Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. Introduction
Round
Zone
Location
1
2
All
All (excluding
TK)
Triton Knoll
Moray firth
Firth of Forth
Dogger Bank
Hornsea
Various
Various
Abstract
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Norfolk
Southern
array
West IoW
SE Lincs
NE Scotland
E. Fife
NE England
Humber
Estuary
E. Norfolk
SW Sussex
Capacity
(GW)
~1*
5.8*
Distance
to Shore
<10 km
<30 km
1.2
1.3
3.5
9
4
32 km
28 km
50 km
160 km
~95 km
7.2
0.6
54 km
20 km
Isle
of 0.9
21 km
Wight
3
Atlantic Array Bristol
1.5
24 km
Channel
3
Irish Sea
Irish Sea
4.2
15 km
*Extensions have recently been awarded to some Round 1 and 2
wind farms providing a further 2GW of capacity
GIL
400kV AC
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
Year
6. Next Steps
The analysis presented in this paper has shown that it may be
cost effective to adopt higher capacity connection designs for
offshore wind farms, once the technology capability exists,
than will be allowed under the proposed revised SQSS
planning limits. This could therefore provide an OFTO
responsible for operating the connection assets for a given
offshore wind farm or developments an alternative connection
design that may be more financially attractive.
Further work is however required to fully assess the financial
implications and conclusions found to date against a range of
economic and technology variables, including: cost of energy;
equipment capital costs; reserve generation costs; background
generation scenarios; OFTO rate of return, etc. This will
provide a much clearer picture of the extent and limitations of
the financial savings that could potentially result from higher
capacity offshore wind farm connection designs.
7. Conclusions
The review of transmission connection technologies presented
in this paper has shown that the technology capability for
offshore wind farm connections will progress to capacities
beyond the maximum limit outlined in the existing NETS
SQSS, and beyond the proposed revised SQSS limits. Our
preliminary analysis has shown that to design offshore
connections for the future Round 3 wind farms based on the
current SQSS limits would require much greater initial capital
costs than utilising the technologies which are under
development and expected to become available over the next
ten years, such as 2000 MW VSCs and HVDC cables.
This paper has shown how the additional reserve
requirements normally associated with increasing the infeed
loss limits may be relatively small in comparison with the
capital cost savings associated with higher capacity
connection designs, if consideration is given to the
intermittent nature of offshore wind generation. To fully
assess the impact of increasing the limits defined in the
SQSS, further studies would need to be carried out to
determine in more detail the financial and technological
impacts of carrying the reserve.
Other potential options also exist which have not been
covered by this paper such as the use of Smart Metering to
monitor generation output and match demand accordingly.
This would mean it would be possible to shed non-critical
demand for short periods or even to use battery charging
systems for electric vehicles as a source to provide response
to the frequency drop.
References
[1] European Parliament and the Council of the European
Union Directive 2008/28/EC on the promotion of the
use of energy from renewable sources, (2009).
[2] Dept. of Energy and Climate Change UK Renewable
Energy Strategy, (2009).
[3] The Crown Estates, Round 3 Offshore Wind Farms
Table
[4] SQSS Review Group Review of Requited Boundary
Transfer Capability with Significant Volumes of
Intermittent Generation, pp. 43 44, (2010).
[5] Imperial College London, Dept of Energy and Climate
Change The Impact of Intermittent Generation on
Transmission Network Investment, pp.78 82, (2009).
[6] SQSS Review Group, Amendment Report: SQSS
Review Request GSR007 Review of Infeed Loss
Limits, (2009).
[7] H. Brakelmann, K. Burges. Transmission technologies
for collective offshore wind farm connecions, European
Wind Energy Conference, (2007).
[8] European Commission Trans European Energy Network
(TEN-E) Project, North Sea Network Using GIL
Technology.
[9] Siemens Power Transmission and Distribution Leaflet
Gas-Insulated Transmission Line (GIL), (2010)