Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Article history:
Received 13 July 2015
Accepted 9 October 2015
Key Words:
Cyclophosphamide
Obese
Lymphoma
Hematopoietic cell
transplantation
a b s t r a c t
No clear dosing guidelines exist for cyclophosphamide (Cy) dose adjustments in obese patients treated with
high-dose chemoradiotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We prospectively compared the outcomes of high-dose Cy/total body irradiation (TBI) conditioning in 147 nonHodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients in 3 weight groups: nonobese (<120% ideal body weight [IBW];
n 72), overweight (120% to 149% IBW; n 46), and obese (150% IBW; n 29). Nonobese and overweight
patients received Cy (120 mg/kg of total body weight, intravenously) and TBI (1320 cGy), whereas obese
patients (median body mass index, 36) received an adjusted Cy dose based on IBW plus 50% of the difference
between total body weight and IBW (AdjBW50). The median patient age was 57 years (range, 19 to 73). The
most common diagnoses were diffuse large B cell lymphoma (n 57) and mantle cell lymphoma (n 51).
Three-year overall survival was 61% (95% condence interval [CI], 48% to 72%) for nonobese patients, 68% (95%
CI, 52% to 82%) for overweight patients, and 80% (95% CI, 62% to 93%) for obese patients. Cumulative incidence
of relapse (48%, 43%, and 38%, respectively) and nonrelapse mortality (w4%) were similar in all groups.
Hemorrhagic cystitis and cardiac toxicity were rare events. Our data show that the AdjBW50 formula can be
safely and effectively used for Cy dose adjustments in obese patients treated for NHL with high-dose Cy/TBI
conditioning followed by autologous HCT.
2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
INTRODUCTION
Cyclophosphamide (Cy) is a bifunctional alkylating cytotoxic agent commonly used as the backbone of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) preparative regimens of varied
intensity. In addition to its antitumor activity against
hematologic malignancies, Cy contributes lympholytic and
immunosuppressive properties. Despite its wide use, limited
data exist on how to safely and effectively dose Cy in obese
patients. Optimally, the dose should provide equivalent
antitumor and tissue exposure as for a nonobese person;
however, altered pharmacokinetic parameters, including
drug distribution, exposure, and clearance in obese patients
compared to nonobese patients, add complexity to the
optimal dose calculation [1-3]. Routine Cy dosing is based on
Financial disclosure: See Acknowledgments on page 4.
* Correspondence and reprint requests: Veronika Bachanova, MD, PhD,
Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Mayo Mail
Code 480; 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
E-mail address: bach0173@umn.edu (V. Bachanova).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.10.012
1083-8791/ 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
transplantation and at day 100 and by CT every 3 months for 1 year and at 18
and 24 months thereafter using standard staging criteria for NHL [10].
The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS), cumulative
incidence of relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) while adjusting for
patient, disease, and transplantation-related characteristics. We also evaluated cumulative incidences of neutrophil and platelet engraftment and
incidences of specic toxicities related to high-dose Cy, including hemorrhagic cystitis and cardiac toxicity. Infection density was calculated as the
number of infectious episodes divided by the number of patient days at risk
multiplied by 1000 and compared using Fishers exact test.
OS was evaluated using standard survival methods, including KaplanMeier estimations and Cox regression [11-13]. The cumulative incidence
function with Fine and Gray regression were used for other outcomes to
accommodate competing risks [14,15]. Relapse was considered a competing
risk for NRM, and death was considered a competing risk for relapse and
engraftment. Multivariable regression models were limited by event
numbers adjusting for 2 factors in addition to weight group. Because of their
previously established association with outcomes, lymphoma type (diffuse
large B cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and others) and complete
remission (CR) status at HCT were prespecied. Age and gender were
associated with weight, and a separate model was t with these 2 factors,
which showed similar effects to weight on all outcomes. Incidence of cardiac
toxicity was compared using Fishers exact test.
RESULTS
Patients, Disease, and Transplantation Characteristics
We examined 147 patients with NHL (Table 1). The most
common histologies were diffuse large B cell lymphoma
(n 57) and mantle cell lymphoma (n 51). Patient age
ranged from 19 to 73 years with median of 57 years.
There was a median of 12 months from diagnosis to
transplantation. Eighty-nine percent received lgrastimmobilized peripheral blood stem cell grafts; others received
peripheral blood stem cells and bone marrow grafts. The
median CD34 dose was 5.5 106 CD34 cells/kg, with the
Table 1
Characteristics by Weight of Patients Who Underwent Autologous HCT for NHL between 2003 and 2012
Characteristic
<120% IBW
150% IBW
Total
No.
Age, median, yr
Age, 19-49
Age, 50-59
Age, 60-73
Male
BMI, median (range)
Weight, median (range), kg
Lymphoma subtype
Diffused large cell NHL
Mantle cell lymphoma
Follicular lymphoma
T cell NHL
Other NHL
Disease status at HCT
CR
Relapse lymphoma/PIF sensitive
Resistant
KPS
KPS 70-80
KPS 90-100
Graft source
Marrow
Peripheral blood cells
CMV serostatus
Recipient negative
Recipient positive
Yr of transplantation
2003-2007
2008-2012
Mo from diagnosis to transplantation, median (range)
CD34, mean (SD), 106/kg
TNC, mean (SD), 108/kg
72
56
24
22
26
53
25
77
46
58
9
20
17
32
29
90
29
60
4
11
14
13
36
102
147
57
37
53
57
98
27
84
26
26
6
4
10
(100%)
(33%)
(31%)
(36%)
(74%)
(19-28)
(48-97)
(36%)
(36%)
(9%)
(6%)
(15%)
20
12
4
2
8
(100%)
(20%)
(43%)
(37%)
(70%)
(24-34)
(58-123)
(43%)
(26%)
(9%)
(4%)
(18%)
11
13
4
1
(100%)
(14%)
(38%)
(48%)
(45%)
(30-55)
(75-177)
(38%)
(45%)
(14%)
(3%)
57
51
14
7
14
(100%)
(25%)
(36%)
(39%)
(67%)
(19-55)
(48-177)
(39%)
(35%)
(8%)
(5%)
(8%)
42 (58%)
28 (39%)
2 (3%)
32 (70%)
14 (30%)
0 (0%)
19 (66%)
9 (31%)
1 (3%)
93 (63%)
51 (35%)
3 (2%)
4 (6%)
67 (93%)
6 (13%)
37 (80%)
2 (7%)
25 (86%)
12 (8%)
129 (88%)
9 (13%)
63 (88%)
3 (7%)
43 (93%)
4 (14%)
25 (86%)
16 (11%)
131 (89%)
32 (44%)
40 (56%)
19 (41%)
27 (59%)
11 (38%)
18 (62%)
62 (42%)
85 (58%)
27
45
11
5.1
11.8
(38%)
(63%)
(4-160)
(4.4)
(6.6)
14
32
16
5.7
11.7
(30%)
(70%)
(5-147)
(4.0)
(7.0)
11
18
12
6.1
9.0
(38%)
(62%)
(6-79)
(7.5)
(4.9)
52
95
12
5.5
11.2
(35%)
(65%)
(4-160)
(5.0)
(6.5)
BMI indicates body mass index; PIF, primary induction failure; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; CMV, cytomegalovirus; TNC, total nucleated cells.
Table 2
Multivariable Analysis of the Effect of Weight on OS and Relapse
Factor
BMI
72
46
29
25 (19-28)
29 (24-42)
36 (30-55)
TBW
TBW
IBW .5 (TBWIBW)
1.00
.92 (.47-1.80)
.75 (.35-1.64)
P Value
P Value
.80
.48
1.00
.70 (.35-1.37)
.41 (.16-1.07)
.29
.07