Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SERVICEABILITY OF
PVC AND
PVC PRODUCTS
In recent years, the impacts of industrial products
and their raw materials on the environment in all
phases of production, use and waste disposal have
drawn attention from the standpoint of global
environment and depletion of natural resources.
LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) is highlighted as one
of the tools to evaluate quantitative impacts on
the environment, and its effectiveness has been
demonstrated.
Compared with other plastics, PVC products are
less dependent on oil, which is a fossil fuel, and are
chemically stable, therefore PVC is a plastic which
has suitable characteristics for production of durable
products.
In this chapter, the features of PVC and PVC
products will be explained based on LCA and physical
properties of PVC to help gain understanding on the
serviceability of PVC and PVC products.
<Water pipes>
2.72
(15 cm diameter,
per 1 km length)
2
1
0.78
10
CO2106kg
Steel
PVC
<Agricultural green houses>
(per 1 km2)
9.500
8
6
4
2
0.177
0
0.346
PVC
Polyolefin
Glass
15
10.85
10
5
Expanded PS
LDPE
PS
PP
HDPE
PET
PVC
Source: Prepared from "A report on LCI data for petrochemical products", PWMI
60
*1 The heat loss through single glazing aluminum profiles is defined as 100 for comparison.
*2 low-e : low emissivity
High
0
Low
Heat insulation
20
40
60
80
100 ( % )*1
100
71.4
53.5
Double profiles
(aluminum profile + PVC inner window
(single glazing) (low-e*2 double glazing)
35.7
35.7
PVC profiles
(low-e double glazing)
35.7
Source: Prepared from "A document by the energy saving construction materials promotion center"
within the Federation of Construction Material Industries, Japan
Other
PVC
Contributes to recycling
PVC is a material suitable for recycling. It has the
longest history of recycling among plastics, and it is
most advanced in mechanical recycling. For example,
about 68% of end-of-life agricultural films (agrofilms) were recycled and used for flooring, etc. in 2005
(Fig.5-5).
HDPE
LDPE
PS
ABS
PP
0
20
40
60
80
100
Source: Prepared from A plastics demand structure survey reportby the MITI
recycled
About 68%
The Next Generation Energy-Saving Standard :
The revision of the Japanese Housing Energy Efficiency took
place in 1999, triggered by the 1997 Kyoto Protocol which
required 6% reduction of CO2 emission from the level in 1990.
Reduction standards, etc. for heat loss from openings (e.g.,
windows and entrances) of housing have been defined.
61
16.532
10.689
15.699
16.250
10.710
10.623
Resource energy
Process energy
17.257
16.381
14.352
10.849
10.407
10.233
8.301
4.857
5.843
4.989
5.627
6.147
6.850
5.992
LDPE
HDPE
PP
PS
Expanded PS
PVC
6.052
PET for bottles
CO2=kg/kgNOX/SOX=g/kg
CO2
NOX
SOX
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
2.706
2.632
1.0
0.5
0
1.421
LDPE
2,534
2.356
1.231
2.663
2.546
1.379
HDPE
1.756
PP
2.871
3.015
2.717
2.882
1.430
1.862
PS
1.941
2.131
Expanded PS
PVC
3.205
2.540
1.416
PET for bottles
Source: Survey report for LCI data of petrochemical products by PWMI, July 1997
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) :
Method to evaluate the magnitude of resources
consumption and impacts on the environment
for a material or product throughout its whole
62
(Mcal/kg)
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
11.597
2.006
10.855
9.591
10.275
13.211
2.252
0.580
10.959
Agro-films
(calendered)
5.784
2
1
0
1.662
2.248
2.077
1.485
2.154
1.957
5.711
2.304
Agro-films
(calendered)
Source: "Report on Investigation of LCI Data Concerning PVC Products" October 1999, JPEC
Resource energy :
Evaluation in terms of calorific values of each
hydrocarbon sources used as raw materials.
63
Fig. 5-8 Comparison of LCI data between PVC products and non-PVC products
Energy
80
60
97
(thousand MJ)
1,200
(comparison with
PE pipes 57.7%)
40
1,200
PVC pipes
CO2 emission
1,163
kg
30,000
1,420
(comparison with
PE pipe 81.9%)
600
300
0
20,000
CO2 emission
27,173
20,000
15,000
10,000
7,824
(comparison with
ductile iron pipes 28.8%)
5,000
1,797
PVC pipes
(thousand MJ)
10,000
8,000
Energy
546
(comparison with
ductile iron pipes 30.4%)
8,962
PVC
Polyolefin
CO2 emission
346,000
(comparison with
PE films 73.7%)
6,000
4,000
2,000
PVC pipes
kg
350,000
CO2 emission
44,300
Environmental load
Energy
Environmental load
40,000
30,000
PVC pipe
25,000
Polyethylene pipes
kg
50,000
374
(comparison with
ductile iron pipes 33.9%)
0
PVC pipes
1,800
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
600
Polyethylene pipes
900
(thousand MJ)
1,102
200
Environmental load
Environmental load
kg
1,500
800
400
20
0
1,000
56
Energy
(thousand MJ)
11,400
(comparison with
ductile iron pipe 25.7%)
10,000
0
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
PVC pipes
177,000
(comparison with
PE films 51.2%)
PVC
Polyolefin
Source: Summarized and prepared based on the survey report by Chem Systems
64
5.6104
9.7104
CO2 (kg)
1,163
1,420
NOX (kg)
SOX (kg)
11
37.4104
110.2104
CO2 (kg)
7,824
27,173
NOX (kg)
51
77
SOX (kg)
76
89
Energy consumption
(MJ)
PVC
(123 t/km2 )
polyolefin
(96 t/km2 )
660.3104
896.2104
54.6104
179.7104
CO2 (kg)
11,400
44,300
CO2 (kg)
177,000
346,000
NOX (kg)
75
126
NOX (kg)
690
520
SOX (kg)
111
144
SOX (kg)
860
330
65
Mechanical recycling :
Method of recycling where plastic wastes
undergo treatment such as crushing and sorting,
and then recycled back into materials for plastic
products. PVC shows less degradation of physical
66
(1) pipes
12
Virgin
10.86
Recycled
10
8
6
4
2.50
2.154
1.485
Energy
CO2
1.957
0.499
0.483
NOX
0.440
SOX
Virgin
Recycled
7.06
6
4
2.853
2.39
1.703
1.071 0.517
Energy
CO2
0.655
0.516
NOX
SOX
(3) agro-films
(Energy = Mcal/kg, CO2 = kg/kg, NOX/ SOX = g/kg)
12
Virgin
10.85
Recycled
10
8
6
4
2
0
1.60
2.131
1.430
0.322
Energy
CO2
1.941
0.304
NOX
0.287
SOX
Virgin material :
Colloquial term for materials manufactured
entirely from unused raw materials, in other
words made without using any recycled
materials.
Moldability
Test items
Rigid
Flexible
(without filler)
Flexible
(with filler)
72105
75105
75105
140205
140176
140176
53140
35140
35140
149213
160196
160196
7032,812
5621,758
70140
Compression ratio
2.02.3
2.02.3
0.22.3
0.0020.006
0.0100.050
0.0080.035
Specific gravity
D792
1.301.58
1.161.35
1.31.7
0.770.63
0.860.74
0.770.59
D638
415527
105246
70246
4080
200450
200400
415457
24,60042,200
D695
562914
63120
70127
D790
7031,125
21,10035,200
D256A
2.212
Thermal properties
ASTM test
method
D2240/D2583
6585
50100
50100
Shore D
Shore A
Shore A
C177
3.55.0
0.250.35
0.30.5
0.30.5
D696
50100
70250
D648
6076
5782
D257
1016
10111015
10111014
34(continued to 34
next page)
67
Mechanic
D790
7031,125
21,10035,200
withPVC
notch AND PVC PRODUCTS
impact strength cmkg/cm
D256A
2.212
CHAPTER 5 Izod
: SERVICEABILITY
OF
(3 mm thickness test piece)
Thermal properties
Shore hardness
D2240/D2583
6585
50100
50100
Shore D
Shore A
Shore A
C177
3.55.0
34
34
0.250.35
0.30.5
0.30.5
D696
50100
70250
D648
6076
5782
D257
10
15
10 10
10 1014
D149
350500
300400
250300
60 Hz
D150
3.24.0
5.09.0
5.06.0
1 KHz
3.03.8
4.08.0
4.05.0
1 MHz
2.83.1
3.34.5
3.54.5
60 Hz
0.0070.020
0.080.15
0.101.05
1 KHz
0.0090.017
0.070.16
0.090.16
16
11
11
Electrical properties
(humidity50%temperature23 )
Voltage resistance (short time test)
(thickness 3 mm, V/mil)
Dielectric constant
Power factor
1 MHz
0.0060.019
0.040.14
0.090.10
D492
6080
D542
1.521.55
Light transmissibility %
7682
Chemical properties
Optical
properties
Arc resistance
sec
Haze %
818
D570
0.040.4
0.150.75
0.501.0
Sunlight influence
D543
None
None
None
None-slight
None-slight
None-slight
None
None
None
None
None
None
not soluble in alcohol, aliphatic hydrocarbon or
oil/fat, either soluble or swells in ketone and
ester, swells in aromatic hydrocarbons
<Advantages>
Superior mechanical properties
Superior creep resistance
Flexibility can be changed at ease using plasticizers
Superior chemical resistance
Transparence
Superior adhesion properties and printability
Fire resistant properties
Good electrical properties
For flexible PVC products, elastomer texture of
rubber or leather-like texture can be obtained
68
<Disadvantages>
Lack impact strength at low temperatures
Slightly low heat distortion temperature
(maximum temperature upon use)
Leaching of plasticizers in the case of flexible PVC products
High viscoelasticity, not suitable for injection molding of
large-sized products
mechanical properties
PVC is a polar polymer and its mechanical
properties are excellent due to strong interaction
Fig. 5-11 Classification of plastics by type of S-S curve
Type
Features
Tensile Tensile
modulus strength
Elongation
Examples
Others
low
low
medium
high
medium~high
low
high
high
medium
low
medium
high
high
high
medium medium~high
high
high
Tensile strength
Fig.5-12 shows the comparison
of tensile strength of PVC
products with other plastics. The
tensile strength is expressed in
terms of the maximum stress
per unit area of the cross section
when the test piece breaks by
applied loads to both ends of
the test piece.
(an index to show the magnitude of
force at break, when both ends of
the test piece are pulled apart)
PVC (rigid)
PVC (flexible)
6.925
3482
PS (general purpose)
3459
ABS
PE (high density)
2238
PP
2938
0
20
40
60
Tensile strength (MPa)
80
100
Source: Plastic materials guidebook, new edition by Kogyo Chosakai Publishing Co. Ltd (1993)
Tensile modulus
Fig.5-13 shows the comparison
of tensile modulus of PVC
products with other plastics. The
tensile modulus is also known as
the Young's Modulus, which is
expressed in terms of the ratio
between the tensile stress per
unit area of the cross section
and the elongation in the
direction of the tensile stress.
Plastics possessing large tensile
modulus have small stress-strain.
(an index to show the magnitude
of elongation, when a test piece
is pulled apart. It is like the
equivalent of the spring constant)
2.54.1
PS (general purpose)
2.74.1
1.43.2
PS (impact resistant)
ABS
2.32.7
HDPE
0.41.1
LDPE
0.10.3
PP
1.11.6
Polyamide (nylon 6)
1.13.1
PC
2.5
0
2
3
Modulus (103 MPa)
69
69114
PS
3472
ABS
2593
9.3
PE
7689
PC
0
50
100
150
Bending strength (MPa)
200
Source: "Plastic materials guidebook, new edition" by Kogyo Chosakai Publishing Co. Ltd.
Compressive strength
Fig.5-15 shows the
compressive strength of PVC
products in comparison with
other plastics. It is expressed in
terms of the maximum stress
at break per unit area of the
cross section, when a vertical
stress is applied to the test piece
sandwiched by two pieces of the
test panel.
(an index to show the magnitude of
force at break of a cubic test piece,
i.e., resistance to crushing force)
Rigid PVC
5589
PS (general purpose)
8289
4552
1925
PP
3855
PC
6978
0
50
100
Compressive strength (MPa)
Source: "Plastics guidebook" by the Osaka Municipal Technical Research Institute and others
PVC
1.7 17
PS
1.02 10.0
PE
1.12 11.0
PP
ABS
1.12 11.0
Fatigue strength
Fig.5-16 shows the fatigue strength of PVC
products in comparison with other plastics.
It is expressed in terms of the maximum stress
at which the test piece would not break after
applying repeated stress for 107 (10 million) times.
(the maximum stress, which the test piece can endure
after repeated application of an external force).
Creep properties
Plastic products show creep phenomenon,
where product is deformed in room temperature
as time elapses when an external force is applied
continuously. The phenomenon is also known as
cold flow. When plastics are used for construction
or industrial applications, cold flow is an especially
important point to be considered. Under normal
1.2 11.8
70
150
10
20
30
40
PE
PP
3
2
1
PVC
1
2
3
Stress (kg/mm2)
600
2
3
400
200
0 0
10
400
20
30
200
2
0
40
10
20
30
Plasticizer concentration (%)
40
Plastics
Alkalis
Acids
Oxidizing agents
Relative resistance
Salts
1: Polyester adipate
2: DEHP
3: DEHA
Organic
solvents
Chemical resistance
Tensile strength
kg/cm2
800
Elongation
Plasticizing effects
Nylon 66
PC
Polyester (chemical resistant)
PE
Polyfluorocarbon
Polymethyl methacrylate
PP
PS
PU
PVC (flexible)
PVC (rigid)
ABS
Epoxy resin
7
6
6
5
10
4
5
2
8
4
6
4
6
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
7
1
4
10
10
7
10
10
6
9
10
8
7
3
7
7
10
10
9
10
10
6
10
10
9
9
2
6
6
8
10
4
8
4
4
6
9
4
2
71
Films
High-pressure process PE
(inflation molding)
515
65
High-pressure process PE
(T-die extrusion)
210
1575
22
210
65
Non-drawn PP
(T-die extrusion)
23
7075
Biaxial drawn PP
1.52
80
Rigid PVC
12
79.5
Structure Properties
Polar/Amorphous
Non-polar/Amorphous
Transparency
Thermoplastics
Thermosets
Thermoplastics
Thermosets
PVC
Good
PS
Good
Polycarbonate
Good
Polymethyl methacrylate
Good
Polyester (PET)
Good
Polyamide (Nylon)
Good
PU
Epoxy resin
Good
Good
HDPE
Poor
LDPE
Poor
PP
Poor
Polyimid
Silicon resin
Poor
Poor
72
Electrical characteristics
The electrical characteristics of PVC such as electrical
insulating properties or dielectric constant are
excellent. To express electrical insulating properties,
volume resistivity or dielectric strength is widely
used as an index. The volume resistivity is expressed
in terms of electrical resistance calculated per unit
volume of the test piece. The dielectric strength
is expressed in terms of the magnitude of voltage
withstood without destruction of the test piece
when a specified amount of voltage is charged for a
specified period of time. In both cases, greater value
means better electrical characteristics. As shown in
Fig.5-23,24, the volume resistivity of PVC products is
slightly lower than those of olefin resin products, but
10 10
20
10161020
10171019
10141016
10141015
10131015
(rigid)
10151019
(flexible)
PE
PP
PS
Tetrafluoroethylene
PVC
Methacrylate
PU
Nylon
Polyester
Neoprene
Epoxy resin
16
Oxygen index
Polytetrafluoroetylene
95.0
PVC
4549
PC
2628
Nylon 66
2429
PET
20.0
PS
17.618.3
PP
PE
17.4
17.4
Value
(-cm)
Materials
Materials
Self-extinguishing plastics
10131014
10121014
10111013
1081014
Rubber
Ceramics
Thermoplastics
Thermosets
Various plastics
PVC
PP
PS
PE
0
10
20
30
40
Dielectric strength (kV/mm)
50
60
73
Plastics
PE
PVC
PS
PE
-12
25
25
25
Frequency (Hz)
1103
1106
1108
2.37
2.35
2.33
4.55
3.3
Specific gravity
LDPE
HDPE
PP
PS
PVC
ABS
Polyester
PC
Nylon 66
Teflon
0.910.93
0.940.97
0.900.91
1.041.07
1.351.45
0.991.10
1.381.39
1.2
1.131.15
2.12.2
Plastics
PVC
PS (general purpose)
PS (impact resistant)
ABS
HDPE
LDPE
PP
PC
Plastics
Measured value
()
PS
ABS
PVC
PC
PE
PP
102.5
102.3
92.0
156.2
127.3
152.2
74
Impact strength
The glass transition temperature (second order
transition point) of PVC is over 70 , which is higher
than room temperature, representing low impact
strength. Having poor impact resistance especially at
low temperature range is one of the disadvantages
of PVC. There are many ways to measure impact
strength. Fig.5-29 shows the results of energies
High pressure PE
not broken
PP
Rigid PVC
PS
ABS
PC
0
5
10
15
20
25
Notched impact strength k (kgcm/cm2 kJ/m2)
120
30
HDPE
LDPE
100
(kgcm/cm2kJ/m2)
Low pressure PE
80
60
40
Rigid PVC
20
0
PS
-50
-30
-10 0 10 20
40
60
Temperature ()
80
20
DOP
(DEHP)
DHP
15
DnOP
10
5
0
DIDP
15
60
135 240
Heating time (hrs) Oven temp. 165
Source: "Revised practical manual for plastics and
rubber additives" by Kagaku Kogyosha
75
EVA
Thermoplastic
polyurethane
Processability, Cost
TPEE
Thermoplastic
polyester elastomer
ib
lex
y, F
t
i
,
c
sti
ce
ela istan tance
h
Hig e res resis
ez on
Fre rasi
Ab
Chlorinated
polyethylene
e,
c
tan
sis ity
e
r
ct bil
pa sa
Im oces
Pr
High fluidity, Heat resistance,
Impact resistance
PVC
ility
CPE
Fire retardance
pa
Pro ct res
ista
ce
ssa
nc
e
bili
ty
Im
Processability
Heat resistance
Impact resistance
TPU
W
Co eathe
Acrylonitrile
st, ra
butadiene rubber
Pro bili
Fre
ce ty,
ssa
Oil eze
bili
res res
ty
i
ista sta
nc nce
e
, El
ast
High elasticity,
icit
y,
Abrasion resistance, Flexibility
Impact resistance
Freeze resistance
NBR
Processability
Anti migration
Ethylene-vinyl
acetate copolymer
ABS
Acrylonitrile-butadienestyrene
MBS
Methacrylate
butadiene styrene
Acrylic resin
Source: Polymer alloy utilization, edited by Takashi Inoue, Kogyo Chosakai (1992)
Impact resistance
76
ABS
20
MBS
EVA
CPE
100
50
10
15
20
25
110
100
90
80
PVC 100
"Ther-alloy" 0
80
60
40
20
40
60
PVC/ "Ther-alloy" (phr)
20
80
100
Sekisui PVC-HA 31K
90
80
70
60
HA 100
PVC 0
50
50
Blending ratio (%)
0
100
10
DO
s+ s
art art
5 p r 25 p
2
P e
DO lyest
Po
arts +
2.5 p 7.5 parts
1
P
DO ester 3
Poly
rts
Polyester 50 pa
6
4
2
0
art
p
50
D
Po OP
lye 37.
ste 5 p
r 1 arts
2.5 +
pa
rts
Vicat
"Ther-alloy" A-15
Volatile loss
120
20
40
60
Heating time (min)
80
77
78