Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Note: Explore our full index to revealing excerpts of key major media news articles on dozens of
engaging topics. And read excerpts from 20 of the most revealing news articles ever
published.
webpage states, "Since the first National Vaccine Injury Compensation (VICP) claims were filed in
1989, 3,981 compensation awards have been made. More than $2.8 billion in compensation
awards has been paid to petitioners."
classified Pentagon Papers which documented U.S. government malfeasance during the
Vietnam War into the public record. Gravel said the revelations by former/retired Captains
Robert Salas, Bruce Fenstermacher, and David Schindele, as well as retired Security
Policeman Sgt. David Scott, are "the smoking gun of the whole issue" of government
secrecy on UFOs. On September 27, 2010, Captain Salas co-hosted the "UFOs and Nukes"
press conference with noted researcher Robert Hastings, during which seven USAF veterans
revealed ongoing UFO activity at U.S. nuclear weapons sites during the Cold War era. That media
event was extensively and favorably covered by hundreds of news organizations worldwide,
including CNN, which streamed the proceedings live. The full-length video of the press conference
appears at http://www.ufohastings.com. The latest testimony about UFOs knocking ICBMs offline
was heard by Senator Gravel and five other former members of congress at the "Citizen Hearing
on Disclosure" organized by Stephen Bassett at the National Press Club last week.
Note: For the thorough research of Capt. Salas into the event where UFOs disabled nuclear
missiles, click here. Could UFOs disabling nuclear warheads be a message from extraterrestrial
forces for us not to play with such dangerous toys? Hundreds of military and government
witnesses have gone on record claiming a major cover-up around UFOs, including a former
chief of the CIA, the former chiefs of defense of the UK and Canada (see video), and Edgar
Mitchell, the sixth man to walk on the moon. Why is it that so few people are aware of this and
other amazing and even inspiring facts around UFOs? For more, click here.
Note: For the complete text of the article, which has been taken down from the Sacramento Bee
website, click here. Read about a key scientific study which showed that monkeys given standard
human vaccines developed autism symptoms, at this link. And an MSNBC/Associated Press report
shows that the FDA rejected limits on thimerosal and that "most doses of flu vaccine still contain
thimerosal."
If you follow the news about health research, you risk whiplash. First garlic lowers bad cholesterol,
thenafter more studyit doesnt. Hormone replacement reduces the risk of heart disease in
postmenopausal women, until a huge study finds that it doesnt. But what if wrong answers arent
the exception but the rule? More and more scholars who scrutinize health research are now
making that claim. It isnt just an individual study here and there thats flawed, they charge.
Instead, the very framework of medical investigation may be off-kilter, leading time and
again to findings that are at best unproved and at worst dangerously wrong. The result is a
system that leads patients and physicians astrayspurring often costly regimens that wont help
and may even harm you. Even a cursory glance at medical journals shows that once heralded
studies keep falling by the wayside. A major study concluded theres no good evidence that statins
(drugs like Lipitor and Crestor) help people with no history of heart disease. The study ... was
based on an evaluation of 14 individual trials with 34,272 patients. Cost of statins: more than $20
billion per year. Positive drug trials, which find that a treatment is effective, and negative trials,
in which a drug fails, take the same amount of time to conduct. But negative trials took an extra
two to four years to be published. With billions of dollars on the line, companies are loath to
declare a new drug ineffective. As a result of the lag in publishing negative studies, patients
receive a treatment that is actually ineffective. From clinical trials of new drugs to cutting-edge
genetics, biomedical research is riddled with incorrect findings.
Note: For the good of your health, the entire article at the link above is well worth reading. For lots
more on how the profit-oriented health profession puts public health at risk, click here and here.
Note: For a powerfully revealing article by Robert Kennedy, Jr. showing a major cover-up of this
issue, click here. For another suppressed article on a published University of Pittsburgh study with
strong evidence of an autism-vaccine link, click here.
chimera be before more stringent research rules should kick in? Chimerism becomes a more
sensitive topic when it involves growing entire human organs inside animals. And it becomes
especially sensitive when it deals in brain cells. Imagine, said Robert Streiffer, a professor of
philosophy and bioethics at the University of Wisconsin, a human-chimpanzee chimera endowed
with speech ... what some have called a "humanzee." Perhaps the most ambitious efforts to make
use of chimeras come from Irving Weissman, director of Stanford University's Institute of
Cancer/Stem Cell Biology and Medicine. Weissman helped make the first mouse with a nearly
complete human immune system. More recently his team injected human neural stem cells into
mouse fetuses, creating mice whose brains are about 1 percent human. Now Weissman says he
is thinking about making chimeric mice whose brains are 100 percent human.
Note: If the above link fails, click here.
prove a hypothesis are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. Negative results
now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false
is as important to science as knowing what is true.
Note: For more on corruption in science, see the deeply revealing reports from reliable major
media sources available here.
manufactured by the Earth under ultrahot conditions and tremendous pressures. As this
substance migrates toward the surface, it is attacked by bacteria, making it appear to have
an organic origin dating back to the dinosaurs, he says. That ... raises the tantalizing possibility
that oil may not be the limited resource it is assumed to be. In 2008 ... a group of Russian and
Ukrainian scientists [said] that oil and gas don't come from fossils; they're synthesized deep within
the earth's mantle by heat, pressure, and other purely chemical means, before gradually rising to
the surface. The idea that oil comes from fossils "is a myth" that needs changing according to
petroleum engineer Vladimir Kutcherov, speaking at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden.
"All kinds of rocks could have oil and gas deposits." Alexander Kitchka of the Ukrainian National
Academy of Sciences estimates that 60 percent of the content of all oil is abiotic in origin and not
from fossil fuels.
Note: For more on the intriguing abiotic oil theory, click here. For key reports from major media
sources on promising energy sources, click here.
key outcomes such as heart attacks or mortality. "None of us really care what our cholesterol level
is. We care about having a heart attack," Gibson said. "For the drug to be worthwhile taking, it has
to be directly related to prevent a heart attack."
Note: For lots more reliable information about corruption in the pharmaceutical industry, click here.
mostly scientists and doctors, including Nobelists in chemistry and medicine, have signed
the petition of the Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis, which
calls for a more independent and skeptical approach to the question of AIDS causality.
Note: If you want to be educated about the details of how rampant corruption has become in the
medical research industry, read this well researched article. For a concise description of unbridled
corruption in the health care industry by one of the most respected doctors in the world, click here.
miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent, endpoints that foster
reductive metrics. National assessment procedures ... incentivise bad practices. And individual
scientists, including their most senior leaders, do little to alter a research culture that occasionally
veers close to misconduct. Part of the problem is that no-one is incentivised to be right.
Instead, scientists are incentivised to be productive. The conclusion of the symposium was
that something must be done. The good news is that science is beginning to take some of its worst
failings very seriously. The bad news is that nobody is ready to take the first step to clean up the
system.
Note: The Lancet is considered by many to be the most prestigious medical journal in the world. If
the editor-in-chief of the Lancet is making these comments, who can we trust? Read a powerfully
revealing essay by former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine Marcia Angell on
how the drug companies blatantly manipulate science for profit.
A bogus scientific paper about a new anti-cancer compound was accepted by more than half of
300 scientific journals it was submitted to in the past year, despite having obvious and serious
scientific flaws. Science journalist John Bohannon reported the results of his experiment in the
journal Science. Bohannon, who holds a PhD in molecular biology and is a visiting scholar at
Harvard Universitys program in ethics and health, ... concluded [that] a huge proportion of the
journals were not ensuring their papers were peer reviewed. Even in cases where peer review
happened, it didnt always function correctly. For example, the Ottawa-based International Journal
of Herbs and Medicinal Plants clearly sent the paper out to be reviewed by real scientists, who
pointed out some flaws, Bohannon recalled. Even so, when Bohannon submitted a revised version
of the paper without correcting any of the flaws, it was accepted. Bohannon said peer review is
crucial so that readers of a scientific paper know it has at least passed muster with a couple of
experts who are in a position, hopefully, to judge. It could be the whole peer review system is just
failing under the strain of the tens of thousands of journals that now exist. He added that if peer
review isnt working, then people with what amounts to fraudulent scientific credentials and
publication records are slowly filling university departments and government offices,
making important science-based policy decisions. In addition, terrible science is
polluting the global pool of knowledge."
Note: For more on the corruption of science, see the deeply revealing reports from reliable major
media sources available here.
Note: For deeply revealing reports from reliable major media sources on scientific corruption and
climate change, click here and here.
in 2008. The protocol requires that all interview requests for scientists employed by the
government must first be cleared by officials. A decision as to whether to allow the interview
can take several days, which can prevent government scientists commenting on breaking
news stories. Sources say that requests are often refused and when interviews are granted,
government media relations officials can and do ask for written questions to be submitted
in advance and elect to sit in on the interview. Andrew Weaver, an environmental scientist at
the University of Victoria in British Columbia, described the protocol as "Orwellian". Professor
Weaver said that information is so tightly controlled that the public is "left in the dark"."The only
information they are given is that which the government wants, which will then allow a supporting
of a particular agenda," he said.
Note: For lots more from major media sources on government corruption, click here.
If you want to understand the way prescription drugs are marketed today, have a look at the 1928
book, Propaganda, by Edward Bernays, the father of public relations in America. For Bernays, the
public relations business was less about selling things than about creating the conditions for things
to sell themselves. When Bernays was working as a salesman for Mozart pianos, for example, he
did not simply place advertisements for pianos in newspapers. That would have been too obvious.
Instead, Bernays persuaded reporters to write about a new trend: Sophisticated people were
putting aside a special room in the home for playing music. Once a person had a music room,
Bernays believed, he would naturally think of buying a piano. As Bernays wrote, "It will come to
him as his own idea." Just as Bernays sold pianos by selling the music room, pharmaceutical
marketers now sell drugs by selling the diseases that they treat. The buzzword is "disease
branding." To brand a disease is to shape its public perception in order to make it more
palatable to potential patients. Once a branded disease has achieved a degree of cultural
legitimacy, there is no need to convince anyone that a drug to treat it is necessary. It will
come to him as his own idea. It is hard to brand a disease without the help of physicians, of
course. So drug companies typically recruit academic "thought leaders" to write and speak about
any new conditions they are trying to introduce.
Note: This key topic is discussed in great depth in the BBC's documentary "Century of the Self"
available here. And for a top doctor's analysis that the cholesterol scare was largely manufactured
for profit, click here.
Note: The author of this commentary is Arthur Caplan, director of the Center for Bioethics at the
University of Pennsylvania. For many other examples of government-sponsored experimentation
on human guinea pigs, click here.
Explosive News
2010-02-22, Washington Times
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/22/inside-the-beltway-70128635
A lingering technical question about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks still haunts some, and it has
political implications: How did 200,000 tons of steel disintegrate and drop in 11 seconds? A
thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a
new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade
Center. "In order to bring down this kind of mass in such a short period of time, the material must
have been artificially, exploded outwards," says Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and
founder of the nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Mr. Gage, who is a member of the
American Institute of Architects, managed to persuade more than 1,000 of his peers to sign a new
petition requesting a formal inquiry. "The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and
National Institute of Standards and Technology reports provide insufficient, contradictory and
fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers' destruction. We are therefore calling for a
grand jury investigation of NIST officials," Mr. Gage adds. "The implications are enormous."
Note: To read statements questionig the official account of the events of 9/11 by hundreds of
professors, government officials and professionals, click here and here. For our 9/11 Information
Center, click here.
Swine flu was as elusive as WMD. The real threat is mad scientist
syndrome
2010-01-14, The Guardian (One of the UK's leading newspapers)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jan/14/swine-flu-elusive-as-wmd
Remember the warnings of 65,000 dead? Health chiefs should admit they were wrong yet again
about a global pandemic. Let me recap. Six months ago [the] BBC was intoning nightly statistics
on what "could" happen as "the deadly virus" took hold. The happy-go-lucky virologist, John
Oxford, said half the population could be infected, and that his lowest estimate was 6,000 dead.
The chief medical officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, bandied about any figure that came into his head,
settling on "65,000 could die", peaking at 350 corpses a day. The media went berserk. The World
Health Organisation declared a "six-level alert" so as to "prepare the world for an imminent attack".
If anyone dared question this drivel, they were dismissed by Donaldson as "extremists".
When people started reporting swine flu to be even milder than ordinary flu, he accused them of
complacency and told them to "wait for next winter". He was already buying 32m masks and
spending more than 1bn on Tamiflu and vaccines. It was pure, systematic governmentinduced panic in which I accept that the media played its joyful part.
Note: For lots more on the gross profiteering and fear mongering of swine flu scare, click here.
quality-of-life drugs like antidepressants, painkillers and diet pills. But the situation has become
more serious this year after a few editors said they had discovered ghostwriting in manuscripts
about life-and-death products like cancer and hematology drugs.
Note: For background on the prevalence of ghostwriting in major medical journals, click here and
here and here.
because its scientific base has eroded and its scientific organizational structure is weak. The FDA
cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific workforce does not have sufficient capacity and
capability. FDA does not have the capacity to ensure the safety of food for the nation. The FDA
science agenda lacks a structure and vision, as well as effective coordination. The FDA has an
inadequate and ineffective program for scientist performance. Recommendations of excellent FDA
reviews are seldom followed.
Note: The above excerpts are all taken from the chapter headings in the initial table of contents
and the second page of the initial overview.
Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. They
were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists from such prestigious
universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard and Princeton. These academicians espoused race
theory and race science, and then faked and twisted data to serve eugenics' racist aims. Stanford
President David Starr Jordan originated the notion of "race and blood" in his 1902 racial epistle
"Blood of a Nation," in which the university scholar declared that human qualities and conditions
such as talent and poverty were passed through the blood. The Rockefeller Foundation helped
found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in
before he went to Auschwitz.
Note: Josef Mengele's US-funded eugenics research laid the foundation for his experimentation
on human subjects before and during World War II. He went on to participate in CIA-funded mindcontrol experimentation after that war. For more on Mengele, click here.
part-funded by former Labour science minister, Lord Sainsbury, who is one of the countrys biggest
supporters of the technology. Another co-author was Professor Jim Dunwell, of the University of
Reading. He was a founder member of CropGen, which describes its mission as to make the case
for GM crops and foods
Note: For more on government corruption, see the deeply revealing reports from reliable major
media sources available here. For an excellent summary of the risks and dangers from GMO
foods, click here.
A group of experts advising the nations premier cancer research institution has recommended
changing the definition of cancer and eliminating the word from some common diagnoses as part
of sweeping changes in the nations approach to cancer detection and treatment. The
recommendations, from a working group of the National Cancer Institute, were published [in] The
Journal of the American Medical Association. They say, for instance, that some premalignant
conditions, like one that affects the breast called ductal carcinoma in situ, which many doctors
agree is not cancer, should be renamed to exclude the word carcinoma so that patients are less
frightened and less likely to seek what may be unneeded and potentially harmful treatments that
can include the surgical removal of the breast. The group, which includes some of the top
scientists in cancer research, also suggested that many lesions detected during breast, prostate,
thyroid, lung and other cancer screenings should not be called cancer at all but should instead be
reclassified as IDLE conditions, which stands for indolent lesions of epithelial origin. The
impetus behind the call for change is a growing concern among doctors, scientists and
patient advocates that hundreds of thousands of men and women are undergoing needless
and sometimes disfiguring and harmful treatments for premalignant and cancerous lesions
that are so slow growing they are unlikely to ever cause harm. Once doctors and patients are
aware a lesion exists, they typically feel compelled to biopsy, treat and remove it, often at great
physical and psychological pain and risk to the patient.
Note: Isn't it interesting that a diagnosis which might not even be accurate can so change a
person's life? For more on promising cancer cures which are being suppressed by the medicalindustrial complex, see the deeply revealing reports from reliable major media sources available
here.
the documents, the full extent of that campaign to forge public opinion emerged. The
documents describe industry lobby efforts to sponsor scientific research, silence media
reports critical of sugar, and block dietary guidelines to limit sugar consumption.
Note: Cristin Couzens publicized secret sugar industry documents in a magazine article titled "Big
Sugar's Sweet Little Lies." For deeply revealing reports from reliable major media sources on
corporate corruption, click here.
said Paul Flynn, the Labour MP who sits on the council's health committee. Although the experts
consulted made no secret of industry ties in other settings, declaring them in research papers and
at universities, the WHO itself did not publicly disclose any of these in its seminal 2004 guidance.
Note: For wide coverage from reliable sourcesof the swine and avian flu "fake pandemics"
designed for corporate profit, click here.
reason to prescribe antidepressant medication to any but the most severely depressed patients,
unless alternative treatments have failed," says Kirsch. "This study raises serious issues that need
to be addressed surrounding drug licensing and how drug trial data is reported." The paper,
published today in the journal PLoS (Public Library of Science) Medicine, is likely to have a
significant impact on the prescribing of the drugs. The National Institute for Health and Clinical
Excellence already recommends that counselling should be tried before doctors prescribe
antidepressants.
Note: For many key reports on health issues from reliable sources, click here.
Joyce Ann Hafford died without ever holding the son she had tried to save from contracting AIDS
by taking an experimental drug regimen administered by government-funded researchers during
her pregnancy. But even before her stunned family could grieve, the 33-year-old's death was
reverberating among the government's top scientists in Washington. They quickly realized the
drugs the HIV-positive woman from Memphis, Tenn., was taking likely caused the liver failure that
killed her. Hafford's family members say they were never told NIH had concluded that the
experimental drug regimen likely caused her death until the Associated Press gave them
copies of NIH's internal case documents this month. They were left to believe Hafford had
died from AIDS complications. "They tried to make it sound like she was just sick. They never
connected it to the drug," said Rubbie King, Hafford's sister. NIH officials acknowledge that
experimental drugs, most likely nevirapine, caused her death. The study during which Hafford died
recently led researchers to conclude that nevirapine poses risks when taken over time by certain
pregnant women. The family says Hafford seemed unaware of the liver risks. They even kept the
bottle of nevirapine showing it had no safety warnings.
Note: If you want to understand just how corrupt and deceitful medical research doctors can be,
read the stunning article on this case at this link. This article mentions the little-known fact that "a
majority of HIV-positive tests, when retested, come back indeterminate or negative. In many cases,
different results emerge from the same blood tested in different labs."
Oops. That's the word that comes to mind when reading Michael Carroll's thoroughly nervewracking book, "Lab 257: The Disturbing Story of the Government's Secret Germ Laboratory" ...
about the federal germ facility on Plum Island. The island [is] home to some of the deadliest
microbes festering on the planet. According to Carroll's book, the island -- and laboratory -- are
also home to slipshod construction, poor safeguards, and lax security. "Lab 257" claims errors at
the facility caused Lyme disease outbreaks and health problems for the local population -claims disputed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which ran the facility until recently. Carroll
[said] that the point of the book was to expose the potential hazards of a poorly run institution; he
has nothing against better-run, more secure institutions. "You have to know how things interact,
germs, bacteria, etc. You [just] don't need to create millions of them to know how to create them
and make them more virulent. Like other government scientific facilities, it's had an aura of
mystery: Plum Island earns a mention in "The Silence of the Lambs," and thriller writer Nelson
DeMille set a novel there. Much of Carroll's research was done through interviews with nearby
residents, as well as documents and reports. While the government was "cooperative at the
outset," Carroll said ... he was later denied access to the facility. Carroll isn't the first to offer
criticism. In 2002, after a power outage on the island, New York's WABC-TV did a story on
whether containment procedures worked; several employees questioned the lab's safety. In
2003, the General Accounting Office listed security problems on the island, partially prompted by a
whistleblower, Jim McCoy, who protested the management of a private concern.
Note: At the northernmost tip of Long Island, Plum island sits directly across from the town of
Lyme, Conn., famous as the epicenter of the Lyme disease outbreak. For a powerful, multiple
award-winning film showing shocking ignorance and even political corruption on the part of the
medical community about the Lyme disease epidemic spreading across the US and even around
the world, click here. It shows evidence that Lyme may be even the cause of many cases of ALS,
Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's disease.
sensors and cameras. Michael Reiss, professor of science education at London's Institute of
Education and a leading bioethics thinker ... said he was uneasy about humankind "subverting the
autonomy" of animals. "There is a part of me that is not entirely happy with the idea of our
subverting a sentient animal's own aspirations and wish to lead a life of its own."
Note: Remember that secret military projects are almost always at least a decade in advance of
anything you read in the media. For lots more on this little-known subject, click here.
Why being 'overweight' means you live longer: The way scientists twist
the facts
2015-04-10, The Independent (One of the UK's leading newspapers)
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/why-bein...
Many medical "facts" are simply not true. By definition, being "overweight" must be bad for your
health or we wouldn't call it overweight. But we do not define overweight as being the weight
above which you are damaging your health; it has an exact definition. To be overweight means
having a BMI of between 25 and 30. In 2009, a German group did a painstaking meta-analysis of
all studies on overweight and obesity that they could find. As with most other researchers, they
found that being overweight was good for you. Of course, they didn't phrase it in this way. They
said: "The prevailing notion that overweight increases morbidity and mortality, as compared to socalled normal weight, is in need of further specification." In need of further specification? An
interesting phrase, but one that hints at the terrible problems researchers have when their findings
fail to match prevailing dogma; if the prevailing consensus is "if your BMI is between 25 and 29, it
is damaging your health and you should lose weight", then you challenge this at your peril.
Despite the fact that study after study has demonstrated quite clearly that "overweight"
people live the longest, no one can bring themselves to say: "Sorry, we were wrong. A BMI
between 25 and 29 is the healthiest weight of all. For those of you between 20 and 25, I say,
eat more, become healthier." Who would dare say such a thing? Not anyone with tenure at a
leading university, that's for sure.
Note: Don't miss the entire article to see how scientists severely manipulate the results of their
data when it does not fit established norms. For more along these lines, see the excellent, reliable
resources provided in our Health Information Center and concise summaries of deeply revealing
news articles about corruption in science.
The untold story of how the sugar industry shaped key government
research about your teeth
2015-03-11, Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/03/11/the-sneaky-way-the...
The powerful U.S. sugar industry skewed the government's medical research on dental
care. Sugar industry leaders advocated for policies that did not recommend people eat less sugar.
The government listened, according to a new report published in the journal PLOS Medicine. In the
1960s, amid a national effort to boost cavity prevention, the U.S. government spearheaded a
research program, known as the National Caries Program (NCP), which aimed to eradicate tooth
decay. But instead of turning to an obvious solution having people eat less sugar the
government was swayed by industry interests that pushed alternative methods, such as [using]
vaccines for fighting tooth decay. [The] committee that was set up by the government to set
research priorities for the NCP included many doctors and scientists who were also ... part of
another group called the International Sugar Research Foundation, which was established by the
sugar industry. Rather than recommending that people reduce sugar intake, governmentfunded research focused on interventions that wouldn't advise Americans to lower their
sweets consumption. For instance, the research encouraged the wider use of fluoride. More
recently, the industry attempted to influence the ongoing debate about changes to the Food and
Drug Administration's nutrition facts label. One of the key changes currently being mulled is the
inclusion of an "added sugar" label, which is meant to communicate how much of any given food's
sugar content was added during processing. The industry is vehemently opposed.
Note: "When you take on Big Sugar, you take on a huge political money operation," Rep. Mark
Steven Kirk from Illinois said while fighting Big Sugar back in 2007. For more along these lines,
see concise summaries of deeply revealing health corruption news articles from reliable major
media sources.
Full scale of plastic in the world's oceans revealed for first time
2014-12-10, The Guardian
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/dec/10/full-scale-plastic-worlds-...
More than five trillion pieces of plastic, collectively weighing nearly 269,000 tonnes, are
floating in the worlds oceans, causing damage throughout the food chain, new research has
found. Data collected by scientists from the US, France, Chile, Australia and New Zealand
suggests a minimum of 5.25tn plastic particles in the oceans, most of them micro plastics
measuring less than 5mm. The volume of plastic pieces, largely deriving from products such as
food and drink packaging and clothing, was calculated from data taken from 24 expeditions over a
six-year period to 2013. The research, published in the journal PLOS One, is the first study to look
at plastics of all sizes in the worlds oceans. We saw turtles that ate plastic bags and fish that
ingested fishing lines, said Julia Reisser, a researcher based at the University of Western
Australia. But there are also chemical impacts. When plastic gets into the water it acts like a
magnet for oily pollutants. Its hard to visualise the sheer amount, but the weight of it is more
than the entire biomass of humans." The research, the first of its kind to pull together data on
floating plastic from around the world, will be used to chart future trends in the amount of debris in
the oceans. But researchers predict the volume will increase due to rising production of throwaway
plastic, with only 5% of the worlds plastic currently recycled.
Note: Ocean acidification was number one on 2014's top 25 stories subjected to press censorship.
much further. A 2011 study published by researchers at the Salk Institute in La Jolla, California,
demonstrated epigenetic mutations that lasted for at least 30 generations in plants. What you eat,
what your mother ate, the age when your grandfather started smoking, the amount of
pollution in your neighbourhood these factors have all been linked to epigenetic changes
that get passed down through the generations. Armed with this new insight, we can take far
more control of our health and the health of future generations.
Note: For a truly engaging and revolutionary book on this topic, read The Biology of Belief by
Bruce Lipton, a top researcher in the field of cell biology. For more on this, see concise summaries
of deeply revealing health news articles from reliable major media sources.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larryhusten/2012/01/27/lancet-editor-richard-hort...
One brief message at a time, Lancet editor Richard Horton is tweeting his dark view of the
contemporary medical establishment. If you have any interest at all in peeking behind the
curtain to see what really goes on behind the scenes of top medical organizations then you
need to follow Richard Hortons Twitter feed. In sudden bursts of candor, humor, and cynicism,
Horton has been tweeting thoughts that dont often see the light of day. Heres his unvarnished
opinion of the World Health Organization, for instance: "WHO is no longer a science-based
organisation. WHO believes that scientists within the agency should be anonymous bureaucrats."
The thread of tweets that prompted this post [is] about an ongoing editorial battle with authors and
another highly respected journal. The significance of these remarks is considerable. As Horton
remarks at the end, the episode appears to lend evidence to the manipulation of journals by
industry: "The mother of all authorship disputes has broken out. When papers get salami sliced
and divided between NEJM and us, it gets complicated. And sometimes nasty. And today, even
threatening. From Principal Investigator: Approval [of the drug in question] has already occurred in
the US, yet private insurers are slow to place it on their formulary. A major publication is typically
how this occurs in the US, and it is important to be in a journal typically recognised by US-based
companies. This publication is critical to (company A's) ability to market their product. Lancet ...
will aid (company Y) quite nicely.
Note: The Lancet is considered by many to be the most prestigious medical journal in the world. If
the editor-in-chief of the Lancet readily admits to for-profit collusion between medical journals,
insurers and big pharma, who can we trust for accurate health information? To learn more, read a
powerfully revealing essay by former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine
Marcia Angell on how the drug companies blatantly manipulate science for profit.
experts say, but they contend that Dr. Stapel took advantage of a system that allows
researchers to operate in near secrecy and massage data to find what they want to find,
without much fear of being challenged.
Note: For lots more from major media sources on corruption in scientific research and publication,
click here.
knew these were unethical experiments, and they conducted them anyway, said Raju
Kucherlapati of Harvard Medical School, a commission member. At least 5,500 prisoners, mental
patients, soldiers and children were drafted into the experiments, including at least 1,300 who were
exposed to the sexually transmitted diseases syphilis, gonorrhea and chancroid, the commission
reported. This is a dark chapter in our history. It is important to shine the light of day on it. We owe
it to the people of Guatemala who were experimented on, and we owe it to ourselves to recognize
what a dark chapter it was, said Amy Gutmann of the University of Pennsylvania, the
commissions chairwoman.
Note: For a long list of verifiable information on experiments where human were used a guinea
pigs, click here.
being circulated online blames the U.S. Militarys supposed research into using microwaves
as a mind control weapon. America has never admitted conducting such research but
proponents say the effects - produced by microwave signals stimulating the brain with fake
images and voices - exactly mimic those displayed in the recent on-air breakdowns. Serene
Branson's garbled Grammys report became an internet sensation, while WISCTV's Sarah Carlson
suffered a similar meltdown in January. Judith Sheindlin, the fast-talking judge on Judge Judy, was
taken to hospital ... after she began speaking a nonsensical string of words during a live recording
of her courtroom TV show.
Note: We don't normally use the UK's Daily Mail as a reliable source, but as the video included in
this article clearly demonstrate something highly unusual, we've included it here. Another video of
this highly strange phemomenon is available here. There is a possibility that some kind of HAARP
technologies may be used in doing this. For more, click here. For reliable, verifiable information on
secret government mind control programs, see the powerful two-page summary available here.
What a scientist didn't tell the New York Times about his study on bee
deaths
2010-11-08, CNN News
http://money.cnn.com/2010/10/08/news/honey_bees_ny_times.fortune/index.htm
Few ecological disasters have been as confounding as the massive and devastating die-off of the
world's honeybees. The phenomenon of Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) -- in which disoriented
honeybees die far from their hives -- has kept scientists, beekeepers, and regulators desperately
seeking the cause. The long list of possible suspects has included pests, viruses, fungi, and also
pesticides, particularly so-called neonicotinoids, a class of neurotoxins that kills insects by
attacking their nervous systems. For years, their leading manufacturer, Bayer Crop Science, a
subsidiary of the German pharmaceutical giant Bayer AG (BAYRY), has tangled with regulators
and fended off lawsuits from angry beekeepers who allege that the pesticides have disoriented
and ultimately killed their bees. A cheer must have gone up at Bayer on Thursday when a frontpage New York Times article, under the headline "Scientists and Soldiers Solve a Bee Mystery,"
described how a newly released study pinpoints a different cause for the die-off: "a fungus tagteaming with a virus." The Bayer pesticides, however, go unmentioned. What the Times article
did not explore -- nor did the study disclose -- was the relationship between the study's lead
author, Montana bee researcher Dr. Jerry Bromenshenk, and Bayer Crop Science. In recent
years Bromenshenk has received a significant research grant from Bayer to study bee
pollination.
Note: Read the full, revealing article to learn how money often corrupts science. For lots more
from reliable sources on corporate corruption, click here.
Note: For lots more on government threats to civil liberties, click here.
politicisation of science. The public relations office should be staffed by expert appointees otherwise they become offices of propaganda." Hansen was also restrained from giving press
interviews by a junior political appointee, George Deutsch. Mr Deutsch left NASA early last year
after it emerged he had falsified his CV.
about any individual or any issue like global warming," he said. Dr. Hansen strongly
disagreed...saying such procedures had already prevented the public from fully grasping recent
findings. Dr. Hansen said that nothing in 30 years equaled the push made since early December to
keep him from publicly discussing what he says are clear-cut dangers from further delay in curbing
carbon dioxide. The fight between Dr. Hansen and administration officials echoes other recent
disputes. At climate laboratories of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, for
example, many scientists who routinely took calls from reporters five years ago can now do so only
if the interview is approved by administration officials in Washington, and then only if a public
affairs officer is present or on the phone.
retarded at all. They were simply poor, uneducated kids with no place to go, who ended up in
institutions like the Fernald School in Waltham, Mass. The Fernald School, and others like it, was
part of a popular American movement in the early 20th century called the Eugenics movement.
The idea was to separate people considered to be genetically inferior from the rest of
society, to prevent them from reproducing. Eugenics is usually associated with Nazi
Germany, but in fact, it started in America. Not only that, it continued here long after Hitler's
Germany was in ruins. Few of the attendants [at Fernald] showed any kindness. And ... there
was sexual abuse. The place was tailor made for it. The school [also] allowed them to be used as
human guinea pigs. In 1994 Senate hearings, it came out that scientists from MIT had been giving
radioactive oatmeal to the boys ... in a nutrition study for Quaker Oats. All they knew is that they'd
been asked to join a science club. The boys were recruited with special treats [like] extra milk. But
they forgot to mention the milk was radioactive, says David White-Lief, an attorney who worked on
the state task force investigating the science club. These experiments, because of the lack of
informed consent, violated the Nuremburg Code established just 10 years earlier, says White-Lief.
Note: The extreme racism of the Nazis was quite popular among certain groups in the U.S. For
lots more on how these ideas came to pervade some groups in U.S. intelligence services, click
here. For a powerful list of military and government sponsored experiments on human guinea pigs
with links for verification, click here.
exercising and writing fiction. He has self-published a bioterrorism thriller and a science fiction
novel. But he says his six-page job description is the ultimate work of creative writing and
describes his position as "a bizarre, surreal situation -- part Orwell, part Kafka and part
Dilbert."
Morgellons is not a medically accepted diagnosis. Researchers at the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention studied 115 people who said they had the condition. In a report published
in 2012, they said they were unable to identify an infectious source for the patients unexplained
dermopathy. The investigators cast doubt on Morgellons as a distinct condition and said that it
might be something doctors were already familiar with: delusional infestation, a psychiatric
condition characterized by an unshakable but erroneous belief that ones skin is infested with bugs
or parasites. These patients have a reduced quality of life, the researchers concluded, but the
cause is not clear. Science one day may find that Morgellons has a physical basis, but at the
moment most experts treat it as a psychiatric disorder to the great frustration of people, like Ms.
Mitchell, who ... are afflicted with it.
Note: See this excellent article on the strange Morgellons disease, and read this one for more
information.
Fraud in scientific research, while still rare, is growing at a troubling pace, a new study finds. A
review of retractions in medical and biological peer-reviewed journals finds the percentage of
studies withdrawn because of fraud or suspected fraud has jumped substantially since the mid1970s. In 1976, there were fewer than 10 fraud retractions for every 1 million studies published,
compared with 96 retractions per million in 2007. The study authors aren't quite sure why this is
happening. But they and outside experts point to pressure to hit it big in science, both for funding
and attention, and to what seems to be a subtle increase in deception in overall society that
science may simply be mirroring. Fraud in life sciences research is still minuscule and committed
by only a few dozen scientific scofflaws. However, it causes big problems, said Arturo Casadevall,
a professor of microbiology at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York. Casadevall is
the lead author of the study which looked at the reasons for 2,047 retractions among many millions
of studies published in journals and kept in a government database. Fraud was the No. 1 cause
of retractions, accounting for 43 percent of them. When fraud was combined with other
areas of misconduct, such as plagiarism, it explained about 2 out of 3 retractions, the study
found. "Very few people are doing it, but when they do it, they are doing it in areas that are
very important," Casadevall said. "And when these things come out, society loses faith in
science."
Note: For deeply revealing reports from reliable major media sources on corruption in science,
click here.
Note: There is intriguing evidence that much of the fear around cholesterol was fabricated to sell
drugs. For more on this, see the article by one of the most respected doctors on the Internet at this
link.
Note: To learn about top doctors and psychiatrists who abused their positions to forward secret
government mind control programs, click here.
Fossils From Animals And Plants Are Not Necessary For Crude Oil And
Natural Gas, Swedish Researchers Find
2009-09-12, Science Daily
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090910084259.htm
Researchers at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm have managed to prove that
fossils from animals and plants are not necessary for crude oil and natural gas to be generated.
The findings are revolutionary since this means, on the one hand, that it will be much easier to find
these sources of energy and, on the other hand, that they can be found all over the globe. Using
our research we can even say where oil could be found in Sweden, says Vladimir Kutcherov, a
professor at the Division of Energy Technology at KTH. Together with two research colleagues,
Vladimir Kutcherov has simulated the process involving pressure and heat that occurs naturally in
the inner layers of the earth, the process that generates hydrocarbon, the primary component in oil
and natural gas. According to Vladimir Kutcherov, the findings are a clear indication that the
oil supply is not about to end, which researchers and experts in the field have long feared.
He adds that there is no way that fossil oil, with the help of gravity or other forces, could
have seeped down to a depth of 10.5 kilometers in the state of Texas, for example, which is rich
in oil deposits. As Vladimir Kutcherov sees it, this is further proof, alongside his own research
findings, of the genesis of these energy sources that they can be created in other ways than via
fossils. This has long been a matter of lively discussion among scientists. There is no doubt that
our research proves that crude oil and natural gas are generated without the involvement of
fossils. All types of bedrock can serve as reservoirs of oil, says Vladimir Kutcherov.
Note: The research work of Kutcherov and others on this topic was recently published in the
scientific journal Nature Geoscience. For more reports from reliable sources on key new energy
discoveries, click here.
President Obama's "science czar," John Holdren, once floated the idea of forced abortions,
"compulsory sterilization," and the creation of a "Planetary Regime" that would oversee human
population levels and control all natural resources as a means of protecting the planet -controversial ideas his critics say should have been brought up in his Senate confirmation hearings
... as director of the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy. It appears that the
senators who scrutinized him had no knowledge of the contents of a textbook he co-authored in
1977, Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment. The 1,000-page course book, which
was co-written with environmental activists Paul and Anne Ehrlich, discusses and in one
passage seems to advocate totalitarian measures to curb population growth, which it says
could cause an environmental catastrophe. Holdren and his co-authors spend a portion of the
book discussing possible government programs that could be used to lower birth rates. Holdren's
office issued a statement to FOXNews.com denying that the ecologist has ever backed any of the
measures discussed in his book. Holdren's co-authors, Paul and Anne Ehrlich, said in a statement
that they were "shocked at the serious mischaracterization of our views and those of John
Holdren," caused by what they called misreadings of the book.
Rivers became crucial. Above all, her task, aided by the study's doctors, was to ensure that the
syphilitic men would receive no treatment, despite the extraordinary advances in treatment from
the 1940s onwards. "By 1955," according to Washington, "nearly one-third of the autopsied men
had died directly of syphilis and many of the survivors were suffering its deadliest complications."
Note: For lots more on the history humans used as guinea pigs in experiments by government:
http://www.WantToKnow.info/humanguineapigs
and
http://www.WantToKnow.info/mindcontrollers10pg#human
Umea University in Sweden. Many ethicists have accepted the idea of gene therapy, changes that
die with the patient, but draw a clear line at altering the germline, since these will extend to future
generations.
Note: Is this voluntary moratorium enough to stay the hand of our corrupt scientific establishment?
professional disciplinary bodies haven't succeeded in enforcing sanctions against the practice.
Ghostwritten publications are used in court to support a manufacturer's arguments about a drug's
safety and effectiveness, and academic experts who appear as witnesses for pharmaceutical and
medical device companies also boost their credibility with the publications on their CV, Lemmens
said.
Note: For a respected doctor's powerful analysis of fraud in the pharmaceutical industry, click
here. For lots more from reliable sources on key health issues, click here.
Inquisition at JPL
2008-01-16, Los Angeles Times
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-rutten16jan16,0,2608869.story
For the last four years, two robot rovers operated from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Canada
Flintridge have been moving across the surface of Mars, taking photographs and collecting
information. It's an epic event in the history of exploration, one of many for which JPL's 7,000
civilian scientists and engineers are responsible -- when they're not fending off the U.S.
government's attempts to conduct an intimidating and probably illegal inquisition into the intimate
details of their lives. The problem began -- as so many have -- in the security mania that gripped
the Bush administration after 9/11. Presidential Directive No. 12, issued by the Department of
Homeland Security, directed federal agencies to adopt a uniform badge that could be used by
employees and contractors to gain access to government facilities. NASA Administrator Michael
Griffin ... directed Caltech, which has a contract to run JPL for NASA, to make sure all of the lab's
employees complied. The government demanded that the scientists, in order to get the badges, fill
out questionnaires on their personal lives and waive the privacy of their financial, medical and
psychiatric records. The government also wanted permission to gather information about them by
interviewing third parties. Twenty-eight of JPL's senior scientists sued in federal court to stop
the government and Caltech from forcing them to agree to the background checks as the
price of keeping their jobs. They point out that Griffin is one of those who remain skeptical that
human actions contribute to global warming, and that some of JPL's near-Earth science has
played a critical role in establishing the empirical case to the contrary. They see the background
checks as the first step toward establishing a system of intimidation that might be used to
silence inconvenient science.
Note: For many disturbing reports on threats to our civil liberties, click here.
documents, even minor reports or prepared talks. Some agency scientists, who until now have
felt free from any political interference, worry that the objectivity of their work could be
compromised. The new requirements state that the USGS's communications office must be
"alerted about information products containing high-visibility topics or topics of a policy-sensitive
nature." The agency's director, Mark Myers, and its communications office also must be told -prior to any submission for publication -- "of findings or data that may be especially newsworthy,
have an impact on government policy, or contradict previous public understanding." In 2002, the
USGS was forced to reverse course after warning that oil and gas drilling in Alaska's Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge would harm the Porcupine caribou herd. One week later a new report
followed, this time saying the caribou would not be affected.
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB100014240527023036271045764118506665820...
It was the kind of study that made doctors around the world sit up and take notice: Two popular
high-blood-pressure drugs were found to be much better in combination than either alone.
Unfortunately, it wasn't true. Six and a half years later, the prestigious medical journal the Lancet
retracted the paper, citing "serious concerns" about the findings. The damage was done. Doctors
by then had given the drug combination to well over 100,000 patients. Instead of protecting them
from kidney problems, as the study said the drug combo could do, it left them more vulnerable to
potentially life-threatening side effects, later studies showed. Today, "tens of thousands" of patients
are still on the dual therapy, according to research firm SDI. When a study is retracted, "it can be
hard to make its effects go away," says Sheldon Tobe, a kidney-disease specialist at the University
of Toronto. And that's more important today than ever because retractions of scientific studies are
surging. Since 2001, while the number of papers published in research journals has risen
44%, the number retracted has leapt more than 15-fold, data compiled for The Wall Street
Journal by Thomson Reuters reveal. Just 22 retraction notices appeared in 2001, but 139 in 2006
and 339 last year
Note: To learn lots more of how the medical industry puts profit above public health, click here.
skyscrapers built with traditional designs would survive such an impact. He also questioned the
makeup of the society's investigation team. On the team were the wife of the trade center's
structural engineer and a representative of the buildings' original design team. "I call this moral
corruption," said Astaneh-Asl, who is on the faculty at the University of California, Berkeley.
Note: For a revealing two-page summary of many unanswered questions about 9/11 raised by
major media sources, click here.
PHR is calling for an official investigation into the role of doctors in the CIA's now widely
discredited programme. It wants to know exactly how many doctors participated, what they did,
what records they kept and the science that they applied.
Note: To watch a video of a Democracy Now! segment on the PHR report, click here. For
astounding information on how MDs participated in the CIA's mind control experiments in the past,
click here.
on the effects of mustard gas - experiments in which thousands of volunteers were to participate.
1940: After the outbreak of war, a secret group is set up at Porton Down to investigate biological
warfare. 1945: Thousands of military personnel had taken part in trials at Porton Down during
World War II. As the war ended, volunteers began participating in nerve-agent trials there - a
practice that was to continue until 1989. 1953: Leading Aircraftman Ronald Maddison
participates in chemical experiments at Porton Down. Within an hour of being given sarin,
he is dead. Military chiefs conduct an inquest in secret. Verdict: misadventure. 1989: Nerveagent trials at Porton Down cease. 2002: Ministry of Defence (MoD) helpline set up to enable
Porton Down veterans to find out more about the trials they were involved in. 2004: Fresh inquest
into the 1953 death of Ronald Maddison returns a verdict of unlawful killing. The MoD [only two
years later] admits "gross negligence". 2008: The BBC learns of a 3m out-of-court settlement
between the MoD and veterans, under which the [360] ex-servicemen will each receive 8,300 and
an apology ... without admission of liability.
Note: The military has repeatedly condoned horrendous research on live subjects. For a revealing
list of highly unethical experimentation on human over the past 75 years, click here. For a concise
summary of the government's secret quest to control the mind and human behavior no matter what
the cost, click here.
vision, contain a clear set of goals, have a plan of action for how the goals are to be achieved, or
describe mechanisms to review and evaluate funded research and assess whether progress has
been achieved. An informal coalition of environmental and business organizations praised the
report, saying that for three years they had been urging the federal government to do more to
assess potential health and environmental effects of nanomaterials.
Note: For many important articles on health issues from reliable sources, click here.
Disturbing new questions have been raised about the role of doctors and other medical
professionals in helping the Central Intelligence Agency subject terrorism suspects to harsh
treatment, abuse and torture. The Red Cross previously documented, from interviews with
high-value prisoners, that medical personnel helped facilitate abuses in the C.I.A.s
enhanced interrogation program during the Bush administration. Now Physicians for Human
Rights has suggested that the medical professionals may also have violated national and
international laws setting limits on what research can be performed on humans. The groups
report focused particularly on a few issues where medical personnel played an important role
determining how far a harsh interrogation could go, providing legal cover against prosecution and
designing future interrogation procedures. In the case of waterboarding, a technique in which
prisoners are brought to the edge of drowning, health professionals were required to monitor the
practice and keep detailed medical records. Their findings led to several changes, including a
switch to saline solution as the near-drowning agent instead of water, ostensibly to protect
the health of detainees who ingest large volumes of liquid but also, the group says, to allow
repeated use of waterboarding on the same subject.
Note: For lots more from reliable sources on the unlawful actions of US intelligence and military
forces in the "global war on terror," click here.
expert for expressing concerns about the potential dangers of a chemical. "It's a scary world if
we create a precedent that says scientists involved in decision-making are perceived to be
too biased," she said. In 2004, the EPA gave Rice and four colleagues an award for what it
called "exceptionally high-quality research" for a study that linked lead exposure to
premature puberty in girls.
Note: For many revealing articles on government corruption, click here.
Despite the protests of more than 50 scientists, including five Nobel laureates in chemistry, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Friday approved use of a new, highly toxic fumigant,
mainly for strawberry fields. The new pesticide, methyl iodide, is designed for growers, mainly in
California and Florida, who need to replace methyl bromide, which has been banned under an
international treaty because it damages the Earth's ozone layer. In a letter sent last month to EPA
Administrator Stephen Johnson, 54 scientists, mostly chemists, warned that "pregnant
women and the fetus, children, the elderly, farmworkers and other people living near
application sites would be at serious risk." Methyl iodide is a neurotoxin and carcinogen
that has caused thyroid tumors, neurological damage and miscarriages in lab animals. But
EPA officials said Friday that they carefully evaluated the risks and decided to approve its use for
one year, imposing restrictions such as buffer zones to protect farmworkers and neighbors.
Growers, particularly those who grow strawberries and tomatoes, have been searching for 15
years for a new soil fumigant to replace methyl bromide. Fumigants are valuable to growers
because they can be injected into the soil before planting to sterilize the field and kill a broad
spectrum of insects and diseases without leaving residue on crops. But fumigants are among the
most potentially dangerous pesticides in use today because the toxic gas can evaporate from the
soil, exposing farmworkers and drifting into neighborhoods. Methyl iodide ... will be allowed on
fields growing strawberries, tomatoes, peppers, ornamentals, turf, trees and vines.
Schizophrenia patients do as well, or perhaps even better, on older psychiatric drugs compared
with newer and far costlier medications, according to a study published yesterday that overturns
conventional wisdom about antipsychotic drugs, which cost the United States $10 billion a year.
The results are causing consternation. The researchers who conducted the trial were so
certain they would find exactly the opposite that they went back to make sure the research
data had not been recorded backward. The study was requested by Britain's National Health
Service to determine whether the newer drugs -- which can cost 10 times as much as the older
ones -- are worth the difference in price. While the researchers had expected a difference of five
points on a quality-of-life scale -- showing the newer drugs were better -- the study found that
patients' quality of life was slightly better when they took the older drugs. There has been a surge
in prescriptions of the newer antipsychotic drugs in recent years, including among children. In an
editorial accompanying the British study, the lead researcher in the U.S. trial asked how an entire
medical field could have been misled into thinking that the expensive drugs, such as Zyprexa,
Risperdal and Seroquel, were much better.
Note: Those who have read our two-page health cover-up summary know very well how the entire
medical
field
could
have
been
misled.
For
those
who
haven't
seen
it:
http://www.WantToKnow.info/healthcoverup
Important Note: Explore our full index to revealing excerpts of key major media news articles on
several dozen engaging topics. And don't miss amazing excerpts from 20 of the most revealing
news articles ever published.