Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CASE NO.
zn 16 SfP2 I PM12: I 3
116CR 089
DlOTf ~
1
Plaintiff,
JUDGE
v.
. .J!1IO
:;,
JClf 1-.ATI
INDICTMENT
Defendants.
18 U.S.C.
21 u.s.c.
21 U.S.C.
21 U .S.C.
21 U.S.C.
21 U.S.C.
21 U.S.C.
21 U.S.C.
2
802(32)
813
841(a)(l)
84l(b)(l)(C)
846
853
856
Beginning on or about or about August 20, 2016, the exact date being unknown and
continuing up to and including September 13, 2016, within the Southern District of Ohio, and
elsewhere, the defendants, PHIILIP WATKINS and JEANNETTA CRAWFORD, did
knowingly and intentionally combine, conspire, confederate and agree with each other and with
others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute
mixtures and substances containing heroin, a Schedule I controlled substance in a detectable
amount, fentanyl, a Schedule II controlled substance in a detectable amount, and a detectable
amount of carfentanil, a Schedule II controlled substance analogue as defined in 21 U.S.C.
802(32) of fentanyl, knowing that the substance was intended for human consumption as
provided in 21U.S.C.813, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(l) and 841 (b)(l)(C). Serious
bodily injury resulted to Victim 1 from the use of the substances so distributed.
If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the
defendant: (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or
sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
(d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other prope1iy
which cannot be divided without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to 2 1
U.S .C. 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendants up to the value of the
above forfe itable property.
A TRUE BILL.
GRAND
BENJAMIN C. GLASSMAN
ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
----