Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
City schools Division of Dasmarias
Dasmarias North National High School
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
S.Y. 2015-2016
Name of Employee: MERCEDITA D. PARADERO
VERIDIANO
Position: TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DASMARIAS CITY
Rating Period: JUNE 2015 MARCH 2016

MFOs

KRAs

Objectives

Timeline

Name of Rater: LORENZO M.

Date of Review:

Weight
per
KRA

Performance Indicators
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

MARCH 28, 2016

ACTUAL RESULTS

Score
Rating
x
Weight

Basic
Education
Services

TeachingLearning
Process
(40%)

1. Delivered/facilitated learning
through functional and updated
lesson plan with instructional
materials and innovative teaching
strategies.

JuneMarch

(25%)

QUALITY
(5) - Individual differences were addressed
when the students were provided by 5 or more
differentiated, localized, contextualized
activities and teaching strategies.
(4) - Individual differences were addressed
when the students were provided by 4 or more
differentiated, localized, contextualized
activities and teaching strategies.
(3) - Individual differences were addressed
when the students were provided by 3 or more
differentiated, localized, contextualized
activities and teaching strategies.
(2) - Individual differences were addressed
when the students were provided by 2 or more
differentiated, localized, contextualized
activities and teaching strategies.
(1) - Individual differences were addressed
when the students were provided by 1 or more
differentiated, localized, contextualized
activities and teaching strategies.
EFFICIENCY
(5) - Objectives were specified, measurable,
attainable, result-oriented, time bound and
excellently executed.
(4) - Objectives were stated with complete
behavioral indicators and executed very
satisfactorily.
(3) - Objectives were stated with complete
behavioral indicators and executed
satisfactory.
(2) - Objectives were stated with 3-4 behavioral
indicator/s missing.
(1) - Objectives were stated with 3-4 behavioral
indicator/s missing.
TIMELINESS
(5) - Lesson plans/logs had complete parts and
submitted before the given time.
(4) - Lesson plans/logs had complete parts and
regularly submitted on time.
(3) - Lesson plans/logs had complete parts and
often submitted on time.
(2) - Lesson plans/logs had complete parts and

Lesson plans/logs had

complete parts and
regularly submitted weekly.
Objectives were stated
with complete behavioral
indicators and executed
well.
Individual differences were
addressed when the
students were provided by
five or more differentiated,
localized, contextualized
activities and teaching
strategies.

3.3
3

0.83

submitted irregularly.
(1) - Lesson plans/logs were not submitted.
2. Established a safe learning
environment

June to
March

(5%)

QUALITY
(5) - Maintained and improved classroom
conducive to teaching and learning at all times.
(4) - Maintained and improved classroom
conducive to teaching and learning most
oftentimes.
(3) - Maintained and improved classroom
conducive to teaching and learning most of the
times.
(2) - Maintained and improved classroom
conducive to teaching and learning sometimes.
(1) - Did not maintain and improve the
classroom to become conducive for teaching
and learning.
EFFICIENCY
The following indicators of a safe learning
environment are observed:
A. Chairs and tables were arranged according
to classroom activities.
B. Appropriate learning materials were
displayed in the bulletin boards.
C. Classroom facilities and surrounding were
clean, orderly, functional and safe.
D. Students manifested discipline and proper
behavior.
(5) - Four (4) indicators have met
(4) - Three (3) indicators have met
(3) - Two (2) indicators have met
(2) - One (1) indicator have met
(1) - No indicators met

Maintained and improved

classroom conducive to
teaching and learning most
of the time and have met 3
indicators of a safe learning
environment.

3. Prepared and used appropriate

assessment techniques for
learner

June to
March

(10%)

QUALITY
(5) - Prepared and used 5 and above nontraditional assessment techniques with rubrics
for learners.
(4) - Prepared and used four (4) non-traditional
assessment techniques with rubrics for
learners.
(3) - Prepared and used three (3) nontraditional assessment techniques with rubrics
for learners.
(2) - Prepared and used two (2) non-traditional

Always execute nontraditional assessment

techniques with rubrics
were prepared and used for
learners, and 3 criteria in
preparing and constructing
summative questions have
met.

3.5

0.175

0.3

assessment techniques with rubrics for

learners.
(1) - Prepared and used one (1) non-traditional
assessment technique with rubrics for learners.
EFFICIENCY
Prepared and constructed summative test
questions using the following criteria:
A. Logically arrange
B. Language and vocabulary used are within
the level of the students
C. Align to the learning competencies
D. Varied levels of questions were asked
(5) - All the criteria have met.
(4) - Four (4) criteria have met.
(3) - Three (3) criteria have met
(2) - One (1) criterion was met.
(1) - Test questions were not properly
constructed.

PupilStudent
Outcomes
(30%)

1. Attained 50% of the

Achievement rating in Araling
Panlipunan Grade 8.

June to
March

(10%)

QUALITY
(5) - 81% & above of the Achievement rating in
Araling Panlipunan Grade 8 have attained.
(4) - 66% - 80% of the Achievement rating in
Araling Panlipunan Grade 8 have attained.
(3) - 50% - 65% of the Achievement rating in
Araling Panlipunan Grade 8 have attained.
(2) - 35%- 49% of the Achievement rating in
Araling Panlipunan Grade 8 have attained.
(1) - 34% and below of the Achievement rating
in Araling Panlipunan Grade 8 have attained.

2. Increased the achievement

level of the students in the post
test over the pre-test by 65%

March

(10%)

QUALITY
(5) - 50% and above increased
(4) - 40% to 49% increased
(3) - 30% to 39% increased

81% of the Achievement

ratings in Araling
Panlipunan Grade 8 have
attained.

0.5

The achievement level in

the post test over the pretest have increased to 30%-

0.3

(2) - 20% to 29% increased

(1) - 19% and below

Community
Involvement
(10%)

3. Monitored and evaluated

students progress quarterly and
attain a grade of 75% at the end
of the school year.

Quarterly

(10%)

1. Conducted and participated in

PTA Meetings and Conferences

JuneMarch

(5%)

2. Participated in community
project/event/activity within the
target date

June to
March

(3%)

QUALITY
(5) - Attained a general average of 86% and
above
(4) - 80% to 85%
(3) - 75% to 79%
(2) - 71& to 74%
(1) - 70% and below

39%

Monitored and evaluated

students progress and
attained a general average
of 86% and above at the
end of the school year.

EFFICIENCY
(5) - attained 36 % and above attendance of
parents/ guardians during PTC
(4 ) - 31% -35% attendance of parents/
guardians during PTC
(3 ) - 25% - 30% attendance of parents/
guardians during PTC
(2 ) - 20% - 24% attendance of parents/
guardians during PTC
(1) - 19% and below attendance of parents/
guardians during PTC

25% to 30% of
parents/guardian attended
during PTC and it
happened in every
quarters.

EFFICIENCY
Participated in the following community
projects/events/activity with full documentation
report:
A. Alay Lakad
B. Brigada Eskwela 2015
C. Participated in Divison Quiz Bee
D. Consumer Protection in the ASEAN
Economic Community 2015
E. SSG Public Speaking Symposium
F. Buwan ng Kasaysayan 2015
(5) - Three (3) with full documentation report
completed
(4) - Two (2) with full documentation report
completed
(3) - One (1) with partial documentation report
completed
(2) - One (1) with no documentation report
completed
(1) - No participation in any community
project/event/activity

Participated in 3
community
project/event/activity with
full documentation report
completed.

0.5

0.15

0.15

Professional
Growth and
Development
(20%)

3. Conducted home visitation,

messaging via text and
Facebook with parents/
guardians of 5 students who
are in need of academic
monitoring and behavioural
problems were visited within and
at least once in a quarter

June to
March

(2%)

EFFICIENCY
(5) - 15 students and above who are in need of
academic monitoring and behavioural
problems were visited and contacted.
(4) - 10-14 students who are in need of
academic monitoring and behavioural
problems were visited and contacted.
(3) - 5-9 students who are in need of academic
monitoring and behavioural problems were
visited and contacted.
(2 ) - 1-4 students who are in need of
academic monitoring and behavioural
problems were visited and contacted.
(1) - No students who are in need of academic
monitoring and behavioural problems were
visited and contacted.
TIMELINESS
(5) - attained every quarter
(4) - attained 1st quarter only
(3) - attained 2nd quarter only
(2) - attained 3rd quarter only
(1) - attained 4th quarter only

5-9 students who are in

need of academic
monitoring and behavioural
problems were visited and
contacted during the 2nd
quarter.

1. Enhanced teaching method by

actively participating in the
following with evidences of
employing what was learned in
their job.
A. In service training seminars
B. Served as cooperating teacher
to practice teacher
C. Innovative instructional
materials contest
D. Peer coaching
E. Demonstration teaching
F. Underwent instructional
supervision from SH.
G. Conference & meetings
H. Online teaching-learning
(quipper, edmodo, goggle apps,
etc.)
I. Action Research

June
March

(10%)

QUALITY
(5) - employed learning in the job with
outstanding result
(4) - employed learning in the job with very
satisfactory result
(3) - employed learning in the job with
satisfactory result
(2) - employed learning in the job with fair
result
(1) - employed learning in the job with poor
result
EFFICIENCY
(5) - participated in all the activities of the
school
(4) - participated in 80% of all the activities of
the school
(3) - participated 70% of all the activities of the
school
(2) - participated 60% of all the activities of the
school
(1) - participated 50% of all the activities of the

Employed learning in the

job with very satisfactory
result and participated in
80% of all the activities of
the school.

0.06

3.5

0.35

school
2. Exercised professional &
personal skills by preparing
accurate, well formatted reports
and passed all these reports
required by Division Office & the
school.

June to
March

(5%)

QUALITY
(5) - all reports are correct and well - formatted
(4) - most of the reports are correct and well
-formatted
(3) - most of the reports are with minimal
corrections in data entry and format
(2) - most of the reports are with maximum
corrections in data entry
(1) - most of the reports are with maximum
corrections in data entry and format.
TIMELINESS
(5) - all report submitted before due date
(4) - all reports submitted on due date
(3) - all reports submitted 1 day later than due
date
(2) - all reports submitted 2 days later than due
date
(1) - all reports submitted 3 days later than the
due date

Most of the reports are

corect and submitted 1 day
later than due date

3. Exercised Social Regards for

Learning by following the listed
indicators at all times throughout
the school year:
A. Abiding by and implementing
school policies and procedures
B. Observing punctuality in
accomplishing tasks and
requirements
C. Observes punctuality in class
attendance and other occasions
D. Maintains appropriate
appearance and decorum at all
times
E. Demonstrating appropriate
behaviour in dealing with
students, superiors and
stakeholder

June to
March

(5%)

QUALITY
(5) - all indicators are always exercised with
Outstanding ratings
(4) - all indicators are always exercised with
Very Satisfactory ratings
(3 ) - all indicators are always exercised with
Satisfactory ratings
(2) - all indicators are always exercised with
Poor ratings
(1) - all indicators are always exercised but
needs improvement

All indicators are always

exercised with very
satisfctory rating.

3.5

0.175

0.15

Plus Factor
(5%)

1. Served as
A. Grade Level Chairman
B. Key Teacher
C. Facilitator
D. Coach/Trainer
E. Adopt-A-School Oordinator
F. Committee Member
G. Club Adviser
H. Officer in any organization
I. Remedial Teacher
J. Substitute Teacher for classes
of teachers who are absent or on
official business

June to
March

(5%)

QUALITY
(5) - Served in any four (4) or more related
tasks with documentation/artifacts/certification
(4) - Served in any three (3) related tasks with
documentation/artifacts/certification
(3) - Served in any two (2) related tasks with
documentation/artifacts/certification
(2) - Served in any one (1) related task with
documentation/artifacts/certification
(1) - No involvement in any related tasks.

Have served in any 4 or

more related tasks with
documentation/artifacts/cer
tification

OVERALL
RATING

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE

ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500-5.000
3.500-4.499
2.500-3.499
1.500-2.499
Below 1.999

Outstanding
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Poor

LORENZO M. VERIDIANO
Head Teacher III

Rater

BERNIECE ANN E. ABELAR

Teacher I

Ratee

VIOLETA R. GONZALO
Principal IV

Approving Authority

EMMANUEL L. RESURRECCION

MANUELA. S. TOLENTINO

Assistant City Schools Superitendent

City Schools Superitendent

0.25

3.89V
S