Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Rezultate
Simpla descriere
40 de adolescenti au fost inclusi in studiu, cu varsta cuprinsa intre 13 ani si 18 ani, cu
o medie a varstei de 15.70 ani si o deviatie standard de 1.265 ani. In ceea ce priveste
distributia pe sexe, 13 adolescenti apartin sexului feminin si 27 de adolescenti apartin
sexului masculin. Dintre acestia, 52.5% ( 21)dintre adolescenti au fost diagnosticati cu
tulburare de conduit socializata, 5% (2) diagnosticati cu tulburare de conduita
nesocializata,27.5 % (11), diagnosticati cu tulburare de conduit hiperkinetica, 15%(6),
diagnosticati cu tulburare de conduit de tip depresiv.
Tabel nr 1 Diagnostic
diagnostic
tulburare de conduita
socializata
tulburare de conduita
nesocializata
tulburare hiperkinetica de
conduita
tulburare de conduita de tip
depresiv
N=40
frecventa %
52.5%
5.0%
27.5%
15.0%
media (SD)
15.70 (1.265)
urban
29 (72,5%)
feminin
13 (32,5%)
rural
11 (27,5%)
masculin
27 (67,5%)
media (SD)
94.9 (25.52)
scor tristete
scor deprimare
scor ingrijorare
scor anxietate
scor rationalitate
scor irationalitate
13.72 (5.42)
15.75 ( 6.47)
14.77 (4.79)
12.75 (5.07)
14.85 (2.73)
64.57 (10.04)
media (SD)
12.52 (3.16)
18.86 (3.63)
9.47 (5.29)
10.47 (4.57)
7.50 (2.72)
.821**
.852**
-.139
.463**
40
.000
40
.000
40
.392
40
.003
40
.821**
.818**
-.211
.466**
.000
40
40
.000
40
.192
40
.002
40
.852**
.818**
-.088
.240
.000
40
.000
40
40
.591
40
.136
40
-.139
-.211
-.088
.012
.392
40
.192
40
.591
40
40
.943
40
.463**
.466**
.240
.012
Sig. (2-tailed)
.003
.002
N
40
40
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
.136
40
.943
40
40
Distres
Global
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
deprimare
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
anxietate
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
rationalitate
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
irationalitate
callousness
uncaring
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
.317*
.387*
.356*
-.056
40
.046
40
.014
40
.024
40
.739
38
.317*
.546**
.206
-.190
40
.000
40
.203
40
.252
38
.046
40
Pearson
.387*
.546**
Correlation
unemotional
Sig. (2-tailed)
.014
.000
N
40
40
Pearson
.356*
.206
Correlation
supresia
Sig. (2-tailed)
.024
.203
N
40
40
Pearson
-.056
-.190
Correlation
reevaluare
Sig. (2-tailed)
.739
.252
N
38
38
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
.391*
-.028
40
.013
40
.867
38
.391*
.019
.013
40
40
.909
38
-.028
.019
.867
38
.909
38
38
Discutii si concluzii
S-au gasit corelatii intre PDA-GABS. Calcularea coeficientului de corelaie Pearson
ntre variabile a artat existena unei corelaii pozitive ntre nivelul de distres global, emotiile
disfunctionale negative (deprimare p.c.=0.82 i sig= 0.01; anxietate p.c.=0.85 i sig= 0.01) si
irationalitate (p.c.=0.46 i sig= 0.003), de asemenea s-a observat o corelatie intre emotiile
disfunctionale negative ( deprimare si anxietate p.c=0.81 si sig=0.01) si intre deprimare si
irationalitate ( p.c=0.46 si sig=0.02).
Alte corelatii care s-au putut face sunt intre ERQ-ICU. Intre insensibilitate si alte
emotii, s-au gasit corelatii pozitive: intre insensibilitate si nepasare (p.c=0.31 si sig=0.46),
intre insensibilitate si lipsa emotiilor (p.c=0.38 si sig=0.01), intre insensibilitate si supresie
(p.c=0.35 si sig=0.02), intre lipsa emotiilor si nepasare (p.c=0.54 si sig=0.01) si intre lipsa
emotiilor si supresie (p.c=0.39 si sig=0.01).
Limitele studiului
Limitele si restrictiile studiului sunt legate de faptul ca scalele completate de catre
adolescenti, poate exista o pierderea a acuratetei cazurilor, care poate duce la erori.
Materialele psihometrice nu identifica complet mecanismele de reglare emotionala si
criteriile de excludere sau lipsa unei evaluari a strategiilor cognitive sau non-cognitive este
posibila.
Bibiliografie
1. JF Greuel, N Reinhold, M Wenglorz, N Heinrichs. Self-reported Emotion Regulation
Strategies in Children and Adolescents with Mental Disorder. Prax Kinderpsychiatr.
2015:64(5):368-85.
2. Gross, J.J., & Thompson, R.A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations.
In J.J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press.
3. Gross JJ. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of
General Psychology. Special Issue: New directions in research on emotion. 1998
4. Eisenberg N, Morris AS. Children's emotion-related regulation. Adv Child Dev
Behav. 2002;30:189-229.
5. McLaughlin KA, Mennin DS, Farach FJ. The contributory role of worry in emotion
generation and dysregulation in generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2007
Citate
rspunde-mi,
cine-s mai frumoi: oamenii?... ploaia?...
Nichita Stanescu
6. Aug;45(8):1735-52.
7. Lynch TR, Trost WT, Salsman N, Linehan MM. Dialectical behavior therapy for
borderline personality disorder. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:181-205
8. Kashdan TB, Breen WE. Social anxiety and positive emotions: a prospective
examination of a self-regulatory model with tendencies to suppress or express
emotions as a moderating variable. Behav Ther. 2008 Mar;39(1):1-12. doi:
10.1016/j.beth.2007.02.003.
9. Sullivan TN, Helms SW, Kliewer W, Goodman KL. Associations between Sadness
and Anger Regulation Coping, Emotional Expression, and Physical and Relational
Aggression among Urban Adolescents. Soc Dev. 2010
10. Phillips ML, Drevets WC, Rauch SL, Lane R. Neurobiology of emotion perception II:
Implications for major psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2003
11. Calkins SD, Keane SP. Cardiac vagal regulation across the preschool period: stability,
continuity, and implications for childhood adjustment. Dev Psychobiol. 2004
Nov;45(3):101-12.