Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
r ilE
ual'RACT: During 1961, a deep well was drilled at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal northeast of
V n v e r , Colorado, to dispose of contaminated waste w a t e r . The well is bottomed in 75 f e e t of
,,ly f r a c t u r e d Precambrian gneiss. P r e s s u r e injection of waste water into the f r a c t u r e d Pre.ibrian rock was begun in March 1962. Since the start of fluid injection, 710 Denver-area earth ikes have been r e c o r d e d . The majority of these earthquakes had epicenters within a five-mile
.'uiius of the Arsenal well. The volume of fluid and p r e s s u r e of fluid injection appear to be directly
-.-ated to the frequency of earthquakes. Evidence also suggests that rock movement is due to the
- c r e a s e of fluid pressure within the fractured reservoir and that open fractures may exist at depths
than previously c o n s i d e r e d possible.
-, raoDUCTiON
Products for chemical w a r f a r e have been
...inufactured on a large scale under the direc jn of the Chemical Corps of the U. S. Army
.; -.he Rocky Mountain Arsenal since 1942. A
; . - p r o d u c t of this operation is contaminated
i i = te water and, until 1961, t h i s ' w a s t e water
. 1 5 disposed of by evaporation from dirt
r e s e r v o i r s (Scopel, 1964).
When it was determined that Arsenal
j..idte water was contaminating the local ground a t e r supply and endangering crops (Gahr,
, :ol; Walker, 1961), the Chemical Corps tried
-.aporation of the contaminated waste f r o m
l i t e r - t i g h t r e s e r v o i r s . This proved unsuccess:.::. The Chemical Corps and the Corps of
Engineers then decided to drill an injection disjosal wel! for the purpose of disposing of the
jontaminated waste water (Scopel, 1964).
The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Jmaha. District, commissioned the firm of
.. A. Polumbus, J r . , and Associates, I n c . ,
~) design the well, s u p e r v i s e the drilling and
^Jmpletion, provide the necessary engineering
.eological services, and manage the project.
-ouis J. Scopel, as an associate, was the
Project Geologist and was responsible for all
.?ological aspects of the operation. Another
.cological associate was George R. Downs,
- Mountain G e o l o g i s t , v. 3, no.
1, p. 2 3 - 3 6
23
ROCKY MTN.
ARSENAL
WELL (-8000'
8000
6000
^'^'^^n^^^s^^rW^-^'r^HV'/^.V^.^
4000
^GRANIJET'^'/IDAHOJ'/
:;-V^fiMFTqS^'-r'qpR<5_ pM.
20001
6000'
TERTIARY-
4000'
2000'
PRECAMBRIAN
0
-2000']
-2000'
-4000'
-4000'
PERMIAN
-6000'
PENN.
-6000'
CAM B.-8000'
GRANITE GNEISS;
-8000'
3 MILES
Figure 2.
C r o s s - s e c t i o n showing the subsurface geology f r o m the Arsenal well to the outcrop of
Precambrian granite gneiss west of Denver (after M. F. and C. M. Boos, and H. H. Odiorne).
The line of cross-section is shown in f i g u r e 1.
REGIONAL GEOLOGY
The Rocky Mountain Arsenal Disposal well
is located on the gently dipping east flank of
the D e n v e r - J u l e s b u r g Basin, just a few miles
w e s t of the axis of the basin. As indicated in
f i g u r e 1, the Arsenal well is located in a region
of the s u b c r o p of Cambro-Ordovician rocks,
near the area w h e r e these rocks are truncated
by Pennsylvanian sediments.
Figure 1 is a structural map of a portion
of the D e n v e r - J u l e s b u r g Basin in the vicinity
of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal well after
Anderman and Ackman (1963). Figure 2 is a
c r o s s section a f t e r M. F. and C. M. Boos and
H. H. Odiorne which shows the subsurface
geology f r o m the Arsenal well to the outcrop of
24
t,
4" FLOVLMV
rtWM HUCCT1M
-^1_
^
PUMPS
JOtTM VU.V*
INJECTION
2=^2_T *>M.yf. TOM-CUW
mittun DISPOSAL WELL ~-<|TS||P3^TO
^H
"* OITICTO* o
q
>/
ROCKY
MOUNTAIN
ARSENAL
WHULUi
ALAMH
^
f"
KB
y.
en
"""
//
//
tf-*"
Vi
\\
\\
13 W CSI6
r^i-8ULA
24 'MOLE "*^i
zo'CAsmo ^^
IT n' MOLE
/^
'
'
IO4L
CCMCNT WITH 2%
CALCIUy CHLONIOC
2 OOO1 -
II" HOLE
8 5/B" CASING
3S
~~*' .
^
=--=^=
5 1/2" TUBIS
SECOND STAC COCLA*
4307'
fj
5,448'
ZONE
i?^
HYGIENE
SS.
k!
8k.
i*
* 0
Q <j
t
1-2
1-3
7,710' NIOBRARA
C H A L K Y SH.
;',,v_y;.;,
8120' GREENHORN
LSVB
9 000'
^S'CC
S ,
n OOO'
>011'
'/
^SAKE* MOOCLV
RETAINCH
PflOOUCTIOM
JTINOCH
-^
\ PACKER.
ift W
^STINflER.
8-13
> I
%S345'6RANEROS SH.J
\'\\\848S' "J'OR "MUDDY" SS. ""
7V
?-;
_*li
,
It.OOT .
X
, ,.LIlie,-!il^-> 1M'^ --AAM MSS LIHEK
J 1.880' REGOLITH
f\ 1,895' ORDOVICIAN?
MO A 0.9* HIM, 10
M.975k
J
*
Figure 3.
POLUMBUS.
"""" ooa
^~^T.tt 12,045'
T.D. 12,045'
E.
HAMCM.
ISO SACKS Or MZMIX
JR.
AND
ASSOCIATES.
INC.
Diagram and log of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal Injection Disposal Well (Scopel, 1964).
25
FOUNTAIN
REGOLITH
MAROON-RED BROWN SHALE
MAROON QUARTZITE
f r a c t u r e s o b s e r v e d w e r e partially to completely
cemented with quartz.
ORDOVICIAN ? CAMBRIAN ?
ORANGE QUARTZ
CONGLOMERATE
PURPLE SHALE
PINK
DOLOMITE
PURPLE SHALE
PRE-CAMBRIAN
SCHIST
GREEN, MICACEOUS
11,970
h- PRE-CAMBRIAN
GNEISS
FRACTURES
12.045
TOTAL DEPTH
F i g u r e 4.
Log of pre-Pennsylvanian portion
of disposal well (Scopel, 1964).
26
COLUO.
in
CD
CD
o
LU
O
LU
c -o
OOLUQ-
a
-1 2
o
CD
UJ
S "
~ c
.S u
T3 2
0)
(O
"
n)
11
O
UJ
Sa
C/)LUQ_
ro
31
^tm
C
u o
X u
CD
CD
a -S
1!
El
O
O
COUJQ-
IM
C\J
CO
CD
a S
a o
3
SO
Dcor^-cDio^rooj-
'OIAI/SN011V9 SNOI11IIAI
27
T
plants is f i r s t collected and allowed to settle in
a two-hundred-million-gallon w a s t e - s e t t l i n g
basin that is sealed w i t h an asphaltic m e m brane to prevent seepage. It is then flocculated
and clarified. Next it is f i l t e r e d to less than
20 parts per million of suspended solids less
than 5 m i c r o n s in d i a m e t e r . It is sterilized
and m o n i t e r e d for bacteria, then pumped into
the well. Four 1 3 0 - h o r s e p o w e r positivedisplacement electric pumps are available.
Normally, two or t h r e e pumps are used.
The f i r s t contaminated w a s t e was injected
into the well during March 1962, when 4 . 2
million gallons of waste w e r e injected into the
well. The monthly volume of waste injected
into the well is shown in the lower half of
f i g u r e 5. During the first year of operation,
considerable trouble was experienced with the
f i l t e r plant with the result that the injection
well was often shut down for a few days or
weeks at a time. From March 1962 until
September 1963 the maximum injection p r e s s u r e
is r e p o r t e d to have been about 550 pounds, with
a fluid injection rate of 200 gallons per minute.
At the end of September 1963 the injection
well was shut down, and no fluid was injected
until operations were resumed 17 September
1964. During the shut-down period, surface
evaporation, f r o m the settling basin, was
sufficient to handle the plant output.
From 17 September 1964 until the end of
March 1965, injection operations w e r e resumed
by gravity discharge into the well. No wellhead p r e s s u r e was necessary to inject the
maximum of 2 . 4 million gallons of waste per
month into the well.
Beginning in April 1965 larger quantities
of fluid w e r e injected. The filter plant operated
efficiently, and fluid was usually injected 16 to
24 hours daily. During April and May a maximum pump p r e s s u r e of 800 pounds was r e q u i r e d .
From June to the end of September 1965 a
maximum p r e s s u r e of 1,050 pounds was required to inject 300 gallons per minute into the
well.
28
u
f
En
>;
3i
tf
D U - O
T3 -O <|
0)0)011)
-OTI-O-O
a s
|
-" c K 2 a
J)
|H
a a a a
X K S X
D.-...J
T J 3 3
t,
a o o
3JJ
"
"
^ ^ 2 ^ ^ ^.i^.^^ i
u u
a C
D
1)
3 3 3
0 0 0
CU
c a c
D
Q Q Q Q
a a
a a a
D
71
71
01
in
in
r-
71
71
71
0)
1)
0)
s ss
r- r- NO
0)
75 -a
y o
D
T)
3
*j "
*J ^
iT)
- O
CO
- O
IT)
~-t
<M
NO
tN.
[N.
in in m in
c^- c^. % % ^ 5 S pj iC f- ^ Ln
o o o o o o - ^ o
mo
in
in
0
0 0 0
NH m TJ<
O o o o
-H
u
0
ro
!>
0 ~~
O O O O O O ^ O
^"O
IM
in
O
00
ro
fi
ro
ON
ro
0
r-
0 O O
O"N 00 [^
71
L<
ro
3
O
*
*
. NO
m
o
0)
Mon.
ifear
'-'*?
O^ O
ro
ro
in
o
Is-
'
o
Z
u
0
rj
NO
00
ON
IN] Ln TJ<
vO
ON Q
* *
*
* * *
* *
* *
fNj 00
ON
rj
^<?QQ^<?'<i?'S^'^^^t
in
00
o oo
ro
i rq rj
"3
O. Q. Q.
0) D -1)
C/5 to CO
in
in in in
NO NO
NO
ON
.a
-""^
ti U
Q En En
fNl
<^
#
29
ON 0
-1
1965, w i t h a d d i t i o n s )
(>.
Day
v''
,*'*;
3
J1
a - 2 ^ i u o
4-)
I1
i
a c c a
j u a u u S u a a u a a l a u
'I
s< ^.2
Table 1.
}}
aa-ji
c
^
Q so 3 O ? E ^ f f l a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a Q a S 5
1;
Jj"
9
y1
2
s c"-i1 -j - <
n) 3
&
-I*
1
11
=0 -0
Q OH
^ >
j,
e>
Si
*;'
|
^cx
*^
Is"
!
I
, Louisv
, Louisv
lontrose, Opllir,
^durliorn, Ridge-
rgetown and
* **
-*
30
ra
EXPLANATION
TATION AT THC
P T or it4
. ,.
P R O J E C T I O N
2 - STATION
ON
S E C T I O N
A - A
OAT*
SEDIMENTARY
'"'ROCK
v-X '
1
4 STATION
Of
,..-1
K VC
,AAX
Jt
J,
""
*
i_
|
_i
_
0
PRECAM8RIAN
METAMORPMIC
ROCK
J,
'
FOU
"-
Sr
TI
"
* *
MO*e-TU.-4-STAT,001TJ
( lt4,,Sl
'
:
U S COAST ft S E O D E T l C SUHVEY 10
POELIMINAHT OETCDHINATION Of
CA1THOUAME KT'OCEMTEIt
'
I
G R A N I T I C - LIKE
7~=
I j
ROCK
BASALTIC - LIKE
ROCK
M A N T L E
S C A L E I 125.000
9
Figure 6.
Earthquake hypocenters during 1963-64 from local seismological stations in the Denver
area (after Wang, 1965). All epicenters calculated from four or m o r e recording stations are within
seven miles of the Arsenal well. All hypocenters calculated from four or m o r e recording stations
are *ithin area indicated on section A - A.
30
31
60
50
cc
UJ
40
30
0 20
| 10
10
37
LULL. O
O
co c;
23
03
1962
Figure 7.
-NO WASTE
INJECTED
1963
1964
MAXIMUM
^INJECTED INJECTION}
Y GRAVITY PRESSURE
1050 LBSA
1965
32
2000
4000
.^LITHOSTATIC
PRESSURE
^6000
J 8000
10,000
OBSERVED
^uvnoncTATir*
PRESSURE *\\HYDROSTAT1C^
12,000
pC WATER
F i g u r e 8.
P r e s s u r e - d e p t h relations, Prec a m b r i a n r e s e r v o i r , Rocky Mountain Arsenal
Disposal well.
33
3. The majority of the earthquake epic e n t e r s are located within five miles of
the Arsenal well. All e p i c e n t e r s d e t e r mined f r o m f o u r - o r - m o r e station data
are within seven miles of the well.
4. T h e r e is evidence that the earthquake
activity is taking place along a plane
that dips e a s t w a r d and passes beneath
the Arsenal well at a depth of 6. 5 miles
( W a n g , 1965).
5. When the Arsenal injection p r o g r a m is
c o n s i d e r e d on the basis of high, m e d i u m ,
low, or no injection, t h e r e is a c o r r e l a tion between the fluid injected and earthquake f r e q u e n c y .
6. The best correlation of earthquake f r e quency with fluid injected o c c u r r e d
during July, August and September 1965,
when relatively large amounts of fluid
w e r e injected at higher p r e s s u r e s and
for longer p e r i o d s of time than previously.
7. A statistical analysis (Bardwell, 1966)
is cited that suggests a mathematical
relationship b e t w e e n Arsenal earthquakes and volumes of waste i n j e c t e d
into the Arsenal well.
The volume of fluid injected appears to be
affecting the Precambrian r e s e r v o i r only for a
limited distance f r o m the well bore, and r o u g h
estimates of the e n e r g y r e l e a s e d by a single
earthquake suggest that relatively minor rock
m o v e m e n t is involved.
The Precambrian r e s e r v o i r r e c e i v i n g the
Arsenal w a s t e is highly f r a c t u r e d g r a n i t e
gneiss of v e r y low p e r m e a b i l i t y . The f r a c t u r e s
are nearly vertical. The f r a c t u r e porosity of
the r e s e r v o i r is filled with salt w a t e r . R e s e r voir p r e s s u r e is 900 pounds s u b - h y d r o s t a t i c .
It appears that m o v e m e n t is taking place
in this f r a c t u r e d r e s e r v o i r as a result of the
injection of water at p r e s s u r e s f r o m 900 to
1,950 pounds g r e a t e r than r e s e r v o i r p r e s s u r e .
Hubbert and Rubey ( 1 9 5 9 ) point out that
rock m a s s e s in f l u i d - f i l l e d r e s e r v o i r s are
s u p p o r t e d by solid s t r e s s and the p r e s s u r e of
interstitial f l u i d s . As fluid p r e s s u r e approaches
lithostatic p r e s s u r e , the shear s t r e s s required
to move rock m a s s e s down v e r y gently slopes
approaches z e r o .
It a p p e a r s that t h e s e principles offer an
explanation of the r o c k m o v e m e n t in the
Arsenal r e s e r v o i r . T h e highly f r a c t u r e d rocks
of the r e s e r v o i r are at r e s t on s t e e p slopes
under a condition of s u b - h y d r o s t a t i c fluid
34
r
p r e s s u r e . As the fluid p r e s s u r e is raised
within the r e s e r v o i r , frictional resistance
along fracture planes is reduced and, eventually, movement takes place. The elastic
wave energy released is r e c o r d e d as an earthquake.
If earthquake hypocenters indicate the
point at which movement is taking place and
injected fluid is triggering this m o v e m e n t , then
t h e r e is evidence that open f r a c t u r e s exist at
depths of 12 miles under conditions of lower
fluid p r e s s u r e - o v e r b u r d e n weight ratios than
has f o r m e r l y been considered possible (Secor,
1965). It is believed that the high angle of this
f r a c t u r e system is an important factor. Because the f r a c t u r e s are almost vertical, only a
small part of the lithostatic p r e s s u r e is acting
to f o r c e the f r a c t u r e s closed, and they can remain open under conditions of lower fluid
p r e s s u r e , and at greater depth than if they
w e r e horizontal or inclined at a lower angle.
The time lag between fluid injection and
earthquake f r e q u e n c y is believed to be due to
the unsteady state of percolation of fluid through
the f r a c t u r e s in the r e s e r v o i r due to the opening and closing of these passages resultin'g
f r o m the applied p r e s s u r e of the injected waste.
It is believed that as fluid continues to be
injected into this r e s e r v o i r fluid p r e s s u r e will
be increased at greater distances f r o m the well
bore, and rock movement will be occurring at
ever increasing distances.
In the present case it is believed that a
stable situation in this Precambrian reservoir
is being made unstable by the application of
fluid p r e s s u r e . However, it is interesting to
speculate that the principle of increasing fluid
REFERENCES
Calhoun, J. C . , 1953, R e s e r v o i r rocks and
rock-fluid s y s t e m s , Part II, Fundamentals
of Reservoir Engineering, Norman,
University of Okla. P r e s s .
Gahr, W. M. , 1961, Contamination of ground
w a t e r , vicinity of Denver (abstract):
Symposium on Water I m p r o v e m e n t , Am.
Assoc. Adv. Sci. , p. 9 - 2 0 .
Hedge, C. E., and Walthall, F. G. , 1963,
Radiogenic Strontium-87 as an index of
geologic p r o c e s s e s :
Science, v. 140,
p. 1Z14-1217.
Hubbert, M . K . , a n d Rubey, W . W . , 1959,
Role of fluid p r e s s u r e in mechanics of
overthrust faulting: Pt. I, Mechanics of
fluid-filled porous solids and its application to o v e r t h r u s t faulting: Geol. Soc.
A m e r i c a ' B u l l . , v. 70, p. 115-166.
?
''',
Consulting. Geologists
Specialists
Robert E. McDonald
Milton O. Childers, Ph.D.
PHONE: 7 5 7 - 6 3 2 2
AREA COOK: 3 0 3
DENVER, C O L O . B O 2 2 3
POWERS ELEVATION
COMPANY, INC.
Oil Well Elevation Service
INDEPENDENT
EXPLORATION
COMPANY
MAIN OFFICE
Houston5825 Chimney Rock Road713MO 6-2561
IN DENVER
Covering
Eight States in the Rocky Mountain Area
Six District Offices to Serve You
P. O. Box 1156
3600 South Huron. Phone 761-1983, Code 303
J. R. Hunt, Vice-Pres. & Division Mgr.
P. 0. Box 10205