Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 17 May 2014
Received in revised form 20 January 2015
Accepted 3 March 2015
Available online 20 March 2015
Keywords:
Durability
Supplementary cementing materials
Sugarcane bagasse ash
Heat of hydration
Portland pozzolana cement
Sustainability
a b s t r a c t
By-products from a number of industrial processes are used as alternative supplementary cementitious
materials in concrete. Sugarcane bagasse ash is mainly composed of amorphous silica and can be used as
a pozzolanic material in concrete. Production of sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) based blended cements
with different replacement levels of SCBA, and the performance of concrete with these cements in terms
of compressive strength, heat of hydration, drying shrinkage and durability are discussed in this paper.
Durability performance was investigated by ve different methods in this study, namely oxygen
permeability test, rapid chloride penetration test, chloride conductivity test, water sorptivity test, DIN
water permeability test and Torrent air permeability test. The results from this study show that use of
sugarcane bagasse ash in concrete prominently enhances its performance. Low heat of hydration, additional strength gain due to pozzolanic reaction, signicant reduction in permeability because of pore
renement and similar drying shrinkage behavior were observed for bagasse ash blended concrete compared to control concrete.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Different waste materials as well as by-products are used as
pozzolanic materials in concrete. Utilization of different supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) for the production of
blended cements contributes to achieving durable and sustainable
concrete [1]. Enormous quantities of sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA)
are obtained as by-product from cogeneration combustion boilers
in sugar industries; this material has been described to be a suitable supplementary cementitious material for use in concrete in
previous research studies [27]. India is the second largest producer of sugarcane and large quantity of bagasse ash (67,000 tonnes/day) is directly disposed to nearest land which causes severe
environmental problems [8]. Rapid implementation of bagasse
based new cogeneration plants (that are mandated by the government) is expected to substantially increase bagasse ash generation.
The utilization of bagasse ash as a supplementary cementing material through systematic processing and characterization offers a
protable and environment-friendly alternative to its disposal.
Pozzolanic materials such as sugarcane bagasse ash and rice
husk ash are agricultural by-products and cannot be directly used
as a mineral admixture in concrete due to the presence of unburnt
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: manusanthanam@gmail.com (M. Santhanam).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.03.004
0958-9465/ 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
78
cement, as well as the use of SCM [24]. Reduction in heat of hydration has been reported for all pozzolanic materials by several
researchers [25]. Montakarntiwong et al. [26] measured heat of
hydration of concrete with sugarcane bagasse ash using a simple
method by inserting a thermocouple at the center of the concrete
specimen (thus creating a semi-adiabatic condition); reduction in
heat evolution was reported for this concrete as compared to control concrete without bagasse ash. To simulate real mass concrete
conditions, it is imperative to measure the heat of hydration in
adiabatic condition [27].
Only limited studies are available on the durability performance
of SCBA against aggressive deteriorating agents like chlorides, sulfates, oxygen, and carbon dioxide. Chusilp et al. [28] studied the
performance of concrete containing bagasse ash for water
permeability characteristics, and reduction in the water penetration depth compared to control concrete was reported. Instead of
using only a single test method, there is a need to investigate the
durability performance of bagasse ash for the reason that ingress
of these aggressive chemicals is based on different transport
mechanisms including permeation, adsorption, diffusion, migration, convection, absorption, and combinations of these mechanisms [29]. A systematic and thorough investigation of durability
performance needs to be addressed in the performance evaluation
for bagasse ash or any new pozzolanic material to enable its potential use in concrete.
Ganesan et al. [6] studied performance of bagasse ash in concrete which was directly burnt to 650 C for 1 h and ground to
5.4 lm mean particle size. Frias et al. ground bagasse ash to below
90 lm size and its inuence on consistency, setting time, compressive strength and chloride diffusion in concrete were investigated
[4]. In earlier research studies, raw sugarcane bagasse ash was
directly burnt to different approximate temperatures to remove
or reduce the amount of unburnt particles as well as ground to
cement size and used as a mineral admixture in the concrete for
the performance evaluation, without sufcient understanding of
the material by suitable characterization and proper processing.
It is essential to evaluate the performance of bagasse ash to facilitate its effective use in concrete.
In this study, SCBA blended cements were used for the performance evaluation instead of direct replacement of cement with
raw bagasse ash in concrete. These cements were produced
through a well-dened methodology of processing of SCBA and
blending with OPC for ve replacement levels (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%
and 25%). Inuence of SCBA blended cements on the compressive
strength, heat of hydration, drying shrinkage, and durability was
investigated to understand the potential of the sugarcane bagasse
ash for use as a SCM.
2. Materials
2.1. Sugarcane bagasse ash blended cements
After burning sugarcane bagasse as a fuel, the residual ash is
collected as a by-product from the cogeneration boiler by using a
bag house lter. The collected bagasse ash consists of ne burnt
particles as well as coarse unburnt or partially burnt particles
and is directly stored in large silos in the cogeneration plant.
Periodically, this bagasse ash is mixed with water and disposed
to the nearest land. The disposed ash was used in the study. For
this study, raw bagasse ash was collected from disposal area and
further dried at 105110 C for 24 h to remove water. The dried
sample was used in this study to investigate its pozzolanic activity
and detailed material characterization. X-ray uorescence analysis
of the raw bagasse ash indicated high silica content (more than 70%
SiO2). In addition to silica, 9% K2O and 6% CaO, along with
OPC
SCBA
5%
PPC
10%
PPC
15%
PPC
20%
PPC
25%
PPC
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
K2O
Na2O
LOI (%)
20.68
5.12
5.44
60.36
0.83
0.27
0.23
1.24
75.67
1.52
2.29
6.62
1.87
9.59
0.12
36
21.11
5.57
4.10
58.92
0.92
0.31
0.20
1.31
25.82
5.52
4.10
55.84
0.95
0.31
0.20
1.32
31.16
5.44
4.08
52.46
0.98
0.64
0.20
1.39
36.41
5.42
4.07
49.04
1.01
1.01
0.20
1.53
40.53
5.36
4.06
46.03
1.04
1.25
0.20
1.98
79
Table 2
Physical characteristics of SCBA blended cements.
Characteristics
OPC
5%
PPC
10%
PPC
15%
PPC
20%
PPC
25%
PPC
Specic gravity
Fineness (m2/kg)
Soundness, expansion (mm)
Consistency (%)
Initial setting time (min)
Final setting time (min)
3.16
310
1.61
30
125
165
3.13
308
1.14
30
135
165
3.02
306
1.30
35
135
205
2.97
313
1.10
40
180
280
2.86
317
1.36
40
190
285
2.83
308
1.18
44
225
295
100
OPC
5%
10 %
15 %
20 %
25%
Passing (%)
80
60
2.2. Aggregates
Graded river sand was used as ne aggregate and crushed granite was used as coarse aggregate (conforming to IS 383-1970 [39])
in concrete mixes. Polycarboxylic ether (PCE) based high-performance super plasticizer (meeting the requirements of ASTM
C494 Type-F [40]) with specic gravity of 1.09 and solids content
30% was used (dosage of 0.5% by weight of cement).
40
20
0
1
10
100
Size (m)
Fig. 2. Particle size distribution for the OPC and blended cements in this study.
3. Experimental methods
Six concrete mixes, with binder content of 360 kg/m3 and w/b
of 0.45, were prepared for the performance evaluation. Control
80
(a)
12000
X-ray counts
9000
Q-Quartz
C-Crystobalite
6000
QC
Q
3000
0
20
40
60
80
2 (Cu K radiation)
(b)
25 % PPC
80000
X-ray Counts
20 % PPC
15 % PPC
40000
10 % PPC
5% PPC
OPC
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2 (Cu K radiation)
Fig. 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) processed bagasse ash; (b) OPC and blended
cements.
mix, and 5% 15%, 25% replacement mixes were cast for durability
testing. In addition to this, 10% and 20% replacement mixes were
cast for heat of hydration measurement with constant water to
binder ratio of 0.45. With the use of a PCE based superplasticizer,
all concrete mixes had good workability (85100 mm slump) and
no segregation was observed in any mix. After casting, the specimens were stored in the laboratory environment (29 C temperature and 71% relative humidity) for 24 h. Specimens were then
demoulded and cured in the moist room until specied testing
duration.
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of adiabatic calorimeter (based on Gibbon et al. [41]; Prasath and Santhanam [42]).
In chloride conductivity test, after vacuum saturation, the specimens were removed from salt solution; the saturated mass of the
specimen was measured. The specimen was then placed in the central part of the exible rubber collar. 5.0 M NaCl was lled in the
conductivity cell. Threaded perspex luggin probe with rubber
washer was used to avoid leakage of solution in the conductivity
cell as shown in Fig. 5. Ammeter and voltmeter were connected
with the conductivity cell. The applied voltage across the concrete
specimen was adjusted to 10 V from a DC power supply and the
corresponding current was noted. The conductivity was then calculated as per Eq. (1). The chloride conductivity index was calculated
as the average of the chloride conductivity (obtained using Eq. (1))
of three individual test specimens.
r id=VA
where r is chloride conductivity of the specimen (mS/cm), i = electric current (mA), d = average thickness of specimen (mm),
V = potential difference and A = cross-sectional area of the specimen
(mm2) [43].
3.4. Gas based tests
Different accelerated methods are used to estimate gas permeation/diffusion into the concrete in the eld as well as in laboratory
conditions. In this study, South African Oxygen permeability test
and Torrent air permeability test (Swiss Standard SIA 162/1-2003
[45]) were used. In Oxygen permeability test, the conditioned
specimen was placed inside a compressible rubber collar, which
was then tted inside a steel sleeve and placed in the permeability
cell as illustrated in Fig. 6.
Oxygen was lled inside the pressure vessel and the outlet of
the vessel was opened for 5 s to expel the gases present other than
oxygen. Pressure was adjusted to 100 5 kPa. The pressure was
measured using a digital pressure gauge every 30 min until 6 h.
The test was stopped after 6 h.
The coefcient of permeability was then determined as per the
methodology suggested in the South African Durability Index
Manual [43]. The oxygen permeability index (OPI) was calculated
as the negative log of the average of the coefcients of permeability
of the three tested specimens [29,43]. In the Torrent test, the vacuum cell was placed on the cleaned surface of concrete specimen
as shown in Fig. 7 and vacuum was created using a pump. When
the pressure in the inner chamber reached 30 mbar, the secondary
valve was automatically closed to achieve uniform pressure in the
inner chamber. The air in the pores of the cover concrete, which is
initially at atmospheric pressure, to ow into the inner chamber of
81
82
the vacuum cell. Due to this, the pressure in the inner chamber
gradually increases with time. The instrument records the rise in
the effective pressure at the end of the test, and converts it to
the coefcient of air-permeability kT (1016 m2), which is directly
reported by the instrument display.
3.5. Water based tests
The resistance to water penetration was studied by South
African water sorptivity test and the water penetration test (DIN1048 Part 5) [46]. For the DIN-1048 test, after 28 and 56 days of
curing, the 150 mm cube specimens were transferred to an oven
at 50 C for 7 days and the penetration test was conducted after
this conditioning procedure (this is a deviation from the actual procedure, where the moist cured specimens is directly placed in the
permeability apparatus without pre-conditioning; this was done in
order to ensure a combination of initial sorption and penetration
under pressure, in order to accentuate the differences between
the concretes). The specimens were placed in the permeability cell
and the cover plate was seated on the surface of the specimen. A
suitable rubber or neoprene gasket was provided at the bottom
of the cover plate to ensure proper contact between the specimen
and the cover plate. Sealant was applied at the interface between
the rubber gasket and specimen to prevent the leakage of water.
Constant water pressure (0.5 N/mm2) was maintained on the
83
2.5
Control
250
200
150
Control
10 % SCBA
20 % SCBA
100
20
40
60
80
100
120
Time (hours)
Fig. 8. Comparison of total heat curves.
Control
10 % SCBA
20 % SCBA
0
0
20
40
60
80
Time (hours)
Fig. 9. Comparison of heat of hydration rates for cements.
10 % SCBA
2.0
20 % SCBA
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0
20
40
60
80
50
100
84
1.6
70
60
50
3 days
28 days
56 days
40
30
POOR
1.4
28 days
56 days
1.2
GOOD
1.0
0.8
EXCELLENT
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Control
10
15
20
Control
25
Replacement (%)
respectively. According to ASTM 1202-12 [44] classication, control specimens had moderate resistance against chloride ion
penetration. Replacement of cement with bagasse ash considerably
decreased the electrical conductance as illustrated in Fig. 12. When
compared to control specimens, the total charge passed was found
to be reduced by 74% and 83% for 15% and 25% SCBA replaced
specimens respectively. SCBA replaced specimens showed signicantly higher resistance than control specimens at 28 days as well
as 56 days, and can be characterized as very low permeability
concretes as per guidelines.
The signicant reduction in charge passed can be attributed to a
combination of many factors, the primary ones being: (a) lowering
of pore solution conductivity, that is generally attributed to the use
of supplementary cementing materials with reactive silica, and (b)
improvement in pore structure, or in other words, lowering of pore
connectivity that results from the pozzolanic performance of SCBA.
Results of the chloride conductivity test, in terms of the chloride
conductivity index (CCI) measured after 28 and 56 days of curing,
are presented in Fig. 13. Chloride conductivity indices of SCBA
replaced concretes were lower than for control concrete. When
compared to control, 32% reduction in chloride conductivity index
was observed for 25% SCBA replaced concrete at 28 days. In addition to this, substantial reduction in chloride conductivity index
was observed between 28 and 56 days for all the SCBA replacements because of the additional pozzolanic reaction.
Reduction in CCI for 25% SCBA replaced concrete was increased
from 32% to 54% at 56 days. Notable reduction in the observed
3000
28 days
56 days
2500
25
Fig. 13. Chloride conductivity for concrete at 28 and 56 days of curing (qualitative
classications for concrete are also indicated).
1.4
3000
15
Replacement (%)
RCPT-28 days
RCPT-56 days
CCI-28 days
CCI-56 days
2500
2000
1.2
1.0
1500
0.8
1000
0.6
500
20
80
0.4
0
Control
15
25
Replacement (%)
Fig. 14. Comparison of total charge passed and chloride conductivity index for
concrete at 28 and 56 days curing.
Moderate
2000
Low
1500
1000
Very Low
500
0
Control
15
25
Replacement (%)
Fig. 12. Total charge passed at 28 and 56 days of curing.
85
0.18
Good
9.5
Normal
0.14
0.12
0.10
0.08
10
0.06
0.04
0.02
9.0
0.00
Poor
Control
8.5
Control
15
15
25
Replacement (%)
25
Replacement (%)
Fig. 15. Oxygen permeability for concrete at 28 and 56 days of curing.
Fig. 17. Comparison of oxygen permeability index and Torrent air permeability for
concrete at 28 and 56 days curing.
<0.01
0.16
28 days
56 days
-16
m2 )
0.18
10.0
11
m)
Very Good
0.16
-16
10.5
OPI-28 days
OPI-56 days
Torrent-28 days
Torrent-56 days
kT (10
12
28 days
56 days
0.14
Excellent
0.12
0.10
0.1-1.0
Fair
1.0-10
Poor
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
control
10
15
20
25
Replacement (%)
Fig. 16. Torrent air permeability for concrete at 28 and 56 days of curing.
28 days
56 days
0
control
15
25
Replacement (%)
Fig. 19. Water penetration depth for concrete at 28 and 56 days of curing.
28 days
56 days
50
40
Very low
30
Low
20
Moderate
10
High
0
Control
15
25
Replacement (%)
Fig. 21. Resistivity for concrete at 28 and 56 days curing (qualitative classications
indicating corrosion risk based on Feliu et al. [54] are also marked).
8
SI-56 days
DIN-56 days
10
6
9
8
7
2
6
5
11
60
Resistivity (kcm)
86
0
Control
15
25
Replacement (%)
Fig. 20. Comparison of sorptivity index and depth of penetration for concrete at
56 days curing.
Fig. 22. Comparison of chloride conductivity index and resistivity for concrete at 28
and 56 days curing.
700
87
600
Acknowledgement
500
400
OPC
5%
15 %
25 %
300
200
References
100
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Duration (days)
Fig. 23. Drying shrinkage behavior of concretes.
5. Conclusions
In this study, sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) based blended
cements with different levels of SCBA replacement were prepared
and characterized in a systematic manner, and used to prepare
concretes that were then subjected to a comprehensive evaluation
of mechanical and durability properties. The specic conclusions
from the study are as follows:
Concrete with bagasse ash replacement showed equal or marginally better strength performance compared to control concrete, even at 3 days. The results clearly indicate that concrete
of the same grade can be produced with up to 25% replacement
of cement by SCBA.
Heat of hydration of concrete containing SCBA based cements
with 10% and 20% replacement was studied using adiabatic
calorimetry. The total heat as well as the peak heat rate of
bagasse ash blended concrete was found to be lesser than the
control mix.
Durability performance of concrete with SCBA based cements
against chloride, gas and water penetration was investigated
with six different methods. Resistance of concrete against chloride and gas penetration signicantly increased with increase in
bagasse ash replacement. Although water sorptivity test
showed a marginal deviation in the result, signicant reduction
in the water penetration was observed under an applied
pressure.
Surface resistivity of SCBA replaced concretes was found to be
higher compared to control concrete due to excellent pozzolanic performance of SCBA as well as improvement in quality
of concrete.
Drying shrinkage behavior of SCBA replaced concretes was similar to that of OPC concrete.
The results of the comprehensive evaluation of mechanical and
durability characteristics suggest that sugarcane bagasse ash can
88
[27] Ballim Y, Graham PC. A maturity approach to the rate of heat evolution in
concrete. Mag Concr Res 2003;55:24956.
[28] Chusilp N, Chai J, Kraiwood K. Utilization of bagasse ash as a pozzolanic
material in concrete. Constr Build Mater 2009;23:33528.
[29] Alexander MG, Ballim Y, Mackechnie JR. Guide to the use of durability indexes
for achieving durability in concrete structures. Industry/FRD collaborative
research programme: achieving durable and economic concrete construction
in the South African context. Res Monogr 1999;2:511.
[30] ASTM C311. Standard test methods for sampling and testing Fly Ash or Natural
pozzolans for use in Portland-cement concrete. West Conshohocken (United
States): Annual Book of ASTM Standards; 2011.
[31] IS 1727. Methods of test for pozzolanic materials. New Delhi (India): Bureau of
Indian Standards; 2004.
[32] McCarter WJ, Tran D. Monitoring pozzolanic activity by direct activation with
calcium hydroxide. Constr Build Mater 1996;10:17984.
[33] British Standard BS EN 196(5)-2005. Method of testing cement. Pozzolanicity
test for pozzolanic cement; 2005.
[34] Donatello S, Tyrer M, Cheeseman CR. Comparison of test methods to assess
pozzolanic activity. Cem Concr Compos 2010;32:1217.
[35] IS 12269 Specication for 53 grade ordinary Portland cement. New Delhi
(India): Bureau of Indian Standards; 2008.
[36] IS 8112 43 Grade ordinary Portland cement specication. New Delhi (India):
Bureau of Indian Standards; 2005.
[37] IS 1489 Portland pozzolana cement specication (Part 1). New Delhi (India):
Bureau of Indian Standards; 2005.
[38] ASTM C204. Standard test methods for neness of hydraulic cement by airpermeability apparatus. West Conshohocken (United States): Annual Book of
ASTM Standards; 2011.
[39] IS 383 Specication for coarse and ne aggregates from natural sources for
concrete. New Delhi (India): Bureau of Indian Standards; 2007.
[40] ASTM C494/C494M. Standard specication for chemical admixtures for
concrete. West Conshohocken (United States): Annual Book of ASTM
Standards; 2013.
[41] Gibbon GJ, Ballim Y, Grieve GRH. A low-cost, computer controlled adiabatic
calorimeter for determining the heat of hydration of concrete. ASTM J Test Eval
1997;5(2):2616.