Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
UNIVERSITET
METHODOLOGIES IN EUROCODE 3
FOR ESTABLISHING FIRE RESISTANCE
KULDEEP VIRDI
EUROCODE STRATEGIES
Eurocode 3 allows three strategies for establishing fire
resistance:
Time:
e
tfi,d
fi d > tf
Load resistance:
Temperature:
cr,d > d
TIME DURATIONS
Feasible by hand
calculation. Aim is to
find reduced resistance
at design temperature
Simplest EC3 method.
Find critical
temperature for loading
and compare with
design temperature
90
60
30
60
90
NO!
60
60
30
30
60
120
90
60
60
60
90
NO!
60
60
30
60
60
120
90
60
15
30
15
60
15
90
60
120
To storey floor
level
Times
given in
min
ACTIONS
S
ACTIONS
A
C
T
I
O
N
S
FIRE
G
Q
S
W
Fire
1,1
= 0.50
STEEL
fy yield stress
E elastic modulus
fp proportionality
limit stress
t limiting yield
strain
f
I
II
IV
III
% of normal value
100
Rft
80
SS
CONCRETE
60
40
20
Rft
SS
Elastic modulus
300
600
900
Temperature (C)
1200
Normalised stress
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
06
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Concrete strength
reduction factors are:
20C
200C
400C
Strength (% of normal)
Strain (%)
6
100
Strain at maximum
strength
50
600C
Normal-weight
Concrete
800C
1000C
1
4
3
2
1
Strain (%)
200
400
600
800 1000 1200
Temperature (C)
THERMAL EXPANSION
Thermal expansion is of concern only in Advanced
Calculation Models
The basic effect of heating is thermal expansion.
THERMAL EXPANSION
2.0
SIMPLE METHOD 1
CRITICAL TEMPERATURE METHOD
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
EUROCODE STRATEGIES
EUROCODE STRATEGIES
tfi,d
fi d > tf
Load resistance:
Temperature:
cr,d > d
Feasible by hand
calculation. Aim is to
find reduced resistance
at design temperature
Temperature:
cr,d > d
Find critical
temperature for
loading and
compare with
design
temperature
MEMBER CLASSIFICATION
For the following cases, the section classification used
is the same as for ambient temperature.
-
Compression members
Si
Simple
l beams
b
supporting
i a concrete slab
l b on the
h
top flange
All Class 3 and Class 4 sections
MEMBER CLASSIFICATION
MEMBER CLASSIFICATION
Class 1 Class 2
Flange
Class 3
235
fy
MEMBER CLASSIFICATION
For these members, the width/thickness ratios of the
flange and the web elements should be less than the
values shown in the same table but with:
=
235 kE,
f y ky
0.85
0 85
235
fy
(Approximately)
Efi,
fi d,t
dt
Rfi,d,20
Non-slender sections
(Classes 1, 2, 3) treated
th same.
the
cr 39.19 ln
0.9674 0
3.833
1 482
Slender (Class 4)
sections treated
conservatively (350C).
STEEL TEMPERATURE
800
Classify member
700
Class 1, 2, 3 sections
600
500
400
300
Class 4 sections
200
Degree of utilisation
100
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Degree of Utilisation 0
Critical temperature
cr,d
INCREASE OF TEMPERATURE IN
UNPROTECTED MEMBERS
Temperature
p
increase
in time step t:
a,t
perimeter
area of cross section
exposed perimeter
area of cross section
2(b+h)
area of cross section
1
ca a
Fire
temperature
Am
hnet,d t
V
Steel
temperature
Steel
HEAT FLUX
The heat flux has two parts - one due to radiation and
the other due to convection.
Heat flux
hnet,d = hnet,r + hnet,c
= configuration factor
(can be set to 1.0 in the absence of data)
EMISSIVITY
res
= resultant emissivity
= f m
(can be taken as 0.5 in the absence of data)
=e
emissivity
ss ty o
of tthe
e fire
e co
compartment
pa t e t
(can be taken as 0.8 in the absence of data)
STEEL TEMPERATURE
Find Section Factor Am/V
Calculate
in time t
PROTECTED STEEL
Definition of Section Factor Ap/V for protected members
b
INCREASE OF TEMPERATURE IN
PROTECTED MEMBERS
Steel perimeter
steel area
cp p
ca a
dp
Fire
temperature
Ap
Steel
temperature
Steel
2(b+h)
steel area
OTHER PARAMETERS
board perimeter
steel area
= thickness of p
protection material
Protection
dp
p / d p Ap
1
/ 10
1 g,t
g,t a,t t e
ca a V 1 / 3
EXAMPLE
UNPROTECTED TENSION MEMBER
Ties - steel
Gk+Q K.1
D
Tie
3.5m
G +Q
k k,1
G +Q
k k,1
B
G +Q
k k,1
G +Q
k k,1
G +Q
k K.1
Column (steel
or composite)
3.5m
3.5m
G
3.5m
H
5m
5m
Utilisation factor:
(4.2.4)
= 619C
= 20.00 C
= 96.54 C
Increase in temperature
= 0.92 C
= 20.00+0.92
= 20.92 C
Class 1, 2, 3 sections
600
500
(Graph alongside)
400
300
Class 4 sections
200
100
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Degree of Utilisation 0
= 20.92 C
= 146.95 C
for steel
for the room after 10 sec
Increase in temperature
= 1.57 C
= 20.92+1.57
Temp (C)
800
ISO834
700
600
619 C
Steel member
500
400
300
= 22.49 C
200
100
(Not OK)
500
1000 1500
Time (sec)
EXAMPLE
PROTECTED TENSION MEMBER
cp
Ap/V
= 800 kg/m3
= 1700 J/kgK
=
0.2 W/mK
= 300.97 m-1
Temp (C)
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
(OK)
ISO834
Bare steel member
619 C
SUMMARY
613 C
1000
2000
3000 4000
Time (sec)
SUMMARY SO FAR
Eurocode 3 allows three strategies for establishing fire
safety of protected and unprotected steel structures.
The simple method, based on critical temperatures, has
b
been
described
d
ib d in
i detail.
d t il
METHOD 2
STRENGTH UNDER FIRE
EUROCODE STRATEGIES
Load resistance:
Feasible by hand
calculation. Aim
is to find reduced
resistance at
design
temperature
UNRESTRAINED BEAMS
10
UNRESTRAINED BEAMS
UNRESTRAINED BEAMS
LT,fi is the lateral-torsional buckling strength reduction
factor in fire design situation.
M.fi
LT, ,com
< 0.4
% of normal value
100
Rft
80
SS
RESTRAINED BEAMS
60
40
20
Rft
SS
Elastic modulus
300
600
900
Temperature (C)
1200
RESTRAINED BEAMS
Restrained beams do not exhibit lateral-torsional
buckling. Moment capacity is found by using:
LT.fi = 1
COLUMNS
11
COMPRESSION MEMBERS
This information applies to Class 1, 2 or 3 sections. The
axial buckling resistance is checked for the maximum
temperature a,com in the steel:
N b, fi, t, Rd A ky, ,max f
fi
M.fi
COMPRESSION MEMBERS
The strength reduction factor LT.fi for axial buckling is
calculated using normalised slenderness :
Bracing system
lfi=0.7L
0.7L
lfi=0.5L
SUMMARY SO FAR
Eurocode 3 allows three strategies for establishing fire
safety of protected and unprotected steel structures.
SUMMARY
COMPOSITE FLOORS
A composite slab comprises three main components
Profiled steel
decking
Reinforcement
in-situ concrete slab
Some
reinforcement
Support beam
Metal decking
Cast-in-situ
concrete
Support beam
12
COMPOSITE FLOORS
Composite floor slabs offer advantages over other
systems
-
STRENGTH CRITERION R
STEEL TEMPERATURE
1= 1 + 1 + 1
z
u1 u 2 u3
STEEL STRENGTH
The strength of the
steel reinforcement is
determined using the
appropriate material
strength
st
e gt reduction
educt o
factor ky
(Rft for reinforcement)
Slab
Rebar
u1
u3
u2
Steel sheet
u2
u1
u3
80
SS
60
40
20
Rft
SS
Elastic modulus
300
600
900
Temperature (C)
1200
13
0
100
705 [C]
M
1
MH 1 H MS M0
2
8M0
METHOD 3
ADVANCED CALCULATION MODELS
14
OUTLINE
Advanced Calculation Models for
Analysis for Temperature Distribution
Analysis for Strength
Computer Modelling for Temperature Distribution
Program TASEFplus
x 2 y 2
k t
15
p
x 1, y
4t p
Txp1, y Txp, y 1 Txp, y 1 1
T
2 x, y
x
(Explicit form)
(Depends upon
Critical Time Increment t)
PROGRAM TASEF
TASEF is a program written in FORTRAN and has a
line-by-line data input. It was developed by Ulf
Wickstrm from Sweden.
PROGRAM TASEF
PROGRAM TASEF
A variety of boundary conditions can be applied to
surfaces of the section. These include not only
surfaces subjected to heat flux as in a fire but also
those in which there is no gain or loss of heat and
tthere
e e is
s no
oc
change
a ge in e
entropy
t opy (Adiabatic).
( d abat c)
PROGRAM TASEF
Material properties required are specific heat
conductivity and specific heat capacity of the
material.
Latent heat of water is used to handle problems
involving moist materials such as concrete.
16
PROGRAM TASEFplus
TASEFplus, written in Visual Basic, is a pre-processor
and a post-processor for TASEF. It was developed
by the author while at City University London.
PROGRAM TASEFplus
p
PROGRAM TASEFplus
PROGRAM TASEFplus
PROGRAM TASEFplus
PROGRAM TASEFplus
Node groups
17
PROGRAM TASEFplus
PROGRAM TASEFplus
The temperature-time history specifies the times at
which the calculations are output.
In fact, the time domain has an explicit idealisation, so
the calculations are carried out for a critical time
step for accuracy and convergence.
PROGRAM TASEFplus
PROGRAM TASEFplus
All the instructions required are given on the front
page of the program.
(The program also comes with a user manual)
PROGRAM TASEFplus
PROGRAM TASEFplus
The output is in the form of a fully annotated ext file.
In addition, colour contours of temperature
distribution can be plotted.
18
PROGRAM TASEFplus
The temperature history of one or more selected
nodes can be plotted.
19
COLUMN MODEL
Non-uniform profile
along the length
Temperature
dependent
material
properties
Lateral loading
Initial imperfections.
20
COLUMN MODEL
CALCULATION MODEL
Column Equilibrium
equation
Mx = P (ex + u)
This is a non-linear
equation.
External Equilibrium
Calculation of deflections using finite differences
and second-order iteration (finding u)
[Mx = P (ex + u)]
INTERNAL EQUILIBRIUM
EXTERNAL EQUILIBRIUM
Stresses need to be
integrated over
appropriate areas, using
non-linear temperature
dependent
depe
de t stress-strain
st ess st a
relations, to satisfy
internal equilibrium
{ u k+1 } = { u k } - [ I K ] -1 { u k U k }
[K] is determined numerically
STABILITY ANALYSIS
The method described is
applied repeatedly,
starting with a small
applied load and solving
for
o the
t e deflected
de ected shape,
s ape,
and then increasing the
load until no convergence
for the deflected shape is
obtainable.
Load
Ultimate Load
PROGRAM COMPSEFplus
p
Deflection
21
PROGRAM COMPSEFplus
COMPSEF is a program written also in FORTRAN.
COMPSEFplus, written in Visual Basic, is a preprocessor for COMPSEF.
PROGRAM COMPSEFplus
As for TASEFplus, all the instructions necessary to
analyse a problem appear on the first screen.
PROGRAM COMPSEFplus
The next screen defines what kind of analysis is being
performed, whether it is uniaxial or biaxial bending.
PROGRAM COMPSEFplus
The subsequent screen defines the column length and
few other parameters, which are often default values.
PROGRAM COMPSEFplus
Geometry is mapped by defining quadrilaterals and the
applicable material.
PROGRAM COMPSEFplus
Temperature output file from TASEF is read directly.
22
PROGRAM COMPSEFplus
PROGRAM COMPSEFplus
Axial load
Time
Time increment
Axial displacement
X convergence norm
Y convergence norm
= -587000.000000
=
49.050000
=
0.050000
=
1.378246
=
0.000000
=
-1536.013848
---------------------------------------Station
X-Deflection
Y-Deflection
----------------------------1
0.000000
0.00
2
0.000000
-1.19
15
0.000000
-101.19
16
0.000000
-102.22
17
0.000000
-101.09
----------------------------------------FAILURE TIME
=
49.05
-----------------------------------------
APPLICATIONS
If one looks at Eurocode 4, the design method for
concrete filled tubes in Annex H is less than
satisfactory.
APPLICATION TO
CONCRETE FILLED STEEL TUBES
APPLICATIONS
REFERENCE
1.2
1
Buckling curve c
140x5 - Annex H
0.8
0.6
270x6 - Annex H
0.4
400x8 - Annex H
400x8 - COM PSEF
0.2
0
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1.25
1.5
1.75
2.25
23
SHADOW EFFECT
In fire engineering, it is recognised that the radiative
heat exchange in unprotected steel I-sections is
reduced due to geometric effects.
APPLICATION
SHADOW EFFECT
SHADOW EFFECT
Ignoring the shadow effect leads to conservative
results.
However, one consequence is that a given design may
thus become uneconomic.
uneconomic
Based on some of the work of co-author Ulf Wickstrm,
a much simplified approach appears in the fire
engineering part of Eurocode 3 for steel structures.
SHADOW EFFECT
As an example of the Advanced Calculation Model,
temperature distributions in steel beams with or
without considering the shadow effect are evaluated
in a more rigorous manner.
The effect of reduced temperatures obtained on the fire
duration from TASEF is later evaluated using the
finite difference based program COMPSEF.
The introduced
boundaries follow
the same fire curve
as the rest of the
section.
Thus,
Thus while following the
fire curve, it does not
cause radiation to pass
through, thus
introducing a shadow.
24
Position Eurocode 3
A
B
C
827`
827`
827
No
Shadow
Effect
709
544
714
With
Shadow
Effect
661
510
666
CONCLUSIONS
25
CONCLUSIONS
Eurocode 3 methodologies have been described.
The basis of Advanced Calculation Models as
permitted in Eurocodes was covered.
Use of Advanced Calculation Models requires computer
programs.
CONCLUSIONS
The programs can be used for design, research, and
for teaching.
These programs have indeed been used in Fire
Engineering modules for Masters programmes at
City University and at Lule University of
Technology in Sweden.
CONCLUSIONS
Two programs - one for heat transfer and one for
mechanical response - have been described.
These programs are not general purpose, but
dedicated to solving specific range of problems
problems.
Consequenly, what they can do, can be done with
limited input, results are fast to obtain, and the
learning curve is not too steep.
CONCLUSIONS
One application has described how the shadow effect
can be taken into account in determining the
temperature distributions in a steel beam exposed
to fire.
The reduction in temperatures obtained by an
advanced calculation method, using the program
TASEF, is first due to the transmission of heat into
the concrete slab supported by the beam, a feature
not taken into account in Eurocode 3.
CONCLUSIONS
Further significant reductions in temperatures are
obtained by considering the shadow effect.
The resulting improved structural performance,
calculated by the finite difference based program
COMPSEF, is reflected in the increase in time to
failure.
THANK YOU
26