Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Nb
= 0759530
Designation: G 4 - 95
0 5 5 5 7 4 85 b 9
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS
1916 Race St Philadelphia, Pa 19103
Reprinted fromthe Annual Book of ASTM Standards.CopyrightASTM
If not listed inthe current combined index, will appear in
the next edition
1. Scope
1,l This guide covers procedures for conducting corrosion
coupon tests in plantequipment under operating conditions
to evaluate the corrosive attack upon engineering materials.
It does not cover electrochemical methods for determining
corrosion rates.
1.1.1 While intended primarily for immersion tests, general guidelines provided can be applicable for exposure of
test coupons in plant atmospheres, provided that placement
and orientation of the coupons isnon-restrictive to air
circulation.
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associatedwith its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
A S T M G4 9 5 I0759530 0 5 5 5 7 4 7 4 T 5
@')
G4
A S T M G4 7057 5 9 5 3005 5 5 7 5 0
117 W
em G 4
blasts with glass beads. This is one of the most economical
waysof
preparingcoupons.Manufacturingvariablesin
coupon preparation that can be removed reasonably should
be eliminated, A standard surfacefinishfacilitates
the
comparison of results among test samples.
7.2 Some of the available finishes are:
7.2.1
Mill
finish
(pickled,
bright
annealed,
or
shot
blasted),
7.2.2Electrolyticpolished,
(Note that electrolyticpolishing can produce a surface layer enriched in some alloying
elements while depletedin others. For example, chromium is
enriched on stainless surfacesand sulfur is depleted.)
7.2.3 Blasted with sand or steel shot, (Note that blasting
many metals with sand can cause embedded sand particles
and steel shot can cause surface contamination with iron or
iron oxide. Glass beads are better, but not if broken pieces
are allowed to be used in the blasting.)
7.2.4 Sanded with abrasive cloth or paper,
7.2.5 Machine finished, and
7.2.6 Passivation with nitric acid to remove surface iron
contamination and other chemical cleaning methods used,
for example, after welding.
7.3 The surface finish most widely used is produced
by
sanding with an abrasive cloth or paper, Sanding removes
the millscale and oxides as well as other defects in the
that canproduce
materialsuch as scratches,pits,etc.,
misleading results when the data are being analyzed.
7.3.1 A 120gritfinish
is generallyacceptable and is
for specialized equip
readilyproducedwithouttheneed
ment. Other surface finishes may be obtained through
the
appropriate useof abrasivepapersandcloth.In
order to
7. Preparation of Test Specimens
prevent metallurgical changesthat could affect the corrosion
7.1 Controversy existsas to whether the test couponedges
resistance, the test sample should be cooled during fabricashould be machined. The cold-workedareacaused
by
tion. Wet sanding is one method of preventing specimens
shearing or punching coupons can provide valuableinfonnato begin
tion on alloy susceptibilityto stress corrosion cracking. Also, fromheatingup.Inmanycases,itisnecessary
sanding
with
coarse
abrasives
and
progressively
move
to
the ability to compare information among coupons of
finer abrasives.
different materials can be affected by the amount of cold
7.3.2Cleanpolishingbeltsshouldbeusedtoavoid
work performed on the material. Therefore, the decision to
contamination
of the metal surface, particularlywhen widely
machine test coupons and to test coupons with/without the
dissimilar metalsare being finished. For example, a belt
used
residual stresses associated with cold work should be made
to sand brass should notbe used to sand aluminum. Particles
on a case-to-Case basis.
of one metal could become imbeddedin the other, resulting
7.1,l The depth of coldworkassociatedwithpunching
in erroneous data.
and shearing operations typically extends back fromthe cut
7.4 Test specimens should be cleanedand the initial mass
edge to a distance equal to
the coupon thickness. Removal of
determined (see Practice G 1).
the coldworkedareas can be performed by grinding or
7.5 A pre-exposure inspection of test specimens should be
careful machiningthe coupon edges.
conducted
in order to identify
any
pits,
mechanical
7.1.2 Ideally, the surface finish of the test coupon should
be identical withthe surface finish ofthe material to be used scratches, or residual surface treatment artifacts that could
influence the corrosion behaviorof the specimen.
for equipment fabrication. However, this isoftendifficult
because the finish on materials varies between mills, between
sheet and plate and even between heat treatments. The mill
8. Number of Test Specimens
scale and the amount of oxides on the surface can vary as
8.1In general, at least duplicate specimensshouldbe
well. Also, surface finishesare difficult to apply to edgesthat
tested. If possible, in cases in which confidence limits are
havebeen distorted by punching or shearing.Since the
required for corrosion rate measurement,
then somewhere
primary requirement is usually to determine the corrosion
resistance ofthe material itself, a clean metal surface is most between 5 and 10 replicates should berun, depending on the
scopeof the program. The confidence levelcanbe estaboftenused. The purpose of the testdictatestherequired
lished by the procedures shown in Guide G 16. The duplifinishof
the coupon. For instance,forwater
treating
catesamplesshould bewidely separatedonthetestrack
applications,relativechanges ofweightsof
coupons are
rather than adjacent to one another. The resultsfor the
usuallycompared
to optimize inhibitor additions. The
samples should also be reported separately.
coupon are generally punched or sheared and finished by
3
COPYRIGHT American Society for Testing and Materials
Licensed by Information Handling Services
ASTM G 4 95
0 7 5 9 5 1 0 0 5 5 5 7 5 3 053
45111
9. Identification of Test Specimens
9.1 Although it may be necessary in special instances to
notch the edgeof the specimensforidentification, it is
preferable that they be stamped with a code number. The
stamped number has an additional advantage in that, should
a specimen show a preferential attack at the stamped area, a
warning is giventhat the material is susceptible to corrosion
whencoldworked.Itis
also possible in some instances to
detect stress-corrosion crackingemanating from the stamped
areas.Note,however, that although the presenceofsuch
localized attacks is a positive indication, absence of attack is
not a guarantee of immunity from attack in operating
equipment.
G4
4
COPYRIGHT American Society for Testing and Materials
Licensed by Information Handling Services
A S T M 64
End Plate
82-102mm
(3 1/4"-4")
-I
&;;
L
10.5 Selection of theprocesslocation is critical to obtaining meaningful data. The three basic process locations
are (see Fig. 4): ( I ) immersed stagnant, for example,the boot
of the filterwheredeaeratedconditions,solidsettlements
prevail, (2) immersed flowing, for example, in piping where
aeration, gas andsolids entrainment, and turbulence or
velocityexerteffects, (3) splash,waterline, or liquidlevel
where the conditions simulate partial immersion or spray.
When calculating corrosion rates,
the test time is not reduced
to compensate for partial immersion conditions.
ASTM G4 95
m 0759510
0555753 926
G4
A. For Unused
Nozzle
E. For Pipe
Lines or Nozzles
in Use
This plate m a y be
d o t t e d or othenrise
perforated to permit
flow in ipc lines or
nozzles %
use.l
(See options below)
nI 1
u
FIG. 3 Pipe Insertion Rack
rod
YATERUL:
Malerlml Rmnlrtanl
Envlormmnt.
AIIJ
to Corroslv.
FIG. 4
= 0 7 5 9 5 1 00 5 5 5 7 5 57 T 7
~
ASTM G4 7 5
~~
(l!# G 4
surface is indicative of the pitting tendency of the environment on the boldly exposed surfaces of
the specific alloyand
specimens to be evaluated.
17.4 In the case of pitting of the specimen, the mass loss is
of littlevalue and the studyofthe
number, size, and
distribution of the pits will be of much more importance.
Sometimes pitting is initiated but is self-healing and stops.
(Additional information is provided in Practice G 46.)
17.5 If an alloy is known to be susceptible to localized
as the phenomenon of
corrosion on amicroscale,such
intergranular corrosion in stainless steel, dezincification in
brass, or stress-corrosion cracking of anykind, the specimen
should be bent after the previously outlined examination is
completed, and any cracks
that develop on the surface noted.
Use caution when bending materials susceptibleto hydrogen
embrittlement. The results should be compared with those
obtained on similar bend tests
on unexposed specimens from
the samelot
of material.Metallographic
examination
(Practice E 3) is also a useful means of characterizing these
phenomena.
17.6 The behavior of the coupons in galvanic couples can
be compared withthat of corresponding insulated specimens
exposed at the same time, and any galvanic effects can be
observed. In a galvanic couple,the corrosion on one coupon
willbe accelerated while the other willbe decelerated. As
mentionedearlier,suchtests
are onlyqualitative, as the
extent of the galvanic corrosion is influenced by the area
ratiobetween the anodic and cathodic members of the
galvanic couple, the relative potential difference between
the
dissimilar metals, and the solution conductivity. The results
will apply directly only to assemblies in which the ratio of
areas used in making the tests is similar to the ratio of areas
anticipated in the fabricated assembly.
18. Localized Corrosion
18.1Metalsoftenperformdifferently
in aeratedversus
nonaerated environments, depending on howstronglyoxygen reduction (cathodic depolarization) controls the cathodic reaction. The presenceof other oxidizers,such as
femc or cupric ions, also can have an effect. Other factors
that canaffectcrevicecorrosionbehaviorinclude,for
example, crevice former material and size, the resulting gap
produced by tightening, and the area ratio of the shield to
exposed surfaces. Some variables influence the initiation of
attack while others mayimpact both initiation and propagation.Inprocess
equipment containing crevices,suchas
under gaskets or scale deposits, variable corrosion behavior
may occur.
18.2 Severaltypesofcrevicecorrosionspacerscanbe
substitutedfor the normal flatwasher to studycrevice
corrosion in more detail (see Guide G 78). Coupons should
be photographed to document thelocation and overall
affectedareaofcreviceattack.Although
the presence of
crevice corrosionon test coupons is a positiveindication, its
absence does not guarantee the immunity of equipment to
failure.
18.3 Pitting canoccur on an unshielded metal surface and
can lead to failure of equipment displaying a low general
corrosion rate. Pitting can occur in passive type materials
such as some grades of aluminum and stainless steel;it may
alsoaffectsomecopperbase
and nickelbasealloys. The
8
COPYRIGHT American Society for Testing and Materials
Licensed by Information Handling Services
21. Keywords
2 1.1 corrosive coupons; forms of corrosion; general corro20.1 The reproducibility of plant corrosion tests is depension rate; in-plant exposures; localized attack; specific size
dent on a number of factors, including the alloys tested,the
and surface conditions; testduration; test racks
variabilityof
the environment, and the nature of the
The American Society for Testing end Materials takes
no position respecting the validity
of any patent rights asserted in connection
with any item mentioned inthis standard. Usersof this standard are expressly advised that determination
of the validity of any such
patent rights, and the risk of Infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standerd is subjectto revision at any time
by the responsible technical committee and must
be reviewed every five years and
or withdrawn. Your commentsare invited either for revision
of this standard or for
additionalstandards
if not revised, either reapproved
and should be addressed to ASTM Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideratlon at a meeting of the responsible
technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your
views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, 7976 Race St., Philadelphia, PA 19103.