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 Neutral
4 Agree
44
88
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 2
120
100
100
88
80
60
No. of Employees
40
20
Percentage
4
0
12
34 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree Neutral
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here HR Executives are 88% agree that they aware of the business needs and strategies.
36
Table 4:- Efforts are taken to generate awareness amongst the employees
about the organizations need.
Ratings
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
46
92
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 3
120
100
92
100
80
60
No. of Employees
40
20
Percentage
6
0
12
34 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree Neutral
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 92% of the employees agree that efforts are taken to generate awareness about the organizations
need. 6% of employees are neutral. 2% of employees are strongly agree with the statement.
37
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
35
70
5 Strongly agree
15
30
Total
50
100
Graph 4
120
100
100
80
70
60
40
No. of Employees
30
Percentage
20
0
12
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 70% of employees are agree with the statement.30% of employees are strongly agree.
38
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
42
84
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 5
120
100
100
84
80
60
No. of Employees
40
Percentage
20
0
1Strongly
Disagree
2
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Disagree
Strongly
agree
Total
Here 84% of employees agree that their job rotation is done. 6% of employees are neutral and strongly
agree. 4% of employees are disagreeing with the statement.
39
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
43
86
10
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 6
120
100
100
86
80
60
No. of Employees
40
20
Percentage
4
10
0
12
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 86% of employees are agree with the statement. 10% of employees are strongly agree with the
statement. 4% of employees are neutral.
40
Table 8:- The organization has a formal policy of career planning and
development.
Ratings
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
5 Strongly agree
Total
46
92
50
100
Graph 7
120
100
100
92
80
60
No. of Employees
40
20
Percentage
8
0
12
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 92% of employees are agree that organization do have a formal policy for career planning and
development. 8% of employees are strongly agree with statement.
41
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
44
88
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 8
120
100
100
88
80
60
No. of Employees
40
Percentage
20
0
1Strongly
Disagree
2
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Disagree
Strongly
agree
Total
Here 88% of employees are agree that their job is secured. 8% of employees are strongly agree with the
statement. 4% of employees are neutral.
42
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
20
40
4 Agree
22
44
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 9
120
100
100
80
60
40
44
No. of Employees
40
20
Percentage
8
0
1 - Strongly
2
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
Disagree Disagree
5
Strongly
agree
Total
Here 44% of employees are agree that authority and responsibility is passed on to the employees
appropriately. 40% of employees are neutral with the statement. And 8% of employees are strongly
agree. And remaining 8% of employees are disagreeing with the statement
43
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
40
80
14
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 10
120
100
100
80
80
60
No. of Employees
40
20
Percentage
6
14
0
1 - Strongly
2
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
Disagree Disagree
5
Strongly
agree
Total
Here 80% of employees are agree with the statement. 14% of employees are strongly agree. 6% of
employees are neutral.
44
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
42
84
10
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 11
120
100
100
84
80
60
No. of Employees
40
20
Percentage
6
10
0
12
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 84% of employees are agree with the statement. 10% of employees are strongly agree with the
statement. 6% of employees are neutral.
45
Table 13:- The organization has been managing change by integrating the HR
issues with the business strategies.
Ratings
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
40
80
12
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 12
120
100
100
80
80
60
No. of Employees
40
20
Percentage
12
0
1Strongly
Disagree
2
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Disagree
Strongly
agree
Total
Here 80% of employees are agree with the statement. 12% of employees are strongly agree. 6% of
employees are disagree with the statement. 2% of employees are neutral.
46
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
10
20
4 Agree
28
56
5 Strongly agree
12
24
Total
50
100
Graph 13
120
100
100
80
56
60
No. of Employees
40
20
24
Percentage
20
0
12
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 56% of employees are agree that performance appraisal system is extended to all members. 24%
of employees are strongly agree with the statement. 20% of employees are neutral
47
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
16
4 Agree
28
56
5 Strongly agree
14
28
Total
50
100
Graph 14
120
100
100
80
56
60
No. of Employees
40
20
28
Percentage
16
0
12
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 56% of employees are agree that performance standards are carefully developed on the basis of
employees opinion. 28% of employees are strongly agree with the statement. 16% of employees are
neutral.
48
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
34
68
18
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 15
120
100
100
80
68
60
No. of Employees
40
20
Percentage
18
8
0
12
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 68% of employees are agree with the statement. 18% of employees are strongly agree. 8% of
the employees are disagree. And remaining 6% of employees are neutral.
49
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
10
4 Agree
35
70
5 Strongly agree
10
20
Total
50
100
Graph 16
120
100
100
70
80
60
No. of Employees
40
10
20
Percentage
20
0
12
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
34 Agree
5
Neutral
Strongly
agree
Total
Here70% of employees are agree with the statement. 20% of employees are strongly agree. 10 of
employees are neutral.
50
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
39
78
16
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 17
120
100
100
Iamstifedh gvncositadfrg.
60
40
20
0
Iamstifedhgvncoafirt.
78
80
No. of Employees
Iamsatifedtha Iamgivenconsiten andfair ating.
16
6
Percentage
IamstifedthaI mgivencositenadfiratng.
12
34 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree Neutral
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 78% of employees are agree with the statement. 16% of employees are strongly agree. 6% of
employees are neutral.
51
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
35
70
5 Strongly agree
12
24
Total
50
100
Graph 18
120
100
100
70
80
60
No. of Employees
40
20
24
Percentage
0
12
34 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree Neutral
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 70% of employees are agree with the statement. 24% of employees are strongly agree. 6% of
employees are neutral.
52
Table 20:productivity.
Performance
review
Ratings
techniques
impacts
No. of Employees
on
employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
11
22
4 Agree
32
64
14
50
100
5 Strongly agree
Total
Graph 19
120
100
100
80
64
60
40
20
No. of Employees
22
Percentage
14
0
12
3 - Neutral 4 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 64% of employees are agree with the statement. 22% of employees are neutral. 14% of
employees are strongly agree.
53
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
37
74
5 Strongly agree
13
26
Total
50
100
Graph 20
120
100
100
80
74
60
No. of Employees
40
26
Percentage
20
0
12
34 Agree
5
Strongly Disagree Neutral
Strongly
Disagree
agree
Total
Here 74% of employees are agree with the statement. 26% of employees are strongly agree.
54
Table 22:- Appropriate feedback is given to all the employees regarding their performance.
Ratings
No. of Employees
Percentage
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 Agree
33
66
5 Strongly agree
15
30
Total
50
100
Graph 21
120
100
100
80
66
60
20
No. of Employees
30
40
Percentage
0
12
3Strongly Disagree Neutral
Disagree
4
5
Agree Strongly
agree
Total
Here 66% of employees are agree with the statement. 30% of employees are strongly agree. 4% of
employees are neutral.
55
No. of Employees
Percentage
Below 25
15
30
25-35
27
54
35-45
12
45 and above
50
100
ToTal
Graph 23
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
100
54
No. of Employees
30
12
Percentage
4
ToTal
Here the maximum no. of employees at WelcomHotel is of the age group 25-35 years of age i.e 54% and 30%
employees are of less than 25 years of age.
56
Ratings
No. of Employees
Percentage
Male
39
78
Female
11
22
Total
50
100
Graph 24
120
100
80
100
78
No. of Employees
60
40
Percentage
22
20
0
Male
Female
Total
57
No. of Employees
Percentage
2-4 years
27
54
5-7 years
18
36
50
100
Graph 25
150
100
100
54
50
8
No. of Employees
36
Percentage
2
0
ToTal
Here 54% employees are working at WelcomHotel from 2-4 years and 36% employees are from 5-7 years.
58
59
60
The majority i.e. of respondents are of the age group 25-35 years of
age.
The majority of respondents are male i.e. 78% and 22% respondents
are female.
54% of respondents are working in WelcomHotel from 2-4 years.
61
CONCLUSION
The data provided a description of a relatively young, well-educated
and trained work force which received moderate levels of financial
remuneration.
The superior should start delegating greater authority and
responsibilities to the subordinates.
62
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Rao R K (Oct-Dec 1999), Management by values, Personnel Today, Vol.XX, No.3.
2. http://www.statista.com/statistics/206825/hotel-occupancy-rate-in-2011-byregion/
3. -(http://www.statista.com/statistics/206825/hotel-occupancy-rate-in-2011by-region/)
4. World travel and tourism council ecomic impact 2015, TechSci Research
5. (http://www.statista.com/statistics/206825/hotel-occupancy-rate-in-2011-byregion/)
63