Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
RESERVATION of food is one of the most significant applications of refrigeration. Cooling and freezing food effectively
reduces the activity of microorganisms and enzymes, thus retarding deterioration. In addition, crystallization of water reduces the
amount of liquid water in food and inhibits microbial growth (Heldman 1975).
Most commercial food and beverage cooling and freezing operations use air-blast convection heat transfer; only a limited number of
products are cooled or frozen by conduction heat transfer in plate
freezers. Thus, this chapter focuses on convective heat transfer.
For air-blast convective cooling and freezing operations to be
cost-effective, refrigeration equipment should fit the specific
requirements of the particular cooling or freezing application. The
design of such refrigeration equipment requires estimation of the
cooling and freezing times of foods and beverages, as well as the corresponding refrigeration loads.
Numerous methods for predicting the cooling and freezing times
of foods and beverages have been proposed, based on numerical,
analytical, and empirical analysis. Selecting an appropriate estimation method from the many available methods can be challenging.
This chapter reviews selected procedures available for estimating the
air-blast convective cooling and freezing times of foods and beverages, and presents examples of these procedures. These procedures
use the thermal properties of foods, discussed in Chapter 19.
THERMODYNAMICS OF COOLING
AND FREEZING
(1)
where h is the convective heat transfer coefficient, L is the characteristic dimension of the food, and k is the thermal conductivity of the
food (see Chapter 19). In cooling time calculations, the characteristic
dimension L is taken to be the shortest distance from the thermal center of the food to its surface. Thus, in cooling time calculations, L is
half the thickness of a slab, or the radius of a cylinder or a sphere.
When the Biot number approaches zero (Bi < 0.1), internal
resistance to heat transfer is much less than external resistance, and
the lumped-parameter approach can be used to determine a foods
cooling time (Heldman 1975). When the Biot number is very large
(Bi > 40), internal resistance to heat transfer is much greater than
external resistance, and the foods surface temperature can be
assumed to equal the temperature of the cooling medium. For this
latter situation, series solutions of the Fourier heat conduction equation are available for simple geometric shapes. When 0.1 < Bi < 40,
both the internal resistance to heat transfer and the convective heat
transfer coefficient must be considered. In this case, series solutions,
which incorporate transcendental functions to account for the influence of the Biot number, are available for simple geometric shapes.
Simplified methods for predicting the cooling times of foods and
beverages are available for regularly and irregularly shaped foods
over a wide range of Biot numbers. In this chapter, these simplified
methods are grouped into two main categories: (1) those based on f
and j factors, and (2) those based on equivalent heat transfer dimensionality. Furthermore, the methods based on f and j factors are
divided into two subgroups: (1) those for regular shapes, and (2)
those for irregular shapes.
The preparation of this chapter is assigned to TC 10.5, Refrigerated Distribution and Storage Facilities.
where Tm is the cooling medium temperature, T is the product temperature, and Ti is the initial temperature of the product.
20.1
Copyright 2014, ASHRAE
(2)
20.2
(3)
(4)
20.3
Table 2 Expressions for Estimating f and jc Factors for
Thermal Center Temperature of Infinite Cylinders
Biot Number Range
Bi 0.1
f
ln 10
-----2 = ----------2 Bi
L
j c = 1.0
Bi 0.1
f
ln 10
-----2 = ----------Bi
L
j c = 1.0
v = 1.257493 + 0.487941 ln Bi
+ 0.025322 ln Bi 0.026568 ln Bi
f
-----2 = 0.3982
L
Bi > 100
j c = 1.6015
where
0.002888 ln Bi + 0.001078 ln Bi
and J0(v) and J1(v) are zero and first-order Bessel
functions, respectively.
f
ln 10
-----2 = ---------2
L
v
2J 1 v
j c = --------------------------------------2
2
v J0 v J1 v
f
ln 10
-----2 = ---------2
L
u
2 sin u
j c = --------------------------------u + sin u cos u
Bi 0.1
f
ln 10
-----2 = ----------3 Bi
L
j c = 1.0
f
ln 10
-----2 = ---------2
L
w
2 sin w w cos w
j c = ------------------------------------------w sin w cos w
where
u = 0.860972 + 0.312133 ln Bi
+ 0.007986 ln Bi 0.016192 ln Bi
0.001190 ln Bi + 0.000581 ln Bi
Bi > 100
f
-----2 = 0.9332
L
j c = 1.273
where
w = 1.573729 + 0.642906 ln Bi
2
+ 0.047859 ln Bi 0.03553 ln Bi
4
0.004907 ln Bi + 0.001563 ln Bi
f
-----2 = 0.2333
L
j c = 2.0
Bi > 100
Source: Lacroix and Castaigne (1987a)
1
------------- =
f comp
jcomp =
---f-i
(5)
ji
(6)
20.4
(7)
A2
B 2 = --------2L
(8)
2.303L
f = ------------------2
M 1
(9)
where is the thermal diffusivity of the food. In addition, an expression for estimating a jm factor used to determine the mass average
temperature is given as
2
jm = 0.892e0.0388M1
(10)
As an alternative to estimating M12 from the nomograph developed by Smith et al. (1968), Hayakawa and Villalobos (1989)
obtained regression formulas for estimating M12. For Biot numbers approaching infinity, their regression formula is
ln (M12) = 2.2893825 + 0.35330539Xg 3.8044156Xg2
9.6821811Xg3 12.0321827Xg4
(11)
7.1542411Xg5 1.6301018Xg6
where Xg = ln(G). Equation (11) is applicable for 0.25 G 1.0.
For finite Biot numbers, Hayakawa and Villalobos (1989) gave the
following:
ln (M12) = 0.92083090 + 0.83409615Xg 0.78765739Xb
0.04821784XgXb 0.04088987Xg2 0.10045526Xb2
+ 0.01521388Xg3 + 0.00119941XgXb3 + 0.00129982Xb4 (12)
where Xg = ln(G) and Xb = ln(1/Bi). Equation (12) is applicable
for 0.25 G 1.0 and 0.01 1/Bi 100.
Fig. 6 Nomograph for Estimating Value of M12 from Reciprocal of Biot Number and Smiths (1966) Geometry Index
2
3cL j
= --------------ln -----
2
kE Y
(13)
Equation (13) is applicable for center temperature if Yc < 0.7 and for
mass average temperature if Ym < 0.55, where Yc is the fractional
unaccomplished temperature difference based on final center temperature and Ym is the fractional unaccomplished temperature difference based on final mass average temperature. In Equation (13),
is cooling time, is the foods density, c is the foods specific heat,
L is the foods radius or half-thickness, k is the foods thermal conductivity, j is the lag factor, E is the equivalent heat transfer dimensionality, and is the first root (in radians) of the following
transcendental function:
cot + Bi 1 = 0
(14)
Bi
+ 1.85
E = -----------------------------43
1.85
Bi
------------- + ---------E
E0
(15)
(16)
20.5
(17)
For two-dimensional, irregularly shaped foods, E0 (the equivalent heat transfer dimensionality for Bi = 0) is given by
1 1 2
1
E 0 = 1 + ------- 1 + ------------------
1
2 1 + 2
(18)
2 0.4
1 + 2 + 1 1 + 2 + 2 1 + 1 1 2
E0 = 1.5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- (19)
1 2 1 + 1 + 2
15
(21)
where
2
1
(22)
(24)
(25)
Shape
Infinite slab
(1 = 2 = )
Infinite rectangular rod
(1 1, 2 = )
Brick
(1 1, 2 1)
Infinite cylinder
(1 = 1, 2 = )
Infinite ellipse
(1 > 1, 2 = )
Squat cylinder
(1 = 2, 1 1)
Short cylinder
(1 = 1, 2 1)
Sphere
(1 = 2 = 1)
Ellipsoid
(1 1, 2 1)
p1
p2
p3
0.75
41/
0.75
0.75
41/
1.52
1.01
1.01
1.01
0.75
1.2251
1.01
0.75
1.52
1.01
1.24
1.01
1.24
1.2252 1
where
1.5 + 0.69 Bi
= -------------------------------
1.5 + Bi
(26)
20.6
cot + Bi 1 = 0
cot + 6.44 1 = 0
= 2.68
11
2 = ------ = 2.75
4
1.625 2.75
------------------------------------------------ = 2.06
15
Assuming the ham to be ellipsoidal, the geometric factors can be
obtained from Table 4:
p2 = 1.24
(1.72) = 0.721
p1 = 1.01
p3 = 1
1
1.625
f (1) = ---------------2 + 0.01 1 exp 1.625 --------------- = 0.4114
6
1.625
2
1
f (2) = ------------2 + 0.01 1 exp 2.75 2.75
------------ = 0.1766
6
2.75
A1
L 1
B1 = --------2- = --------------= 1 = 1.625
2
L
L
43
6.44
+ 1.85
E = ---------------------------------- = 1.44
43
6.44
1.85
------------------ + ---------1.38
2.06
A2
L 2
B2 = --------2- = --------------= 2 = 2.75
2
L
L
Step 6: Calculate the lag factor applicable to the mass average temperature.
From Table 4, = 1, 1 = 1, and 2 = 2. Using Equation (24), j
becomes
j = 1.271 + 0.305 exp[(0.172)(1.625) (0.115)(1.625)2]
+ 0.425 exp[(0.09)(2.75) (0.128)(2.75)2] = 1.78
3
3
G = 0.25 + ---------------------------- + -------------------------2- = 0.442
2
8 1.625
8 2.75
Using Equation (12), determine the characteristic value M12:
Xg = ln(G) = ln(0.442) = 0.816
Using Equation (23), the lag factor applicable to the center temperature becomes
1
1.35
6.44
+ ------------1.625
- = 1.72
jc = -------------------------------------1.35
1
6.44
------------------ + ------------1.78
1.625
Using Equations (25) and (26), the lag factor for the mass average
temperature becomes
A2 = L22
20.7
2.303L c
2.303L
f = ------------------= ------------------------2
2
M1 k
M1
2
4.91 ln 0.1538
= ------------ ---------------- = 3.45 h
2.303 0.777
hD
Bi = ------ks
Planks Equation
One of the most widely known simple methods for estimating
freezing times of foods and beverages was developed by Plank
(1913, 1941). Convective heat transfer is assumed to occur between
the food and the surrounding cooling medium. The temperature of
the food is assumed to be at its initial freezing temperature, which is
constant throughout the freezing process. Furthermore, constant
thermal conductivity for the frozen region is assumed. Planks
freezing time estimation is as follows:
Lf
2
PD RD
= ------------------ -------- + ----------
Tf T m h
ks
(27)
(28)
where h is the convective heat transfer coefficient, D is the characteristic dimension, and ks is the thermal conductivity of the fully frozen food. In freezing time calculations, the characteristic dimension
D is defined to be twice the shortest distance from the thermal center
of a food to its surface: the thickness of a slab or the diameter of a
cylinder or a sphere.
In general, the Plank number is defined as follows:
Cl Ti Tf
Pk = ---------------------------H
(29)
(30)
PD RD 2
-------- + ----------
ks
h
(31)
(32)
20.8
(33)
Ste
P = 0.7306 1.083 Pk + Ste 15.40U 15.43 + 0.01329 --------- (34)
Bi
R = 0.2079 0.2656U(Ste)
(35)
PD RD 2
-------- + ----------
ks
h
Tm Ti
1 = f1log j 1 ------------------ T T
m
f
where Tm is the coolant temperature, Ti is the foods initial temperature, and Tf is the initial freezing point of the food. The f1 and j1 factors are determined from a Biot number calculated using an average
thermal conductivity, which is based on the frozen and unfrozen
foods thermal conductivity evaluated at (Tf + Tm)/2. See Chapter 19
for the evaluation of food thermal properties.
The expression for estimating subcooling time 3 is
Tm Tf
3 = f3log j 3 --------------------
Tm Tc
(40)
where Tc is the final temperature at the center of the food. The f3 and
j3 factors are determined from a Biot number calculated using the
thermal conductivity of the frozen food evaluated at the temperature
(Tf + Tm)/2.
Lacroix and Castaigne model the phase change time 2 with
Planks equation:
Lf D
P
2 = ---------------------------- ---------- + R
Tf T m k c 2Bi c
(36)
(37)
(41)
(42)
R = 0.15396
(43)
P = 0.27553
(44)
R = 0.07212
(45)
P = 0.19665
(46)
R = 0.03939
(47)
(39)
For spheres
(38)
where 1, 2, and 3 are the precooling, phase change, and subcooling times, respectively.
DeMichelis and Calvelo (1983) suggested using Cleland and
Earles (1982a) equivalent heat transfer dimensionality method, discussed in the Cooling Times of Foods and Beverages section of this
chapter, to estimate precooling and subcooling times. They also
suggested that the phase change time be calculated with Planks
equation, but with the thermal conductivity of the frozen food evaluated at temperature (Tf + Tm)/2, where Tf is the foods initial freezing temperature and Tm is the temperature of the cooling medium.
Lacroix and Castaigne (1987a, 1987b, 1988) suggested the use
of f and j factors to determine precooling and subcooling times of
foods and beverages. They presented equations (see Tables 1 to 3)
for estimating the values of f and j for infinite slabs, infinite cylinders, and spheres. Note that Lacroix and Castaigne based the Biot
1
1
P = P 0.02175 --------- 0.01956 --------- 1.69657
Bi
Ste
(48)
1
1
R = R 5.57519 --------- + 0.02932 --------- + 1.58247
Bi c
Ste
(49)
For rectangular bricks, P and R are calculated using the expressions given in Table 5 for the P and R of bricks.
Pham (1984) also devised a freezing time estimation method,
similar to Planks equation, in which sensible heat effects were
considered by calculating precooling, phase-change, and subcooling times separately. In addition, Pham suggested using a mean
20.9
Table 5
Shape
P and R Expressions
Infinite
slab
0.0105
P = 0.5072 + 0.2018 Pk + Ste 0.3224 Pk + ---------------- + 0.0681
Bi
Applicability
2 h 88 Btu/hft2 F
0 D 4.7 in.
Ti 104F
49 Tm 5F
0.0710
P = 0.3751 + 0.0999 Pk + Ste 0.4008 Pk + ---------------- 0.5865
Bi
R = 0.0133 + Ste 0.0415 Pk + 0.3957
Sphere
Bi
R = 0.0784 + Ste 0.0386 Pk 0.1694
P = P 2 + P 1 0.1136 + Ste 5.766P 1 1.242
Brick
where
and
Bi
R 2 = R 1 1.202 + Ste 3.410 Pk + 0.7336
1 2
P 1 = -------------------------------------------2 1 2 + 1 + 2
Q
r
s
1
R 1 = ---- r 1 1 r 2 r ln ----------- s 1 1 s 2 s ln ------------ + ------ 2 1 + 2 2 1
r 1
s 1
2
72
in which
1
2 12
---- = 4 1 2 1 1 + 2 1
Q
1
2 1 2
r = --- 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 2 1 1 + 2 1
3
and
1
2 1 2
s = --- 1 + 2 + 1 1 2 1 1 + 2 1
3
i = 1, 2, 3
(50)
H1 = Cl (Ti Tfm)
H2 = Lf + Cs(Tfm Tc)
(51)
T i + Tf m
T1 = ------------------- Tm
2
T2 = Tfm Tm
(53)
(54)
Geometric Considerations
(52)
20.10
Variables
i=1
k1 = 6
Q1 = Cl (Ti Tf m )V
Precooling
Tm1
Subcooling
T m3
E = G1 + G2E1 + G3E2
(60)
1.77 1
1.77
0.73
E1 = X 2.32 1 ------- + 1 X 2.32 1 -----------2.50
1
1
(61)
1.77 0.50
1
- + 1 X 2.32 2 ---------3.69
-----2
2
(62)
1.77
and G1, G2, and G3 are given in Table 7. In Equations (61) and (62),
the function X with argument is defined as
(55)
Freezing time of the infinite slab is then calculated from one of the
many suitable freezing time estimation methods.
Using data collected from a large number of freezing experiments, Cleland and Earle (1982b) developed empirical correlations
for the equivalent heat transfer dimensionality applicable to rectangular bricks and finite cylinders. For rectangular brick shapes with
dimensions D by 1D by 2D, the equivalent heat transfer dimensionality was given as follows:
E = 1 + W1 + W2
(56)
2
Bi 5
2
W1 = --------------- --------3- + --------------- ------------------------- Bi + 2 8 1 Bi + 2 1 1 + 1
(57)
where
(58)
For finite cylinders where the diameter is smaller than the height,
the equivalent heat transfer dimensionality was given as
E = 2.0 + W2
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
E2 = X 2.32 1
2
Bi 5
2
W2 = --------------- --------3- + --------------- -------------------------Bi
+
2
8 2 Bi + 2 2 2 + 1
G3
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
1
where
and
G2
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
i=3
k3 = 6
Q3 = Cs (Tf m To)V
Bi3 = Bis
T fm T m T o T m
= ------------------------------------------------------ T fm T m
ln ---------------------
To Tm
shape = slab /E
G1
Infinite slab
Infinite cylinder
Sphere
Finite cylinder (diameter > height)
Finite cylinder (height > diameter)
Infinite rod
Rectangular brick
Two-dimensional irregular shape
Three-dimensional irregular shape
Source: Cleland et al. (1987a)
i=2
k2 = 4
Q2 = L f V
Bi2 = Bis
Tm2 = Tf m Tm
Phase change
Shape
(59)
X() = /(Bi1.34 + )
(63)
Using the freezing time prediction methods for infinite slabs and
various multidimensional shapes developed by McNabb et al.
(1990), Hossain et al. (1992a) derived infinite series expressions for
E of infinite rectangular rods, finite cylinders, and rectangular
bricks. For most practical freezing situations, only the first term of
these series expressions is significant. The resulting expressions for
E are given in Table 8.
Hossain et al. (1992b) also presented a semianalytically derived expression for the equivalent heat transfer dimensionality of
two-dimensional, irregularly shaped foods. An equivalent pseudoelliptical infinite cylinder was used to replace the actual twodimensional, irregular shape in the calculations. A pseudoellipse is a
shape that depends on the Biot number. As the Biot number
approaches infinity, the shape closely resembles an ellipse. As the
Biot number approaches zero, the pseudoelliptical infinite cylinder
approaches an infinite rectangular rod. Hossain et al. (1992b) stated
that, for practical Biot numbers, the pseudoellipse is very similar to
a true ellipse. This model pseudoelliptical infinite cylinder has the
same volume per unit length and characteristic dimension as the
actual food. The resulting expression for E is as follows:
2
1 + ------Bi
E = 1 + --------------------2 2 2
2 + --------Bi
(64)
In Equation (64), the Biot number is based on the shortest distance from the thermal center to the foods surface, not twice that
distance. Using this expression for E, the freezing time shape of
20.11
Shape
sin z n
2
2
E = 1 + ----- 1 + ----- 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bi
Bi
2
sin z n z n
n=1 3
Bi Bi
where zn are roots of Bi = zn tan(zn) and Bi = hL/k, where L is the shortest distance from
the center of the rectangular rod to the surface.
Finite cylinder, height exceeds
diameter
(radius L and height 21L)
yn
yn
4
2
3
E = 2 + ------ 1 + ------ 8 y n J 1 y n 1 + -------2- cosh 1 y n + ----- sinh 1 y n
Bi
Bi
Bi
Bi
1 1
n=1
where yn are roots of yn J1(yn) BiJ0( yn) = 0; J0 and J1 are Bessel functions of the first kind,
order zero and one, respectively; and Bi = hL/k, where L is the radius of the cylinder.
sin z n
2
2
E = 1 + ----- 1 + ----- 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bi
Bi
z
2
n
Bi
where zn are roots of Bi = zn tan(zn); I0 and I1 are Bessel function of the second kind,
order zero and one, respectively; and Bi = hL/k, where L is the radius of the cylinder.
Rectangular brick
(2L by 21L by 22L)
sin z n
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
2
2
E = 1 + ----- 1 + ----- 4 3
z
sin
z
n
n
Bi
Bi
8 2
n=1 m=1
z nm
sin z n sin z m cosh z nm + ----------- sinh z nm
Bi 2
1
1
2
2
2
z n z m z nm 1 + -----sin z n 1 + -----------sin z m
Bi
Bi 1
where zn are roots of Bi = zn tan(zn); zm are the roots of Bi1 = zm tan(zm); Bi = hL/k, where L is the
shortest distance from the thermal center of the rectangular brick to the surface; and znm is given as
2
2
2 2
2 2
z nm = z n 2 + z m -------
(65)
geometries. These methods can be used with Equation (55) to calculate freezing times.
Mean Conducting Path. Phams freezing time formulas, given
in Equations (50) and (51), require knowledge of the Biot number.
To calculate the Biot number of a food, its characteristic dimension
must be known. Because it is difficult to determine the characteristic
dimension of an irregularly shaped food, Pham (1985) introduced
the concept of the mean conducting path, which is the mean heat
transfer length from the surface of the food to its thermal center, or
Dm /2. Thus, the Biot number becomes
Bi = hDm/k
(66)
Bi
--------- = 1 + 1.5 1 1
Bi o
1
1
4
+ ----- + ----- 1 + --------
Bi o
1 2
4 0.25
(67)
20.12
Slab
Infinite cylinder
Sphere
Infinite rod
Rectangular brick
where Bio is the Biot number based on the shortest dimension of the
block D1, or Bio = hD1/k. The Biot number can then be substituted
into a freezing time estimation method to calculate the freezing time
for rectangular blocks.
Pham (1985) noted that, for squat-shaped foods, the mean conducting path Dm/2 could be reasonably estimated as the arithmetic
mean of the longest and shortest distances from the surface of the
food to its thermal center.
Equivalent Sphere Diameter. Ilicali and Engez (1990) and
Ilicali and Hocalar (1990) introduced the equivalent sphere diameter concept to calculate the freezing time of irregularly shaped
foods. In this method, a sphere diameter is calculated based on the
volume and the volume-to-surface-area ratio of the irregularly
shaped food. This equivalent sphere is then used to calculate the
freezing time of the food item.
Considering an irregularly shaped food item where the shortest
and longest distances from the surface to the thermal center were
designated as D1 and D2, respectively, Ilicali and Engez (1990) and
Ilicali and Hocalar (1990) defined the volume-surface diameter Dvs
as the diameter of a sphere having the same volume-to-surface-area
ratio as the irregular shape:
Dvs = 6V/As
(68)
(69)
Methods
Infinite slab
Infinite cylinder
Short cylinder
Rectangular brick
Two-dimensional
irregular shape
Three-dimensional
irregular shape
diameter Deq,s. Any of the previously discussed freezing time methods for spheres may then be used to calculate this freezing time.
(70)
2
1
Deq,s = --------------- Dv + --------------- Dvs
2 + 1
2 + 1
20.13
Property
At 14F
(Final
Temp.)
At 28.9F
(Initial
Freezing
Point)
At 50F
(Initial
Temp.)
Density, lb/ft3
Enthalpy, Btu/lb
Hs = 35.81 Hl = 117.8
cl = 0.840
Specific heat, Btu/lb F cs = 0.504
Thermal conductivity,
Btu/lbftF
ks = 0.96
0.0182
+ 0.289 0.2296 0.211 + ---------------- + 0.1050
0.964
= 0.379
P = 0.379 + 0.316{0.1136 + 0.289[(5.766)(0.316) 1.242]}
= 0.468
Determine R from Table 5.
1
2 12
= 10.6
---- = 4 3 4 3 1 + 4 1
Q
1
2
r = --- 3 + 4 + 1 + 3 4 3 1 + 4 1
3
12
= 3.55
1
2
s = --- 3 + 4 + 1 3 4 3 1 + 4 1
3
12
= 1.78
3.55
1
R 1 = ----------------------- 3.55 1 3 3.55 4 3.55 ln -------------------
10.6 2
3.55 1
1.78
1.78 1 3 1.78 4 1.78 ln -------------------
1.78 1
1
+ ------ 2 3 + 2 4 1 = 0.0885
72
R2 = 0.0885{1.202 + 0.289[(3.410)(0.211) + 0.7336]} = 0.144
R = 0.144 + 0.0885{0.7344 + 0.289[(49.89)(0.0885) 2.900]}
= 0.248
Step 6: Calculate the beefs freezing time.
Because the final temperature at the thermal center of the beef is
given to be 14F, use Equation (31) to calculate the freezing time:
20.14
5640
0.468 0.125 0.248 0.125 = 1.32 h
= ------------------------------ ------------------------------------ + --------------------------------------28.9 22
7.4
0.96
Example 4. Orange juice in a cylindrical container, 1.0 ft diameter by 1.5 ft
tall, is to be frozen in a blast freezer. The initial temperature of the juice
is 41F and the freezer air temperature is 31F. The surface heat transfer coefficient is estimated to be 5.3 Btu/hft2 F. Calculate the time
required for the thermal center of the juice to reach 0F.
Solution: Because the food is a finite cylinder, the algorithm based on
the method of equivalent heat transfer dimensionality (Cleland et al.
1987a, 1987b) is used. This method requires calculation of the freezing
time of an infinite slab, which is determined using the method of Hung
and Thompson (1983).
Property
At 40F
(Fully
Frozen)
At 0F
(Final
Temp.)
At 41F
(Initial
Temp.)
Density, lb/ft3
Enthalpy, Btu/lb
s = 60.6
s = 60.6
Hs = 17.5
l = 64.9
Hl = 164
cs = 0.420
cl = 0.933
ks = 1.29
1.77 = 1.132
= 2.32/1.77
2 = 2.32/1.5
E = G1 + G2E1 + G3E2
Step 7: Calculate freezing time of the orange juice using Equation (55):
G3 = 1
Calculate E2:
G2 = 0
SYMBOLS
A1
A2
As
B1
B2
Bi
Bi1
Bi2
Bi3
Bic
Bil
Bio
Bis
c
Cl
Cs
D
D1
D2
Deq,s
Dm
Dv
Dvs
E
E0
E1
E2
E
f
f1
f3
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
fcomp
G
G1
G2
G3
h
I0(x)
I1(x)
j
j1
j3
jc
jcomp
jm
js
J0(x)
J1(x)
j
k
kc
20.15
Ym = fractional unaccomplished temperature difference based on final
mass average temperature
yn = roots of transcendental equation; yn J1( yn ) Bi J0( yn ) = 0
z = coordinate direction
zm = roots of transcendental equation; Bi1 = zm tan(zm)
zn = roots of transcendental equation; Bi = zn tan(zn)
znm = parameter given in Table 8
Greek
REFERENCES
Becker, B.R., and B.A. Fricke. 1999a. Evaluation of semi-analytical/empirical freezing time estimation methods, part I: Regularly shaped food items.
International Journal of HVAC&R Research (now HVAC&R Research)
5(2):151-169.
Becker, B.R., and B.A. Fricke. 1999b. Evaluation of semi-analytical/empirical freezing time estimation methods, part II: Irregularly shaped food
items. International Journal of HVAC&R Research (now HVAC&R
Research) 5(2):171-187.
Becker, B.R., and B.A. Fricke. 1999c. Freezing times of regularly shaped
food items. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
26(5):617-626.
Becker, B.R., and B.A. Fricke. 2000a. Evaluation of semi-analytical/empirical freezing time estimation methods, part I: Regularly shaped food items
(RP-888). Technical Paper 4352, presented at the ASHRAE Winter Meeting, Dallas.
Becker, B.R., and B.A. Fricke. 2000b. Evaluation of semi-analytical/empirical freezing time estimation methods, part II: Irregularly shaped food
items (RP-888). Technical Paper 4353, presented at the ASHRAE Winter
Meeting, Dallas.
Cleland, A.C. 1990. Food refrigeration processes: Analysis, design and simulation. Elsevier Science, London.
Cleland, A.C., and R.L. Earle. 1977. A comparison of analytical and numerical methods of predicting the freezing times of foods. Journal of Food
Science 42(5):1390-1395.
Cleland, A.C., and R.L. Earle. 1979a. A comparison of methods for predicting the freezing times of cylindrical and spherical foodstuffs. Journal of
Food Science 44(4):958-963, 970.
Cleland, A.C., and R.L. Earle. 1979b. Prediction of freezing times for foods
in rectangular packages. Journal of Food Science 44(4):964-970.
Cleland, A.C., and R.L. Earle. 1982a. A simple method for prediction of
heating and cooling rates in solids of various shapes. International Journal of Refrigeration 5(2):98-106.
20.16
Cleland, A.C., and R.L. Earle. 1982b. Freezing time prediction for foods
A simplified procedure. International Journal of Refrigeration 5(3):
134-140.
Cleland, A.C., and R.L. Earle. 1984. Freezing time predictions for different
final product temperatures. Journal of Food Science 49(4):1230-1232.
Cleland, D.J., A.C. Cleland, and R.L. Earle. 1987a. Prediction of freezing
and thawing times for multi-dimensional shapes by simple formulae
Part 1: Regular shapes. International Journal of Refrigeration 10(3):
156-164.
Cleland, D.J., A.C. Cleland, and R.L. Earle. 1987b. Prediction of freezing
and thawing times for multi-dimensional shapes by simple formulae
Part 2: Irregular shapes. International Journal of Refrigeration 10(4):
234-240.
DeMichelis, A., and A. Calvelo. 1983. Freezing time predictions for brick
and cylindrical-shaped foods. Journal of Food Science 48:909-913, 934.
Hayakawa, K., and G. Villalobos. 1989. Formulas for estimating Smith et al.
parameters to determine the mass average temperature of irregularly
shaped bodies. Journal of Food Process Engineering 11(4):237-256.
Heldman, D.R. 1975. Food process engineering. AVI, Westport, CT.
Hossain, M.M., D.J. Cleland, and A.C. Cleland. 1992a. Prediction of freezing and thawing times for foods of regular multi-dimensional shape by
using an analytically derived geometric factor. International Journal of
Refrigeration 15(4):227-234.
Hossain, M.M., D.J. Cleland, and A.C. Cleland. 1992b. Prediction of freezing and thawing times for foods of two-dimensional irregular shape by
using a semi-analytical geometric factor. International Journal of Refrigeration 15(4):235-240.
Hossain, M.M., D.J. Cleland, and A.C. Cleland. 1992c. Prediction of freezing and thawing times for foods of three-dimensional irregular shape by
using a semi-analytical geometric factor. International Journal of Refrigeration 15(4):241-246.
Hung, Y.C., and D.R. Thompson. 1983. Freezing time prediction for slab
shape foodstuffs by an improved analytical method. Journal of Food Science 48(2):555-560.
Ilicali, C., and S.T. Engez. 1990. A simplified approach for predicting the
freezing or thawing times of foods having brick or finite cylinder shape.
In Engineering and food, vol. 2, pp. 442-456. W.E.L. Speiss and H.
Schubert, eds. Elsevier Applied Science, London.
Ilicali, C., and M. Hocalar. 1990. A simplified approach for predicting the
freezing times of foodstuffs of anomalous shape. In Engineering and
food, vol. 2, pp. 418-425. W.E.L. Speiss and H. Schubert, eds. Elsevier
Applied Science, London.
Lacroix, C., and F. Castaigne. 1987a. Simple method for freezing time calculations for infinite flat slabs, infinite cylinders and spheres. Canadian
Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal 20(4):252-259.
Lacroix, C., and F. Castaigne. 1987b. Simple method for freezing time calculations for brick and cylindrical shaped food products. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal 20(5):342-349.
Lacroix, C., and F. Castaigne. 1988. Freezing time calculation for products
with simple geometrical shapes. Journal of Food Process Engineering
10(2):81-104.
Lin, Z., A.C. Cleland, G.F. Serrallach, and D.J. Cleland. 1993. Prediction of
chilling times for objects of regular multi-dimensional shapes using a
general geometric factor. Refrigeration Science and Technology 19933:259-267.
Lin, Z., A.C. Cleland, D.J. Cleland, and G.F. Serrallach. 1996a. A simple
method for prediction of chilling times for objects of two-dimensional
irregular shape. International Journal of Refrigeration 19(2):95-106.
Lin, Z., A.C. Cleland, D.J. Cleland, and G.F. Serrallach. 1996b. A simple
method for prediction of chilling times: Extension to three-dimensional
irregular shaped. International Journal of Refrigeration 19(2):107-114.
McNabb, A., G.C. Wake, and M.M. Hossain. 1990. Transition times between steady states for heat conduction: Part IGeneral theory and
some exact results. Occasional Publications in Mathematics and Statistics 20, Massey University, New Zealand.
Pflug, I.J., J.L. Blaisdell, and J. Kopelman. 1965. Developing temperaturetime curves for objects that can be approximated by a sphere, infinite
plate, or infinite cylinder. ASHRAE Transactions 71(1):238-248.
Pham, Q.T. 1984. An extension to Planks equation for predicting freezing
times for foodstuffs of simple shapes. International Journal of Refrigeration 7:377-383.
Pham, Q.T. 1985. Analytical method for predicting freezing times of rectangular blocks of foodstuffs. International Journal of Refrigeration 8(1):
43-47.
Pham, Q.T. 1986. Simplified equation for predicting the freezing time of
foodstuffs. Journal of Food Technology 21(2):209-219.
Plank, R. 1913. Die Gefrierdauer von Eisblocken. Zeitschrift fr die gesamte
Klte Industrie 20(6):109-114.
Plank, R. 1941. Beitrage zur Berechnung und Bewertung der Gefriergeschwindigkeit von Lebensmitteln. Zeitschrift fr die gesamte Klte
Industrie 3(10):1-24.
Smith, R.E. 1966. Analysis of transient heat transfer from anomalous shape
with heterogeneous properties. Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
Smith, R.E., G.L. Nelson, and R.L. Henrickson. 1968. Applications of
geometry analysis of anomalous shapes to problems in transient heat
transfer. Transactions of the ASAE 11(2):296-302.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Pham, Q.T. 1986. Freezing of foodstuffs with variations in environmental
conditions. International Journal of Refrigeration 9(5):290-295.
Pham, Q.T. 1987. A converging-front model for the asymmetric freezing of
slab-shaped food. Journal of Food Science 52(3):795-800.
Pham, Q.T. 1991. Shape factors for the freezing time of ellipses and ellipsoids. Journal of Food Engineering 13:159-170.