Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
B.
are generally quite expensive (about INR 40,000,000 per annum per
license) and thus out of reach. Moreover, optimization provided by
all the above tools has primarily been region specific and based on
local conditions.
Due to continuously varying traffic distributions, operators are
confronted with a continuous need to plan and optimize their
networks time and again. Since the solutions provided by these tools
are region-specific and based on local geographic and traffic
conditions, these solutions may not be globally optimal for larger
service areas with varying local conditions. In this demonstration, we
validate this argument by performing a 3C analysis for two different
areas in India.
The solution framework is discussed in Section II. In Section III, an
optimization scheme is presented and the network plans of a leading
telecom operator for two different service areas in Bangalore, India
are substantially optimized. We conclude this paper in Section IV.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
N
min
Ek
k=1
N
max
k= 1
N
min
k=1
...(1)
max
, M
ik
i : MS index ,
j : KPI index.
(2)
Table 2). Note that several clusters of heavy traffic demands are
observed in Jayanagar area. As a result, several Compensator CIDs
fail to maintain CBmin whenever TRX are turned off in Candidate
CIDs. This is apparent in the substantially lower level of optimization
in Jayanagar area than in Bangalore East.
'
Fig.6. Cell Ids (Bangalore East) with Coverage Overlap > 60%
IV. CONCLUSION
In this paper we propose a tool based solution using clustering and
cooperative game theory to provide wireless mobile network
planning and optimization. Our tool can be used by wireless service
providers for rolling out greenfield network and for optimizing
existing networks. We also demonstrate the usage of this tool through
network optimization of a major telecom operator's network in
Bangalore, India. We demonstrate that there is still a possibility of at
least 10% optimization in Bangalore, which can be translated to
minimization of cost as well as maximization of coverage and
capacity. Though the overall design of this tool is complete,
commercialization of this tool requires some more tests.
REFERENCES
[1] A. Wilton and T. Charity, Deploying Wireless Networks.
Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[2] M. Younis, A. Lalani, and M. Eltoweissy, Safe base-station
repositioning in wireless sensor networks, in 25th IEEE
International Conference IPCCC 2006, pp. 8 pp.528.
[3] C.Y. Lee and H.G. Kang, "Cell planning with capacity expansion
in mobile communications: a tabu search approach," Vehicular
Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol.49, pp.1678-1691, Sep
2000.
[4] S. Hurley, "Planning effective cellular mobile radio networks,"
Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol..51, pp.243253, Mar 2002.
[5] H. Meunier, E. Talbi, and P. Reininger, A multiobjective genetic
algorithm for radio network optimization, in Proc. in Congress
on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, pp. 317324, 2000.
[6] M. Felegyhazi and J.-P. Hubaux, Game Theory in Wireless
Networks: A Tutorial, EPFL technical report, LCA-REPORT,
February 2006.
[7] H. K. Rath, K. N. R. S. V. Prasad, V. Revoori and A. Simha, "A
Joint Local-Global Optimization for Wireless Mobile Network
Planning and Optimization", in IEEE 24th PIMRC, 2013.
[8] T. Rappaport, Wireless Communications: Principles and
Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: PH PTR, 2nd ed., 2001.