Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

Case: 1:16-cr-00089-SJD Doc #: 16 Filed: 09/21/16 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 73

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

CASE NO.

zn 16 SfP2 I PM12: I 3

116CR 089

DlOTf ~
1

Plaintiff,

JUDGE

v.

. .J!1IO

:;,

JClf 1-.ATI

INDICTMENT

PHILLIP WATKINS (1),


JEANNETTA CRAWFORD (2),

Defendants.

18 U.S.C.
21 u.s.c.
21 U.S.C.
21 U .S.C.
21 U.S.C.
21 U.S.C.
21 U.S.C.
21 U.S.C.

2
802(32)
813
841(a)(l)
84l(b)(l)(C)
846
853
856

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:


COUNT ONE
(NARCOTICS CONSPIRACY)

Beginning on or about or about August 20, 2016, the exact date being unknown and
continuing up to and including September 13, 2016, within the Southern District of Ohio, and
elsewhere, the defendants, PHIILIP WATKINS and JEANNETTA CRAWFORD, did
knowingly and intentionally combine, conspire, confederate and agree with each other and with
others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute
mixtures and substances containing heroin, a Schedule I controlled substance in a detectable
amount, fentanyl, a Schedule II controlled substance in a detectable amount, and a detectable
amount of carfentanil, a Schedule II controlled substance analogue as defined in 21 U.S.C.
802(32) of fentanyl, knowing that the substance was intended for human consumption as
provided in 21U.S.C.813, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(l) and 841 (b)(l)(C). Serious
bodily injury resulted to Victim 1 from the use of the substances so distributed.

Case: 1:16-cr-00089-SJD Doc #: 16 Filed: 09/21/16 Page: 2 of 4 PAGEID #: 74


All in violation of 21 U.S.C. 846.
COUNT TWO

(Distribution and attempt to distribute a Controlled Substance)


On or about August 23, 2016, within the Southern District of Ohio, and elsewhere, the
defendants, PHIILIP WATKINS and JEANNETTA CRAWFORD, did knowingly and
intentionally distribute mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of heroin, a
Schedule I controlled substance.
In violation of21 U.S.C. 841(a)(l), 84l(b)(l)(C) and 18 U.S.C. 2.
COUNT THREE

(Distribution and attempt to distribute a Controlled Substance Analogue)


On or about August 25, 2016, within the Southern District of Ohio, and elsewhere, the
defendants, PHIILIP WATKINS and JEANNETTA CRAWFORD, did knowingly and
intentionally distribute mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of carfentanil, a
Schedule II controlled substance analogue as defined in 21 U.S.C. 802(32) of fentanyl , knowing
that the substance was intended for human consumption as provided in 21 U.S.C. 813 .
In violation of21 U.S .C. 841(a)(l), 84l(b)(l)(C) and 18 U.S.C. 2.
COUNT FOUR

(Distribution and attempt to distribute a Controlled Substance)


On or about August 29, 2016, within the Southern District of Ohio, and elsewhere, the
defendants, PHIILIP WATKINS and JEANNETTA CRAWFORD, did knowingly and
intentionally distribute mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of heroin, a
Schedule I controlled substance.
In violation of 21 U.S.C. 841 (a)(l ), 84l(b)(l)(C) and 18 U.S.C. 2.

Case: 1:16-cr-00089-SJD Doc #: 16 Filed: 09/21/16 Page: 3 of 4 PAGEID #: 75


COUNT FIVE
(Distribution and attempt to distribute a Controlled Substance)
On or about August 30, 2016, within the Southern District of Ohio, and elsewhere, the
defendants, PHIILIP WATKINS and JEANNETTA CRAWFORD, did knowingly and
intentionally distribute mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of heroin, a
Schedule I controlled substance.
In violation of21 U.S.C. 841(a)(l), 84I(b)(l)(C) and 18 U.S.C. 2.
COUNT SIX
(Distribution and attempt to distribute a Controlled Substance Analogue)
On or about August 30, 2016, within the Southern District of Ohio, and elsewhere, the
defendants, PHIILIP WATKINS and JEANNETTA CRAWFORD, did knowingly and
intentionally distribute mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of carfentanil, a
Schedule II controlled substance analogue as defined in 21 U.S.C. 802(32) of fentanyl , knowing
that the substance was intended for human consumption as provided in 21 U.S.C. 813.
In violation of21 U.S .C. 841(a)(l), 84l(b)(l)(C) and 18 U.S.C. 2.
COUNT SEVEN
(Operating a drug involved premises)
On or about August 20, 2016, and continuing up to and including September 13, 2016, the
exact dates being unknown, within the Southern District of Ohio, and elsewhere, the defendants,
PHIILIP WATKINS and JEANNETTA CRAWFORD, with others known to the grand jury,
did knowingly and willfully open, lease, rent, use or maintain any place; to wit: 145 West 661h
Street Apartment 4, Cincinnati, Ohio, whether permanently or temporarily for the purpose of
distributing a controlled substance.
In violation of21 U.S .C. 856(a)(l) and 18 U.S.C. 2.

Case: 1:16-cr-00089-SJD Doc #: 16 Filed: 09/21/16 Page: 4 of 4 PAGEID #: 76


FORFEITURE ALLEGATION
Upon conviction of the offenses set forth in Count One and/or Two and or Count Three
and/or Count Four and/or Count Five and/or Count Six and/or Count Seven and/or Count Eight of
this Indictment, the defendants PHIILIP WATKINS and JEANNETTA CRAWFORD shall
forfeit to the United States pursuant to 2 1 U.S.C. 853(a), (a) any property constituting, or derived
from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the said violations, and (b) any
property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the
commission of the said violations including but not limited to: $5,000.00 in official United States
Currency.
Substitute Assets

If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the
defendant: (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or
sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
(d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other prope1iy
which cannot be divided without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to 2 1
U.S .C. 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendants up to the value of the
above forfe itable property.

A TRUE BILL.

GRAND
BENJAMIN C. GLASSMAN
ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

----

Potrebbero piacerti anche