Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract
This paper is discussing the main challenges that are still
encountered after constructing simulation models incase of not
introduced to a practical QA/QC procedure to ensure accurate
results for reservoir management decisions.
The study includes the main criterias which were used to
define the optimum development plan for gas production
improvement towards achieving maximum recovery.
The field was partially developed in 1989 with 10 gas
producers to supply 500 MMscf/day of gas for auto injection
into oil rim reservoir. The field is under further development
scheme to produce 1.0 Bscf/day to meet the increasing demand
of gas for auto injection into other oil reservoirs and for export.
The main difficulties encountered to develop this field are
linked to obtain representative model, in addition to other
related development aspects of drilling costly gas wells and
utilization of the produced gas for auto-gas injection or export.
Several methods (Deterministic and Stochastic) have been
introduced to distribute hydrocarbon in the geological model,
which was compared later with simulation model estimated
initial gas and condensate in-places to ensure achieving more
reliable volumes. The current and the future development
plans performances were assessed using detailed
compositional simulation model that was constructed based
recent rock and fluid characterization studies.
The newly established QA/QC procedure for models results
accuracy has been successfully applied, and the lessons learnt
were shared with other simulation teams.
SPE 111117
Gas quality in upper (86% C1) and lower (89% C1) parts
of the reservoir. The variation of gas composition has an
impact on the development of the equation-of-state.
Gas utilization for auto gas injection at high WHFP.
Lack of enhanced recovery mechanisms that are not
available in the emerging technology.
SPE 111117
Test Qg
1
2
29-58
25-56
BHFP
Range
6697-6111
5893-4820
3
4
33-48
17-58
15-42
5228-4594
7000-6909
6906-6389
634
517
79
17-57
6696-6617
79
MMscf/day
BHFP
Change
586
1077
Remarks
Sensitive
High
Sensitive
Sensitive
Sensitive
Not
Sensitive
Not
Sensitive
Test Rate
MMscfd
Test
BHFP
Model
BHFP
Quality
Match (Error %)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
52
47
26
54
35
41
54
59
4293
4335
3781
4244
3700
3980
4095
4630
4240
4427
3830
4331
3704
3998
3962
4649
SPE 111117
TEST
RATE
TEST
BHFP
MMSCFD
MODEL
RATE
MODEL
BHFP
QUALITY
MATCH
-44 psi
( 0.7% )
+ 7 psi
(0.1 %)
-17 psi
( 0.3 % )
+30 psi
( 0.4 % )
MMSCF/D
29.2
6697
29.8
6756
59.6
6266
58.2
6286
27.0
6232
26.2
6215
50.0
6920
49.7
6890
(ERROR %)
SPE 111117
Acknowledgment
The authors wish to thank the management of Abu Dhabi
National Oil Co. (ADNOC) for permission to present and
publish this paper.
Nomenclature
OGIP, Original gas in-place
QA/QC, Quality Assurance and Quality control
FFSM, Full Field Simulation Model
EOS, Equation-of-state
HLC, Hydraulic lift curves
Qg,
gas rate
Qc,
Condensate rate
Qw,
Water rate
Pc,
Capillary pressure
Sw,
Water Saturation
GCR,
Gas-Condensate ratio
BHCIP, Bottomhole close in pressure
BHFP, Bottomhle flowing pressure
WHFP, Wellhead flowing pressure
RFT,
Repeat Formation Tester
MDT, Modular Formation Dynamics Tester
PLT,
Production logging test
WCT, Water cut
CAPEX, Capital Expenditure
OPEX, Operating Expenditure
References
1. Umm Shiaf Field Kuff Formation, Core Static Rock Type
Study. ADNOC, E&P, Offshore Gas Team Report,
Author: Arnaud Meyer (TotalFinalElf), July 2002.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
SPE 111117
SPE 111117
SPE 111117
SPE 111117