Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Review
Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Received 18 April 2006; received in revised form 15 June 2006; accepted 15 June 2006
Abstract
Due to its versatility and wide range of applications, activated carbon is widely used as contaminant removal media. Recent research have focused
on enhancing the effectiveness of activated carbon by modifying their specific properties in order to enable the carbon to develop affinity for certain
contaminants. In view of this, a comprehensive list of literatures on chemical, physical and biological modification techniques of activated carbon
pertaining to enhancement of contaminant removal from aqueous solutions was compiled and reviewed. Acidic treatment to introduce acidic
functional groups onto surface of activated carbon was by far, the most studied technique. It was apparent from the literature survey that the
beneficial effects of specific modification techniques on activated carbon adsorption of targeted contaminant species from aqueous solutions were
profound, with some studies reported increase of contaminant uptake factors of more than 2. Concurrently, considerable decreases associated with
certain contaminant uptakes can also occur depending on the technique used.
2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Activated carbon modification; Surface functional groups; Impregnation; Contaminant; Aqueous solution
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Modification of chemical characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1. Acidic treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2. Basic treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impregnation of foreign material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1. Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2. Recent studies on AC impregnation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3. Surfactant modified AC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4. Functionalization method of graphitic layers using ligands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Modification of physical characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Removal of organic-based compounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1. Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2. Adsorption of fungicides and herbicides on modified AC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3. Adsorption of dyes on modified AC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bioadsorption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Concluding remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1383-5866/$ see front matter 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2006.06.009
404
404
405
407
407
407
408
408
408
409
409
409
410
411
411
412
412
404
1. Introduction
Activated carbon (AC) has been proven to be an effective
adsorbent for the removal of a wide variety of organic and inorganic pollutants dissolved in aqueous media, or from gaseous
environment. It is a widely used adsorbent in the treatment of
wastewaters due to its exceptionally high surface areas which
range from 500 to 1500 m2 g1 , well-developed internal microporosity structure as well as the presence of a wide spectrum of
surface functional groups [1]. As an inert porous carrier material,
it is capable of distributing chemicals on its large hydrophobic internal surface, thus making them accessible to reactants
[2]. While the effectiveness of ACs to act as adsorbents for a
wide range of contaminants is well noted [3,4] more and more
research on AC modification are gaining prominence due to the
need to enable ACs to develop affinity for certain contaminants
to cater for their removal from varying types of wastewater in
the industries.
It is, therefore, essential to understand the various factors
that influence the adsorption capacity of AC prior to their modification so that it can be tailored to their specific physical and
chemical attributes to enhance their affinities toward metal, inorganic and/or organic species present in aqueous solutions. These
factors include specific surface area, pore-size distribution, pore
volume and presence of surface functional groups. Generally,
the adsorption capacity increases with specific surface area due
to the availability of adsorption site while pore size, and micropore distribution are closely related to the composition of the AC,
the type of raw material used, the degree of activation during
production stage and the frequency of regeneration [5]. Recent
research have placed emphasis on modifying these physical and
chemical attributes and this paper aims to review and summarize the various AC modification techniques and their effects on
adsorption of chemical species from aqueous solutions. In order
to facilitate a more focused discussion, only studies on modification of AC in granular or powdered form were reviewed.
Also, it should be noted that the term modification in this paper
Table 1
Technical advantages and disadvantages of existing modification techniques
Modification
Treatment
Advantages
Disadvantages
Chemical characteristics
Acidic
Basic
Impregnation of
foreign material
Physical characteristics
Heat
Biological characteristics
Bioadsorption
405
Fig. 3. Cation exchange mechanism with the carbon surface carboxylic group
[34].
wet oxidation involves reactions between AC surfaces and oxidizing solutions (such as aqueous solutions of HNO3 , H2 O2 ,
NaOCl and ((NH4 )2 S2 O8 ) under relatively mild reaction conditions (20100 C) [13,14]. Table 2 lists the recent research on
modification of carbon surfaces for creation of specific surface
functional groups to enhance removal of chemical species.
2.1. Acidic treatment
Many investigations, with emphasis on metal removal from
aqueous solutions, are directed towards modifying carbon surfaces to increase their acidic surface functional groups [33],
which are types of oxygen complexes. Examples of these acidic
surface functional groups are carboxyl, quinone, carbonyl, lactone, hydroxyl and carboxylic anhydride and they are illustrated
in Fig. 2.
These specific functional groups are essential for the adsorption of heavy metals due to chelating attribute of these groups
where alkaline-earth metal cations can be integrated with the
groups to form complexes as indicated in the following equation [2,22]:
Mn+ + n(COOH) (COO)n M + nH+
The reaction above occurs due to cation exchange mechanism
where the metal cation exchanges site with the hydrogen ion
previously attached as a whole carboxylic group as illustrated
in Fig. 3.
In general, acidic reactions with regards to AC have
been associated with oxide structures, which are part of the
Fig. 2. Simplified schematic of some acidic surface groups bonded to aromatic rings on AC [4].
406
Table 2
Recent research on modification of carbon surfaces for creation of specific surface functional groups to enhance removal of metal species
Researchers
Technique used
Cu2+
Pb2+
Increased by factors of
approximately 3.7 (HNO3 ),
2.2 ((NH4 )2 S2 O8 ), 1.7 (O2 )
for Cr(III), decreased by
factors of approximately 4.3
(HNO3 ), 2.1 ((NH4 )2 S2 O8 ),
1.6 (O2 ) for Cr(VI)
Increased by factors of 1.4
(for pH 3) and 1.2 (for pH 5)
Increased by factors of 1.7
(without presence of KNO3 )
and 1.9 (with KNO3 )
Increased by a factor of 1.35
Heat treatment in H2 S
Cu2+
Loading of ZnO on AC
Pb2+
Helium-oxygen plasma
treatment to produce oxygen
resulting in creation of
surface functional groups
Oxidization using nitric acid
on two commercial AC (BPL
and WPL)
Treatment at ambient
temperature and 900 C in
SO2 and/or H2 S
Treatment using hydrochloric
acid
Ozonation at 298 K and 1 atm
Fe2+
Li et al. [24]
Weakly acidic
Rivera-Utrilla and
Sanchez-Polo [27]
Zn2+
Cd2+
Cd2+
Cr(VI)
Cr(III)
Increased by a factor of up to
2.6
Electrophilic aromatic
substitution of nitro groups
onto AC followed by
reduction of NO2 to NH2
Oxidization using HNO3 ,
H2 O2 or Fe(NO3 )3 followed
by heat treatment
Fe3+
Cr(VI)
Distribution coefficient, Kd
was increased by a factor up
to 140 (for Cu2+ ) and 4 (for
Pb2+ )
Increased by a factor of up to
1.4
407
with dilute phenol solutions. However, at high phenol concentrations, several authors have observed the opposite behaviour.
As a case in point, Terzyk et al. [42] (along with references cited)
observed an increase in phenol uptake at high phenol concentrations after treatment with HNO3 . This effect was attributed to
the prevalence of adsorbateadsorbate interactions in the high
phenol concentration zone, which could even be enhanced by
the presence of oxygen groups [41].
2.2. Basic treatment
There were studies carried out to determine the effect of basic
treatment of ACs on metal adsorption capacity. Park and Jang
[26] reported that adsorption of Cr(VI) reduced by a factor of
about 2 at a contact time between NaOH-treated AC and the
metal ion at over 170 min. They suggested that this reduction
may be due to the decrease of specific surface area or micropore
volume. Under alkaline environment (basic components in aqueous solutions), it is expected that OH ion will react with the
surface functional groups of AC. This was verified in the study
conducted by Chiang et al. [43] where AC treated with NaOH
showed major increase in concentration of phenolic functional
groups on the surface.
Review on studies pertaining to basic treatment seems to
indicate that basic treatment is beneficial in enhancing uptake
of organic-based substances from aqueous solution. Przepiorski
[44] studied the influence of AC treatment with gaseous ammonia from 400 to 800 C on adsorption toward phenol from aqueous solution. It was found that the adsorption capacity toward
phenol was enhanced by as much as 29% at the optimum treatment temperature at 700 C. In a separate study, Chen et al.
[45,46] investigated the modification of AC surface with ammonia thermal treatment to achieve higher adsorption capacity for
perchlorate from aqueous solution, without undermining the
pore structure that was beneficial to the perchlorate adsorption.
They reported that the most favorable improvement occurred
between temperatures of 650 and 700 C in which a four-fold
increase in perchlorate adsorption.
3. Impregnation of foreign material
3.1. Denition
It is generally accepted that the adsorptive capacity of activated carbon to remove hazardous substances can be substantially boosted by impregnation with suitable chemicals [47].
The term impregnation, however, is rather vaguely defined
by researchers. Henning and Schafer [48] defined impregnation as fine distribution of chemicals on the internal surface of
AC. However, there are researchers [49,50] that associate AC
treatment with acids or bases to increase acidic/basic surface
functional groups as impregnation techniques. In this context,
the authors construe that impregnation methods exclude acidic
or basic treatment in which the effect of impregnate AC with
substance(s) that generally, does not exert significant influence
on pH of surface of AC. These substances can be metals or
polymeric materials, which are generally not associated with
408
409
Table 3
Recent techniques used to significantly modify physical characteristics of AC
Researchers
Technique(s) used
Changes in physical
characteristic(s)
Attia et al.[64]
Ozonation
Rangal-Mendez and
Cannon [67]
Yoo et al. [68]
Micropore volume
(+5070%), mesopore
volume (+65-90%)
Bet surface area (+ up to
19.4%), total pore volume (+
up to 19.2%)
Methylethylketone and
benzene
Herbicides
(2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid and benzolin)
2-Methylisoborneol
Maltooligosaccharide
(carbohydrate)
410
Table 4
Recent research on adsorption of aromatic compounds on modified ACs
Researchers
Technique(s) used
25 C
Ozonation at
p-nitrophenol
Nouri and
Haghseresht [85]
p-nitrophenol
Przepiorski [44]
Phenol
at
100 C
Ozonation at 25 C decreased
adsorption capacity for all
compounds while ozonation at 25 C
increased adsorption capacity for
phenol and p-nitrophenol
Decreased by approximately 20%
(both HNO3 and NaOCl)
At pH 2: increased by 1.3%(H2 ),
decreased by 3.8% (urea) and 16.3%
(H2 SO4 ). At pH 12: increased by
22.9%(H2 ) and 6.3% (urea),
decreased by 22.9% (H2 SO4 )
Increased by 29% at the optimum
treatment temperature at 700 C
At pH 2: increased by approximately
40% (nitrobenzene), marginal
fluctuations for phenol and aniline.
At pH 12: increased by
approximately 38% (aniline) and
43% (nitrobenzene). Marginal
fluctuations for phenol
411
Table 5
Types of microorganism adsorbed on AC and chemical species removed
Researchers
Microorganism(s) adsorbed
Phenol
Atrazine, simazine
Atrazine
Nitrite
Phenol
Phenol
Lead
Copper, zinc, nickel, cadmium, atrazine
1,2 dichloroethane
Acid dyes
Naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid
412
413
[44] J. Przepiorski, Enhanced adsorption of phenol from water by ammoniatreated activated carbon, J. Hazard. Mater., in press.
[45] W. Chen, F.S. Cannon, J.R. Rangel-Mendez, Ammonia-tailoring of GAC
to enhance perchlorate removal, I: characterization of NH3 thermally
tailored GACs, Carbon 43 (2005) 573580.
[46] W. Chen, F.S. Cannon, J.R. Rangel-Mendez, Ammonia-tailoring of GAC
to enhance perchlorate removal. II: perchlorate adsorption, Carbon 43
(2005) 581590.
[47] N. Adhoum, L. Monser, Removal of phthalate on modified activated carbon: application to the treatment of industrial wastewater, Sep. Purif.
Technol. 38 (2004) 233239.
[48] K.D. Henning, S. Schafer, Impregnated activated carbon for environmental protection, http://www.activated-carbon.com/enviro.html (1998).
[49] L.V. Rajakovic, M.D. Ristic, Sorption of boric acid and borax by activated carbon impregnated with various compounds, Carbon 34 (6) (1996)
769774.
[50] E. Sayan, Ultrasound-assisted preparation of activated carbon from alkaline impregnated hazelnut shell: An optimisation study on removal of
Cu2+ from aqueous solution, Chem. Eng. J. 115 (2006) 213218.
[51] H.J. Fan, P.R. Anderson, Copper and cadmium removal by Mn oxidecoated granular activated carbon, Sep. Purif. Technol. 45 (2005) 6167.
[52] C.P. Huang, L.M. Vane, Enhancing As5+ removal by a Fe2+ treated
activated carbon, J. Water Pollut. Contam. Fed. 61 (9) (1989) 15961603.
[53] R. Leyva Ramos, J. Ovalle-Turrubiartes, M.A. Sanchez-Castillo, Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution on aluminium-impregnated carbon,
Carbon 37 (1999) 609617.
[54] S.A. Dastgheib, T. Karanfil, C. Wei, Tailoring activated carbons for
enhanced removal of natural organic matter from natural waters, Carbon
42 (2004) 547557.
[55] S.B. Ghorishi, R.M. Keeney, Development of a Cl-impregnated activated
carbon for entrained-flow capture of elemental mercury, Environ. Sci.
Technol. 36 (20) (2002) 44544459.
[56] S.W. Hu, P. Pendleton, Adsorption of anionic surfactant by activated carbon: effect of surface chemistry, ionic strength and hydrophobicity, J.
Colloid Interface Sci. 243 (2001) 306315.
[57] J.X. Xiao, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, J. Zhang, C.M. Wang, Y.X. Bao, Z.G. Zhao,
Adsorption of cationicanionic surfactant mixtures on activated carbon,
Carbon 43 (2005) 10321038.
[58] C.M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M.L. Gonzalez-Martin, V. Gomez-Serrano, J.M.
Bruque, L. Labajos-Broncano, Analysis of the adsorption isotherms of a
non-ionic surfactant from aqueous solution onto activated carbons, Carbon 39 (2001) 849855.
[59] C.M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M.L. Gonzalez-Martin, R. Denoyel, A.M.
Gallardo-Moreno, L. Labajos-Broncano, J.M. Bruque, Ionic surfactant
adsorption onto activated carbons, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 278 (2004)
257264.
[60] C.M. Gonzalez-Garcia, M.L. Gonzalez-Martin, J.F. Gonzalez, E. Sabio,
A. Ramiro, J. Ganan, Nonionic surfactants adsorption onto activated carbon: influence of the polar chain length, Powder Technol. 148 (2004)
3237.
[61] R. Parette, F.S. Cannon, The removal of perchlorate from groundwater by
activated carbon tailored with cationic surfactants, Water Res. 39 (2005)
40204028.
[62] J. Garcia-Martin, R. Lopez-Garzon, M.L. Godino-Salido, M.D.
Gutierrez-Volero, P. Arranz-Mascaros, R. Cuesta, F. Carrasco-Marin, Ligand adsorption on an activated carbon for the removal of chromate ions
from aqueous solutions, Langmuir 21 (2005) 69086914.
[63] R. Torregrosa-Macia, J.M. Martin-Martinez, M.C. MittelmeijerHazeleger, Porous texture of activated carbons modified with carbohydrates, Carbon 35 (4) (1997) 447453.
[64] A.A. Attia, W.E. Rashwan, S.A. Khedr, Capacity of activated carbon in the
removal of acid dyes subsequent to its thermal treatment, Dyes Pigment
69 (2006) 128136.
[65] H.L. Chiang, P.C. Chiang, C.P. Huang, Ozonation of activated carbon and
its effects on the adsorption of VOCs exemplified by methylethylketone
and benzene, Chemosphere 47 (2002) 267275.
[66] P. Chingombe, B. Saha, R.J. Wakeman, Effect of surface modification of an engineered activated carbon on the sorption of 2,4-
414
[67]
[68]
[69]
[70]
[71]
[72]
[73]
[74]
[75]
[76]
[77]
[78]
[79]
[80]
[81]
[82]
[83]
[84]
[85]
[86]
[87]
[88] J.J.M. Orfao, A.I.M. Silva, J.C.V. Pereira, S.A. Barata, I.M. Fonseca,
P.C.C. Faria, M.F.R. Pereira, Adsorption of a reactive dye on chemically
modified activated carbonsinfluence of pH, J. Colloid Interface Sci., in
press.
[89] H. Valdes, M. Sanchez-Polo, J. Rivera-Utrilla, C.A. Zaror, Effect of ozone
treatment on surface properties of activated carbon, Langmuir 18 (2002)
21112116.
[90] S. Wang, Z.H. Zhu, A. Coomes, F. Haghseresht, G.Q. Lu, The physical and
surface chemical characteristics of activated carbons and the adsorption
of methylene blue from wastewater, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 284 (2005)
440446.
[91] K. Abu-Salah, G. Shelef, D. Levanon, R. Armon, C.G. Dosoretz,
Microbial degradation of aromatic and polyaromatic toxic compounds
adsorbed on powdered activated carbon, J. Biotechnol. 51 (1996) 265
272.
[92] G.M. Walker, L.R. Weatherley, Biological activated carbon treatment of
industrial wastewater in stirred tank reactors, Chem. Eng. J. 75 (1999)
201206.
[93] J. Rivera-Utrilla, I. Bautista-Toledo, M.A. Ferro-Garcia, C. MorenoCastilla, Bioadsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II) and Cr(VI) on activated carbon from aqueous solutions, Carbon 41 (2003) 323
330.
[94] A.K. Camper, M.W. LeChavelier, S.C. Broadaway, G.A. McFeters, Bacteria associated with granular activated carbon particles in drinking water,
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52 (1986) 434438.
[95] M.H. Stewart, R.L. Woffe, E.G. Means, Assessment of the bacteriology
activity associated with granular activated carbon treatment of drinking
water, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56 (1990) 38223829.
[96] J. Rivera-Utrilla, I. Bautista-Toledo, M.A. Ferro-Garcia, C. MorenoCastilla, Activated carbon surface modifications by adsorption of bacteria
and their effect on aqueous lead adsorption, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
76 (2001) 12091215.
[97] L.R. Radovic, C. Moreno-Castilla, J. Rivera-Utrilla, Carbon Materials as Adsorbents in Aqueous Solutions, in: Chemistry and
Physics of Carbon, vol. 27, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000,
pp. 227405.
[98] C. Moreno-Castilla, I. Bautista-Toledo, M.A. Ferro-Garcia, J. RiveraUtrilla, Influence of support surface properties on activity of bacteria
immobilised on activated carbons for water denitrification, Carbon 41
(2003) 17431749.
[99] J.D. Lowry, C.E. Burkhead, The role of adsorption in biologically
extended carbon columns, J. Water Pollut. Contam. Fed. 522 (1980)
389399.
[100] G. Annadurai, S. Mathalai-Balan, T. Murugesan, Design of experiments
in the biodegradation of phenol using immobilized Pseudomonas pictorum (NICM-2077) on activated carbon, Bioprocess Eng. 22 (2000) 101
107.
[101] J.W. Choi, N.C. Choi, B. Mahendran, D.J. Kim, C.E. Lee, Sorption kinetics of aqueous benzene for attached bacteria on sorbents, Curr. Appl.
Phys., in press.
[102] H.M. Ehrhardt, H.J. Rehm, Semicontinuous and continuous degradation
of phenol by Pseudomonas putida P8 adsorbed on activated carbon, Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30 (1989) 312317.
[103] S.J. Feakin, B. Gubbins, I. McGhee, L.J. Shaw, R.G. Burns, Inoculation of granular activated carbon with s-triazine-degrading bacteria
for water treatment at pilot scale, Water Res. 29 (7) (1995) 1681
1688.
[104] L.R. Jones, S.A. Owen, P. Horrell, R.G. Burns, Bacterial inoculation of
granular activated carbon filters for the removal of atrazine from surface
water, Water Res. 32 (8) (1998) 25422549.
[105] A. Morsen, H.J. Rehm, Degradation of phenol by a mixed culture of Pseudomonas putida and Cryptococcus elinovii adsorbed
on activated carbon, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26 (1987) 283
288.
[106] S.L. Pai, Y.L. Hsu, N.M. Chong, C.S. Sheu, C.H. Chen, Continuous
degradation of phenol by Rhodococcus sp. immobilized on granular activated carbon and in calcium alginate, Bioresour. Technol. 51 (1995)
3742.
415