Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Brahminical theory of varna system. Other vices of the society were derived
from the caste system like child marriage, sati.
N. B. Halhead compiled the Hindoo Dharmasashtra under the name A Code of
Gentoo Law
Consequences of the orientalist view
I.
Acceptance of the varna system, which was not the case as showcased by
evidence of the political structures in the late nineteenth century.
II.
View that Indian society is static, timeless, and spaceless (Statements from
texts of 3rd BC were applied to 19th century)
Administrative View
This aim of this view was to understand the society for administrative purposes,
meaning to help them maintain law and order better and to help generate income to
support their functions.
Many studies were done with this sole purpose, be it studies about languages, or
the customs. A prime example of this is Buchanans work, which was carried out on
the orders of East India Company.
Missionaries felt that for the improvement of the Hindu society Hinduism
should be eliminated.
For this they opined that conversion of Hindus to Christians was detrimental,
therefore their view was one of proselytsation.
Effort was to condemn Hindu Society and to hold up religion to ridicule with
translation from the Sanskrit texts.
This view was not a coincidence, it was purposeful to nudging the masses to
convert, which it did to some extent.
Charles grant
Grant felt that the caste system, the legal system, government and above all the
controlling roles of the Brahmans who the society were the cause of the the state of
Hindus his observations were published as State among the Asiatic Subjects of
Great Britain. Stephen Hislop, a missionary gave useful description of tribes of
central India
DEVELOPMENT OF OFFICIAL VIEW OF CASTE
Caste was defined as a thing, as an entity that existed and could be measured
(meaning it has definable characteristics- endogamy, commensality, rules fixed
occupation, ritual practices)
The pigeonholing of most of the castes was done because it was convenient for the
administrator, it meant that he did not have to differentiate between them. Also, it
allowed them to record this as a fact (which was again conveniently different in
different places)
Therefore India was looked at as a state of different castes, which prompted the
admins to have the classifications of caste. The most prominent one was of HH
Risleys (2000 odd castes), after classification the questioned that itched their
minds was where did they come from?
Nesfield said caste has its origin in division of labour.
H.H Risely argued for a racial origin of caste.
Ibbestson saw formation of caste in tribal origin.
J H Hutton tried to discussed factors like economic dependence,
stability of of society, varna theory such other factors as responsible for the
origin of caste system.
In urban environment caste was gradually experiencing massive
changes like: formation of caste based sabha, inter-caste marriages, caste
hostels etc. so their understanding of caste as a rigid group was in problem.
The following part is from my class notes, because it is getting really hard
understand what she deemed important)
India was a land of village republic, self-sufficient corporately organized village
Community.
Luis Dumont traced the development of concept of Village community in three
different phases
1. For Britishers Village community is a political society.
2. As a body of co-owner of the soil - Ryotwari system.
3. Centre of economic and political agenda for patriotism.