U.P.

College of Education
Oral Presentation Rubric
Teacher: Prof. Lizamarie Campoamor-Olegario
Title of Work: ___________________

Name: ________________________
Date of Presentation: ____________

Exceptional (1)
Admirable (2)
Acceptable (3)
Amateur (4)
Involved the audience in Presented facts with
Some related facts but Incoherent; audience
the presentation; points
some interesting "twists"; went off topic and lost lost interest and could
made in creative way; held held the audience's
the audience; mostly not determine the
the audience's attention
attention most of the time. presented facts with
point of the
throughout. Discussion is Discussion is interactive. little or no imagination presentation
highly interactive
Collaboration Almost always listens to, Usually listens to, shares Often listens to, shares Rarely listens to,
with Peers
shares with, and supports with, and supports the
with, and supports the shares with, and
the efforts of others in the efforts of others in the
efforts of others in the supports the efforts of
group. Tries to keep people group. Does not cause
group but sometimes is others in the group.
working well together.
"waves" in the group.
not a good team
Often is not a good
member.
team member.
Content
An abundance of material Sufficient information that There is a great deal of Thesis not clear;
clearly related to thesis;
relates to thesis; many
information that is not information included
points are clearly made
good points made but
clearly connected to thethat does not support
and all evidence supports there is an uneven
thesis
thesis in any way
thesis; varied use of
balance and little variation
materials
Coherence and Thesis is clearly stated and Most information
Concept and ideas are Presentation is
Organization
developed; specific
presented in logical
loosely connected;
choppy and disjointed;
examples are appropriate sequence; generally very lacks clear transitions; does not flow;
and clearly develop thesis; well organized but better flow and organization development of thesis
conclusion is clear; shows transitions from idea to
are choppy
is vague; no apparent
control; flows together well; idea and medium to
logical order of
good transitions; succinct medium needed
presentation
but not choppy; well
organized
Creativity
Very original presentation Some originality apparent; Little or no variation;
Repetitive with little or
of material; uses the
good variety and blending material presented with no variety; insufficient
unexpected to full
of materials/media
little originality or
use of multimedia
advantage; captures
interpretation
audience's attention
Length of
Within two minutes of
Within four minutes of
Within six minutes of Too long or too short;
Presentation
allotted time +/
allotted time +/
allotted time +/
ten or more minutes
above or below the
allotted time
Preparedness Student is completely
Student seems pretty
The student is
Student does not
prepared and has
prepared but might have somewhat prepared, seem at all prepared
obviously rehearsed.
needed a couple more
but it is clear that
to present. Does not
Shows a full understanding rehearsals.
rehearsal was lacking. seem to understand
of the topic.
Shows a good
Shows a good
the topic very well.
understanding of the
understanding of parts
topic.
of the topic.
Speaking Skills Poised, clear articulation; Clear articulation but not Some mumbling; little Inaudible or too loud;
proper volume; steady rate; as polished
eye contact; uneven
no eye contact; rate
good posture and eye
rate; little or no
too slow/fast; speaker
contact; enthusiasm;
expression
seemed uninterested
confidence
and used monotone
Audience
Response

U.P. College of Education

Oral Presentation Rubric
Teacher: Prof. Lizamarie Campoamor-Olegario
Title of Work: ___________________

Name: ________________________
Date of Presentation: ____________
Criteria
Audience Response

Scorer 1

Scorer 2

Scorer 3

Scorer 4

Scorer 5

Scorer 6

Total

Coherence and Organization

Collaboration with Peers
Content
Creativity
Length of Presentation
Preparedness
Speaking Skills
Overall, the oral presentation is: (CIRCLE ONE)
Exceptional
. 1
Admirable
. 2
Acceptable
. 3
Amateur
. 4
The strong points of the oral presentation are:
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Evaluator 6

The oral presentation can be improved by:

Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Evaluator 6

Evaluated by: GROUP NO. _____

Rubric for a Research Project
Student Name(s)_____________________________Final Grade________
Thesis/Problem/Qu
estion
1

Student(s) posed a
thoughtful, creative
question that
engaged them in

Information
Seeking/Selecting
and Evaluating
Student(s) gathered
information from a
variety of quality
electronic and print

Analysis

Synthesis

Documentation

Product/Process

Student(s) carefully
analyzed the
information collected
and drew appropriate

Student(s) developed
appropriate structure
for communicating
product,

Student(s)
documented all
sources, including
visuals, sounds, and

Student(s) effectively
and creatively used
appropriate
communication tools

challenging or
provocative research.
The question breaks
new ground or
contributes to
knowledge in a
focused, specific
area.

Student(s) posed a
focused question
involving them in
challenging research.

Student(s)
constructed a
question that lends
itself to readily
available answers

Student(s) relied on
teacher-generated
questions or
developed a question
requiring little
creative thought.

sources, including
appropriate licensed
databases. Sources
are relevant,
balanced and include
critical readings
relating to the thesis
or problem. Primary
sources were
included (if
appropriate).
Student(s) gathered
information from a
variety of relevant
sources--print and
electronic

and inventive
conclusions
supported by
evidence. Voice of
the student writer is
evident.

incorporating variety
of quality sources.
Information is
logically and
creatively organized
with smooth
transitions.

animations. Sources
are properly cited,
both in-text/inproduct and on
Works-Cited/WorksConsulted
pages/slides.
Documentation is
error-free.

to convey their
conclusions and
demonstrated
thorough, effective
research techniques.
Product displays
creativity and
originality.

Student (s) product

shows good effort
was made in
analyzing the
evidence collected

Student(s) logically
organized the
product and made
good connections
among ideas

Student(s) effectively
communicated the
results of research to
the audience.

Student(s) gathered
information from a
limited range of
sources and
displayed minimal
effort in selecting
quality resources
Student(s) gathered
information that
lacked relevance,
quality, depth and
balance.

Student(s)
conclusions could be
supported by
stronger evidence.
Level of analysis
could have been
deeper.
Student(s)
conclusions simply
involved restating
information.
Conclusions were not
supported by
evidence.

Student(s) could
have put greater
effort into organizing
the product

Student(s)
documented sources
with some care,
Sources are cited,
both in-text/inproduct and on
Works-Cited/WorksConsulted
pages/slides. Few
errors noted.
Student(s) need to
use greater care in
documenting
sources.
Documentation was
poorly constructed or
absent.
Student(s) clearly
plagiarized materials.

Student(s) work is
not logically or
effectively structured.

Student(s) need to
work on
communicating more
effectively

Student(s) showed
little evidence of
thoughtful research.
Product does not
effectively
communicate
research findings.

Teachers Comments:

Guidelines for Research Project

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Choose your own lifespan topic to investigate in depth

Write questions about the topic that you want to answer. Always include implications to parenting and teaching.
Show multiple perspectives on the issue, discuss your personal experience relevant to the topic.
Do related fieldwork to investigate the topic in Philippine setting.
Have at least 5 key references (listed using APA format) aside from the references that I listed. Use psychological journals.
Avoid popular media and esoteric sources as references.
Obtain peer feedback from one groupmate on a draft of your paper. Attach the peer commentary on the paper that you will
submit. The commentary should include minimum of five constructive suggestions.

7.
8.
9.
10.

Attach the rubric on top of your paper. It is where I will write your grade.
All papers must be original and written individually. Plagiarized papers will automatically get 5.0
Late papers will get .25 deduction per meeting day past the due date.
I do not accept emailed papers.