Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Regn Date
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
: Serum
Ref no
/ Male
URIC ACID
TEST NAME
Uric Acid
RESULT
6.3
RESULT
7.5
4.2
3.3
1.3
1.2 - 1.5
Method : Biuret
Albumin
Method : Bromocresol Green Dry Chemistry
Globulins
Method : Biuret + Bromocresol Green + Calculation
BLOOD UREA
TEST NAME
Urea
RESULT
22
Adult
: 10 - 50 mg/dL
Newborn : 8.4 - 25.8 mg/dL
Children : 10.8 - 38.4 mg/dL
Infant
: 10.8 - 38.4 mg/dL
ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE
TEST NAME
Alkaline Phosphatase
RESULT
79
30 - 120 U/L
RESULT
0.8
0.1
0.7
Conjugated Bilirubin
Method : Dichlorophenyl Diazonium Tetrafluroborate
Unconjugated Bilirubin
Method : Dichlorophenyl Diazonium Tetrafluroborate + Calculation
CREATININE
Released Date
27/06/2016 13:20
Page 1 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
: Serum
Ref no
/ Male
CREATININE
TEST NAME
Creatinine
RESULT
1.0
RESULT
19.93
Note:
Testing for 25(OH) vitamin D is recommended as it is the best indicator of vitamin D
nutritional status as obtained from sunlight exposure & dietary intake.For diagnosis
of vitamin D deficiency it is recommended to have clinical correlation with
serum 25 (OH)vitamin D, serum calcium,serum PTH & serum alkaline phosphatase.
The required dosage of vitamin D supplements & time to achieve sufficient
vitamin D levels show significant seasonal (especially winter) & individual variability
depending on age, body fat, sun exposure, physical activity genetic factors (especially
variable vitamin D receptor responses), associated liver or renal disease,malabsorption
syndromes and calcium or magnesium deficiency influencing the vitamin D metabolism
Vitamin D toxicity is known but very rare. Kindly correlate clinically, repeat with
fresh sample if indicated.
SGOT / AST
TEST NAME
SGOT (AST)
RESULT
16
SGPT / ALT
TEST NAME
SGPT (ALT)
RESULT
13
Released Date
27/06/2016 13:20
Page 2 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
: Serum
Ref no
SUBBA REDDY
BIOCHEMIST
Released Date
27/06/2016 13:20
Page 3 of 12
/ Male
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
: Fluoride Plasma
Ref no
/ Male
RESULT
101
70 - 100 mg/dL
Method : Hexokinase
SUBBA REDDY
BIOCHEMIST
Released Date
27/06/2016 12:44
Page 4 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
: Serum
Ref no
/ Male
RESULT
1.09
Adult
: 0.60-1.81ng/mL
6.70
Adult
2.25
Adult
: 0.35-5.5 IU/mL
Total T4
Method : Chemiluminescence Immuno Assay (CLIA-Centaur)
TSH
Method : Chemiluminescence Immuno Assay (CLIA-Centaur)
DR.VIJAY
CONSULTANT BIOCHEMIST
Released Date
27/06/2016 14:42
Page 5 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
Ref no
/ Male
RESULT
ABO Group
Rh Typing
Positive
Remarks :
. Reconfirm the Blood Group & Rh Typing along with cross matching before blood transfusion
. Recent blood transfusion, if any, interferes with interpretation of blood grouping.
DR.GEETA JAHAGIRDAR
CONSULTANT PATHOLOGIST
Released Date
27/06/2016 15:34
Page 6 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
Ref no
/ Male
RESULT
Haemoglobin
13.8
4.85
7100
Neutrophils
59
40.0 - 80.0 %
Lymphocytes
31
20.0 - 40.0 %
Eosinophils
03
1.0 - 6.0 %
Monocytes
07
2.0 - 10.0 %
Basophils
00
0-2 %
Platelet Count
257000
RBC
Normocytic Normochromic
WBC
Platelets
Adequate
Differential count
Peripheral Smear
Method : Automated
WBC, RBC Coulter Principle
Haemoglobin Photometric measurement
Platelet Count Derived from Platelet Histogram
HCT, MCH, MCHC Calculated
MCV Derived from RBC Histogram
Differential Count VCS Technology & Microscopy
Morphology Microscopy of Leishman stained smear.
DR.GEETA JAHAGIRDAR
CONSULTANT PATHOLOGIST
Released Date
27/06/2016 12:34
Page 7 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
: Urine
Ref no
/ Male
RESULT
Colourless
Pale Yellow
Clear
Clear
1.004
1.003 - 1.035
Acidic (6.0)
4.6 - 8
Nil
Nil - Trace
Nil
Nil
Normal
0.2 - 1 mg/dL
Negative
0 - 0.02 mg/dL
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Pus Cells
Nil
0 - 5 /HPF
R.B.C
Nil
0 - 2 /HPF
Epithelial Cells
Nil
0 - 8/HPF
Casts
Nil
Nil
Crystals
Nil
Nil
Macroscopic Examination
Colour
Reflectivity measurement method
Appearance
Light scattering measurement method
Specific Gravity
Transmission refractometry method
Reaction/pH
pH Indicator
Protein
Protein error of Indicator
Sugar (Glucose)
GOD-POD
Urobilinogen
Diazonium method
Bilirubin
Diazonium method
Ketones
Nitroprusside reaction
Nitrites
Diazonium method
Microscopic Examination
Method : Reagent Strips (Dual wave length reflectance method),Flow cytometry and Microscopy.
DR.GEETA JAHAGIRDAR
CONSULTANT PATHOLOGIST
Released Date
27/06/2016 13:53
Page 8 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
Ref no
/ Male
RESULT
18
< 10 mm/hr
DR.GEETA JAHAGIRDAR
CONSULTANT PATHOLOGIST
Released Date
27/06/2016 13:47
Page 9 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
: Serum
Ref no
/ Male
HBS Ag (SPOT)
TEST NAME
RESULT
HBs Ag (Spot)
Non Reactive
INTERPRETATION :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RESULT
INTERPRETATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Nonreactive
Presumed not currently infected or even though infected,
antigens have not yet reached detectable levels.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reactive
Indicative of acute or chronic Hepatitis B virus infection or chronic
HBV carrier state.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Clinical Significance :
--------------------------- This test is a screening assay, it should not be used as a sole criterion for diagnosis of Hepatitis B infection.
Positive results should be confirmed by HBV DNA PCR. Detection of HBsAg is, not useful during "window period"
of acute hepatitis B virus infection (i.e., after disappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and
prior to appearance of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs).
- Testing for acute HBV infection should also include hepatitis B core IgM antibody (anti HBc-IgM).
- Reactive results should be interpreted in conjunction with test results of other HBV serologic markers
(eg, anti-HBs Ab, anti-HBc total, and anti-HBc IgM, HbeAg & Anti HBe Ab).
DR.GAYATRI KORIDE
CONSULTANT MICROBIOLOGIST
Released Date
27/06/2016 14:43
Page 10 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
: Serum
Ref no
/ Male
RESULT
Serum Status
Clear
Triglycerides
262
229
140
Optimal
: < 100 mg/dL
Near Optimal : 100 - 129 mg/dL
Borderline High : 130 - 159 mg/dL
High
: 160 - 189 mg/dL
Very High
: > 190 mg/dL
37
52
< 30 mg/dL
6.19
Low Risk
: 3.3 - 4.4
Average Risk : 4.5 - 7.1
Moderate Risk : 7.2 - 11.0
3.77
Method : GPO-POD
Total Cholesterol
LDL Cholesterol.
HDL Cholesterol
VLDL
Method: Calculation
Method: Calculation
Method: Calculation
SUBBA REDDY
BIOCHEMIST
Released Date
27/06/2016 13:20
Page 11 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
: Serum
Ref no
/ Male
RESULT
0.548
DR.VIJAY
CONSULTANT BIOCHEMIST
Released Date
27/06/2016 14:42
Page 12 of 12
: 27-06-2016
Name
Regn No
10:47
Sample Collection
: 27/06/2016 10:54
: MR. S V SUBBAIAH
Print Date
: 28-06-2016 18:26
: 1016135128
Age / Sex
: 57 Years
Ref By
Regn Centre
: Himayatnagar
Sample Type
Ref no
/ Male
RESULT
6.5
< 5.6%
: Non Diabetic
5.7 - 6.4% : Increased Risk for Diabetes
> 6.5%
: Diabetic Range
NABL Accredited
DR.VIJAY
Certificate # M-0047
CONSULTANT BIOCHEMIST
Released Date
:
27/06/2016 16:20
Page 1 of 1
*1016135128*