CHAPTER IV

Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

This chapter presents, analyze and interprets data gathered
through survey among 25

respondents from Scuola Maria.

I.Socio-Demographic Profile
The Socio-Demographic Profile contains the data about the age,
gender and the year and section of the respondents. The respondents
were grouped according to their age, gender, year and section.

Table 1
Age of Respondents
AGE

NUMBER OF

PERCENTAGE

(YEARS OLD)
12
13
14
15
16
TOTAL

RESPONDENTS
2
9
5
3
6
25

8%
36%
20%
12%
24%
100%

Graph 1
Age
8%

12 years old

24%

13 years old
14 years old
36%

12%

15 years old
16 years old

20%

The age of the respondents was grouped into five categories 12,
13, 14, 15 and 16 years old. The majority of the respondents were 13
years of age which comprise 36% or 9 of the respondents which
represents the sample population. Six of the respondents or 24% were
16 years old. The 5 of the respondents were 14 years old which is
20%. The number of 15 year old and 12 year old were almost the
same having 3 and 2 respondents respectively.

Table 2
Gender of Respondents
GENDER

NUMBER OF

PERCENTAGE

Male
Female

RESPONDENTS
9
16

36%
64%

Total

25

100%

Graph 2
Gender

36%

Male
Female

64%

The respondents were grouped according to their gender, male

and female. The majority of the respondents were female which
comprise 64% or 16 out of 25 respondents. The male respondents
comprise 36% or 9 out of 25 respondents.
Table 3
Year & Section of Respondents
YEAR AND SECTION
Grade 7 Hope
Grade 7 Obedience
Grade 8 Humility

NUMBER OF

PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENTS
6
2

24%
8%

20%

Grade
Grade
Grade 10
Grade

8 - Loyalty
9 - Faith
- Service
10 -

2
3
5
2

8%
12%
20%
8%

25

100%

Charity
TOTAL

Graph 3
Year and Section
8%

7-Hope
24%

7-Obedience
8-Humility

20%

8-Loyalty
9-Faith
8%

10-Service
10-Charity

12%
8%

20%

The respondents were grouped according to their section, 7Hope, 7-Obedience, 8-Humility, 8-Loyalty, 9-Faith, 10-Service and 10
Charity. The majority of the respondents were grade 7-Hope which
comprise 24% or 6 out of 25 respondents. The number of respondents
in grade 8-Humility and grade 10-Service were the same having 20%
or 5 out of 25 respondents. While the grade 9-Faith comprise 12% or 3
out of 25 respondents. And the number of respondents in grade 7Obedience, grade 8-Loyalty and grade 10-Charity were the same
having 2 respondents respectively.

II. Related Questions

The respondents were asked about their opinion whether the
Parent Teacher Collaboration was effective in improving their
academic performance. The data gathered was shown below.

Table 4
Is PTC important?
NUMBER OF
RESPONSE
YES
NO
Sometimes
Maybe
TOTAL

PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
21

84%

3
1
25

12%
4%
100%

Table 5
Do you want this PTC?
NUMBER OF
RESPONSE
YES
NO
Sometimes
Maybe
TOTAL

RESPONDENT
4
9
11
1
25

PERCENTAGE
40%
12%
44%
4%
100%

Table 6
It can help your study so far?
NUMBER OF
RESPONSE
YES
NO
Sometimes
Maybe
TOTAL

PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
10

36%

9
6
25

40%
24%
100%

Table 7
The PTC is distraction only to your studies?
NUMBER OF
RESPONSE
YES
NO
Sometimes
Maybe
TOTAL

PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
2
14
6
3
25

8%
56%
24%
12%
100%

Table 8
Is the PTC is the way to get high grades?

NUMBER OF
RESPONSE
YES
NO
Sometimes
Maybe
TOTAL

RESPONDENT
2
7
13
3
25

PERCENTAGE
12%
24%
52%
12%
100%

Graph 4
How does PTC They
improve
the
academic
performance
will study harder to make their
parents proud of students?
4%
12% well in class and pass their
They will participate
requirements on time

It will gain their self-confidence

28%
By being attentive in the class

56%

Graph 5
How effective is this program
in
improving
thetheir
academic
of students?
The parents will monitor what
children doperformance
in
school
12%
The students will become closer to the teacher
12%
It will help the students to gain their self-confidence
8%
68%
The students will become more closer to their
parents