Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Healthcare Safety
chrisry L. Beaudin, PhD LCSW CPHQ FNAHA
Luc R. Pelletier, MSN PMHCNS-BC CPHQ FNAHQ FAAN
Glenview,IL
I
I
Copyright @ 2OI2 by the National Association for Healthcare Quality. All rights reserved.
Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this
publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, including but
not limited to the process of scanning and digitization, or stored in a database or retrieval
system without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Copyright @ 2005, 2008, 2}12by the National Association for Healthcare Quality.
All rights reserved. First edition published in 2005. Second edition published in 2008.
rsBN 978-0-9858 336-2-6
National Association for Healthcare Quality
47OO W. Lake Avenue
Glenview,IL 60025
www.nahq.org
For the National Association for Healthcare Qualiry
Stacy Sochacki, Executive Director
Beth Zemach, Senior Programs and ProductAnalyst
Karen Schrimmer, Practice Content Manager
June Pinyo, MA, ManagingEditor
Monica Piotrowski, Associate Editor
Sonya Jones, Senior Graphic Designer
Printed in the UnitedStotes of America
ThirdEdition
Contents
l.
StrategicConsiderations.,..
A. TheHealthcareSafetylmperative..
t. Types of PatientSafetyand Harm..
..........,
...........
..........2
.
. . . . .. .z
HealthcareQuality
........5
B. CreatingandSustainingaHealthcareSafetyCulture
...........6
l.Aligning StructuretoSupportQuality
.,......6
C. Leadershipand Culture: lntegrating HealthcareSafety Concepts intothe Organization... ......10
D. HealthcareSafetyGoals.
.....17
2. Tiansforming the Healthcare Delivery System Through National Policy
g. Ethicsand
ll. OperationalConsiderations.
HealthcareSafetyProgramDevelopment......
B. HealthlnformationTechnology
C. Risk Management
D. lmplementing Safe Medication Practices
E. NQFNeverEvents
F. ConsumerEmpowerment, Engagement, andActivation ...
G. EvaluatingAdoption of Safety Practices
A.
'l
I
t
i
lll.
Tools
lV.
Summary
for lmproving
Safety
References
SuggestedReading.
Online
Resources
lndex.
.........17
.......17
.......19
..... 21
......24
..........26
....26
.......iO
....
.Zt
........92
.....25
.........37
.....41
........
45
Vi
Q SoluEions
Ta bles
Table
1.
Table 2.
Table 3.
Table 4.
Gble
s.
lOPatientSafetyFacts
...........4
.
Safe PracticesforBetterHealthcare-2O10 Update
TheJointCommissionizotz HospitalNPSGs.
lnformation Technology Commonly Used by Healthcare Professionals.
Patient Safety Culture Composites and Descriptions.
...
10
........12
...........18
...
22
Table 6.
PotentialBenefitsandSafetyConcernsofHealthlTComponents.... ....22
Table
7.
Table 8.
Table 9.
lnjury.
.....
2s
NQF:SafePracticesRelatedtoMedicationAdministration..... .........26
NQF:SeriousReportableEventsinHealthcare-2Ot1Update..... ....... 27
Figures
Figure
1.
NationalQualityStrategyAims and
PriorityAreas..
.......
vii
I
I
!
I
t
I
I
i
I
t,
I
I
{
i
:
i
I
I
viii
Q SoluEions
Preface
Healthcare is complex and at times confusing to customers. Delivery systems, health plans,
solo and group practitioners, employers, and government agencies seek ways to achieve the
Triple Aim-ensure quality of care for the individual, improve the health of the population,
and control costs. Developing, deploying, and sustaining appropriate quality strategies
pose challenges and opportunities for healthcare quality professionals. Thoughtful
strategies employ effective, efficient, and evidence-based approaches to measure, monitor,
and determine outcomes. Did the actions and interventions yield intended goals and
objectives for improved quality and performance excellence? The healthcare qualiry
professional must successfully navigate the system to demonstrate quality and safety. The
application of sound theoretical and methodological practices is imperative. Q Solutfons
covers the breadth and depth of critical areas for professional development and leadership,
including frameworks for quality management, the linking of science with practice, and
the translation of data into practical information that can be used and understood by any
customer, whether it is a practitioner, third-party payer, or consumer.
The development of the third edition of Q Solutions was informed by the most recent
Healthcare Quality Certification Commission's (HQCC's) practice analysis. The practice
analysis assesses the current functions and competencies for certified professionals in
healthcare quality. Organized under the HQCC detailed content outline, the following
modules were created:
.
.
.
.
.
Leadership andManagement
These modules feature critical components of healthcare qualiry the science and art
qualiry
of
and performance management, and environmental considerations such as
healthcare reform. In addition, Q Solutions was developed using feedback from healthcare
quality professionals and academic and policy experrs in the field.
In our world of teeming technology, rapid innovation, and continuously expanding
science, we also rely on hope day in and day out. We hope that political agendas will reflect
the needs of patients, families, and other stakeholders; that resources will be available for
the work to be done; and that fear will not result in barriers to uncovering mistakes, flaws,
and failures. For healthcare quality to permeate the healthcare landscape, the cultures of
silence that still exist in institutions must be eradicated.
In addition to emerging technologies and techniques, the foundation of our work
involves the collaborative relationships we form and develop with various stakeholders.
Our work, after all, is relationship based. Mutual respect and accord lead to mutual
understanding and a sense of camaraderie as we face complex healthcare quality
challenges. This is accomplished in many ways including affiliations with professional
groups such as the National Association for Healthcare Quality (NAHO.
Q Solutions is targeted to audiences across the care continuum and provides critical
knowledge to develop and enhance essential leadership skills in healthcare quality. In
effect, these tools and techniques are universal to any healthcare setting. The basic
principles can be adapted to your organization. When we embarked on the third edition
journey, there was no question about who the right people were to make these publications
ix
happen. We were humbled by-the company we kept. Fortunately, these individuals made
time for what proved to be a fruitful endeavor. The product you hold in your hands would
not have been possible without the uirceasing efforts of our esteemed authors-Cathy E.
Duquette, PhD RN CPHQ NEA-BC; Robert Rosati, phD; susan v. white, phD RN cpHe
NEA-BC FNAHQ; and Diane S. Brown, PhD RN CPHQ FNAHQ FAAN. Their vision
for NAHQ is depicted on every page. We thank them all for their thoughts and ideas
throughout the development process. In addition, we appreciate the thorough content
examination by our external review panel members-James B. Conway, MS LFACHE;
Gerald N. Glandon, PhD; John Hansen, MD MpH; Bernard J. Horak, phD FACHE cpHe;
and Barbara G. Rebold, MS RN CPHQ. As always, we acknowledge the continuous support
of the NAHQ Board of Directors, which has resulted in the successful launch of the third
edition of Q Solutions.
The work of healthcare quality professionals is noble indeed. Armed with a set of
advanced skills and practical tools, we are a force that can be boundless. Our nobiliry comes
from the fact that we are truth seekers. We are consrantly challenged to tell a qualiry story
that is cogent, accurately depicts healthcare circumstances, and is understood by varying
audiences. To be able to tell the truth, we must demand that healthcare organizations
' provide resources necessary to conduct investigations and to maintain reporting
systems that use state-of-the-art information technologies;
' allow and support a solid infrastructure for continuous readiness, including health
information technology that supports the continuous quality improvement paradigm
and doesn't disappear after an accreditation survey or regulatory audit;
' ensure that all organizations are educated on the science of discovery (i.e., data,
methods, analysis, and application); and
' contribute to the growing body of healthcare quality science by sharing evidencebased, outcomes-oriented quality techniques making a difference in the safery care,
and service embraced by forward-thinking, highly reliable organizations.
Our primary goal for this suite of Q Solutions modules is to provide NAHe members
and other quality and patient safety professionals with a product that is reliable, valid,
innovative, and timely. These updated modules reflect recent changes in national
healthcare safety as well as the transformation of healthcare as we know it. In the future,
NAHQ plans to supplement these modules with other relevant topics and learning
opportunities.
Luc R. Pelletier, MSN PMHCNS-BC CPHQ FNAHe FAAN
San Diego, CA
I
I
'!
xt
Christy L. Beaudin, PhD LCSW CPHQ FNAHQ is national director of qualiry for AIDS
Healthcare Foundation in Los Angeles, CA. In her current role, Dr. Beaudin is responsible
for healthcare safety, accreditation, infection prevention and control, public reporting, and
education. At the executive level, she led healthcare safety efforts at Children's Hospital
Los Angeles, PacifiCare Behavioral Health, and Value Behavioral Health, and served as
vice president of research and development at Magellan Behavioral Health. Dr. Beaudin
supported hospitals and managed care organizations in preparing for and maintaining
state licensure and accreditation compliance including the National Committee for
Quality Assurance (NCQA), URAC, Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health
Care (AAAHC), and The Joint Commission. Dr. Beaudin earned her doctorate in health
services from the UCLA School of Public Health, master's degree in social work from San
Diego State Universiry and bachelor's degree in criminal justice from California State
Universiry San Bernardino. Dr. Beaudin is adjunct faculty at the Universiry of Redlands
and participates in state- and national-level qualiry initiatives for NAHQ, SNP Alliance, and
the California HealthCare Foundation. She is widely published, serves on several editorial
boards and review panels, and is a national subject matter expert on healthcare qualiry
behavioral health, and managed care.
:
)
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
,
'l
Healthcare Safety
Facilitate assessment and ongoing development of the organization's healthcare safety culture.
2. Link healthcare safety goals and activities with the organization s strategic goals.
3. lntegrate concepts and evidence-based practices with the organization! healthcare safety program.
1.
+. ldentify applicablllty of external healthcare safety initiatives (e.g., regulatory accreditation, National Quality
Forum, World Health Organization IWHO]).
5. Determine mechanisms and tools to evaluate the success of healthcare safety activities and innovations.
6. Contribute to the development, revision, and enhancement of a written plan for a healthcare safety program.
7. Demonstrate technologys ability to enhance the healthcare safety program.
8. Perform, coordinate, and integrate enterprise risk management into the healthcare safety strategy.
l.
StrategicConsiderations
Q SoluEions
Any improvement efforts focused on eliminating errors requires a just culture, detailed
analysis of the care delivery process, human factors that influence processes of care, and
the resources to bring about sustained systematic change.
1.
2.
All healthcare constituencies (e.g., purchasers, healthcare professionals, regulators, consumers) should commit to a national statement of purpose for the healthcare system,
setting six aims for improvement to raise the quality of care to unprecedented levels.
Clinicians, patients, and healthcare organizations need to adopt a new set of principles
to guide the redesign of care processes.
Healthcare Safety
The government, through-the U.S. Department of Health and Human Senrices (HHS),
must identifi, a set of priorities to focus initial efforts, provide resources to stimulate
innovation, and initiate the change process.
' Healthcare organizations need to design and implement more effective support processes to make change in the delivery of care possible.
' An environment needs to be created to foster and reward improvement in the context
of ever-expanding knowledge and rapid change. This is accomplished by creating an
infrastructure to support evidence-based practice, facilitating the use of information
technology, aligning payment incentives, and preparing the workforce to better provide care to patients.
As part of the agenda for change, the IOM proposed six improvement aims to address
key dimensions of healthcare qualiry. At a minimum, healthcare should be
. safe:Avoid injuries to patients from care that is intended to help them.
. effective: Provide care based on scientific knowledge regardingwho will likely benefit,
and restrain from providing care when it is not likely to benefit a patient.
needs, and values. Furthermore, patient values should guide all clinical decisions.
'
timely: Wait times and harmful delays for those who receive and provide care should
be eliminated.
'
fficient: Care should be provided in ways that avoid waste, including waste of equipment, supplies, ideas, and energy.
'
2001).
al-aQ.
Various health professions have taken the charge to ensure quality and safery are integrated into academic curricula. An example of this is Qualiry and Safety Education for Nurses
(QSEN), a formal program to guide faculty in providing this core content to furure healthcare frontline staff.
International health enterprises such as WHO blaze the trail for healthcare quality. Since 2002 WHO has addressed patient safery as a public health issue and designed
Q SoluEions
programs to address 10 facts about patient safety in the world. These facts are detailed in
Table l. The Patient Safety Curriculum Guide (wHO, 20tt) presents an interprofessional approach in educating healthcare professionals about healthcare safety.
Several national imperatives emerged in the first decade of the 21st century. In 20Io
Affordable Care Act legislation directed the HHS National Quality Strategy (NeS) "to better
meet the promise of providing all Americans with access to healthcare that is safe, effective,
and affordable" (National Priorities Partnership [NPP], 2OLl, p.2). The development of the
NQS would occur with input from various stakeholders to influence a realistic, achievable
strategy. As a result, the National Qualiry Forum (NQF) convened the multistakeholder Npp
comprising a8 public and private-sector partners to provide input as HHS developed the
NQS goals, measures, and strategic opportunities (Nppr 2OlL, p.2).
The Nctional Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care (HHS, 20I1b) describes
three broad aims of an NQS: better care, healthy people/healthy communities, and affordable care (i.e., The Triple Aim). The report highlights six priority areas for an NeS, one of
which is to "make care safer." The goals include the following (Npp,201t):
' Improve patient, family, and caregiver experience of care related to qualiry safery and
access across settings.
Table 1. 1O Patient
1. Patient safety is a serious global public health issue. In recent years countries have increasingly recognized the
importance of improving patient safety. ln 2oo2 WHO Member States agreed on a World Health Assembly
resolution on patient safety.
2.
Estimates show that in developed countries as many as one in 10 patients is harmed while receiving hospital care.
The harm can be caused by a range of errors or adverse events.
3.
ln developing countries the probability of patients being harmed in hospitals is higher than in industrialized nations.
The risk of healthcare-associated infection in some developing countries is as much as 20 times higher than in
developed countries.
1.4 million people worldwide suffer from infections acquired in hospitals. Hand hygiene is the
most essential measure to reduce healthcare-associated infection and antimicrobial resistance.
At
5'
least 50% of medical equipment in developing countries is unusable or only partly usable. Often the
eguipment is not used due to lack of skills or commodities. As a resulE diagnostic procedures or treatments
cannot be performed. This leads to substandard or hazardous diagnosis or treatment that can pose a threat to the
safety of patients and may result in serious injury or death.
6.
ln some countries the proportion of injections given with syringes or needles reused without sterilization is as high
asTo%. This exposes millions of people to infections. Each year, unsafe injections cause .l.3 million deaths, primari!
due to transmission of bloodborne pathogens such as hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and HIV
7. Surgery is one of the most complex health interventions to deliver. More dran loo million people require surgical
treatment every year for different medical reasons. Problems associated with surgical safety ln developed
countries account for half of the avoidable adverse events that result in death or disability.
8. The economic benefits of improving patient safety are compelling. Studies show that additional hospitalization,
litigation costs, infections acquired in hospitals, lost income, disabihty, and medical expenses have cost some
countries between U.S. $o billion and U.5. $29 billion a year.
lndustries with a percelved higher risk such as aviation and nuclear energy have a much better safety record than
healthcare. There is a one in 1,oo0,Ooo chance of a traveler being harmed while in an aircraft. ln comparison, there
is a one in 300 chance of a patient being harmed while receiving healthcare services.
'10.
Patients' experience and their health are at the heart of the patient safety movement. The World Alliance for
Patient Safety is working with 40 champions who have suffered as the result of a lack of patient safety measures to
help make healthcare safer worldwide.
From l0 Facts on Patient Safery by World Health Organization, 2012. Retrieved from, www.who.int/features/factfitedpatient--safety/patient-safety-
'ri
I
Healthcare Safety
'
Figrr"
1.
Ai-,
priority
"nd
Ar"",
Better Care
*eatthy Peonle,l
Healthy Communlfies
Affordable Care
From Input to the Secretary of Health and Human Services on Priorities for the National
Quality Strategy
washington, DC Nationa/ Qu ality Forum. Copyright zott. Reprinted with permission.
6y National
Priorities
p-r*6h,r*,
Q Soluuions
ractic ing the profe s sio n-with honesty, integritSl and accountabiliry;
maintaining the level of competency as outlined in the Standards of Practice for Health-
Is ;
a
a
a
activity;
promoting the right of privacy for all individuals and protecting the maintenance of
confidential information to the fullest extent permitted by law;
using expertise to inform employers or clients of possible positive and negative out.orn., of management decisions in an effort to facilitate informed decision making;
a
a
a
B. Creating
1. Aligning
Like the plrysical structure of a house, organizationo.l structure identifies and distin'
guishes the individual parts of an organization and ties these pieces together to define
in integrated whole. Organizational structure dffirs from the physical structure of a
house, howeyer, in thot it encompasses more than inanimate characterfstics of walls,
doors, and. windows. Organizational structure includes the interaction patterns thot
link people to people and people to work, and unlike ahouse, structural dimensions of
organizations frequently change and evolve. (Dunham & Pierce, 1989, p. 399)
Although everyone in the healthcare enterprise is responsible for healthcare quality and safery an organization's leadership must include safety as a core component of its
comprehensive healthcare safefy program. The most important patient safety issues facing
healthcare organizations today are
maintaining a culture of safety that supports a safe and just culture,
.
.
.
.
.
identifyingorganizationalchampions,
deploying and sustaining patient safety strategies,
determining key drivers for patient safety programs, and
ensuring the adoption of current and evolving safety-related technologies.
Botwinick, Bisognano, and Haraden propose that "leadership is the critical element
in a successful patient safery program and is non-delegable" (2006, p. 1). Providing for a
healthcare safety culture typically starts at the strategic planning stage when leaders develop their mission and vision statements, core values, and strategic goals. Whereas "do no
harm" was previously an individual responsibility, a paradigm shift makes "safety a system
Healthcare Safety
prioriry" (IOM, CQHCA,2001, p.67). The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) adds
the observation that when patients are harmed, the cause can be traced mostly to flaws in
the system of care (IHI,2008).
Among errors, 85%o rypically are the result of systems issues, and t5% are attributable to
human factors (Deming, 2000). According to fHI, 'The key to reliable, safe care does not lie
in exhorting individuals to be more careful and try harder. It lies in learning about causes of
error and designing systems to prevent human error whenever possible" (IHI, 2008, p. t9).
Those working in healthcare safety who are involved in identifying and acting on opportunities to improve safety must give attention to planning, development, implementation, and
evaluation, as well as to continuous improvement
Since the IOM started delivering reports on healthcare safety in 2000, various national
organizations, state and federal agencies, accreditation organizations, and professional associations have focused on the identification of safe practices and strategies for organizational or system-wide implementation. In addition, many states have established coalitions
to promote patient safety (Comden & Rosenthal,2OO2).
Addressing the need to improve the safe delivery of healthcare, Congress passed The
Patient Safery and Quality Improvement Act of zOOS (Patient Safety Act; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ], 2005). To implement the Patient Safety Act, HHS issued
the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement final rule (AHRQ, HHS, 2008). The Patient
Safety Act and the Patient Safety Rule authorizedthe creation of patient safety organizations
(PSOs) to improve qualiry and safety through the collection and analysis of data on patient
events (Cartwright-Smith, Rosenbaum, & Sochacki, 20U).
PSOs are organizations that share the goal of improving the quality and safety of
healthcare delivery. Organizations that are eligible to become PSOs include public or private entities, profit or not-for-profit entities, provider entities such as hospital chains, and
other entities that establish special components to serve as PSOs. By providing both privilege and confidentialiry PSOs create a secure environment in which clinicians and healthcare organizations can collect, aggregate, and analyze data, thereby improving qualiry by
identifying and reducing the risks and hazards associated with patient care.
Eight patient safety activities are carried out by, or on behalf of PSOs or healthcare
providers:
. efforts to improve patient safety and the quality of healthcare delivery;
. collection and analysis of patient safety work product (PSWP);
.
.
.
.
'
development and dissemination of information regarding patient safety, such as recommendations, protocols, or information regarding best practices;
activities related to the operation of a patient safety evaluation system and the provision of feedback to participants in a patient safety evaluation system (AHRQ, n.d.).
As of November 2009,27 states plus the District of Columbia had passed legislation or
regulation supporting adverse event reporting to a state agency. The new laws and regulations were intended to raise accountability in healthcare organizations. Public reporting
also has the potential to improve healthcare safety through event analysis and by examining and disseminating lessons learned (National Academy for State Health Policy, 2011).
Q SoluEions
.
.
.
.
Healthcare Safety
TeamworkWithinUnits (average 807o positive response)-the extent to which staffmembers support each other, treat each other with respect, and work together as a team;
2. Supervisorflllandger Expectations andActions PromotingPatient Safety (average 75o/o positive response)-the extent to which supervisors/managers consider staffsuggestions to
improve patient safety, praise stafffor following patient safety procedures, and do not
overlook patient safety problems;
3. Organizational Learning, Continuous Improvement (average 72o/o positive response)the extent to which mistakes lead to positive changes and changes are evaluated for
effectiveness; and
4. Management Support for Patient Sdfety (average 72o/o positive response)-the extent to
which hospital management provides a work climate that promotes patient safety and
shows that patient safefy is a top prioriry (Sorra et al., 2012, p.3).
Issues presenting the most potential for improvement for most hospitals (according to
survey responses) included
1. Nonpunitive Response to Error (average 44o/o positive response)-the extent to which staff
feel their mistakes and event reports are not held against them, and that mistakes are
not kept in their personnel file;
2. Handffi andTransirions (average 45o/o positive response)-the extent to which
important patient care information is transferred across hospital units and during shift
changes; and
3. Staffing (average 567o positive response)-the extent to which there are enough staff
to handle the workload, and work hours are appropriate to provide the best care for
patients (Sorra et al., 2OL2, p.3).
Each of the 12 areas, or composites, in the survey are described in Table 2. The University
of Texas Safery Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is another tool that helps healthcare organizations measure caregiver attitudes about six patient safety-related domains, compare themselves to other organizations, prompt interventions to improve safety attitudes, and measure
the effectiveness of these interventions. The domain scales are teamwork climate, job satisfaction, perceptions of management, safety climate, working conditions, and stress recognition
(Sexton et al., 2AO6; Thomas, Sexton, & Helmreich, 2003). An organization can use the tool to
gather baseline data and test the effectiveness of various patient safety practices.
When the IOM published Crossing the Quality Chasm in 2001, the extent of preventable medical errors was far-reaching (IOM, CQHCA, 2001). Many initiatives focus on inpatient care and fewer focus on other settings such as ambulatory or nursing home care.
The Health Research and Educational Trust-in partnership with the American Hospital
Association, the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), and the Medical Group
Management Association and its certifying body, the American College of Medical Practice
Executives-developed the Physician Practice Patient Safety Assessment (PPPSA) for the
medical practice setting (Health Research and Educational Trust, 2006). The PPPSA is an
interactive self-assessment tool for evaluating medication safery handoffs and transitions,
surgery and invasive procedures, personnel qualifications and competency, practice management and culture, and patient education and communication. Healthcare qualiry professionals in ambulatory settings can use the PPPSA to
gain specific ideas to improve patient safery
.
.
.
.
.T
Q SoluUions
10
Composite
l. Communication openness
error
3. Frequency of events
about
reported
;: ff
+. Handoffs and transitions
is
*:
5. Management support for patient safety Hospital management provides a work climate that promotes patient
safety and shows that patient safety is a top priority.
6. Nonpunitive
response to
7. Organizational
error
Staff feel their mistakes and event reports are not held against them,
and that mistakes are not kept in their personnel file.
learning-continuous
improvement
8. Overall perceptions of patient
Mistakes have led to positive changes and changes are evaluated for
effectiveness.
safety
9.
Staffing
There are enough staff to handle the workload, and work hours are
appropriate to provide the best care for patients.
units
and
units
Staff support each other, treat each other with respect, and work
together as a team.
Healthcare Safety
undertook an update of the original set and endorsed pracrices with significantly expanded
specifications, supporting literature, and guidance for implementation. In 2009, the practices were updated to address pediatric imaging, organ donation, caringfor caregivers, glycemic control, and falls prevention. In 2010, NQF added evidence to the existing practices, and
more direction was given to healthcare professionals for implementation and patient and
family engagement. The resulting 34 safe-care practices are detailed in Table B (NeF, 2010).
Attention to infection prevention and control is growing as part of the national effort
to achieve "zero" preventable hospital infections. Public reporting of infection rates is the
"new clinical mandate" (The Advisory Board Company, p. 3). The 'Journey to Zero" includes
innovative strategies to eradicate hospital-associated infections through a process of laying
the foundation (sizing the burden), crafting a multipronged stratery (establishing frontline
awareness and minimizing pathogen opportuniry), and ensuring sustainable success (promoting long-term gains; The Advisory Board Company, 2008, pp. 18-19). Research shows
that employing nine best practices can reduce the burden of hospital-associated infections.
These practices include
. apresent-on-admissiontutorial,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
an infectionomics primer,
a
prioritization compass,
ahigh-touch objectspotcheck,
central line certification,
a dedicated insertion team,
a Foley validity check,
clockworkantibioticadministration,
automated data intelligence,
an off-protocol physician pilot, and
real-time accountabiliry enforcer (The Advisory Board Company, 2008, pp. 18-19).
The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) also plays a leadership role in promoting patient safety by providing a secure, Internet-based safety surveillance system. It
collects and reports on national and state-specific standardized infection ratios for select
healthcare-associated infections.
Recently introduced in safe practices is the concept of fair and just culture (Marx,
2OO7).In a fair and just culture, everyone throughout the organization is aware that medical errors are inevitable, but all errors and unintended events are reported, even when the
events may not cause patient injury. This culture can make the system safer. A just culture
recognizes that competent professionals make mistakes and acknowledges that even
competent professionals develop unhealthy norms (shortcuts or routine rule violations);
nevertheless, this culture has zero tolerance for reckless behavior. Three principles of a just
culture are described as follows:
l. A fair and just culture is not an effort to reduce personal accountability and discipline.
It is a way to emphasize the importance of learning from mistakes and near misses to
reduce errors in the future.
2. In a fair and just culture an individual is accountable to the system, and the greatest error is to not report a mistake, and thereby prevent the system and others from learning.
Policies that would discourage any healthcare provider from self-reporting errors are at
odds with the goals of a fair and just culture.
11
Q SoluEions
12
Safe Practice
iafePractice't, ':
"I
Leadership Structures
and
Systems
-rt-..'
Leadership structures and systems must be established to ensure organizationwide awareness of patient safety performance gaps, direct accountabllity of leaders
for those gaps, and adequate investment in performance-improvement abilities,
and that actions are taken to g,nsure safe c;re of every patient served.
Culture Measurement,
risk.
Safe Practice 2:
Safe Practice 4:
ldentification and
Mitigation of Risks and
Hazards
Safe Practice 5:
Informed Consent
Ask each patient or legal surrogate to "teach back," in his or her own words, key
information about the proposed treatments or procedures for which he or she is
'
7:
Following serious unanticipated outcomes, including those that are clearly caused
by systems failures, the patient and, as appropriate, the family should receive
timely, transparent, and clear communication concerning what is known about the
event.
Safe Practice
B:
Following serious unintentional harm resulting from systems failures and/or errors
that resulted from human performance failures, the involved caregivers (cllnical
providers, staff and administrators) should receive timely and systematic care to
include: treatment that is just, respect, compassion, supportive medical care, and
the opportunity to fully partlcipate in event investigation and risk identification and
mitigation activities that will prevent future events.
lmplement critical components of a well-designed nursing workforce that mutuatly
reinforce patient safeguards, including the following:
'
a nurse staffing plan with evidence that it is adequately resourced and actively
malaged
a1rd its
safety;
.
.
senior administrative nursing leaders, such as a chief nursing officer, are part of
the hospital senior management team;
governance boards and senior administrative leaders that take accountability for
ieducing patient safety risks related to nurse staffing decisions and the provision
.
,i
"
'
Direct Caregivers
Ensure that nonnursing direct care staffing levels are adequate, that staff are
competent, and that they have had adequate orientation, training, and education
to perform their asslgned direct care duties.
continued
Y;'
I
I
Healthcare Safety
13
(continued)
Safe Practice
Practice Statement
Safe Practice
All patients in general intensive care units (both adult and pediatric) should
11:
,.,rn"di.1T"
Safe Practice
Safe Practice
cetified') .
, :,
.,,
i,
timely manner and in a clearly understandable form to patients and all of the
patient's healthcare providers/professionals within and between care settings who
need that information to provide continued care.
a
13:
Order Read-Back
Abbreviations
(triticaf.care
12:
Safe Practice
be
managed by physicians who have specific training and certification in critical care
and
''
'
For verbal or telephone orders or for telephonic reporting of critical test results,
verify the complete order or test result by having the person who is receiving
the information record and "read back" the complete order or test result.
'
Standardize a list of "do not use" abbreviations, acronyms, symbols, and dose
designations that cannot be used throughout the organization.
Studies
A discharge plan must be prepared for each patient at the time of hospital
14:
Labeling of Diagnostic
discharge, and a concise discharge summary must be prepared for and relayed
Discharge Systems
Computerized Prescriber
lmplement a computerized prescriber order entry system built upon the requisite
foundation of reengineered evidence-based care, an assurance of healthcare
organization staff and independent practitioner readiness, and an integrated
Order Entry
16:
Safe Adoption of
lvledrcatron Keconcrlratron
Safe Practice
.accuratepatientmedicationlistthroughoutthecontinuumofcare
Pharmacy leaders should have an active role on the administrative leadership
18:
team that reflects their authority and accountability for medication management
systems performance across the organization.
Comply with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) hand
Hand Hygiene
hygiene guidelines.
Pharmacist Leadership
lnfluenza Prevention
control.
Safe Practice
21:
Central Line-Associated
by
Bloodstream lnfection
Prevention
Take actions
Surgical-Site lnfection
Prevention
intervention praciices.
continued
'9167'wruo1,huengpuonep,iq'(uoptatpe6puqe)roda
lllpno
snsuasuo3y:alepd61 Otg7-are)qlleeHJallagro1salpe4ay5utotJpaldepy
ol
Posn aq Plnoqs
uaqM
aje sarPnls 6urber-ur
6ur6euu1
Il
'solrl)erd uorlua^.lalut
Paseq-aluaPl^a 6ulluau-laldurl
,(q saunlur patelar-llpj a)npar pue slle, luarled tua^ard ol suorpe eIeI
)rrlerpad
lolluo] lrual,(;9
:zt alrllerd ajes
'suorlenle^a
lsu s,luarled
aqi uo paspq slua^a asra^pe ro1 lsr.r aql olnper ol poqlaur aleudordde,(11etrur1r
e asn PUe'srsorqlJ )rujals^s ltua6oiqdau Palelfosse-u-lnrurlope6 Pue ajnlleJ leuar
parnpur-erpaul-lserluo) roJ )srr le sluarled alenle^a o1 s1o:olord PalePlle^ asn
'r(delarll luPInEeosll ue
uuo.rl 6url;nsar
'srxelLqdordoqLUorLlt
paseq-aruaplna'eleudordde
jo lsrr
.ro1
X11e:rur1:
esn
Jo spoqtau
'Lr.rsrloqu-raoqurorqt snouan 6urdoganap
uorluaAard
r.1r sr
I
oqur
aoquo.rLll snouan
:gz
altlleld ojes
'arnpalord 6uor14 'alr5 6uor11 6ur1ua,ner6 ro, lotolord lesre^rull aql luauualdul
a)tlreld ajes
uorlue^aid
uortla1ul
Xq
's.iuaLilssassp
F)ol
e uo
6utluau.ralduur
uosnpu nJ palenleaa
aq plnovs
.ra
peqdaluj
fueuul'1
PalPDossv-ralaLllel
:sz a)ttleJd aJes
u.ralsls
)si./ /euotlezuebto uo paseg 7ara1
ellarsgapy sai:ads
a1e1
lrel
se
pue-to eq)uaq)sj
q)ns-ryDeq a^qebau-wetb
luqlsat
'suorllajur
roj lsu le
oucl
-sluarled
]uatu3]els
suo!Qnlos
luelsrsag-6nrprl;n61
luaulalduul
(panwtuot)
uorlueleld r-usrue6rg
alllleld
arel
arlper6
a1e5
'
:g7
al!lf,erd ares
vl
T'
I
I
I
Healthcare Safety
15
3. A new culture of patient safety is successfully created when all serve as safery advocates
regardless of their positions within an organization. Providers and consumers will feel
safe and supported when they report medical errors or near misses and voice concerns
about patient safety.
Healthcare organizations committed to a fair and just culture identify and correct the
systems or processes of care that contributed to the medical error or near miss; they do not
assign blame. When feeling protected by a nonpunitive culture of medical error reporting,
more healthcare professionals will report more errors and near misses, which will further
improve patient safety through opportunities for improvement and lessons learned (California Patient Safery Action Coalition, 2008; Marx, 2OO7).
Senge's concept of the learning organization has been applied to heaithcare during the
past several years. His definition of a learning organization is one "where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive
patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people
are continually learning to see the whole together" (Senge, 1990, p. 3). Alearninghealthcare
system "is designed to generate and apply the best evidence for the collaborative healthcare
choices of each patient and provider; to drive the process of discovery as a natural outgrowth of patient care; and to ensure innovation, qualiry, safery and value in health care"
(IOM, Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine [ROEBM], 2007, p.ix).The most pressing
needs for change identified by the IOM roundtable are those related to
adaptation to the pace ofchange;
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
strongersynchronyofefforts;
culture of shared responsibility;
new clinical research paradigm;
clinical decision support systems;
universal electronic health records;
tools for database linkage, mining, and use;
notion of clinical data as a public good;
incentives aligned for practice-based evidence;
public engagement;
trusted scientific broker; and
leadership (IOM, ROEBM, 2oo7,p.
S).
Q SoluUions
16
As part of its duties, the governing body or board of directors holds responsibility to
promote quality of care and preserve safety. The heightened attention being given to
healthcare quality measurement and public reporting affects this responsibility. Quality
oversight is recognized more clearly as a core fiduciary duty relating not only to financial
health and reputation but to safety and quality of care. Ensuring and improving care cannot
be delegated to the medical staff and executive leadership. An activated board, in partnership with executive leadership and medical staff, can set system-level expectations and accountability for high performance, high reliabiliry, and the elimination of harm.
Qualiry and safety, which also can benefit financially stable and growing healthcare organizations, are of board interest and represent a fiduciary duty. Bond-rating agencies such
as Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investors Service stress the importance of healthcare
leaders' attention to clinical quality outcomes and safety as they make decisions about bond
ratings for hospitals. A recent Moody's publication noted,
From a credit perspective, a not-for-profit hospital's focus on a quality agenda can
translate into improved ratings through increased volume and market share, operational effi,ciencies, better rates from commercial payers, and improved financial
performance. Like mdny strategies, [Moody's] recognize[s] that realizing financial
returns from a quality strategy may require large capital costs and incurred operating
Iosses in the short term. However, over the long term, a hospital's focus on quality
will be viewed as a credit positite if greater patient demand and financial improvements materialize. Many not-for-profit hospitals are launching strategies to improve
evidence-based clinical outcomes and patient safety, which we view as the two key
to improve quality is a
facets of a strategy aimed at improving quality. The
major component of most hospitals' mission to provide the best patient care possible.
(Moody's Glob al Credit Rese arch, 200 8)
ffirt
Safety can be integrated into strategic planning. IHI QOOT) outlines six things all
boards should consider in their effort to improve quality and reduce harm.
1. Setting aims: Set a specific aim to reduce harm this year. Make an explicit public commitment to measurable quality improvement (e.g., a reduction in unnecessary mortality
and harm), establishing a clear aim for the faciliry or system.
2. Getting data and hearing stories: Select and review progress toward safer care as the
first agenda item at every board meeting; progress should be grounded in transparency
and a desire to put a "human face" on harm data.
3. Establishing and monitoring system-level measures: Identifii a small group of
organization-wide measures of patient safety (e.g., facility-wide harm, risk-adjusted
mortaliry), update the measures continually, and make them transparent to the entire
organization and all of its customers.
Changingthe environment, policies, and culture: Committo establishingand maintaining an environment that is respectful, fair, and just for all who experience pain and loss as
a result of avoidable harm and adverse outcomes (patients, their families, and the staff).
Learning, startingwith the board: Develop capability as a board. Learn how the best
boards work with executives and physician leaders to reduce harm. Set an expectation
for similar levels of education and training for all staff.
Establishing executive accountability: Oversee the effective execution of a plan to
achieve aims to reduce harm, including executive team accountabiliry for clear performance improvement targets.
't'
I
Healthcare Safety
With the convergence of clinical care, safety priorities, and economic stabiliry, board
members'interestwill increase over time and create opportunities for healthcare quality professionals to educate organizational leaders on the importance of paying attention to safety.
Il.
Operational Considerations
A.
17
Q SoluEions
18
NPSG.OI.Ot.O1
Use at least two ways to identify patients. For example, use the patienti name and date of
birth. This is done to make sure that each patient gets the correct medicine and treatment.
NPSG.ot.os.ol
Make sure that the correct patient gets the correct blood when they get a blood transfusion.
NPSG.oz.os.Ot
NPSG.os.o+.ot
Before a procedure, label medicines that are not labeled, for example, medicines in syringes,
cups, and basins. Do this in the area where medicines and supplies are set up.
NPSG.o:.os.oi Take extra care with patients who take medicines to thin their blood.
NPSG.oE.oo.ot Record and pass along correct information about a patients medicines. Find out what
medicines the patient is taking. Compare those medicines to new medicines given to the pa-
tient. Make sure the patient knows which medicines to take when they are at home. Tell the patient it is important to bring their up-to-date list of medicines every time they visit a doctor.
Prevent infection
NPSG.oz.ot.oi
Use the hand cleaning guidelines from the CDC or the WHO. Set goals for improving
hand cleaning. Use the goals to improve hand cleaning.
NPSG.oz.o:.0l
NPSG.Oz.o+.ol
Use proven guidelines to prevent infection of the blood from central lines.
NPSG.oz.os.ol
N PSG.oz.oo.Ol
NPSG.1S.Ot.Ol
Find out which patients are most likely to try to commit suicide.
UP.Ot.Ot.Ot
Make sure that the correct surgery is done on the correct patient and at the correct place
on the patients body.
UP.ot.OZ.Ot
UP.oi.o:.ot
Mark the correct place on the patient's body where the surgery is to be done.
Pause before the surgery to make sure that a mistake is not being made.
From "2012 Hospital National Patient Safety Goals," by The Joint Commission, 2012. Retrieved from wwwjointcommission.orgfassetsftfdfzotzNPSG-HAP.pdf. Copyright zotz by The Joint Commission. Reprinted with permission.
Healthcare Safety
healthcare leaders have a dug to recognize the inevitability of human error, attempt
to design systems that make such error less likely, and avoid punitive reactions to honest
errors. Regardless of the setting or type of healthcare organi zation, the scope and oversight
of the patient safety program includes the following areas:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
definition of objectives,
design ofsafe processes,
process implementation, and
measurement, monitoring, and improvement.
The patient safety program provides a coordinated and integrated system for hospitalwide assessment and improvement of interrelated safery support, and clinical care processes that affect patient outcomes, including standards compliance. Healthcare qualiry
professionals can develop a patient safery program by
.
.
.
.
.
working collaboratively to enhance the adverse event, sentinel event, and peer review
processes; and
19
Q SoluEions
20
as EHRs; patient engagement tools such as personal health records and secure, private
Internet ptrtals; and health information exchanges. A recent IOM report (IOM, 2Ol2)
that examined the state of the art in system safety and opportunities to build safer systems
concluded that
just the
Safety is an emergent property of a larger system that takes into account not
software but also how it is used by clinicians.
The'sociotechnical system" includes technology (software, hardware), people
(clinicians, patients), processes (workflow), organization (capacity, decisions about
how health IT is applied, incentives), and the external environment (regulations,
public opinion).
Safer implementation and use of health IT is a complex, dynamic process that
requires a shared responsibility between vendors and healthcare organizations.
poor user-interface design, poor workflow, and complex data interfaces threaten
patient safety.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
o
Healthcare Safety
breast cancer, colon cancer, cystic fibrosis, diabetes, HIV infection, and sickle cell anemia.
When the patients were asked about privacy protections, they ranked the following topics as
needing the most protection: abortion history, mental health history HIV/AIDS, genetic test
results, drug and alcohol history, and sexually transmitted disease history (Plantinga et al.,
2003).
W. Edward Hammond presented solutions to the interoperability dilemma. He
proposed the following to meet the goals for a single EHk (1) a unique identifier is needed
for each person in America; (2) all stakeholders need to agree on a common terminology;
(3) all stakeholders need to use standardized data elements with a single terminolory;
(+) the leaders of all types of healthcare organizations (practitioners, group practices,
healthcare enterprises, and health plans) need to be totally committed to modernizing care
delivery through health IT; (5) a national leader is needed who can articulate what needs
to be done at a national level to meet these goals; (6) vendors need to be brought into the
process of modernizing the healthcare infrastructure; (7) a sustainable funding model must
be developed; and (8) a feasible timeline should be developed (Hammond, 2OO7). EHRs
have the potential to capture data that can be reported for purposes of healthcare safety
performance and improvement.
Leadership plays a critical role in the adoption of health IT. But major barriers
to realizing its potential benefit exist. These barriers include the need for increased
standardization, funding regulatory relief, a single set of privacy and security laws, and a
uniform approach in matching patients to their records (Merritt, 2OO7).
Various technological solutions have been proposed to enhance patient safety
programs. The premise of these solutions is that if processes are standardized and the
potential for medical error is reduced by the automation of processes, errors will be
mitigated. Clancy (2005) proposed four health IT goals: (1) connect health records, (z) build
smart systems, (3) put the patient at the center of care, and (+) put prevention at the center
of treatment. In healthcare, technology can be applied to the work of nurses and other
healthcare professionals. Table 5 illustrates this point.
EHRs typically include four core components: electronic clinical documentation,
results reporting and management, electronic prescribing, results reporting and
management, and clinical decision support. Barcoding and patient engagement tools
have been added. Table 6 provides potential benefits and safety concerns of health IT
components.
C. Risk Management
Enterprise risk management is recommended as a strucflrred analyical process focusing on
identifying and eliminating the portfolio of risks rather than risk avoidance (Carroll, zOOa).
The portfolio includes the domains of operations (the organization's systems and practices),
financial resources (the earning, raising, or accessing of capital and the costs associated
with transferring risk), human resources (recruitment, maintenance, and management of
the workforce), strategic direction (the organization's ability to grow and expand), legal and
regulatory affairs (compliance with licensure, regulations, and accreditation standards), and
technological resources (biomedical, health Il equipment, and devices).
Using an enterprise-wide approach can help healthcare organizations manage risk.
Organizations also should have established mechanisms for reviewing potential incidents
of risk and safety concern. All members of the workforce are responsible for identifying,
reporting, and documenting risk management and potential quality-of-care problems
that can influence patient safety. Effective strategies for proactively reducing errors and
21
Penulluo)
Molj)ro^l ur suorldnJslc .
'uaPro alqgedLuolul pue '6ursop alqnoP salelrll)ej lerfl uolleredas
uol]lun, -
'suot1e:lpeu .s]uerled
Jo
Mar^
luaraqof
se qfns'sloJJa Jol
saplunlloddo
Mo\
su'l,aouo)/ueles
.suorldrtrsatd ,.6'a) steplo
{tporu
laq6rg .
s]oiJa uollellPaLu Jo lsu a^llelal laMol .
saurl PunoJeurnl .lePJo lauoqs .
srapro elqr6al ut saseelf,ul a6le1 .
s4[euag ppueto4
(lOae)
Peleulolnv .
sllnsar,(6o;orper pue (6o1oq1ed fuo1eroqe1 .
6upeq:,leur;dostP.ratu; .
suats,(s elep 6u1ge1s Pue Peol)roM .
Plolal qlleaLl lo leflPaul fluol})all .
slrodar palelar-,!a1es luarled
srorJa
slralv .
su.uPle
llel
saf
uolleflunulLuol .
le)turll .
surals,{s 6uuaplo )luorlfelf .
}toddns uorsrsap
aurluo .
6ur:ua.rayuo: oap!71 .
6ururell
6urureel
af,uelstc .
6ugureal snonulluo)
aJef
jo lurod le uorleluau:nlo6 .
sProlar lellPau lluoJpalf .
qllrvt uollef
!unuluo)
suals,k
6u1ge1s
pazuelnduro3 .
sualsr{s Xloluarrut
sflloqod .
qlleaqalal Pue aur)rPaualal .
6upo1;uo1a1 luallEd alouau
fluolllalf
slrloqou .
,(6o1ourpa1
fu
fu1au,lxo aslnd .
oaPln .
sJolelquan .
6ur.ro11uouu ePlsPag .
fu1eua1a1 .
ef,uelllaruns
a)uelllaruns
pue'6uFol1uoN'luautssassv lualled
suotSnlos
llel
parl6
zz
I
!
Healthcare Safety
23
'
Benefits
in
SafetyConcerns
'
Reductions
errors,
- risk of toxic drug levels,
- time to therapeutic stabilization,
_ relative risk
of medication
'
'
- management
- prescriptions of nonpreferred
in
medications
'
'
of
Bar coding
Bar coding can be used to track medications, orders, and other healthcare products. lt can also be used to verify
patient identification and dosage.
Potential
'
Benefits
medication
Safety Concerns
lntroduction of workarounds; for example, clinicians can
- transcription,
- dispensing, and
- administration errors
- scan orders
Potential
'
'
Benefits
S.f"ty
children
and
illnesses
Concerns
- patients,
- families,
- friends, or
- unauthorized
users
Note:Ia6/e6r.snotintendedtobeanexhaustiVelistofallpotentialbenefitsandsafetyconcerns"
common potential benefits and safety concems.
From Health lT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care, 6y lnstitute of Medicine, Committee on Patient Safery and Health
lnformation Technology, 2012. Copyright zotz by National Academr'es Press. Reprnte d with permission.
Q SoluEions
24
.
.
.
.
.
identifu, evaluate, and prioritize areas of risk that affect the operations of the
organization;
assess whether the identified risks are caused by internal (controllable) or external
(uncontrollable) factors;
develop and propose comprehensive strategies to minimize risks;
establish action plans to address problems when identified; and
Healthcare qualiry professionals can also work with their organizations to design educational programs to help healthcare executives and other organizational leaders address
serious events when they occur, respond effectively and learn to improve safety as a result
(Conway, Federico, Stewart, & Campbell,20fD.
Disclosing errors to patients and families is becoming more common practice in
healthcare organizations across the country, especially in the aftermath of the Josie King
incident in Maryland. In 20Ol King was 18 months old when she died in a hospital as the
result of medical errors. NQF (2009) identified disclosure as an important part of error
discovery in contrast to tactics of the past, which sprang from fear and blame. A just culture
supports the disclosure of successes and failures. Healthcare quality professionals rypically
are involved in the handling of errors and work with quality management, enterprise risk
management, and legal professionals to determine a course of action. Table 7 outlines NQF
consensus standards regarding the disclosure of error or injury to consumers.
More recent literature on disclosure highlights the "respectful management" of adverse
events (Conway et al., 2011). The aims of this group's work were to
. encourage and help every organization to develop a clinical crisis management plan
before they need to use it;
o provide an approach to integrating this plan into the organizational culture of quality
and safery with a particular focus on patient- and family-centered care and fair and
just treatment for staff; and
o provide organizations with a concise, practical resource to inform their efforts when a
serious adverse event occurs in the absence of a clinical crisis management plan and/
or culture of quality and safety (Conway et al., 2Oll,p.4).
Organizations also should look for ways to encourage reporting using innovations such
as the "Good Catch Awards" at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, MD. This reporting
system encourages every clinician to report situations in which patients are at risk and
potentially lifesaving actions are warranted. Actions reflected system change and were
evaluated for sustainabiliry such as the national recall of improperly labeled drugs that had
caused look- alike medication errors (McCook, 2 011).
'uotssturad tpltA
'6167 'wruo1
hueng
puopeSl
lg
y :alepdl
pluyday
.wruo1
1o uorsrnord
elelpe,
,(er.u
ol'Jnflo
ol ]uaLlrllr,llutotr e
(pauaddeq seq srLlt furos ue 1 "6'a) papadxa
se lou seM auJollno oql leLll 1er6al
1o uorssardxa rrqledr.ua pue ]r:r;dxa ue
se pue ale6rlsanut
-e1dxa ue sopnllur
:6urr*o;1o1 ar-1r,{q
papadxa
sr ura1s,(s
se
a.ratflv,
.
'(otoz
suorlezluebro
,saurol
leuralxe 6urpnPur),Qa1es luerled ro1 e;qrsuodsar asoql ol slua^a burpodal
-1no paledrrrlueun 6urso;rslp to1 are;d ur sasserold
aAeL{ lsnui suot}eztueE.rg
leLulo,
:re6uo1
Jo
sr
teqM
'sauJol1no paledrrrlueun
snot.los 6urr*o;;o3
195) luana
uoN ./ "lq"I
{1e1eg oiecq}leeH
i
26
Q SoluUions
A healthcare safety culture should have as its foundation an atmosphere devoid of blame,
and a search for opportunities for improvement should be employed. The organization should
have systematic ways to welcome the reporting of medication errors. Because 857o of errors are
the result of system failures and traditionally only Llo/o are due to human error, the exploration
of systems issues should be primary in identif,ring a root cause of error (Deming 2000).
NQF has endorsed, through a consensus process, the adoption of safe practices related
to medication administration (Table 8). Other organizations such as the Leapfrog Group
have supported their endorsement. More specific recommendations are found in Sofe
Practices for Better Heakhcare: 2O1O tJpdare (NeF, 2010).
Table 8. NQF: Safe Practices Related to Medication Administration
For verbal or telephone orders or for telephonic reporting of critical test results, verify the complete order or test
result by having the person who is receiving the information record and read back the complete order or test result.
lmplement a computerized prescriber order entry system built upon the requisite foundation of reengineered
evidence-based care, an assurance of healthcare organization staff and independent practitioner readiness, and
an integrated information technology infrastructure.
Standardize a list of "do not use" abbreviations, acronyms, symbols, and dose designations that cannot be used
throughout the organization.
The healthcare organization must develop, reconcile, and communicate an accurate medication list throughout
the continuum ofcare.
Pharmacists should actively participate in medication management systems by, at a minimum, working with other health professionals to select and maintain a formulary of medications chosen for safety and effectiveness, being available for consultation with prescribers on medication ordering, interpretation and review of medication
orders, preparation of medications, assurance of the safe storage and availability of medications, dispensing of
medications, and administration and monitoring of medications.
a
ldentify all high-alert drugs and establish policies and processes to minimize the risks associated with the use of
these drugs. At a minimum, such drugs should include intravenous adrenergic agonlsts and antagonists, chemotherapy agents, anticoagulants and antithrombotics, concentrated parenteral electrolytes, general anesthetics,
neuromuscular blockers, insulin and oral hypoglycemics, and opiates.
Healthcare organizations should dispense medications, including parenterals, in unit-dose, or, when appropriate,
in unit-of-use form, whenever possible.
Adapted from Safe Practices for Better Healthcare-2010 Update: A Consensus Report (abndged version), by National Quality Forum,2otO.
Fo rum. Repinted with permission.
E. NQF'Never
Events"
In 2008 CMS announced a proposed rule that would update payment policies and rates
under the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for fiscal year 2009, beginning
for discharges on or after October 1, 2008. The proposed rule included a discussion of
candidates for addition to the list of hospital-acquired infections for fiscal year 2009,
including several conditions that have been identified by NQF as "serious reportable
adverse events' (also called "never events'). The complete list of 29 serious reportable
events that was updated in 2011 is shown in Table 9 (NQF, 2OlLa, pp. iii-iv). CMS withholds
payment to hospitals if any of these events occurs in an acute care faciliry.
F. Consumer Empowerment,
'uolssrur.,ad
puopep,lq
1g7lqfuldo3'tlOZ'uilo)Al;eng
leuortep
l!
ut
Ttrfl Paugdeu
uruo! hl9no
'l
hl
aLll ul
6urgas arelqlleaq e ur
sllerpeq ro stureitsar lerrs,(qd Jo asn aqt q]!M pelenosse funlur snorras ro \Beep lualled 'C
6urpas aJesqlleaq e ut ssa:o:d a.re: luaqed
e Jo asrnof, aql ul afrnos ,(ue uorl
PaJinf,ur urnq e qlrM PelPDosse funfur snor]as ro qleaplJe$ rc luatled
saf uelsqns :rxol trq palpur.leluol ale lo 'se6 6uo:ar aql .se6 ou
a1rr1ar,
']
ureluol ]uatled aql ol pala^rlap aq o] se6 raqloue ro uaE,fio ro1 paleubrsap suals,(s qf,rqm ur uappu! {uV 'g
6ur11as are)q{ear{ e ur ssatord
a.re: luatled e Jo asrnol aLll ul l)or.ls lulrala ue qllM paler)osse funfur snouas ro Ll]pap
Se$ ro lueqed 'V
slua^f Fuautuor!^uf
.s
buplas arpf,qtleeLl
e
hl
e6er5'1;1
a6ef5,(uy
rc r+eop lua!]ed
gleaq '6
pale: 6uraq
a1;qm
(uorler1s1u1utpe Jo alnor 6uol*.ro 'uorleredard 6uora,r 'a1er 6uorr* 'auurl 6uo.r,ra 'luarled 6uo.nr'asop 6uom
'6rup 6uo.ru aq1 6ur,r;o,rur sro.ua "6'a) rorro uorlef,rpaLU e ql!/r palenosse,&nfur snouas Jo qleap ]ua!]ed
slue^f parua6eueyl
'f
'8
'V
are) .t
6urgas arc)q]leaLl
e ul .lo,
l
'l
'l
pate] 6uraq allqM funfur snouas ur stlnsal leLll Lurprl-jlas ro'ap!l!ns paldrualle'applns lueBed
(aruereaddeslp) luauadole luarled qtlM pater)osse ,ln[ur snor.ras ro tgpap lua[ed '8
uostad pazuotpne ue
ueql laL{}o auo,(ue ol suotsr)aP eleuJ ol alqeun st oqm a6e ,(ue yo luaprsat/tuarled
Jo aseapl .ro
a6teq:sr6 .y
ul
lo y]etsp ]ueBpd .J
Papuatur se ueql Jeqlo suotlf,un, lo Pasn st aft^ap
e
uolllunJ
io
esn
eql qllM palerrosse funlur snoues Jo gleap luaged 'g
Jo
.l
paplaold slr6olorq to 'saf,t^aP 's6ntp paleurr.ueluo) Jo esn aq] qllM peleoosse,(,rnfur snotras ro tfleap lualled
^q .V
.y
slual3 arnpefoJd a^!se^ul ro;ecl6rn5 .t
LZ
Ireleg
elecqtleoH
{.-.
28
Q SoluEions
misused narcotics. Sorrel Kinglater went public with her findings of breakdowns that led
to her daughter's death at Johns Hopkins Hospital, a premier medical system in Baltimore,
MD. The Josie King Foundation was established with the mission "to prevent others from
dying or being harmed by medical errors" (Josie King Foundation, 2008). Together with
the hospital and provider groups, King also founded the Patient Safery Group in 2OO4,
which upholds the mission to 'encourage a culture of safety by providing tools that allow
healthcare organizations the ability to communicate, collaborate, improve, and share"
(The Patient Safety Group, 2008). The recent focus on safety also requires that clinicians
engage patienB in their care. Patients and their families need to understand their role
and responsibilities related to safery. Patient-centered communication has been shown to
improve clinical outcomes (Epstein & Street, 2oo7).Various public and private entities have
launched several initiatives to support consumer engagement. They are described below.
AHRQ: TalkingQuality. TalkingQualiry is a comprehensive resource and guide for organizations that produce and disseminate reports to consumers on the qualiry of care healthcare
organizations (e.g., hospitals, health plans, medical groups, nursing homes) and individual physicians provide. Consumer report sponsors share a common mission to improve the
quality of care consumers receive. They also share a common challenge on how to convey
comparative information about healthcare quality in a way that achieves the following objectives:
.
.
.
.
.
.
TalkingQuality offers
innovative ideas for communicating complex information on healthcare quality to
consumers,
Healthcare Safety
29
Americans for Quality Health Care Quality Tool Box Consumer Engagement. The National Partnership for women and Families (NPWF) believe that "no rir4. person, group
or profession can improve health and healthcare throughout a communiry-wiihout the
support of others" (NpWF,2OL2).
The partnership has also developed a Consumer Partnership for e-Health. Tools have
been developed for engaging consumers.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). According to its website, pCORI "is an independent organization created to help people rnake informed healthcare decisions and improve healthcare delivery. PCORI will commission research that is guided
by
patients, caregivers, and the broader healthcare communiry and will produce
high integriry
evidence-based information. PCORI is committed to transparency rrrd rigorous stakeholier-driven process that emphasizes patient engagement. PCORI will use" a variety of forums
and public comment periods to obtain public input throughout its work" (pCoRI, 20L2,
para.l-2).
In March 2012, the PCoRI Board refined its definition of patient-centered outcomes
research. "Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) helps people and their
caregivers
communicate and make informed healthcare decisions, allowing their voices to be heard
in assessing the value of healthcare options." This research answers patient-centered questions such as
1. Given my personal characteristics, conditions and preferences, what should I expect
will happen to me?
2. What are my options and what are the potential benefits and harms of those options?
3. what can I do to improve the outcomes that are most important to me?
4. How can clinicians and the care delivery systems they work in help me make the best
decisions about my health and healthcare? (PCORI, 2Ot2).
PCORI has established national priorities for patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness, which are
'
Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options: the research goal is to determine which option(s) work best for distinct populations with specific health problems;
'
'
'
one; and
'
-'1
Q SoluEions
30
Beyond reducing harm caussd in hospitals, the Partnership for Patients is an important
test of what can occur when the nation acts as one to address a major national health problem.
The recently formed Innovation Center at the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services
intends to dedicate more than $500 million to test models of safer care delivery and promote
implementation of best practices in patient safety. CMS will also provide $500 million for
a community-based care transition program created by the Affordable Care Act to support
hospitals and community-based organizations in helping Medicare beneficiaries at high risk
for readmission to the hospital safely transition from the hospital to other care settings.
More than Z3OO partners, including more than 3,200 hospitals as well as physicians and
nurses groups, consumer groups, and employers, have pledged their commitment to the
Partnership for Patients (HHS, 2011, para. 1-4).
The Joint Commission empowers consumers by providing educational materials and
tools as navigational aids for complex healthcare systems.In 2OO2 in response to a public
outcry regarding unsafe practices, the Joint Commission, in collaboration with CMS,
or concerns,
and
or
Know what medicctions you take and why you take them. Medication errors dre the
mo st
co
Use a hospital, clinic, surgery center, or other type of heakhcare organization that has
undergone a rigorous on-site evaluation against established state-of-the-art quality
Participate in all decisions about your treatment. You are the center of the healthcare
team. (The Joint Commission, 2012b)
Roizen and Oz, in their book You the Smart Patient: An Insider's Handbookfor Getting the
BestTreatment Q,oo6), provide consumers with "everything from selecting the best physician
or hospital to avoiding all manner of therapeutic misadventures" (Soo Hoo, 2006 ,p.4).
.
.
.
Healthcare Safety
.
.
lll.
.
.
.
Organizations use root cause analysis to determine the cause of a variation in a process.
Human, environmental, equipment, policy, and leadership system factors .r. .*piored in
the analysis. Root cause analysis is described further in Soluti ons:
Q
Quality and performance
ISMP (2008) outlines the things that differentiate a red rule from other crucial rules
such as policies and procedures:
31
Q SoluEions
32
It must be possible and delirable for everyone to follow a red rule every time in a prounder all circumstances (red rules should not contain verbiage such as "except
when . . ." or "each breach will be assessed for appropriateness).
Anyone who notices that the red rule has been breached has the authority and responsibility to stop further progress of patient care associated with the red rule while
protecting the patient or employee from harm.
Managers and other leaders (including the board of trustees) always support the work
stoppage and immediately begin rectifying the problem and addressing the underlying
reason for breaking the rule.
The people who breached the red rule are given an opportunity to support their behavioral choices and are then judged fairly based on the reasons for breaking the
rule, regardless of rank and experience.
cess
.
.
.
.
The red rules are few well understood, and memorable (para. 7).
Healthcare scenarios for which red rules can be beneficial include patient identification
(using rwo identifiers before administering tests of any kind), sponge-count reconciliation,
time-outs before an invasive procedure, timely alarm response, and correct labeling of
specimens.
lV.
Summary
This module includes a synthesis of current knowledge related to preventing errors and
reducing harm. Both strategic and operational components of developing a healthcare
safety program are presented. Beginning with the importance of leadership, the authors
discuss integrating healthcare safety concepts into an organization's vision, mission, strategic plan, goals, and objectives. Healthcare safery goals from various organizations are also
presented as well as national and global imperatives to reduce harm in healthcare. Finally,
the authors provide guidance in using performance-improvement tools to integrate safety
into enterprise's operations. Comprehensive references, resources, and suggested readings
from the Journalfor Heakhcare Quality also are provided.
In summary, consensus and the scientific literature support the following healthcare
safety tenets:
.
.
.
.
Healthcare leaders must set the vision, mission, purpose, and direction and adopt
healthcare safety practices proven to prevent error.
Organizations should strive to create and maintain a fair and just culture emphasizing
learning from errors and near misses to reduce future errors. Instituting safe practices
decreases errors in healthcare.
Error prevention and reduction of harm are the job of everyone, including consumers.
Empowering and engaging patients leads to better outcomes and fewer errors.
Healthcare organizations must continue to adopt new and emerging evidence-based
safery practices.
Healthcare quality professionals possess unique experience and expertise to assist with
the advancement of safety practices in their organizations and the community at large.
Operational considerations for healthcare qualiry professionals include program development; technology to support the program; enterprise risk management; implementation
of safe medication practices; monitoring of errors and never events; consumer empowerment and engagement; and the adoption, spread, and evaluation of evidence-based safety
innovations.