Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Minerals Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mineng
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 23 April 2013
Accepted 2 October 2013
Keywords:
Film otation
Critical impact velocity
YoungLaplace equation
Contact angle
a b s t r a c t
Film otation is highly dependent upon how well wanted and unwanted particles are separated at the
gasliquid free surface. Single particle experiments and modelling analysis can be undertaken to determine
a critical impact velocity at which the optimum separation is likely to occur. However, in commercial lm
otation systems the higher loading density of the free surface can result in interactions that change the
critical impact velocity. To investigate this inuence, lm otation experiments have been undertaken with
4, 5 and 6 mm diameter spherical polypropylene particles with water, sucrose and surfactant (CTAB) solutions contained within vessels of varying dimensions and wettability (static contact angle). Experimentally
it was observed that for a given particle diameter the critical impact velocity was found to decrease with
decreasing vessel diameter, especially when the particle-to-vessel diameter ratio increased beyond about
0.2. Conversely, the critical impact velocity was found to be relatively independent of the liquid depth;
but did decrease with decreasing static contact angle in the region where the vessel wall had an inuence.
The experimental system was also modelled using the YoungLaplace equation using both static and advancing contact angle measurements for both the particle and vessel surfaces. The model predictions were generally in good agreement with the experimental observations, including showing an increase in particle
penetration depth with increasing vessel diameter and meniscus proles, both at the particle impact point
and the wall of the vessel. The predictions were improved when the advancing contact angle was used, especially for the smaller diameter vessels where there was more liquid motion. Finally, a model to determine the
critical (minimum) diameter of vessel required so that the cavity prole generated by the impacting particle
is unlikely to be inuenced by the vessel walls is presented.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Many industrial processes involve the interaction of particles
with gasliquid interfaces. For example, in conventional mineral
otation devices bubbles are used to separate hydrophobic and
hydrophilic particles. The overall recovery of the hydrophobic particles by the bubbles occurs in three stages. Firstly, physical collision is required between the bubbles and particles. Secondly,
sufcient contact time is required to allow the hydrophobic particles to penetrate the gasliquid interface and be become physically
attached to the bubblesotherwise the particles will slide off the
bubbles. Finally, the particles must remain attached to the bubbles
whilst being subjected to the turbulence in the liquid (e.g. Schulze,
1977; Schulze, 1993; Drzymala, 1994; Ralston et al., 1999; Nguyen,
2003; Pyke et al., 2003; Pyke, 2004; Schimann, 2004; Tao, 2004;
Gontijo et al., 2007; Shahbazi et al., 2009). In order to reduce the
probability of detachment then turbulence should be minimised.
However, doing this would reduce the probability of particlebubble collision which would lead to a reduction in otation recovery.
Hence, turbulence can simultaneously have both a benecial and
Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 40339221.
E-mail address: dongmei.liu@newcastle.edu.au (D. Liu).
0892-6875/$ - see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2013.10.001
139
Nomenclature
Bo
D
Dc
dp
g
H
H0
h0
hTPCL
L
DP
R
Rc
R1, R2
r1
r0
rp
rTPCL
T
Liu et al, 2010b). Film otation can be generally classied into two
modes of operation. Firstly, the particle can be placed directly onto
the liquid with zero impact velocity (e.g. Walker et al., 1952; Zisman 1964; Fuerstenau et al., 1985; Fuerstenau et al., 1986; Fuerstenau and Williams, 1987; Diao, 1987; Fuerstenau et al., 1988;
Fuerstenau et al., 1991; Diao and Fuerstenau, 1991; Fuerstenau and
Diao, 1992; Sablik and Wierzchowski, 1992; Peng, 1996; Sablik,
2004; Sablik, 2007; Somasundaran and Zhang, 2006; Suicmez
and Kizgut, 2010; Kowalczuk and Drzymala, 2012). There is the
operational difculty of gently placing a monolayer of a large number of particles (with zero velocity) onto a moving liquid surface;
and for this reason there is a second mode of operation whereby
the particles are discharged from a moving horizontal belt at a given
height above the liquid free surface (e.g.: Liu et al., 2010b; Liu, 2012).
For this second mode of operation the particles are moving in the vertically downward direction when they contact the liquid free surface.
From an operational point of view it is important to know the
critical impact velocity, vc, beyond which the particle would penetrate entirely through the gasliquid interface and not be recovered. The value of the critical impact velocity can be calculated
by undertaking a force balance on the particle over the duration
of the impact. Such an analysis for an individual particle penetrating through a large gasliquid interface has been investigated by a
number of researchers (e.g. Engh et al., 1972; Paliy and Sidorenko,
1972; Narita et al., 1983; Ozawa and Mori, 1983; Lee and Tokuda,
1988; Vella and Metcalfe, 2007; Lee and Kim, 2008; Liu et al.,
2010a). However, a real lm otation system involves a large number of particles falling onto the free liquid surface together so that
each particle is surrounded by many others. What effect, if any, the
proximity of other particles has on the critical impact velocity has
not been reported previously. For this reason, the following experimental and modelling investigation into the behaviour of a single
particle impacting onto a conned volume (diameter and depth) of
liquid has been undertaken.
2. YoungLaplace equation at critical condition
The YoungLaplace Equation (YL) for equilibrium conditions in
the absence of any motion (kinetic energy) within the system is
given by (Young, 1805; Laplace, 1805):
vc
vi
vl
vp
vTPCL
Vp
Vl
time (s)
critical impact velocity of particle (m/s)
impact velocity of particle (m/s)
velocity of liquid (m/s)
velocity of particle (m/s)
velocity of TPCL (m/s)
particle volume (m3)
liquid volume (m3)
Greek symbols
a
angle, dened by Eq. (5)
h
contact angle of liquid on particle ()
ha
advancing contact angle of liquid on particle ()
hs
static contact angle of liquid on particle ()
ll
dynamic viscosity of liquid (Pa s)
ql
density of liquid (kg/m3)
qp
density of particle (kg/m3)
rgl
surface tension of gasliquid interface (kg/s2)
u
contact angle of liquid at vessel wall ()
ua
advancing contact angle of liquid at vessel wall ()
us
static contact angle of liquid at vessel wall ()
DP rgl
1
1
;
R1 R2
8
9 8
9
>
>
2
2
=
<
= <
h
d h=dr
dh=dr
h
;
i
2
3=2
1=2
>
>
L
: 1 dh=dr2
; :r1 dh=dr 2 ;
cot uS
where us is the static contact angle between the liquid and the
cylinder wall surface. At time, t = tc, the corresponding boundary
conditions are:
140
(a) Time, t =0
(b) Time, t = tc
dh
j
tanh
dr rr TPCL
dh
j
cot
dr rD=2
a
where h and u are the contact angles for the particle and cylinder
wall, respectively; and a is given by:
a arcsinrTPCL =rp :
3. Experimental
The experimental apparatus is shown in Fig. 2. It consisted of a
particle release device, vessel lled with liquid, lab-jack and high
speed video camera. The particles used were spherical polypropylene particles of diameters 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 mm, and density of
855 kg/m3. The liquids used were: (1) Milli-Q water, (2) 450 g/L sucrose aqueous solution and (3) 2 104 mol/L cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) aqueous solution. The vessels used
were: (1) 150(L) mm 100(W) mm 100(H) mm glass vessel,
(2) 10, 14, 17 and 21 mm diameter, unsilanized glass tubes, (3)
10 mm diameter silanized (with 0.1 mol/L TMCS solution) glass
tube, and (4) 10 mm diameter Perspex tube. Liquid depth was
adjusted to observe the inuence on critical impact velocity. The
contact angles were measured using Optical Contact Angle (OCA)
20 device. A summary of the physical properties of experimental
materials and experimental conditions at 20 C are shown in
Tables 1 and 2.
The experimental procedure involved the release of a polypropylene spherical particle at a known height above the free liquid
surface, H0. A high speed camera (Phantom V), operating at 1900
frames per second, was used to visually record the motion of the
particle as it passed through the gas phase, collided with the
gasliquid interface, and penetrated into the liquid. For each particle-liquid-vessel system, the release height was varied to obtain
the critical value, above which the impacting particle would penetrate into the liquid. For these conditions the high speed video
images were analysed to obtain the (critical) particle impact velocity and a spatial prole of the free surface (cavity). The reported results were the average of at least 3 repeated experiments. From the
Table 1
Physical properties of particles and solutions.
a
b
c
dp (mm)
qp (kg/m3)
Solution
h ()
ql (kg/m3)
ll (10-3 Pas)
4.0
5.0
6.0
855
855
855
Milli-Q water
450 g/L sucrose
2 104 mol/L CTAB
89
90
85
1000
1182
1000
1.002
4.796a
1.002
72.75
87.42b
60.85c
141
dp (mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
4.0,
4.0,
4.0,
4.0,
4.0,
4.0
5.0
6.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
6.0
4.0,
4.0,
4.0,
5.0,
5.0,
5.0,
5.0,
5.0,
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.0, 6.0
5.0, 6.0
5.0, 6.0
t=0.0 ms
Solution
Dimension (mm)
H (mm)
Material
Silanized
Milli-Q water
450 g/L sucrose
2 104 mol/L CTAB
Milli-Q water
450 g/L sucrose
Milli-Q water
Milli-Q water
Milli-Q water
450 g/L sucrose
450 g/L sucrose
450 g/L sucrose
2 104 mol/L CTAB
2 104 mol/L CTAB
2 104 mol/L CTAB
Milli-Q water
Milli-Q water
Milli-Q water
Milli-Q water
150(L) 100(W)
150(L) 100(W)
150(L) 100(W)
D = 10, 14, 17, 21
D = 10, 14, 21
150(L) 100(W)
150(L) 100(W)
150(L) 100(W)
150(L) 100(W)
150(L) 100(W)
150(L) 100(W)
150(L)100(W)
150(L)100(W)
150(L)100(W)
D = 17
D = 10
D = 10
D = 10
100
100
100
100
100
6.5, 8, 9.6
8, 9.6
9.6
7, 8, 9.6
8, 9.6
9.6
7.5, 8.5
8.5
10.2
10, 20, 30, 50
50
50
50
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Glass
Perspex
Glass
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
t=18.9 ms
t=40.5 ms
t=67.3 ms
t=86.3 ms
t=52.6 ms
t=89.4 ms
t=0.0 ms
t=16.8 ms
t=40.5 ms
Fig. 4. Critical impact velocity (vc) versus tube surface contact angle (us). (Exps. 16
18: liquid: Milli-Q water; D = 10 mm; N dp = 4.0 mm; j dp = 5.0 mm; and
dp = 6.0 mm.)
diameter and tube surface wettability on the critical impact velocity. The resultant F values were found to be 304 and 42 for varying
particle diameter and tube surface wettability, respectively. The
values are greater than F0.01 (2, 4) equal to 18.0, indicating that
both the particle diameter and tube surface wettability have statistically signicant effects on the critical impact velocity.
142
4.2. Inuence of tube liquid volume (Vl) on critical impact velocity (vc)
The effect of liquid volume on the critical impact velocity for the
6.0 mm diameter polypropylene spherical particle impacting
inside a 17 mm diameter tube containing Milli-Q water (Exp. 15)
Fig. 5. Critical impact velocity (vc) versus particle to liquid volume (Vp/Vl). (Exp. 15:
vessel: un-silanized glass tube; liquid: Milli-Q water; D = 17 mm; dp = 6.0 mm.)
143
Fig. 8. Comparison of calculated and measured cavity proles. (Exp. 16: undisturbed airwater interface at initial state; measured prole at nal state; calculated
prole using YoungLaplace applying static (a)/advancing and (b) contact angles; vessel: un-silanized glass tube; liquid: Milli-Q water; D = 10 mm; dp = 5.0 mm.)
D = 10 mm
D = 20 mm
D = 30 mm
D = 40 mm
D = 46mm
D = 50mm
Fig. 9. Cavity meniscus prole versus vessel diameter (D). (Eq. (2); original meniscus
position; vessel: un-silanized glass tube; liquid: Milli-Q water; dp = 5.0 mm.)
144
Dc 2r 0 r 1 ;
Fig. 10. Particle critical height (h0) versus vessel diameter (D). (Conditions
correspond to those of Fig. 9.)
dh
0;
dr rDc =2
tube diameter; and as shown in Fig. 10, reaches a relatively constant value of about 6.4 mm beyond a vessel diameter of 44 mm.
The zero gradient can be used as a boundary condition for solving the YL equation for Zones 1 and 3.
The results shown in Figs. 9 and 10 for the cavity meniscus proles and particle critical height that the cavity produced by the penetrating particle is no longer inuenced by the boundary wall
when the vessel critical diameter, Dc, is greater than about
44 mm. Consider the situation shown in Fig. 11, which illustrates
dp
h
r
rf
h(t) v
TPCL (t)
vp=vc
hTPCL(t)
hTPCL
h0
rTPCL
vp(t)
vp=0
Control Volume
r0
Zone 1
Zone 2
r0
r1
rTPCL
hTPCL
Zone 3
h0
Control Volume
(d) Final state showing impact (1), flat (2) and meniscus (3) zones
Fig. 11. Penetrating particle arriving at its critical impact velocity.
Free surface
r
145
Liquid
5. Conclusions
(
h
p
L 21 sin us if us 6 p2
p
L 21 sin us if us > p2
The resultant plot of Eq. (8) using the system reported in Fig. 9
(5.0 mm polypropylene spherical particle falling into Milli-Q water
inside a glass vessel), is shown in Fig. 13 for contact angles in the
range 1080. For the experimental system the measured contact
angle was 60.5, and the point from the vertical surface at which
dh/dr is zero is approximately r = 15 mm. Hence, in estimating Dc
from Eq. (6), r1 can be assumed to be around 15 mm.
4.7.2. Length of Zone 1 (r0) in determination of vessel critical diameter
(Dc)
The cavity prole in Zone 1 can be calculated using the YL
equation with the following boundary conditions:
dh
j
dr rr TPCL
dh
j
dr rr 0
tanha a
0:
In this study the effect of the vessel wall and volume of the liquid phase on the critical impact velocity of the particle was investigated to simulate the idealized inuence of surrounding particles
on the critical impact velocity. It was found that for a particle penetrating into a conned volume of liquid that the critical impact
velocity increased with increasing static contact angle of the vessel
wall. When the particle-to-vessel diameter ratio increased beyond
about 0.2 it was also found that for a given particle diameter the
critical impact velocity increased with increasing vessel diameter.
The critical impact velocity remained relatively unchanged with
particle-to-liquid volume fraction less than 0.05. The liquid depth
seemed to have little inuence on the critical impact velocity for
the different liquids tested.
The experimental system was modelled using the YoungLaplace equation using both static and advancing contact angle measurements for both the particle and vessel surfaces. The model
predictions were generally in good agreement with the experimental observations, including showing increase in particle penetration
depth with increasing diameter and meniscus proles, both at the
particle impact point and the wall of the vessel. The predictions
were improved when the advancing contact angle was used, especially for the smaller diameter vessels where there was more liquid
motion. The YoungLaplace equation was also able to provide an
estimation of the critical (minimum) diameter of vessel required
so that the cavity prole generated by the impacting particle is unlikely to be inuenced by the vessel walls. The estimated critical
vessel diameter was consistent with experimental observations.
References
146
Fuerstenau, D.W., Williams, M.C., Diao, J., 1986. A novel technique for assessing
powder lyophobicity/lyophilicity. In: AIME Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
Fuerstenau, D.W., Williams, M.C., Narayanan, K.S., Diao, J.L., Urbina, R.H., 1988.
Assessing the wettability and degree of oxidation of coal by lm otation.
Energy & Fuels 2 (3), 237241.
Fuerstenau, D.W., Diao, J., Williams, M.C., 1991. Characterization of the wettability
of solid particles by lm otation 1. Experimental investigation. Colloids and
Surfaces 60, 127144.
Gontijo, C. de, F., Fornasiero, D., Ralston, J., 2007. The limits of ne and coarse
particle otation. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 85, 739747.
Kistler, S.F., Schweizer, P.M., 1997. Liquid Film Coating: Scientic Principles and
Their Technological Implications. Chapman & Hall, London and New York.
Kowalczuk, P.B., Drzymala, J., 2012. Surface otation of particles on liquids.
Principles and applications. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical
Engineering Aspects 393, 8185.
Laplace, P.S., 1805. la Thorie de Laction Capillaire. Trait demcanique cleste,
supplments au Livre X 4, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1805.
Lee, D., Kim, H., 2008. Impact of a super-hydrophobic spherical particle onto water.
Langmuir 24, 142145.
Lee, J., Tokuda, M., 1988. Penetrating behaviour of a single particle injected into
liquid. Transactions ISIJ 28, 278287.
Liu, D., 2012. Film otation of airborne particles impacting a gasliquid interface. In:
Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Newcastle, Australia, 2012.
Liu, D., He, Q., Evans, G.M., 2010a. Penetration behavior of individual hydrophilic
particle at a gasliquid interface. Advanced Powder Technology 21 (4), 401
411.
Liu, D., He, Q., Evans, G.M., 2010b. Flotation separation of mixtures of coal and silica
particles falling onto a moving water surface. In: 40th Annual Australasian
Chemical and Process Engineering Conference, Hilton Adelaide, SA, Australia,
September 2629, 2010.
Maust, E.J., Hollingsworth, C.A., 1942. Film Flotation. US Patent No 2293469.
Narita, K., Makino, T., Matsumoto, H., Ogawa, K., 1983. Tetsu-to-Hagane 69, 392.
Nguyen, A.V., 2003. New method and equations for determining attachment
tenacity and particle size limit in otation. International Journal of Minerals
Proceedings 68, 167182.
Ozawa, Y., Mori, K., 1983. Critical condition for penetration of solid particle into
liquid metal. Transactions ISIJ 23, 769774.
Paliy, G.M., Sidorenko, M.F., 1972. Features of the Injection of a GasPowder Stream
with the Metal being Blown. Metallurgiya, Moscow.
Peng, F.F., 1996. Surface energy and induction time of ne coals treated with various
levels of dispersed collector and their correlation to otation responses. Energy
& Fuels 10 (6), 12021207.
Pyke, B., 2004. Bubbleparticle capture in turbulent otation systems. In: Ph.D.
Thesis, University of South Australia, 2004.
Pyke, B., Fornasiero, D., Ralston, J., 2003. Bubbleparticle heterocoagulation under
turbulent conditions. Journal of Colloid Interface Science 265 (1), 141151.
Ralston, J., Fornasiero, D., Hayes, R., 1999. Bubbleparticle attachment and
detachment in otation. International Journal of Minerals Proceedings 56,
133164.
Sablik, J., 2004. Zero values of otation response and contact angle of coals in the
function of their critical surface tension of wetting. Journal of Pollution,
Minerals and Engineering Society 4 (1), 18.
Sablik, J., 2007. Energy characteristics of nest coal particles surfaces versus their
upgrading using otation. Physicochemical Problems of Minerals Processing 41,
6778.
Sablik, J., Wierzchowski, K., 1992. Evaluation of the inuence of otation reagents
on the hydrophobicity of coal using the lm otation method. Fuel 71 (4), 474
475.
Schimann, H.C.R., 2004. Force and energy measurement of bubbleparticle
detachment. In: Master Thesis.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University.
Schulze, H.J., 1977. New theoretical and experimental investigations on stability of
bubbleparticle aggregates in otation: a theory on the upper particle size of
oatability. International Journal of Minerals Proceedings 4, 241.
Schulze, H.J., 1993. Flotation as a heterocoagulation process: possibilities of
calculating the probability of otation. Surfactant Science Series (Coagulation
and Flocculation) 47, 321354.
Shahbazi, B., Rezai, B., Javad Koleini, S.M., 2009. The effect of hydrodynamic
parameters on probability of bubbleparticle collision and attachment.
Minerals Engineering 22 (1), 5763.
Somasundaran, P., Zhang, L., 2006. Adsorption of surfactants on minerals for
wettability control in improved oil recovery processes. Journal of Pest Science
Engineering 52, 198212.
Suicmez, T., Kizgut, S., 2010. Coal oatability characterization by lm otation.
Energy Sources A: Recovery Utilization Environmental Effects 32 (19), 1801
1811.
Tao, D., 2004. Role of bubble size in otation of coarse and ne particles a review.
Separation Science and Technology 39 (4), 741760.
Tran, D.N.H., Whitby, C.P., Fornasiero, D., Ralston, J., 2010. Selective separation of
very ne particles at a planar airwater interface. International Journal of
Mineral Processing 94 (12), 3542.
Vella, D., Metcalfe, P.D., 2007. Surface tension dominated impact. Physics of Fluids
19, 072108.
Walker, P.L., Petersen, E.E., Wright, C.C., 1952. Surface active agents phenomena in
dust abatement. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 44, 23892393.
Young, T., 1805. An essay on the cohesion of uids. Philosophical Transactions Royal
Society of London 95, 6587.
Zdziennicka, A., Szymczyk, K., Janczuk, B., 2009. Correlation between surface free
energy of quartz and its wettability by aqueous solutions of nonionic, anionic
and cationic surfactants. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 340, 243248.
Zisman, W.A., 1964. Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid
constitution. Advances in Chemistry 43, 151.