Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1.1
Background
INTRODUCTION
offices throughout the country. In each district there are maintenance sections
responsible for maintaining road segments. Each maintenance section is
assigned a total road distance of not less than 180 km, with a few exceptions.
More autonomy is now given to maintenance districts in the areas of planning,
programming, monitoring, personnel administration, financial activities,
procurement and equipment management.
1.2
Campbell-Allen (1987) observes that much can be learned from the majority of
failures that are non-catastrophic, in addition to the less common catastrophic
failures.
If learning is to be achieved, the information should be available to interested
parties, but this can be quite difficult to achieve in practice, due to difficulty
disseminating information, because of limitations in communications
technology and other factors.
Campbell-Allen (1987) has classed failures as either technical or procedural
failures, and the application of lessons learned from failures as either general
or specific.
General application may be in the form of changes to codes of practice,
industry norms or legislation. As mentioned, all of these have both advantages
and disadvantages, and should be carefully considered before carrying out
changes.
Specific application can be by correction of technical defects, due to reports on
similar structures. However, this may leave the structure vulnerable to other
deficiencies.
Campbell-Allen (1987) concludes that:
There is a need to ensure records of accidents/failures are published so they
are accessible to all engineers, and there must be a willingness to do this for it
to be successful.
He states that information of a forensic nature should be available, in the form
of case studies, reports on errors in methods or procedures, and the types of a
certain distress. He acknowledges that the motivation for this to occur must
come from within the industry and profession if it is to be successful.
The investigation is the process by which information is gathered to determine
the probable cause of failure.
Stresses producing minor defects are constantly working in all pavements. The
major types of pavements distresses in paved roads are cracks, disintegrations,
5
and slippery surfaces. Early detection and repair of minor defects is the most
important work done by maintenance crews up on detection of pavement
distress, a detailed investigation should be made to determine the kind of
repair or remedial measure needed repairs then should be made as quickly as
possible.
1.3
Research Questions
1.4 Objective
1.4.1 General objectives
The general objective of this research is to undertake investigation of the
causes of asphalt concrete pavement damages at Wolkitie Atat Junction
Asphalt Road and Atat Junction- Kossie gravel Roads, central Ethiopia.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
Road network is considered very vital in the economies of many nations,
especially the developing ones, like Ethiopia, that require(s) roads and
highways for transportation of most goods and services. However, construction
and maintenance of good road and highway networks in these parts of the
world (i.e., the developing countries) are often problematic, and have resulted to
economic setbacks. Causes of road failures in these areas include inadequacy
of construction materials and poor quality of construction.
Expansive soil is a term generally applied to any soil or rock material that has
a potential for shrinking or swelling under changing moisture conditions the
primary problem that arises with regard to expansive soil is that deformations
are significantly greater than elastic deformation and they cant be predicted by
classical elastic or plastic theory. Movement is usually in an uneven pattern
and of such a magnitude as to cause extensive damage to the structures and
pavements resting on them.
In Ethiopia there is no exact record for cost incurred for damage caused by
expansive soil. However, evidences showed that some structures constructed in
expansive soil areas are damaged. Damages are significantly high in road
construction and the country is spending billions of Birr for maintenance.
Reconnaissance: - is the first phase, it includes the use of maps, field or areal
observations, and local experience to locate potential problem areas. This
information is then used to define the scope of the preliminary investigation.
ii.
iii.
10
11
12
13
aggregate characteristics of the asphalt concrete mix, and the climate of the
site (i.e., the seasonal range and distribution of temperatures). 2,3
Considerable laboratory research into the fatigue life of asphalt concrete mixes
has been conducted. However, attempting to infer from such laboratory tests
how asphalt concrete mix properties influence asphalt pavement fatigue life
requires consideration of the mode of laboratory testing (constant stress or
constant strain) and the failure criterion used. Constant- stress testing
suggests that any asphalt cement property (e.g., lower penetration, higher
viscosity) or mix property which increases mix stiffness will increase fatigue
life. Constant-strain testing suggests the opposite: that less brittle mixes (e.g.,
higher penetrations, lower viscosities) exhibit longer fatigue lives. The
prevailing recommendations are that low-stiffness (low viscosity) asphalt
cements should be used for thin asphalt concrete layers (i.e., less than 5
inches), and that the fatigue life of such mixes should be evaluated using
constant-strain testing, while high- stiffness (high viscosity) asphalt cements
should be used for asphalt concrete layers 5 inches and thicker, and the
fatigue life of such mixes should be evaluated using constant-stress testing.3
In practice, however, it is not common to modify the mixture stiffness for
different asphalt concrete layer thicknesses.
ii.
Block cracking
14
15
iii.
17
18
19
20
Potholes- bowl shaped holes resulting from localized disintegration, due to too
little asphalt, tooth in asphalt surface, too many fine, too few fines, or poor
drainage. Potholes grow in size and depth as water accumulates in the hole and
penetrates into the base and subgrade, weakening support in the vicinity of the
ii)
pothole.
Raveling- Progressive loss of surface material by weathering and /or traffic
abrasion. Raveling and weathering occur as a result of loss of bond between
aggregates and the asphalt binder. This may occur due to hardening of the
asphalt cement, dust on the aggregate which interferes with asphalt adhesion,
localized areas of segregation in the asphalt concrete mix where fine aggregate
particles are lacking, or low in-place density of the mix due to inadequate
compaction. High air void contents are associated with more rapid aging and
increased likelihood of raveling.
22
by traffic loading, but are indicative of an unstable liquid asphalt mix (e.g.,
cutback or emulsion).
surface.
Xi:-Slippery Surfaces
Excess Asphalt (Bleeding)-excess asphalt or a film of asphalt on the pavement
surface, due to rich asphalt mixes or too heavy prime coat/tack coat
Polished Aggregates- aggregates on the surface of pavement worn smooth
under the abrasive action of traffic.
Xii: - Surface Treatment problems
23
Loss of Cover Aggregate Whipping off aggregate under traffic from a surface
treated pavement, leaving the asphalt. Several things can cause loss of cover
aggregates:
treatment.
2.3. Summary of Causes and Maintenance of Pavement Distresses
A. Bleeding:Description: - Localized accumulations of bitumen at road surface, making the
road appear black and shiny.
Probable Cause and Contributing Factors: Caused by excess asphalt in the surface layer and /or low air void content.
Insufficient or excess covering stone
Lack of proper rolling curing placement
Failure to protect a newly constructed surface from traffic until the asphalt
has cured sufficiently.
upward movement of excess bitumen in hot weather
Figure 2.16 Very marked continuous bleeding in
wheel tracks.
How to maintain:
Minor Bleeding can be corrected by applying coarse sand
or stone
screening asphalt up (secure) excess asphalt
Major Bleeding can be corrected by cutting off excess
asphalt with motor grade. If the surfacing is excessively
rough, resurfacing may be necessary.
B. Potholes: - Potholes most often result from wear or destruction of the
wearing course, sometimes from the presence of foreign bodies in the
surfacing.
They are small when they first appear. In the absence of maintenance, they
grow and reproduce in rows, often with a pitch equal to the circumference of a
truck type.
How to Measure:25
Measure the depth, count the number of potholes, and measure the diameter
of the pothole on a length of 100m.
Severity 1
Severity 2
Severity 3
How to maintain;
Top repair potholes take following actions:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Rate
1: If h is smaller than 2cm
2: If h is between 2 and 4cm
3: If h is larger than 4cm
Severity 1
Severity 2
Severity 3
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity
Rate
1: If h is smaller than 2cm / Localized subsidence of severity 1
2: If h is between 2 and 4cm / Ridge of severity 2
3: If h is larger than 4cm / Subsidence of severity 3
Severity 1
Severity 2
Severity 3
Rate
1: Single or clearly separated longitudinal cracks
2: Continues cracks, branched or clearly open
3: Extensive branched cracks or open cracks
28
Severity 1
Severity 2
Severity 3
Rate
1: If d is smaller than 2cm
2: If d is between 2 and 4cm
3: If d is larger than 4cm
Severity 1
Severity 2
29
Severity 3
Severity 1
Severity 2
Severity Rate
Severity 1: Single straight, sharp and thin transverse crack
Severity 2: Crack branching or double or multiple cracks without loss of
material
Severity 3: Crack open and branching or multiple open cracks with los of
material
How to maintain:
Visual assessing affected surface area.
I.
Severity Rate
Severity 1: Single straight, sharp and thin longitudinal crack
Severity 2: Crack branching or double or multiple cracks without loss of
material
Severity 3: Crack open and branching or multiple open cracks with loss of
material
Severity 1
Severity 2
Severity 3
K. Surface Loss
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity
Rate
1: If h is smaller
2: If h is between 2 and 4cm
3: If h is larger than 4cm
Severity 1
Severity 2
Severity 3
Lacy edge: this damage occurs in pavements in which the road base and
shoulders are of the same type, and is caused by the frequent stopping of
vehicles on the shoulders. The extent of the damage is more important than
its severity.
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity
Rate
1 Onset of lacy edges
2 Lace cutting more than 0.50 m into the pavement
3 Extreme erosion approaching destruction of the pavement
32
Severity 1
Severity 2
Severity 3
33
Rate
1 Erosion of ditch repairs limited to ditch
2 Erosion and rain-wash of shoulder
3 Threat to or destruction of a part of the pavement
construction depends upon the maximum use of local material. The prime
objective of the different tests in use is to know and to classify the pavement
materials into different groups depending upon their physical and strength or
stability characteristics.
Soil is very essential highway material because of:
a. Soil sub-grade is part of the pavement structure; further the design
and behavior of pavement especially the flexible pavements depend to
a great extent on the subgrade soil.
b. Soil is one of the principal materials of construction in soil
embankment and in stabilizing soil base and sub base courses.
35
Station
App
crack
Side
length
App
Width of
depth of
crack
(cm)
crack (cm)
Remak
2+000
12
RHS
10
30
7+000
43
LHS
41
14+000
60
RHS
16
20
1+000
23
RHS
13
45
15+000
14
LHS
16
27+000
RHS
36
After finishing the initial visual inspection and categorizing the conditions of
road into two, such as slightly and extremely damages. Subsequently, Ill select
the representative locations for sampling. Based on their failure conditions, six
test pits were selected which represent the two conditions. For each condition
three test pits were dug for laboratory testing as well as field tests. The
stations, locations and date of sampling of the six test pits are listed in Table
3.2.
Station
Side
Damage type
Data of
sampling
center line
Welkitie - Atat Junction Asphalt Road Project
1
2+000
RHS
3.0
Slightly damaged
08/08/07
7+000
LHS
3.0
Slightly damaged
08/08/07
36
14+000
RHS
2.5
1+000
RHS
2.5
15+000
LHS
3.0
27+000
RHS
2.5
05/08/07
3.2.2 Rep resent ative ph otog r aph s of fa ile d por tions on roads.
Figs 3.1 to 3.8 are representative photographs of the Welkitie Atat Junction
asphalt and Atat Junction-Kossie gravel roads. Figs 3.1 to 3.8 are
representative failed sections, which show the degree of failure of the road. As it
is seen clearly from the photographs the road is highly damaged and there are
cracks at the shoulder carriageway interface, inside the carriageway and also
along the centerline. In the newly rehabilitated sections of Welkitie Atat
Junction asphalt and Atat Junction-Kossie gravel road it is not difficult to find
different type of cracks presented in this paper especially in areas of expansive
natural subgrade soil.
F i g 3 . 1 S h o u l d e r c a r r i a g ew ay i n te r fa c e & e x t r e m e l y d a m a g e d
l o n g i t u d i n a l crack
37
38
Fig 3.5 Maintenance of Major transversal crack inside car riage way.
Fig 3.6 Maintenance of gravel road car riage way showing gullies.
Fig 3.7 Per iodic Maintenance of gravel road in addition to some new
alignments.
39
40
W = (Ww/Ws)*100 %
Other sources of error include: the time period used for drying the soil, the
sample size, and weighing errors.
There are many other methods available to determine a soils water content
such as the Microwave Oven Method, Direct Heating Method, and the Calcium
Carbide Gas Pressure Tester Method (field determination).
Water content is an important measurement in determining the bearing
capacity (shear strength) and the possible settlement (deformation under load)
of a soil.
Equipment:
An electronic scale.
Type of
Material
Sub-grade
Station
Location
Water
Content
Standard
Absorptio
n
2+000
Maremia
11.97
8.44
7+000
Gumire
10.82
7.71
14+000
Asp Plant
9.77
6.56
1+000
Atat Hos
11.63
8.18
15+000
Mazoria
11.06
7.82
27+000
Weira
10.92
7.32
Standard
Remark
Table 3.3 Values of Nor mal Water Content and Absor ption For
selected sites on subgrade soil.
3.3.1.2 Specific gravity test results
The specific gravity of a given material is defined as the ratio of the weight of a
given volume of the material to the weight of an equal volume of distilled water.
In soil mechanics, the specific gravity of soil solids (which is often referred to as
the specific gravity of soil) is an important parameter for calculation of the
weightvolume relationship. Thus specific gravity, Gs, is defined as
43
Table 3.4 Range of specifi c gravity test results for diff erent mater ials
Material type
Specific gravity
Base course
2.73 2.90
Sub base
2.20 - 2.58
2.40 - 2.67
optimum moisture content, the materials used as base course in all the three
cases have shown similar Procter test result values. The sub base course also
has similar values in all the three cases. For extremely damaged road section,
the selected material has relatively higher value of optimum moisture content
than the others.
Table 3.5 Values of proctor test for Sub-grade soil
Type of
Material
Sieve
Location
Sub-grade
27+00
0
14+000
1+000
Maremia
7+000
Gumir
e
Asp Plant
Atat Hos
15+000
Mazori
a
0ptimum
moisture
content
59.070
37.710
9.890
20.000
39.665
9.550
Maximu
m dry
density
(gm/cc)
1.048
1.387
1.947
1.264
1.407
1.593
Size
Standar
d
2+000
Remarks
Weira
Table 3.6 Values of proctor test for sub-base and capping soil
Sub-Base
Sieve Size
Asphalt
0ptimum
moisture
content
Maximum
dry
density
(gm/cc)
Standard
Gravel
Capping
Standard
Asphalt
10.500
15.150
11.800
2.010
1.650
1.945
Remarks
Standard
plastic state. With further reduction of moisture, the soil passes into a
semisolid, and then into a solid state. The moisture content (as a percentage)
at which the cohesive soil passes from a liquid state to a plastic state is called
the liquid limit of the soil. Similarly, the moisture content (also as a percentage)
at which the soil changes from a plastic to a semisolid state, and from a
semisolid state to a solid state, are referred as to the plastic limit and the
shrinkage limit, respectively (Fig. 3.11). These three limits are collectively
referred to as the Atterberg limits, named after Albert Atterberg, the scientist
who initially developed them in 1911.
number of blows (drops of the cup) were straight lines for all soils tested. He
called such plots flow curves and described them with the following equation.
w = - F log (N) + C
Where:
w = water content in percent
F = constant, called flow index
N = number of blows
C = constant
In this experiment, the Casagrande liquid limit device will be used to determine
the liquid limit of the soil sample. The liquid limit is found when 25 drops of
the liquid limit device are required to close the groove cut through the sample a
distance of 1/2 in. The plastic limit is found when the soil sample being rolled
breaks at 1/8 in diameter. The moisture content at these limits gives a
quantitative measure of these limits. The following equations for the mass,
liquid limit, plastic limit, moisture content, flow index and plasticity index will
be used in the determination of the Atterberg limits of the soil sample, and to
further classify the soil type.
47
Table 3.7 Char t for values of Specifi c Gravity For selected sites
Type of
Material
Sub-grade
Station
2+000
7+000
Location
Maremia
Gumire
Liquid
Limits
106.41
64.71
Standard
Plastic
Limits
40.80
29.55
48
Standard
Plastic
Index
65.61
35.16
Standard
Remark
Capping
Sub-base
14+000
Asp Plant
61.27
31.05
30.22
1+000
Atat Hos
99.94
49.40
50.54
15+000
Mazoria
97.90
56.92
40.98
27+000
Weira
76.49
65.85
10.64
2+000
Maremia
7+000
Gumire
31.16
16.2
14.96
14+000
Asp Plant
1+000
Atat Hos
15+000
Mazoria
27+000
Weira
2+000
Maremia
7+000
Gumire
36.39
26.9
9.49
14+000
Asp Plant
1+000
Atat Hos
15+000
Mazoria
27+000
Weira
41.98
30.1
11.88
takes for sand grains between 0.075mm 4.0mm and for gravel greater than
4.75mm. For this thesis work AASTHO is followed.
The Unified Soil Classification System uses Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) and
Coefficient of Concavity (Cc) as a classification criterion for coarse-grained
soils. Based on the gradation test results found the base course materials for
all the three conditions have the value of Cc ranging between 1 to 3 and Cu is
greater than 4. According to the unified soil classification criteria the base
course materials are well-graded gravel with little fines.
The sub-base materials according to the unified soil classification criteria are
well-graded gravelly sands with Cu greater than 6 and Cc is ranging between 1
to 3. The selected materials show similar Cc and Cu values as that of sub base
material for all cases.
Sieve
Size
Type of
Material
Sub-grade
Remarks
Location
2+000
7+000
14+000
1+000
15+000
27+000
Standard
Maremia
Gumire
Asp Plant
Atat Hos
Mazoria
Weira
4.750
78.676
76.403
76.759
79.096
76.410
80.260
2.800
63.324
65.316
66.098
64.038
65.151
69.942
2.000
40.954
54.606
55.768
41.946
54.770
59.175
1.180
33.345
50.524
51.027
33.805
50.361
52.343
1.000
31.352
49.013
49.791
31.620
48.817
50.627
50
0.500
13.485
34.162
37.579
13.620
34.283
38.595
0.150
3.061
13.356
15.711
3.616
13.907
16.502
0.075
0.035
3
0.025
6
0.016
8
0.010
0
0.007
2
0.005
1
0.003
7
0.002
7
0.001
9
0.001
3
0.001
1
1.441
6.599
7.568
1.815
7.092
8.282
15.777
19.209
18.571
15.354
18.725
21.314
14.343
17.074
16.429
13.958
14.404
19.182
13.626
13.517
14.286
13.261
13.684
17.051
12.191
12.094
13.571
11.865
12.243
15.630
11.474
10.671
12.143
11.167
10.803
13.499
10.757
9.249
10.714
10.469
10.083
12.078
10.040
5.691
9.286
9.771
8.642
9.946
9.323
3.557
8.571
9.073
7.922
6.394
6.454
1.423
5.714
6.281
6.482
4.973
5.737
0.711
5.000
5.583
5.676
4.263
5.020
0.000
4.286
4.885
5.761
2.842
51
Asphalt
Road
Standard
Gravel Road
50.000
78.676
100.000
37.500
63.324
89.561
25.000
40.954
68.495
19.000
33.345
30.289
12.500
31.352
26.198
4.750
13.485
18.128
2.000
3.061
12.055
1.180
0.425
0.300
0.075
52
7.911
4.238
1.803
17.310
Standard
Remarks
Standard
Asphalt Road
37.500
100.000
20.000
91.988
9.500
64.823
5.000
39.661
2.360
21.621
0.425
3.877
0.075
1.279
53
Remarks
Station
Location
10 Blow
30 Blow
65 Blow
Average
2+000
CBR
7.392
9.727
11.905
9.675
Maremia
% Swell
3.643
3.557
3.505
3.568
7+000
CBR
5.447
12.450
15.952
11.283
% Swell
2.208
2.216
2.019
2.148
14+000
CBR
7.781
12.839
17.119
12.580
Asp Plant
% Swell
1.976
2.113
2.534
2.208
1+000
CBR
7.003
8.948
13.384
9.778
Atat Hos
% Swell
3.780
3.479
3.540
3.600
15+000
CBR
7.003
9.727
14.784
10.505
% Swell
2.131
2.139
1.718
1.996
CBR
21.787
43.575
51.356
38.906
% Swell
0.129
0.301
0.344
0.258
CBR
16.788
29.112
40.721
28.874
% Swell
0.266
0.473
0.859
0.533
Gumire
Sub-grade
Mazoria
27+000
Weira
Capping
Quary
Site
Sub-base
Quary
Site
CBR
58.759
109.169
150.667
106.199
% Swell
0.026
0.034
0.043
0.034
CBR
32.318
43.668
45.200
40.395
% Swell
0.077
0.137
0.163
0.126
54
Type of
Soil
Remark
3.3.1.7 Permeability
The phenomenon of permeability in soils is an important soil property that is
considered when planning and designing geotechnical projects. To illustrate the
importance of permeability in geotechnical design and in civil engineering in
general, consider the following applications where knowledge of permeability is
required:
Soils are permeable (water may flow through them) because they consist
not only of solid particles, but a network of interconnected pores. The
degree to which soils are permeable depends upon a number of factors,
such as soil type, grain size distribution and soil history. This degree of
permeability is characterized by the coefficient of permeability.
Table 3.12 Values of Per meability for Sub-grade section
Type of Material
Sub-grade
Station
Location
Permability
OMC
MDD
2+000
Maremia
0.008
59.070
1.048
7+000
Gumire
0.040
37.710
1.387
14+000
Asp Plant
0.009
9.890
1.947
1+000
Atat Hos
0.953
20.000
1.264
15+000
Mazoria
0.014
39.665
1.407
27+000
Weira
0.004
9.550
1.593
55
Remark
Type of Material
Sub-grade
Station
Location
2+000
Maremia
61.685
7+000
Gumire
23.611
14+000
Asp Plant
59.881
1+000
Atat Hos
61.250
15+000
Mazoria
44.652
27+000
Weira
17.992
56
Color of Soil
Remark
Sub-grade
Station
Location
2+000
7+000
Normal Stress
100
200
300
Maremia
14.778
17.500
22.361
Gumire
16.431
18.278
22.944
14+000
Asp Plant
15.361
18.083
22.458
1+000
Atat Hos
13.844
16.816
23.528
15+000
Mazoria
15.680
17.946
26.947
27+000
Weira
33.644
59.781
74.429
57
Remark
Maximum shear
stress, kPa
Type of Material
Abrasion
Base Course
21 %
Material type
ACV
Base Course
21 %
Flakiness Index
Base Course
12%
59
Soundness Test
Base Course
7.73 %
60
Properties that can be found from the test include the rutting profile, rutting
rate and final rut depth. This test simulates the actual traffic-loading situation
where wheels run across the pavement, and therefore could be expected to give
a good indication of the expected rutting behavior under traffic.
In addition, the influence of the moisture content or degree of saturation on the
performance of the material could be examined by testing the material at
varying degrees, and comparing the results. It should be noted however, that
like any empirical test, it is difficult to use the values for anything outside the
particular test, and a range of typical values are required to enable the test
results to be used correctly.
Other tests used for asphalt include those for the measurement of sensitivity to
water, susceptibility to abrasion loss, binder content, aggregate grading,
compacted relative density, and air voids calculations. Generally, the grading
and density tests are similar to those for soils and aggregates, while taking
account of the different materials being tested.
The dry density (and also moisture content) of an in-situ soil may be
measured using the sand replacement, water balloon or nuclear gauge
methods. The dry density is calculated from the bulk density of the sample
using the moisture content.
Samples of the material may be taken and tested at a standard compactive
effort and varying moisture contents. The relationship between dry density
and moisture content is usually similar to that shown in the Figure 3.17.
Once this testing is complete, the optimum moisture content (OMC) and
maximum dry density (MDD) can be found. The relative density of the
measured in-situ dry density can be found by comparing it to maximum dry
density found from the testing. Low relative density may indicate poor
compaction.
For a cohesion less material, the procedure is different, with the in-situ
density of the material being compared to the minimum and maximum dry
densities, allowing the density index to be calculated.
Other tests may be used to measure the particle density of the soil or
aggregate. This density is that of the particles, and does not include
moisture or air voids.
A Nuclear Gauge.
A Sand Cone Apparatus
62
This section lists important possible failure causes for each failure type,
shown as below. Considering these may reveal what the probable cause(s) of
failure was. Possible sources of the information are listed as required
64
o
o
o
to rise of binder
o Embedment of surface aggregate, due to weakness of
base layer below
o Lack of proper rolling during placement
o Failure to protect newly constructed surface from
o
o
o
o
o
/strength/crushing
Spread rate and uniformity
Construction personnel
Visual inspection of poor spreading
Mix design of asphalt
Visual inspection of over-filled voids
Voids content
65
layers
Wetting or drying action beneath shoulder surface
caused by trapped water standing and seeping through
o Transverse Cracking
- The result of reflection cracking
- Stresses induced by low-temperature contraction of the
pavement, especially if the asphalt is hard and brittle
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
traffic
Non-uniform compaction of the surfacing or base during
construction
on the pavement
Porous or open surface
Clogged side ditches
shoulder surface)
Weak base
68
material
Poor bond between pavement layers
Lack of containment of pavement edge
Inadequate pavement thickness overstressing the
subgrade
Excessive moisture
Contamination caused by oil spillage
Lack of curing time between placing seal treatments
A mixture that is too rich in asphalt
Asphalt has too much fine aggregate
Asphalt has too much aggregate that is rounded or
smooth-textured
Asphalt cement is too soft
Asphalt grading
Hardness of asphalt
Asphalt, high temperatures
aggregate
Degradation of binder through ageing or traffic damage,
under traffic
Excessively open-graded asphalt mix
Insufficient blending of binder before spraying
Poor mix design
Aggregate segregation
Lack of compaction of surface during construction
Aggregate size incompatible with that of previous seal
Fracturing of aggregate
A dry brittle surface
Patching beyond base material
Construction during wet or cold weather
Patching work
Visual inspection: non-uniformity of stripping
Construction Records & personnel
surface distress.
Many recent patches indicating an ongoing problem
71
Test
Specification
Cleanliness
Sedimentation or
decantation
Particle shape
Flakiness index
Strength values
(ACV)
Aggregate crashing
value
< 1 0 p e r c e n t fi n e
va l u e s fo r weaker
aggregates
Strength values
Aggregate impact
value
<25 percent
Strength values
<30percent(wearing
course)
Strength values
Polishing (wearing
Aggregate abrasion
value (AAV)
<35percent(other)
<15 percent
<12 percent (very heavy
traffic)
Not less than 50-75
course only)
Polished stone
value
Durability
Sodium test
<12percent
Durability
Magnesium test
<18 percent
Water
Absorption
Bitumen
affi nity
Water absorption
<2percent
Coating and
stripping
>95 percent
72
depending on location
non-stripped
area aggregate
Test
Specification
Sedimentation or
decantation
Wearing course:
<8% for sa nd fi ne s
<17% for crushed rock fines
Sand
equivalent
Material passing
Traffic
4 . 7 5 mm sieve)
Light (<T3)
M ediu m
/heavy
Plasticity
Index
Durability
Wear ing
course
>35%
Base
course
>40%
>40%
>50%
<4 percent
0.425 mm sieve
Soundness
test
(5 cycles)
Magnesium
<20%
Sodium
<15%
73
Table 4.3 Gradation and other requirements for the base course
based on the specifi cation of Welkitie Atat Junction asphalt road
rehabilitation project.
Sieve size (mm)
100
100
50
60-80
20
40-60
25-40
15-30
0.42
7-19
0.075
5-12
OTHER REQIREMENTS
Los Angeles < 35
PI = 0
74
100
100
50
70-100
20
50-90
25-70
18-50
0.42
15-40
0.075
8-25
OTHER REQIREMENTS
PI <15
75
76
season. 0n the other hand, in areas of good drainage, even if the sub- grade
has a potential to swell, any kind of failure is not seen.
77
5.
C0NCLUSI0NS AND REC0MMENDATI0NS
5. 1 Conclusions
From the findings of the field and laboratory test results the following
conclusions are drawn
a) The methodology developed in this project has been based on similar
work previously conducted in various locations. It was found that the
method was good as a general guide, particularly for people
inexperienced in the area of pavements and road engineering.
b) The study showed that for most pavement failures it is necessary to carry
out some form of materials sampling and testing, if conclusive evidence
regarding the failure cause is to be found. Otherwise, interpretation of
the limited data available can be difficult, or even impossible.
c) The laboratory test results found during investigation proved that the
pavement materials used for the construction of the road under
investigation are as per the specification, and fulfill all the requirements.
d) The causes of failure investigation methodology developed in this project
can serve as a useful guide for the investigation of pavement failures.
The method, combined with the experience of the investigator and
adequate materials investigation, will help to ensure that the cause of a
pavement failure can be reliably determined.
e) The field test results observed during the field investigation showed that
the dry density values of the pavement layers are less than the values
stipulated in the specification. The CBR values found related to the field
dry density for base course are less for slightly damaged road sections
and extremely damaged road sections.
f) In areas of extremely damaged road sections the moisture content for
sub base and selected materials are much higher than the moisture
content in non-affected areas (Intact).
g) 0ne of the reasons for low field dry density is the expansive soil under
the pavement. The swelling and shrinking of this soil loosen the
pavement materials especially in areas of big cracks.
h) The swelling potential and swelling pressure of the natural subgrade
soils are high enough to create problems on the pavement when there is
water at the toe of the road shoulder.
78
80
12)
Kentucky, 1993.
13) Smith B. Richard, Forensic Investigation of Pavement Failures,
October 2004.
14) AACRA Design Manual, February 2003.
81