Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
By Yasushi Hashimoto,
Haruhiko Murase, Tetsuo
Morimoto, and Toru Torii
October 2001
0272-1708/01/$10.002001IEEE
IEEE Control Systems Magazine
71
automation in agriculture has also been conducted in universities. Due to limited funding, most of this research has covered methodologies such as navigation, sensing, and the
application of control theory. At research institutes and manufacturers, which have greater financial resources, more
practical systems have been tested. Researchers are now integrating the new technologies for autonomous navigation in
the field.
It can be concluded that intelligent approaches are useful tools for mechanizing complex agricultural systems.
72
Principle of the
Photosynthetic Algorithm
In the diagram of the Benson-Calvin cycle [3] in Fig. 1(a), each
line represents the conversion of one molecule of each metabolite. Fig. 1(a) also indicates that the product of the
Benson-Calvin cycle is DHAP (dihydroxyacetone-P). Some of
the DHAP, which may be unstable and/or low quality, is reused or reprocessed in the cycle. The remaining portion of
the product DHAP, which may be stable and/or high quality,
stays as starch. The refined high-quality DHAP can be considered the knowledge string that is conceptually equivalent to
the final form of the chromosome (solution or estimate) in a
GA. The Benson-Calvin cycle includes many different
recombinations of molecules that are again conceptually
equivalent to the crossover of chromosomes in the GA. In the
PA, the crossover is regulated more strictly by the
photosynthetic rules than the crossover operator of the GA.
Fig. 1(b) shows the part of the photorespiratory system that
contains the Benson-Calvin cycle. The biochemical balance
between the Benson-Calvin cycle and photorespiration can
be viewed as a natural implementation of an optimization
procedure that maximizes the efficiency of sugar production
under the continuously variable energy of the sun. The PA utilizes this unique natural optimization process, which is analogous to the mutation operator in the GA.
October 2001
3 ATP
Ribulose-5-P
3 ADP
Ribose-5-P
Xylulose-5-P
3 CO2
GAP
Sedoheptulose-7-P
Pi
H2O
Sedoheptulose-1, 7-P2
Glycerate-3-P
6 ATP
6 ATP
DHAP
Erythrose-4-P
Xylulose-5-P
Glycerate-1, 3-P2
Fructose-6-P
Pi
GAP
6 NADPH
6 NADP
H2O
Fructose-1, 6-P2
6Pi
GAP
DHAP
GAP
DHAP
(Product or Feedback)
(a)
Chloroplast
Glycerate
BensonCalvin
Cycle
ADP
AT
Peroxisom
Glycolate
Pi
DHAP
Glycolate-2-P
O2
(b)
October 2001
C=
Vmax
1+ A/ L
(1)
73
RuBP
RuBP
+
Oxygen
3CO2
Ribose-5-P
Sedoheptulose-7-P
Glycerate
GAP
Glycolate
Glycolate
Glycerate
DHAP
Xylulose-5-P
(Benson-Calvin Cycle)
Fructose1, 6-P
Erythrose-4-P
GAP
CO2
(a)
(b)
Figure 2. (a) Recombination of carbon molecules in the B-C cycle and (b) photorespiration.
Atmosphere
Light
(Stimulation)
Oxygen/CO2
Concentration
CO2
Reservior
RuBP
BensonCalvin
Cycle
PhotoRespiration
GAP
Fitness
Copy
Next
Iteration
GAP
GAP
Poor
Discard
Good
DHAP
(Knowledge
String)
Application of PA to
Finite Element Inverse Analysis
The finite element method is a powerful numerical procedure for solving mathematical problems in engineering and
physics. The finite element method was also employed to
devise a spatial NN in a control application [4]. Fig. 4 illustrates a possible application of the finite element NN in a
plant growth control system. The learning algorithm of the
finite element NN is an inverse solution of a problem described by Poissons equation. This finite element inverse
problem is simply an optimization problem or parameter es-
74
October 2001
1)
quency for the Benson-Calvin cycle
and photorespiration, the process
Temperature
Current Growth
then randomly generates the light inHumidity
y
(
t
)
y (t )
D
tensity for the next iteration with a reVegetables
Carbon Dioxide
newed photosynthetic frequency
Light
u(t)
condition.
Root Water Potential
The observed displacements at
nodes 3, 4, and 5 are indicated in Table 1.
Finite Element Structured
Neural Network Growth Model
The negative values of Y imply that nodes
y(t1)
3, 4, and 5 are displaced downward by
Z 1
the force applied at node 4. In this simulaGrowth Indices
Growth
tion, the observed displacements were
Status
calculated from the predetermined elastic moduli. These predetermined elastic
values are intended to be the target values in the estimation test.
The estimation of the elastic moduli
of the finite element model using the PA Figure 4. Conceptual representation of a finite element NN application to a plant growth
was very satisfactory. Fig. 6 shows the control system. y is the desired growth rate.
D
convergence property of the fitness. A
dramatic decline in the error level
down to 10-4 was observed in the initial ten iterations. After
Load
1,000 iterations, the PA converged to a total absolute error
-4
level of about 2.8 10 . No significant improvement was observed after 200 iterations. Tables 2 and 3 summarize the
4
1
comparison of the estimated values of the elastic moduli
(Youngs modulus and Poissons ratio) and corresponding
4
4
target values. The tables show that most of the estimated val5
ues are very close to their target values except the Poissons
Fixed
3
1
ratio of element number 4.
5
October 2001
Deformed
8
7
6
Error 104
5
4
3
2
920
990
780
850
710
570
640
430
500
290
360
150
220
10
80
Iteration Number
75
Displacement
X
Element
Y
Estimated
Target
116
120
0.0332
0.123
80
80
0.4140
1.303
95
90
0.0011
0.055
68
70
Estimated
Target
0.24
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.29
0.30
0.23
0.32
0.5
(a)
(b)
1.5
2.5
Objective Function
76
October 2001
vegetative growth (e.g., root, stem, and leaf growth) and reproductive growth (e.g., flower and fruit growth). In hydroponic
cultivation, however, vegetative growth becomes more active
than reproductive growth because the roots of the plants are always in a suitable environment for the uptake of nutrient ions.
Active vegetative growth induces poor reproductive growth.
The nutrient concentration of the solution in hydroponics
is one of the most important manipulated factors for adjusting the balance between the two types of growth [12]. It is
usually increased with plant growth. The balance between
the two types of growth is determined and fixed at the seedling stage. This means that optimal control during this stage
is important. During the seedling stage, however, since only
such vegetative growth as stem, leaf, and root growth can be
observed, the future balance between the two types of
growth has to be predicted from this growth data. It has been
reported that the ratio of stem dry weight to root dry weight
(S/R) is a good indicator for predicting the future balance and
that a smaller value results in better yields [13]. It is well
known that active stem growth is detrimental to reproductive growth in the cultivation of fruit and vegetables. In this
study, leaf growth was adopted as one of the predictors instead of root growth because it can be measured using an image-processing system, and a larger leaf growth is linked to
the promotion of photosynthate production in plants. From
these findings, the ratio of total leaf length (TLL) to stem diameter (SD) was defined as a predictor for future balance in
growth. Actually, higher values of TLL/SD resulted in better
reproductive growth. Therefore, controls for maximizing
TLL/SD may be valuable only during the seedling stage.
Let TLL( k )/SD( k ) be a time series of TLL/SD as affected by
nutrient concentration NC( k ) ( k = 1,..., N : sampling day, N: final
day). For implementation, the seedling stage(1 k N ) was divided into four steps: 1) transplanting, 2) vegetative growth after transplanting, 3) flowering of the first truss, and 4) fruit
setting for the first truss and flowering for the second truss, and
the values of TLL( k )/SD( k ) at the last step (step 4) were evaluated. The value of the nutrient concentration in each step, NC1 ,
NC2 , NC3 , or NC4 , was kept constant [1 k N 1L (step 1),
N 1L + 1 k N 2L (step 2), N 2L + 1 k N 3L (step 3),
N 3L + 1 k N (step 4), where N 1L , N 2L , N 3L , and N represent
the last days of the first, second, third, and fourth steps].
The objective function was given by the average value of
TLL/SD at the last step (step 4, N 3L + 1 k N ) in its dynamic response as follows (N 3L + 1: first day of step 4):
F ( NC) =
1
N N 3L + 1
TLL( k )
.
k = N 3 L + 1 SD( k )
(2)
Thus, the optimization problem is to determine the optimal four-step set points of nutrient concentration, NC1 , NC2 ,
NC3 , and NC4 , which maximize F ( NC). The nutrient concentration here was constrained to 0.2 NC( k ) 20
. (mS/cm).
maximize F ( NC)
subject to 0.2 NC( k ) 20
. (mS/cm).
October 2001
100
80
60
LCA
GA
40
20
0
0
50
100
150
200
Iteration Number
Neural Networks
In the study, NNs were used for creating black-box models
for simulation, which predict the TLL/SD ratio of the nutrient concentration of the solution. For dynamic identification, arbitrary feedback loops that produce time histories of
77
Genetic Algorithms
To employ GAs, an individual for genetic evolution must
first be defined. Fig. 10(d) illustrates the definition of individuals and population P( t ) used in the GA application. Since
the purpose is to determine the four-step set points of the nutrient concentrations that maximize F ( NC), the set points
NC1 , NC2 , NC3 , and NC4 represent an individual and each nutrient concentration is coded as a 6-bit binary string (e.g.,
Control System
Decision System
New
Set Point
Plants
Identification
Neural Networks
Genetic Algorithms
Control Device
Highly
Concentrated Water
Nutrient
Solution
Sensor
Set
Point
Mixing Tank
Feedback
Controller
Environment
Plant
Hydroponic System
(a)
(b)
NC(k)
Time Series
of Nutrient
Concentration
Time Series
of Light
Intensity
Past Time
Series of
TLL/SD
NC1
NC2
100110 001100
NC3
NC4
000111 101010
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NC(kn)
y(k) =
L(k)
Individual N
000111 111100
001111 000010
TLL/SD
Genetic Operators
Output
Crossover
Mutation
Selection
L(kn)
y(k1)
y(kn)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time Delay
Individual N
(c)
100110
Figure 10. Schematic diagrams of (a) a deep hydroponic system; (b) a control system consisting of a feedback control system and a
decision system; (c) an NN used in the decision system; (d) a GA used in the decision system.
78
October 2001
350
250
Treat. 1
350
Treat. 2
Treat. 3
300
200
TLL/SD
TLL/SD
300
150
100
Estimated
0
10
(a)
15
Observed
20
100
50
20
Light Intensity
102(E m2)
200
150
50
15
10
15
20
Time [Days]
10
5
0
0
Nutrient Concentration
(mS/cm)
250
10
15
20
An elitist strategy was used for selection (i.e., the best individual in a generation was carried through to the next
generation).
1.5
1
0.5
0
10
15
20
Time [Days]
(b)
Figure 11. The observed daily changes in (a) the TLL/SD ratio of
tomato plants and (b) the light intensity and nutrient concentration
of the solution during the seedling stage.
individual i = NCi 1 , NCi 2 , NCi 3 , NCi 4 = 100100, 001001, 001100,
101010). A new population P( t + 1) is generated through
crossover, mutation, and selection (t: generation index).
Fitness, which is given by (2), is an indicator for measuring an individuals survival quality. All individuals are evaluated based on their fitness values. During the evolution
process, individuals having higher fitness reproduce and individuals with lower fitness die in each generation. An individual having the maximum fitness is regarded as an optimal
solution.
The procedure of the GA we have employed is as follows.
Step 1: An initial population consisting of several individuals is generated at random.
Step 2: Several individuals in another population are
added to the original population to maintain diversity.
Step 3: Crossover and mutation operations are applied to the individuals selected at random.
Step 4: The fitness values of all individuals are calculated using the NN model, and their performances are
evaluated.
Step 5: Superior individuals are selected and retained
for the next generation (Selection).
Step 6: Steps 2 through 5 are repeated until an arbitrary condition is satisfied.
October 2001
79
TLL/SD
150
Pc = 0.2, Pm = 0.02
300
Pc = 0.2, Pm = 0.2
Pc = 0.8, Pm = 0.8
10
20
30
100
Conventional Control
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
15
20
25
10
15
20
25
10
15
20
25
10
15
20
25
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Time [Days]
Generation Number
80
Optimized Control
50
Nutrient Concentration
(mS/cm)
Fitness
310
290
ing of the first and second trusses and the fruit setting of the
first truss during the seedling stage).
October 2001
Table 4. The number of presentations on agricultural robots at the annual meeting of JSAM.
Year
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Number of presentations
25
20
31
34
15
37
33
40
34
32
the TLL/SD ratio are 10-15% higher with the optimal control
than with the conventional control. This result was confirmed using a t-test at the 5% level of significance. With the
optimal control, the reason for this result is that stem growth
was significantly suppressed by the low nutrient concentration at the second step, whereas the leaf growth did not vary
significantly in either case. Thus, the effectiveness of this
control system was also confirmed experimentally.
the surrounding soil area, detection of boundary lines between crop and soil areas, and position identification using a
three-dimensional perspective view transformation are required. Discrimination of crop area was performed using color
transformation of an HSI (hue, saturation, and intensity) transform [24]. Fig. 15 shows the result of the HSI transfer of cloudy
and sunny day images taken at 12:00 p.m. Discrimination between the crop canopy and soil area was successful using the
HSI transfer without the influence of climate and shooting
time. A least-squares method was used for boundary detection between crop row and soil area, and a three-dimensional
perspective view transformation was used for position identification. The results showed that the offset error was within
0.02 m and the attitude angle error was within 0.5, which were
sufficient for guidance in the field. This algorithm was applied
to a vision-guided tractor [25]. Fig. 16 shows the resulting path
trajectory and that the offset error was within 0.02 m at a
speed of 0.25 m/s. Work is continuing on this project to increase the speed, and work on vision guidance in the paddy
field is in progress.
At Hokkaido University, an NN vehicle controller was designed in which the motion of a mobile agricultural robot was
specified as a nonlinear system with high learning ability [26].
At Kyoto University, an automatic follow-up vehicle, using
two small head-feeding combines, is under development [27].
A human operator in the front vehicle controls it, and the follow-up vehicle is automatically controlled by computer. At
October 2001
0.4
0.8
Target Line
0.4
0
Offset (m)
Autonomous Navigation
Offset (m)
1.2
10
15
Trace
0.4
Target Line
0.2
0
0.2
Trace
0.4
0.6
10
Distance [m]
Distance [m]
(a)
(b)
15
20
Figure 16. Results of vision-guided navigation. (a) Trace on an artificial lawn; (b) trace on a
crop row.
IEEE Control Systems Magazine
81
Reflectance [%]
82
October 2001
Machine
Sensor
Velocity (m/s)
Errors (m)
References
University of
Tokyo
Tractor
Vision
0.25
0.02
[24]-[26]
Hokkaido
University
Tractor
Geomagnetic direction
sensor
0.5
0.4
Kyoto
University
Combine
Ultrasonic sensor
0.55
Ehime
University
Transport
vehicle
Self-carriage
0.5
Not
described
[28]
MAFF (NARC)
Tractor
1.0
0.1
[31]
MAFF (NARC)
Rice planter
0.8
0.15
[32]
MAFF (NGRI)
Tractor
1.2
1-2
[33]
BRAIN
Tractor
0.4
0.05
[30]
BRAIN
Speed sprayer
Guiding cable
0.7
0.1
[29]
Kubota
Mechanical
weeding for rice
0.7
0.05
[34]
[27]
Harvesting Robots
Developments of harvesting robots were conducted in the
United States, Europe, and Japan in the 1980s. In Japan, research on a harvesting robot for tomato was initiated in
1984 at Kyoto University, mainly by Fujiura and Ura, who received an award from the Japanese Society of Agricultural
Machinery in 1991 [35], [36].
Since 1990, Okayama University has been leading the research in harvesting robots, such as for tomato, cucumber,
grape, and strawberry crops [37]-[40]. In these robots, spectral reflectance was used for the discrimination of fruit from
leaf and stem. Fig. 18 shows the spectral reflectance of cucumber fruit and leaf. The reflectance of the fruit is higher than that
of leaf and stem in the near-infrared band; therefore, band-pass
filters of 550 and 850 nm were used with a monochrome camera for the recognition of fruit. In this research, the cultivation
types were also improved to discriminate the fruit from other
parts. Fig. 19 shows a cucumber-harvesting robot; the stem of
the cucumber was set inclined so that the cucumbers were
separated from leaves and stems. A redundant manipulator is
used for the harvesting to avoid obstacles such as stems or
leaves. Robots for harvesting leaf vegetables such as cabbage
are also being developed [41].
Little research in harvesting robots is currently under
way in Europe and the United States because robotic perfor-
October 2001
83
of image processing is increasing, a robotic system combining machine vision and RTKGPS appears to hold the most
promise for the future. The nursery production robot, transplanting robot, and grafting robot are already in the marketplace, and many new technologies and innovations are
being developed in this area.
Acknowledgment
Conclusions
In this article, we have discussed the application of intelligent approaches to optimization problems in agriculture in
Japan. First, new algorithms, the PA and the LCA, derived
from biosystems, were applied to search and optimization
problems. Biosystems include numerous different natural
phenomena, many of which are very peculiar and impressive. Many other algorithms are represented in biosystems
that may prove useful in engineering applications; seeking
useful engineering principles exemplified in biosystems is
likely to be a fruitful path to advances in bioengineering.
Second, an intelligent control system consisting of a decision system based on NNs and GAs and a feedback control
system were applied to the optimization of the growth of hydroponic tomato plants during the seedling stage. The optimal four-step set points of nutrient concentration that
maximize the TLL/SD ratio were successfully obtained using this decision system. The values of the TLL/SD ratio
were 10-15% higher with the optimized control than with a
conventional method. Good seedlings were obtained, with
better reproductive growth potential. Finally, recent developments in intelligent agricultural robots in Japan were introduced. Although many robots for agricultural use are
being developed or studied in Japan, most are far from
ready for practical use. However, there is great demand for
robotics and automation for crop management tasks, such
as pesticide and herbicide application; thus, autonomous
navigation in the field is a promising research area. As the
cost of RTKGPS is rapidly decreasing and the performance
84
References
[1] J.D. Farmer, N.H. Packard, and A.S. Perelson, The immune system, adaptation, and machine learning, Physica, vol. D22, pp. 187-204, 1986.
[2] D.E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine
Learning. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1989.
[3] J.B. Bowyer and R.C. Leegood, Photosynthesis, in Plant Biochemistry,
P.M. Dey and J.B. Harborne, Eds. San Diego, CA: Academic, 1997, pp. 49-110.
[4] H. Murase, S. Koyama, and A. Tani, Finite element neural network for
non-invasive plant water status monitoring, Contr. Eng. Practice, vol. 2, no. 2,
pp. 211-218, 1994.
[5] M.Z.J. Gale and J. Ben-Asher, Root aeration in a deep hydroponic system
and its effect on growth and yield of tomato, Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 19,
pp. 213-220, 1983.
[6] T. Fukuyama, T. Morimoto, and Y. Hashimoto, Environment control of
root system of melons cultivated in a computer controlled greenhouse, Environment Contr. Biol., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 9-20, 1986 (in Japanese with English
summary).
[7] Y. Hashimoto, Recent strategies of optimal growth regulation by the
speaking plant concept, Acta Horticulturae, vol. 260, pp. 115-121, 1989.
[8] Y. Hashimoto and K. Hatou, Knowledge based computer integrated plant
factory, in Proc. 4th Int. Cong. Computer Technology in Agriculture, 1992, pp. 9-12.
[9] Y. Hashimoto, Applications of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms to agricultural systems, Comput. Electron. Agriculture, vol. 18, no. 2,3,
pp. 71-72, 1997.
[10] S. Chen, S.A. Billings, and P.M. Grant, Non-linear system identification
using neural network, Int. J. Control, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1191-1214, 1990.
[11] J.H. Holland, Genetic algorithms, Sci. Amer., pp. 44-50, July 1992.
[12] D.L. Ehret and L.C. Ho, Effects of osmotic potential in nutrient solution
on diurnal growth of tomato fruit, J. Exp. Botany, vol. 37, no. 182, pp.
1294-1302, 1986.
[13] H. Luo and T. Kato, Studies on the characteristics of seedlings raised in
pots under various conditions and their productivity in eggplant and sweet
pepper, Environ. Contr. Biol., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 91-96, 1987 (in Japanese).
October 2001
[14] T. Morimoto, T. Torii, and Y. Hashimoto, Optimal control of physiological processes of plants in a green plant factory, Contr. Eng. Practice, vol. 3, no.
4, pp. 505-511, 1995.
[15] T. Morimoto, J. Suzuki, and Y. Hashimoto, Optimization of a fuzzy controller for fruit storage using neural networks and genetic algorithms, Eng.
Applicat. Artif. Intell., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 453-461, 1997.
[16] T. Morimoto, W. Purwanto, J. Suzuki, and Y. Hashimoto, Optimization of
heat treatment for fruit during storage using neural networks and genetic algorithms, Comput. Electron. Agriculture, vol. 19, pp. 87-101, 1997.
[17] K.S. Narendra and K. Parthasarathy, Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybernet.,
vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 4-27, 1990.
[18] R. Isermann, S. Ernst, and O. Nelles, Identification with dynamic neural,
in Preprints of 11th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Fukuoka, Japan,
1997, vol. 3, pp. 997-1022.
[19] T. Morimoto and Y. Hashimoto, AI approaches to identification and control of total plant production systems, Contr. Eng. Practice, vol. 8, no. 5, pp.
555-567, 2000.
[20] D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams, Learning representation
by back-propagation error, Nature, vol. 323, no. 9, pp. 533-536, 1986.
[21] T. Morimoto, W. Purwanto, J. Suzuki, and Y. Hashimoto, Identification of
cumulative fruit responses during the storage process using neural networks, in Preprints of 11th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Fukuoka,
Japan, 1997, vol. 3, pp. 1555-1560.
[22] R.G. Hurd, The root and its environment in the nutrient film technique of
water culture, Acta Horticulturae, vol. 82, pp. 87-97, 1978.
[23] Y. Mizrahi, E. Taleisnik, V. Kagan-Zur, Y. Zohar, R. Offenbach, E. Matan, and
R. Golan, A saline irrigation regime for improving tomato fruit quality without reducing yield, J. Amer. Soc. Horticultural Sci., vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 202-205,
1986.
[24] T. Torii, T. Kanuma, T. Okamoto, and O. Kitani, Image analysis of crop
row for agricultural mobile robot, in Proc. AgEng96, Madrid, Spain, 1996, pp.
1045-1046.
[25] T. Torii, A. Takamizawa, T. Okamoto, and K. Imou, Vision-guided tractor,
in Proc. AgEng98, A-44, Oslo, Norway, 1998, pp. 1-8.
[26] S. Noguchi, K. Ishii, and H. Terao, Development of an agricultural mobile
robot using a geomagnetic direction sensor and image sensors, J. Agricultural Eng. Res., vol. 67, pp. 1-15, 1997.
[27] M. Iida, M. Umeda, and M. Suguri, Automated follow-up vehicle system
for agriculture, ASAE Paper 983112, Joseph, MI, pp. 1-9, 1998.
[28] J. Yamashita, K. Satou, M. Hikita, T. Imoto, and T. Abe, Development of an
automatic guided vehicle for use in greenhouses and its traveling performance, in Proc. 1st IFAC Workshop Mathematical and Control Applications in
Agriculture and Horticulture, Matsuyama, Ehime, 1991, pp. 237-242.
[29] K. Tosaki, S. Miyahara, T. Ichikawa, S. Taniai, Y. Mizukura, H. Moriki, and S.
Miyashita, Development of a microcomputer controlled driverless air blast
sprayer, in Proc. ARBIP95, Kobe, Hyogo, 1995, pp. 49-56.
[30] O. Yukumoto, Y. Matsuo, and N. Noguchi, Research on autonomous land
vehicle for agriculture, in Proc. ARBIP95, Kobe, Hyogo, 1995, vol. 1, pp. 41-48.
[31] K. Inoue, K. Otsuka, M. Sugimoto, and N. Murakami, Estimation of place
of tractor and adaptive control method of autonomous tractor using INS and
GPS, in Proc. BIO-ROBOTICS 97, Gandia, Valencia, 1997, pp. 21-24.
[32] Y. Nagasaka, K. Taniwaki, R. Otani, K. Shigeta, and Y. Sasaki, The Development of autonomous rice transplanter, J. Jpn. Soc. Agricultural Machinery,
vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 179-186, 1999.
[33] A. Okado, M. Ishida, K. Imou, H. Takenaga, and N. Itokawa, Development
of an autonomous tractor for forage production, in Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Artificial Life and Robotics, Beppu, Oita, 1998, pp. 238-241.
[34] J. Yoshida, A study on the automatic farm machine system for rice,
Osaka, Crop Engineering System Laboratory, Inc., 1997.
[35] N. Kawamura, K. Namikawa, T. Fujiura, and M. Ura, Study on agricultural
robot, J. Jpn. Soc. Agricultural Mach., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 353-358, 1984.
[36] T. Fujiura, M. Ura, N. Kawamura, and K. Namikawa, Fruit harvesting robot for orchard, J. Jpn. Soc. Agricultural Mach., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 35-42, 1990.
October 2001
Yasushi Hashimoto received the Ph.D. in agricultural engineering from the University of Tokyo in 1967. Since 1985, he
has been a Professor of Biomechanical Systems, Ehime University. He is currently engaged in research and teaching in
mechanization, automation, and informatics in plant production systems. He is President of the Japanese Society of
Environment Control in Biology and Chairman of the Coordinating Committee on Life Support Systems of IFAC.
Haruhiko Murase received his Ph.D. in agricultural engineering from Michigan State University in1977. After receiving his Ph.D., he joined the faculty of Osaka Prefecture
University, Japan, where he is now a Professor of Agricultural Engineering.
Tetsuo Morimoto received the Ph.D. degree in agricultural
engineering from Ehime University, Japan, in 1993. From
1977 until 1994, he was an Assistant Professor and since
1994 an Associate Professor of Biomechanical Systems, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University. His research interests
include the identification and optimal control of plant production processes using intelligent approaches such as neural networks and genetic algorithms.
Toru Torii received the B.A. degree in agricultural engineering in 1980, the M.S. degree in mechanical engineering for
production in 1982, and the Ph.D. degree in 1992 from the
University of Tokyo. From 1982 to 1984, he was with
Mitsubishi Motors Co., and from 1989 to 1999, he was an Assistant Professor in agricultural engineering at the University of Tokyo. Since 1999, he has been an Associate
Professor in precision engineering at the University of Tokyo. His current interests are microfluidic devices and micromechatronics devices for lab on a chip.
85