Point of view

Every company standing should be protective and particular to its employee

all the way to the process until time of leave, termination separation and out
issue. Every beginning of the hiring process should be an orientation
regarding contract context and coverage of which the company paid to
integrate a contract is a fixed command in a sense that are exchange of
agreement and signature filling
And article exchange there always an implication of reproduction of schedule
of benefits.
In the case of Alison gray the companys attempt to correct governmental
process into a private corporation the institution failed to orient the
employees regarding further mission. And regulatory proceeding and even
the integrated sanitary is not secured since it was an implication of bid to
work policy.
For the subject of redundancy maybe there are points in the contract there
were separated over and over but pertains to a similar point of matter after
all in the catering industry has no background for costing and tiding but it is
a seasonal or project base
Statement of the problem
1. The company did not orient the employees regarding the issue for
privatization rutile to the contract
2. The institution never had a corporate lawyer that protects the
management and the employee
3. The corporation lacks in terms of procurement of information system
management of information system management failure in
establishing good support with employees
4. The industry failed in some points of labor issue cause they dont favor
you . they settled the case of redundancy
Employees and the establishment it self

1. Proper implication of back up plane and application of contingency

planning.
2. have a sense of innovation and information technology
3. should be credible for suasion prior to change of management and
ownership
4. should come up with a temporary organizational chart
Areas of consideration
Strength
1.Board of directors are selected who favor terms and condition of the
company
2.No restriction for the entire management
3.No government beau racy

Weaknesses
Although no government involved the company is still liable for taxable

Opportunities
1.Easy and nominal chances of expansion
2.Open to other terms and condition of recruitment and other means
3.Minimal chance of bankruptcy
4.Threats

5.Prone to mismanagement
6.Prone to liabilities more than assets

Recommendation
1.At the first place the company should have first center basis made up to
the employees such as their 2.need for further legal support .privatization
but accompanied by legality
3.Contingency planning and discussion of labor and employment

Conclusion
Having gone to these case study and studying the information exchange of
field study and conclude information exchange and field study . I conclude
that the bottom-line of the challenge is addressed by the caterer was the
liability of the company to organize the phase of development and changes
responsibilities to the matter.
Further more as to the ability of gatherings clients since it was to private
ownership there should be an exchange if contract and schedule of benefits
actually the management and the employees

Case study
Group 1

Matthew Yu
Jenifer Taquio
Ritchie Dela Cruz