Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
O p e n i n g
E n c y c l o p e d i a
2 0 1 6
In chess, braving the gap often leads to disaster after a few moves. We should be able to avoid things going so far. The
ChessBase Opening Encyclopaedia offers you an effective remedy against all sorts of semi-digested knowledge and a means
of building up a comprehensive and powerful repertoire.
More...
Final round
The action started with Evgeny Bareev against Fabiano Caruana (photo by E. Kublashvili)
The team was bolstered by the arrival of former Russian GM Evgeny Bareev, who played first board, and while it was not he who had done the
heavy scoring to reach this point, he took on all the biggest guns of rival teams and was a stalwart rock on board one, playing all eleven rounds.
His challenge now was to find a way to hold Fabiano Caruana.
Fabiano was everything one could hope for in the US team. He did more than just neutralize the top boards of rival teams, such as Magnus Carlsen
no less, he scored crucial points when needed the most. The last round was just such an instance as he defeated Bareev in the quickest game of
the match.
Anton Kovalyov was one of Canada's stars, a word that fully applies (photo by Paul Truong)
Board two was 24-year-old Anton Kovalyov, who has already made waves in Baku before, when he somehow survived not one, but two elite
matches in the World Cup. In fact, he had been so shocked, he had been forced to change his flight arrangements as he had booked a flight home
the day of the first round, expecting to be eliminated just as soon. Now, in the Olympiad, the young talent enjoyed a rush of form that was hard to
believe, and finished on 8.0/10 with a 2852 performance.
Hikaru Nakamura was a true soldier and played all eleven rounds (photo by David Llada)
Playing for the US was Hikaru Nakamura, also scoring when needed, but who had suffered a minor setback in round ten, when ill, he lost to
Georgian GM Mchedlishvili. Hikaru did not back down, and played all eleven rounds, and opted to keep it simple and contain Kovalyov and drew.
Board three for Canada was 40-year-old GM Alexandre Lesiege, rated 2512, and who also did his duty and then some with a 2585 performance,
but his opponent was a sizzling hot Wesley So.
Wesley had recently won the elite Sinquefield Cup, and brought all that confidence and form to the
Olympiad and more. He soundly defeated Lesiege, scoring 8.5/10 in total with a 2896 performance
as well as a gold medal for board three. (photo by David Llada)
Wesley So - Alexandre Lesiege (annotated by GM Elshan Moradiabadi)
[Event "42nd Olympiad Baku 2016 Open"] [Site "Baku"] [Date "2016.09.13"] [Round "11.3"] [White "So, Wesley"] [Black "Lesiege, Alexandre"]
[Result "1-0"] [ECO "B13"] [WhiteElo "2782"] [BlackElo "2512"] [Annotator "Elshan Moradiabadi"] [PlyCount "71"] [EventDate "2016.??.??"]
[EventCountry "AZE"] [SourceTitle "playchess.com"] [Source "ChessBase"] [WhiteTeam "United States"] [BlackTeam "Canada"]
[WhiteTeamCountry "USA"] [BlackTeamCountry "CAN"] [TimeControl "40/5400+30:1800+30"] {The USA team arrived at the last round of the
2016 Chess Olympiad as the leader, edging Ukraine thanks to their better tie-break. In this crucial final round, we watched a North American
derby between the US and the surprisingly strong Canadian team. With Kovalyov and Hansen scoring in every other game, the Canadians reached
4th place after the penultimate round. Being ahead just by a whisker in tie-break, a victory in this match was direly needed by the US squad. With
the team's "big three" guns culminating victories one after other, we just had to sit and wait for one of them to score. This time, it was Caruana
and So who delivered the victory. So's victory came in a topsy-turvy game.} 1. c4 { (00:00) Wesley So is not trying to get into an opening debate
and he opts for an "English".} c5 {(00:56)} 2. Nf3 {(00:00)} Nc6 {(01:52)} 3. Nc3 {(00:17)} g6 $6 {(03:00) There is nothing wrong with this
move. However, Black usually does not combine it with Nc6 due to White's next move.} 4. e3 $1 {(00:10) Now the game enters a form of "Panov
attack", in the Caro-Kann defense!} Nf6 {(00:07)} 5. d4 {(00:04)} cxd4 {(00:04)} 6. exd4 {(00:03)} d5 {(00:20)} 7. Bg5 {(00:13)} (7. cxd5
Nxd5 8. Qb3 Nxc3 9. Bc4 Nd5 10. Bxd5 e6 11. Bxc6+ bxc6 12. O-O {is one of the most popular ways to play this opening. Wesley goes for more
complications to keep the game more unbalanced and more difficult for his 'out of retirement' GM opponent.}) 7... Be6 {(00:36)} 8. Bxf6
{(00:49)} exf6 {(00:05)} 9. h3 $146 {(00:04) I could not believe my eyes but this move is a novelty according to the ChessBase Online
database. White players had almost exclusively played c4-c5 in this position} (9. c5 Bg7 10. Bb5 O-O 11. O-O g5 12. Ne2 a6 13. Bxc6 bxc6 14.
Ng3 a5 15. h3 Rb8 16. b3 Rb4 17. Ne1 Rb7 18. Nc2 Qc7 19. Qd2 Ra8 20. Nh5 Bf5 21. Ne3 Bg6 22. Ng3 Qf4 23. Ne2 Qe4 24. Nc3 Qh4 25. Rad1
f5 26. f4 gxf4 27. Nc2 Bh6 28. Qf2 Qg5 29. Rde1 Bh5 30. Kh1 Kh8 31. Ne2 f3 32. gxf3 f4 33. Kh2 Re7 34. Ng1 Bg6 35. h4 Qg3+ 36. Qxg3 fxg3+
{1/2-1/2 (36) Rakhmanov,A (2641)-Alekseev,E (2636) St Petersburg 2016}) 9... Bb4 {(05:40)} 10. c5 { (00:06)} O-O {(03:04)} (10... Qa5 11.
Qd2 O-O 12. Be2 b6 {Looks very promising for Black.}) 11. Rc1 {( 05:05)} b6 $6 {(26:03) This is a bit risky.} (11... Qd7 12. Be2 Ba5 $5 13. O-O
Bc7 {Looks interesting.}) 12. Bb5 {(08:52) White completes his development by winning a crucial tempo.} Na5 {(14:13)} 13. a3 { (03:05)}
Bxc3+ {(00:17)} 14. Rxc3 {(00:02)} Nc4 {(07:42)} 15. b4 {(00:06)} a5 { (06:29)} (15... a6 16. Ba4 (16. Bxc4 dxc4 {and then Black plays b5f5 and Bd5 and White has nothing there.}) 16... a5 {this looks more promising than the game.}) 16. O-O {( 00:08)} axb4 {(00:35)} 17. axb4
{(00:16) The position has already become too critical for Black.} Qb8 {(05:55)} (17... Ra2 18. Qc1 Qb8 { looks better because.} 19. Bxc4 dxc4
20. Nd2 Rd8 {and unlike in the game the pawn on d4 is hanging in this line.}) 18. Bxc4 {(18:30)} dxc4 {(00:10)} 19. Nd2 {(00:02)} bxc5
{(02:47)} 20. bxc5 {(00:02) White's knight is heading to d6 and Black has to do something about it.} Qb4 {(06:13)} 21. Qf3 {(03:05)} Bd5 {
(08:22) A strong blockade but....} 22. Qxd5 $1 {(00:11) Wesley So has other things in mind.} Qxc3 {( 00:04)} 23. Ne4 {(00:01)} Qd3
{(00:22)} 24. Nxf6+ { (00:06)} Kh8 {(00:38)} 25. Nd7 {(00:07)} Rfe8 {(01:20)} 26. Ne5 {(01:01)} Qf5 $2 {(00:59) Up to this point Lesiege
has been resilient and resourceful, but this move throws away everything. A series of miraculous moves would have saved him.} (26... Qe2 27.
Nxf7+ Kg7 28. Ne5 Kh8 $3 {Only a machine would play like this!} 29. Rc1 (29. Qxc4 $4 Rxe5 $19) 29... Qd2 $1 30. Qxc4 Ra4 $1 31. Qf1 Qxd4
32. Nf3 Qf6 33. c6 Ra7 {And White has a good grip but he really cannot improve even though Black's weakened king offers potential 'time
pressure' blunders in a game like this with such a high outcome at stake.}) 27. Qxc4 {(00:03) White's two passers are just way too strong .} Kg7
{(00:31)} 28. Qc3 {(03:55)} Ra2 { (02:05)} 29. Nd3 $4 {(00:07) Did he just let the other rook to the second rank?!} Qf6 $4 {(00:51) Lesiege
returns the favor in time pressure.} (29... Ree2 30. d5+ f6 $1 {a move that is hard to see but forced.} 31. c6 Red2 $1 32. c7 Rac2 $1 {and Black
is winning!!}) 30. Nb4 {(00:46)} Rae2 {(00:55)} 31. Nd5 {(00:22)} Qg5 {(00:21)} 32. Nc7 {(00:33)} R8e3 $6 {(00:31) Lesiege gets
emotional} (32... Rb8 {would have maintained equality.}) 33. Qc1 {(00:49)} h6 {(01:30)} 34. d5 {(00:57)} Qe5 $4 {(01:25) Lesiege blunders a
rook after a long game. He probably missed the check on a1.} 35. fxe3 {(00:52)} Qg3 {(00:55) } 36. Qa1+ {(00:10) And it is Black who gets
mated not white! And US team wins the Olympiad after four decades!} (36. Qa1+ Kg8 37. Qa8+ Kg7 38. Ne6+ $1 fxe6 39. Qf8+ Kh7 40. Rf7#)
1-0
Board four had Sam Shankland once more taking the post, and as yet undefeated in the Olympiads, but he came against someone who had seen
one step ahead. Facing him was Canadas best scoring player (in points): 24-year-old Eric Hansen.
Both players had correctly guessed the opening of the game, but Erics preparation was the better
and he emerged up a pawn, and inflicted Shanklands first defeat. Although this was not enough to
change the tale of the match, he can be proud of the result of Canada, and his magnificent 9.0/11
contribution with a 2738 performance. (photo by M. Emelianova)
Former elite player, Alexander Beliavsky (left), was board one for Slovenia. He fell to Pavel
Eljanov, whose victory contributed to a 3-1 win for Ukraine. (photo by M. Emelianova)
The main rival of the US, Ukraine, had come tied with the Americans in match points, behind on tiebreaks alone. The Ukrainians continued their
fantastic onslaught, crushing the Slovenian team by 3.5-0.5. Much like the Americans, they had their share of miracle workers, such as Andrei
Volokitin, who won yet again, taking gold medal on board four with 8.5/9 and a 2992 performance, the greatest of any player on any board.
The final medal match was played by Russia, who needed to win to guarantee none of the teams
might threaten its bronze medal. They had no trouble beating Italy, scoring 3-1. (photo by E. Kublashvili)
Of special note, was Vladimir Kramniks win on board one. Not only did this net him the gold
medal for board two, the board he had played on throughout the event, but his win catapulted him
to a 2817 rating, which will appear in the next ratings list, his highest ever. (photo by E. Kublashvili)
Eteri Kublashvili and Anastasiya Karlovich, fixtures for the RCF and FIDE (photo by Paul Truong)
Still, the question on everyones mind was now that both teams had won their matches, who had taken gold? Incredibly, no one knew. While the
first criterion was match points, where both US and Ukraine were tied, the next criterion was not game points, but Olympiad Sonneborn-Berger
without the lowest result.
Even after both top matches were over the US team still had no idea if they had won gold or silver
(photo by Paul Truong)
The basis of all Sonneborn-Berger tiebreak variants is to weight scores against high ranked opponents higher, which means winning against a
team that finishes 5th is worth more than a victory over a team that finished 23rd even if their ratings were the same. Unfortunately that meant
that victory for one or the other might lie not in the hands of the American or Ukrainian players, but some other team they had met earlier. The
permutations are manifold as one can imagine, but to overcome the significant tiebreak score between the two teams, some experts wielding
laptops and Excel spreadsheets concluded that if Ukraine won their final match by 3-1 and Germany failed to beat Estonia, then Ukraine would
take gold.
Captain of the US Team, John Donaldson, begins doing calculations to try to figure out if the US
won, and if not (yet) what they need to win
It seemed incredible, but even with both top table matches over, gold was going to be determined by table 28s result, and it was not obvious.
Germany had won their game on board one, but lost on board four, and tied board two. It all hinged on Matthias Bluebaums ability to win an
endgame that until move 59 engines were declaring a resolute 0.00.
Both teams and many others were following this one game with unwavering focus, and one
wonders whether Bluebaum knew that the winners fate lay entirely in his one game. Move 60 was
the decider as the Estonian IM finally went astray, in a decisive blunder the German never forgave.
(photo by Paul Truong)
Garry Kasparov also commented that the United States had gone through the event without a single loss, a remarkable feat. Indeed they won nine
matches and drew two. However, it should be pointed out that one other team went through the eleven rounds without suffering a defeat. Can you
guess which? The answer is not one of the other top performers, but 18th place finisher Greece! They won four matches, lost none, and drew
seven! Note that this included matches such as a draw with Slovenia, which ended in two wins each.
The Indian team that had started so strong, lost their chance to medal after losing both their
matches to the US and Ukraine, and finished in fourth place. (photo by Paul Truong)
Alejandro Ramirez enjoys a quick chat with GM Vidit Gujrathi, one of India's best scoring players
The surprise fifth place was Norway led by Magnus Carlsen. They were in a group of teams that
ended with 16 match points thanks to their last round draw with India. However, what really gave
them a boost in their tiebreaks was their huge win over Iran in round 10. (photo by M. Emelianova)
Being such overperformers, the Iranians, ranked 46th at the start, ended in 16th place, including a crushing win over Chile in the last round. It is
clear they are very much on the rise, and can expect even more promising results in the future. As it stands, two of the players scored double
grandmaster norms and can expect the title very soon.
First was untitled Parham Maghsoodloo, 16 years old, who more than justified his 2566 rating. He
played all eleven rounds with 8.0/11 and a superb 2684 performance, facing nine grandmasters.
(photo by Paul Truong)
17-year-old IM Shahin Lorparizangeneh (2478) also scored a double GM norm, adding 17 Elo to his
rating as well. (photo by Paul Truong)
They were hardly the only ones, needless to say, such as Italys FM Luca Moroni, 16 years old, who
finished with a double GM norm as well. (photo by M. Emelianova)
Finally, a special salute to IM Helgi Dam Ziska from the Faroe Islands, who is by far the highest
rated player ever from the micronation (population under 50 thousand), and is now its first
grandmaster thanks to his norms. Note that with a rating of 2546 FIDE, he has already fulfilled the
ratings requirements by a healthy margin. In round four, Helgi (right) drew against Veselin
Topalov. (photo by Paul Truong)
Daniel King has a quick chat with Yannick Pelletier (Switzerland) asking him his impressions of the
team and more
GM Maurice Ashley explains how he became the coach of the Ivory Coast
Womens Event
The Womens competition really came down to the epic match on table one. It isnt that other matches were utterly denuded of interest, but with
China facing Russia in a showdown for the gold, it was easily the center of attention. China only needed to win or draw the match to secure gold,
but if Russia were to pull off an upset, not nearly as farfetched as the top matches in the Open section, they could conceivably snatch gold, though
tiebreaks would still decide their fate.
The match was certainly all the fans had hoped for with hard-fought games on all boards. Russias
attempt to torpedo Chinas gold was thwarted though, and it was a team gold for the first time in
14 years, and the first with Hou Yifan. (photo by M. Emelianova)
Although Hou Yifan never quite scored as heavily as her fans might have hoped, the overall team
was made up for it, such as WGM Tan Zhongyi on board three, rated 2475, but finished with
9.0/11 and a 2565 performance. (photo by David Llada)
While Ukraine certainly did well, finishing in third, the true surprise of the event was without question Poland. Although they were consistently in
the top three in the standings from round eight onward, the expectation each time was that another team would take their place the next round or
after. If this seems unjust, consider that they had never achieved better than bronze, and ranked seventh this time, 100 Elo behind Ukraine and
Russia, and more than that behind China, there was no reason to expect a miracle. Yet, they pulled it off in the end, with a magnificent 3.5-0.5
defeat over Hungary, ranked 8th, edging out Ukraine on tiebreak and taking a historic silver.
Team Poland pulled off a small miracle in not only penetrating the podium ahead of the numerous
much higher rated rivals, but taking silver (photo by Paul Truong)
Janelle Mae Frayna from the Philippinnes scored a double WGM norm(photo by David Llada)
Closing Ceremony
All photos by Maria Emelianova
Open event
Team USA with their historic gold: Hikaru Nakamura, John Donaldson (captain), Sam Shankland,
Ray Robson, Wesley So, and Fabiano Caruana
The Russian team: Ian Nepomniachtchi, Andrei Filatov (captain), Alexander Motylev, Vladimir
Potkin, Evgeny Tomashevsky, Sergey Karjakin, Vladimir Kramnik, Alexander Grischuk
Ukraine won the Gaprindashvili Cup, an award to the country with the best combined score of both
Open and Women's teams
Gold Medal for Board one: Leinier Dominguez (silver), Baadur Jobava (gold), Fabiano Caruana
(bronze)
Gold Medal for Board two: Vladimir Kramnik (gold), Jorge Cori (bronze), missing is Anton Kovalyov
(silver)
Gold Medal for board three: Zoltan Almasi (silver), Wesley So (gold), Eugenio Torre (bronze)
The podium with Ukraine (silver), USA, (gold), and Russia (bronze) (click on photo for large
version)
Women's event
China wins gold after a 14-year wait: Ju Wenjun, Tan Zhongyi, Guo Qi, Hou Yifan, Zhao Xue, Yu
Shaoteng (captain)
Poland wins silver for their best result ever: Matlak Marak (captain), Mariola Wozniak, Klaudia
Kulon, Karina Szczepkowska-Horowska, Jolanta Zawadzka, Monika Socko
Ukraine took bronze: Anna Ushenina, Natalia Zhukova, Mariya Muzychuk, Anna Muzychuk
Gold Medal for Board one: Hou Yifan (silver), Anna Muzychuk (gold), and Pia Cramling (bronze)
Gold Medal for Board two: Ju Wenjun (silver), Valentina Gunina (gold), Deimante Daulyte (bronze)
Team
Team
Gms
= -
TB1
TB2
United States
USA
11
20
413,5
Ukraine
UKR
11
10 0
20
404,5
Russia
RUS
11
18
419,0
India
IND
11
16
350,5
12
Norway
NOR
11
16
344,5
19
Turkey
TUR
11
16
341,5
Poland
POL
11
16
331,0
France
FRA
11
16
326,5
England
ENG
11
16
323,0
10
34
Peru
PER
11
16
306,0
11
25
Canada
CAN
11
15
368,5
12
Azerbaijan 1
AZE
11
15
352,0
13
China
CHN
11
15
348,0
14
23
Belarus
BLR
11
15
332,0
15
10
Hungary
HUN
11
15
329,0
Team
Team
Gms +
TB1
TB2
China
CHN
11
20
416,0
Poland
POL
11
17
427,5
Ukraine
UKR
11
17
404,5
Russia
RUS
11
16
380,5
India
IND
11
16
342,5
United States
USA
11
16
332,5
19
Vietnam
VIE
11
16
328,0
16
Azerbaijan 1
AZE
11
16
309,0
18
Israel
ISR
11
16
307,5
10
Georgia
GEO
11
15
356,5
11
13
Iran
IRI
11
15
337,5
12
12
Lithuania
LTU
11
15
324,0
13
27
Serbia
SRB
11
15
321,5
14
23
France
FRA
11
15
320,0
15
Bulgaria
BUL
11
15
309,5
Rtg
25
Canada (CAN)
Rtg
2:1
1.1
GM Caruana, Fabiano
2808
- GM Bareev, Evgeny
2675
1-0
1.2
GM Nakamura, Hikaru
2789
- GM Kovalyov, Anton
2617
1.3
GM So, Wesley
2782
- GM Lesiege, Alexandre
2512
1-0
1.4
GM Shankland, Samuel L
2679
- GM Hansen, Eric
2582
0-1
Rtg
3:
Bo.
Ukraine (UKR)
Rtg
29
Slovenia (SLO)
2.1
GM Eljanov, Pavel
2739
- GM Beliavsky, Alexander G
2602
1-0
2.2
GM Ponomariov, Ruslan
2709
- GM Lenic, Luka
2622
2.3
GM Korobov, Anton
2675
- GM Borisek, Jure
2558
1-0
2.4
GM Volokitin, Andrei
2647
- GM Sebenik, Matej
2526
1-0
Rtg
3:1
Bo.
Russia (RUS)
Rtg
36
Italy (ITA)
3.1
GM Kramnik, Vladimir
2808
- GM Vocaturo, Daniele
2583
1-0
3.2
GM Tomashevsky, Evgeny
2731
- GM Rombaldoni, Axel
2567
3.3
GM Nepomniachtchi, Ian
2740
- GM Brunello, Sabino
2568
2754
FM
2459
1-0
Rtg
Rtg
1:3
3.4
GM Grischuk, Alexander
Bo.
62
4.1
GM Atabayev, Maksat
2485
- GM Radjabov, Teimour
2722
4.2
IM
Atabayev, Yusup
2453
- GM Mamedov, Rauf
2666
4.3
FM
Atabayev, Saparmyrat
2406
- GM Naiditsch, Arkadij
2696
0-1
4.4
GM Odeev, Handszar
2401
- GM Safarli, Eltaj
2688
0-1
Bo.
Turkmenistan (TKM)
India (IND)
Rtg
2:2
GM Harikrishna, P.
2752
- GM Carlsen, Magnus
2857
5.2
GM Adhiban, B.
2671
2651
5.3
2669
- GM Tari, Aryan
2570
1-0
5.4
GM Sethuraman, S.P.
2640
- GM Urkedal, Frode
2537
0-1
Bo.
34
Rtg
2:2
6.1
GM Cordova, Emilio
2638
- GM Adams, Michael
2738
0-1
6.2
GM Cori, Jorge
2609
- GM Howell, David W L
2665
1-0
6.3
IM
2499
- GM Jones, Gawain C B
2635
6.4
GM Cruz, Cristhian
2519
- GM Short, Nigel D
2666
Peru (PER)
Turkey (TUR)
Rtg
20
Norway (NOR)
England (ENG)
Bo.
19
Rtg
2:1
7.1
GM Solak, Dragan
2635
- GM Jobava, Baadur
2665
7.2
GM Ipatov, Alexander
2652
- GM Mchedlishvili, Mikheil
2609
1-0
Rtg
12
Azerbaijan 1 (AZE)
5.1
Rtg
Moroni, Luca Jr
Georgia (GEO)
7.3
GM Yilmaz, Mustafa
2616
2565
- GM Pantsulaia, Levan
2601
0-1
- GM Gelashvili, Tamaz
2575
1-0
Rtg
2:2
-
7.4
GM Can, Emre
Bo.
27
Greece (GRE)
Rtg
8.1
GM Papaioannou, Ioannis
2631
- GM Berkes, Ferenc
2640
8.2
GM Mastrovasilis, Dimitrios
2601
- GM Almasi, Zoltan
2684
0-1
8.3
GM Banikas, Hristos
2571
- GM Balogh, Csaba
2614
8.4
GM Halkias, Stelios
2565
IM
Gledura, Benjamin
2585
1-0
Rtg
17
Bo.
Hungary (HUN)
Rtg
3:1
GM Vachier-Lagrave, Maxime
2813
- GM Navara, David
2742
9.2
GM Maze, Sebastien
2617
- GM Laznicka, Viktor
2651
1-0
9.3
GM Fressinet, Laurent
2664
- GM Hracek, Zbynek
2591
1-0
9.4
GM Bauer, Christian
2623
IM
2519
Poland (POL)
Rtg
14
Rtg
3:1
2736
2716
1-0
2675
2662
2646
2630
1-0
2639
2566
Bo.
France (FRA)
10
9.1
Bo.
Vietnam (VIE)
Rtg
1:3
2723
- GM Wang, Yue
2737
2633
- GM Ding, Liren
2753
0-1
2435
- GM Yu, Yangyi
2725
11.4 FM
2448
- GM Wei, Yi
2717
0-1
Rtg
2:2
15
Cuba (CUB)
Rtg
Rtg
Spain (ESP)
Bo.
32
Plat, Vojtech
30
China (CHN)
Romania (ROU)
2720
- GM Lupulescu, Constantin
2636
12.3 GM Ortiz Suarez, Isan Reynaldo 2581 12.4 GM Gonzalez Vidal, Yuri
2553
IM
Deac, Bogdan-Daniel
- GM Marin, Mihail
2618
1-0
-
2524
2572
0-1
Rtg
Rtg
2:1
1.1
GM
Hou, Yifan
2658
GM
Kosteniuk, Alexandra
2538
GM
Ju, Wenjun
2583
GM
Gunina, Valentina
2520
1-0
2475
2475
1-0
2417
2484
0-1
1.2
1.3
1.4
China (CHN)
Guo, Qi
Bo.
Rtg
2.1
GM
2467
GM
2.2
IM
2372
2.3
Hungary (HUN)
Poland (POL)
Rtg
:3
2437
2429
0-1
2379
2346
0-1
2355
WIM
2246
0-1
Rtg
Rtg
3:1
Socko, Monika
2.4
IM
Bo.
3.1
GM
Muzychuk, Anna
2550
GM
Stefanova, Antoaneta
2515
1-0
3.2
GM
Muzychuk, Mariya
2539
IM
Videnova, Iva
2386
3.3
GM
Zhukova, Natalia
2475
2358
3.4
GM
Ushenina, Anna
2457
2232
1-0
Bo.
16
Gara, Anita
Russia (RUS)
Ukraine (UKR)
Azerbaijan 1 (AZE)
WIM
Wozniak, Mariola
Bulgaria (BUL)
Raeva, Elitsa
Rtg
66
Rtg
3:1
4.1
2295
WFM
Tan, Li Ting
1993
4.2
2361
WFM
1923
4.3
WFM
2339
1994
1-0
4.4
2302
WFM
1945
1-0
Rtg
Rtg
2:2
Hojjatova, Aydan
Bo.
5.1
GM
Krush, Irina
2444
GM
Harika, Dronavalli
2542
5.2
IM
Paikidze, Nazi
2366
IM
Padmini, Rout
2408
1-0
5.3
IM
Zatonskih, Anna
2449
IM
Tania, Sachdev
2402
0-1
5.4
Malaysia (MAS)
Bo.
19
6.1
IM
Vietnam (VIE)
Pham, Le Thao Nguyen
2365
India (IND)
Rtg
21
2338
GM
Netherlands (NED)
Peng, Zhaoqin
2379
Rtg
2:1
2368
0-1
6.2
2325
2306
1-0
6.3
2316
IM
Lanchava, Tea
2258
6.4
2249
FM
Kazarian, Anna-Maja
2231
1-0
Rtg
15
Rtg
3:1
Bo.
18
Israel (ISR)
7.1
WIM
Shvayger, Yuliya
2408
IM
7.2
WIM
Efroimski, Marsel
2322
IM
Batchimeg, Tuvshintugs
2391
7.3
IM
Klinova, Masha
2290
2288
1-0
Gutmakher, Olga
2216
WIM
Rtg
35
7.4
WIM
Bo.
8.1
IM
Javakhishvili, Lela
8.2
GM
8.3
IM
8.4
IM
Bo.
13
9.1
IM
Mongolia (MGL)
2147
1-0
Austria (AUT)
Rtg
3:1
2486
2331
1-0
Khotenashvili, Bela
2463
WIM
Newrkla, Katharina
2214
Batsiashvili, Nino
2474
WFM
Exler, Veronika
2220
1-0
Melia, Salome
2419
WFM
Hapala, Elisabeth
2021
Rtg
28
Georgia (GEO)
Iran (IRI)
Lkhamsuren, Uuganbayar
Azerbaijan 2 (AZE2)
Rtg
3:
2304
1-0
9.2
2335
WIM
Khalafova, Narmin
2219
1-0
9.3
2314
WIM
Fataliyeva, Ulviyya
2234
1-0
9.4
WIM
2308
Bo.
27
Hakimifard, Ghazal
Serbia (SRB)
2247
Rtg
2:1
Lujan, Carolina
2378
WIM
Zuriel, Marisa
2272
1-0
WIM
2189
1-0
WIM
Martinez, Ayelen
2219
0-1
Rtg
26
2318
IM
2221
10.3
WIM
Eric, Jovana
2161
10.4
WIM
Drljevic, Ljilja
2207
Bo.
10
11.1
IM
Germany (GER)
Argentina (ARG)
Rtg
23
Rtg
1:3
2474
IM
Milliet, Sophie
2362
2383
IM
Collas, Silvia
2301
0-1
2342
WIM
Congiu, Mathilde
2232
2324
WIM
Navrotescu, Andreea-Cristiana
2235
0-1
Rtg
12
Lithuania (LTU)
Rtg
1:3
Paehtz, Elisabeth
Bo.
46
12.1
WIM
2281
GM
Cmilyte, Viktorija
2536
0-1
12.2
WIM
2128
IM
Daulyte, Deimante
2421
0-1
12.3
WIM
Secopito, Catherine
2119
WIM
Zaksaite, Salomeja
2298
1-0
1965
WFM
Batyte, Daiva
2189
0-1
12.4 WFM
Philippines (PHI)
France (FRA)
Links
Official tournament site
Download all games in PGN (.zip)
The games are being broadcast live on the official web site and on the server Playchess.com. If you are
not a member you can download a free Playchess client there and get immediate access. You can also use
ChessBase or any of our Fritz compatible chess programs.
Albert Silver
Born in the US, he grew up in Paris, France, where he completed his Baccalaureat, and after college moved to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. He
had a peak rating of 2240 FIDE, and was a key designer of Chess Assistant 6. In 2010 he joined the ChessBase family as an editor and
writer at ChessBase News. He is also a passionate photographer with work appearing in numerous publications.
Feedback and mail to our news service
Please use this account if you want to contribute to or comment on our news page service
0
Twittear
Topics
Olympiad, Baku, 2016 Chess Olympiad
See also
Discuss
Rules for reader comments
User:
Password:
Not registered yet? Register
Comment:
Leave comment
Submit
Reset
koko48 9/13/2016 04:03
Now we'll hear more tripe about how the US "bought", "imported", and "stole" all of their players
2013 ChessBase GmbH | Osterbekstrae 90a | 22083 Hamburg | Germany | Privacy policy | Imprint | Contact | Home