Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Kim Prohaska
Office: DEH 115
Dept:
Fall 2016
Office
10:00
11:30
Kim.Prohaska@sdstate.edu
Office
10:00
11:30
Office by
appointme
nt
or
by chance
3 credits
Location: DEH (Daktronics
CSC 150
S3
9:30
10:45
GE 109L
S3
Friday
Office by
appointme
nt
or
by chance
12:30
1:50
Office
2:00 3:30
Office
2:00 3:30
CSC 150
S5
3:30 4:45
CSC 150
S5
3:30 4:45
Textbook:
Problem Solving and Program Design In C, 8th Edition by Jeri R. Hanly &
Elliot B. Koffman. Published by Pearson 2016 (www.pearsonhighered.com/).
The 8th edition must be used. The text has been updated with different text,
problems, page #s, etc. Access to the text is required, but students may share
a text. The text is available in paper or online as an eText.
(http://www.mypearsonstore.com/bookstore/problem-solving-and-programdesign-in-c-9780134014890?xid=PSED )
Materials:
One USB storage device for assignments and class files. Any storage size available
for purchase should have enough capacity. (Storage device can be used for your
other courses as well.)
Page 1
Page 2
Outcomes:
Essential: Learning to apply course material to improve thinking, problem solving, and
decision making.
Important: Gaining factual knowledge, terminology, classifications, methods, and trends.
Course Evaluation Procedures / Performance Standards
Exam 1
25% of
Exam 2
grade
25% of
grade
Homework
Assignments,
Quizzes, &
Daily In-Class Work
Final Comprehensive
25% of
grade
25% of
grade
100 pt exam
Section 3: Monday, Dec. 12th @ 11:30 a.m. 1:30 p.m.
Section 5: Friday, Dec. 9th @ 4:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m.
Point
reduction
after the due date/time, but on or before the next class date after the due
date
-30%
-50%
nd
ZERO grade
Lab: Room 131 of Daktronics Engineering Hall (Note special postings in the lab for holiday
hours.)
Sunday
Monday - Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Attendance:
Attendance is required. If a student misses a class without a valid excuse, the student should
not expect individualized instructions over what was missed.
Exam Make-Up Policy:
Students who must miss an exam must notify the instructor or Student Affairs in advance.
Please use Student Affairs (688-4493, Admin 312) if it is necessary to miss an exam for
a valid reason such as a funeral, medical situation, or other circumstances. Your instructors
Page 3
will be contacted with notification of the absence. An excused absence will not be issued,
but it will eliminate questions and/or assumptions. Make-up quizzes and exams will be
alternative exams. If an exam or quiz is missed without advance notice, there will be a
reduction in points following the Late-Grading-Procedure noted in this document. All make-up
exams and quizzes must be taken within one week after the date on which the scheduled
exam is given, or a zero grade will be given. Whether the absence is excused or unexcused, it
is the students responsibility to contact the instructor to schedule a make-up exam or quiz.
Academic Success/ Starfish: The Starfish online success program will be used for
communication of various performance updates to you and to those dedicated to supporting
your success at SDSU. If you demonstrate any academic performance or behavioral problems
that may impede your success, a notice will be sent to you via Starfish.
If you receive a
message from Starfish, please see me or seek assistance from your advisor, the Student
Success Center, or other campus resources. The goal is to help you be successful in this
course and to make your learning experience as meaningful as possible. The Starfish link is
in D2L in the top left corner of the homepage.
Student Academic Integrity and Appeals (Cheating and Plagiarism Policy): All students
are expected to do their own work. All students involved in assignments handed in that
indicate copying or cheating will be given a zero grade for that work. Two or more students
sitting around one computer working on one file/program will be considered cheating.
Copying and then customizing another persons file/program will be considered cheating.
Upon discovery of cheating/plagiarism, all prior work is subject to review and a change of
grade, if applicable. Anyone caught cheating on an exam will be given a zero grade for that
exam. In addition, any violation of the academic policy must be reported to Student Affairs
and could result in disciplinary action by the University.
The University has a clear expectation for academic integrity and does not tolerate academic
dishonesty. University Policy 2.4 sets forth the definitions of academic dishonesty, which
includes but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, fabrication, facilitating academic
dishonesty, misrepresentation, and other forms of dishonesty relating to academics. The
Policy and its Procedures also set forth how charges of academic dishonesty are handled at
the University. Academic Dishonesty is strictly proscribed and if found may result in student
discipline up to and including dismissal from the University.
Student Accommodations: This course acknowledges the importance of ADA requirements.
Any student who feels s/he may need an accommodation based on the impact of a disability
should contact the Coordinator of Disability Services privately to discuss your specific needs.
Contact Disability Services at (688-4504) as soon as possible to coordinate reasonable
accommodations for students with documented disabilities. It is the students responsibility to
contact the Office of Disability Services to set up necessary accommodations. The instructor
must receive permission from the Office of Disability Services in order for any special
accommodations to be given.
Freedom In Learning: Under Board of Regents and University policy student academic
performance may be evaluated solely on an academic basis, not on opinions or conduct in
matters unrelated to academic standards. Students should be free to take reasoned
exception to the data or views offered in any course of study and to reserve judgment about
matters of opinion, but they are responsible for learning the content of any course of study
for which they are enrolled. Students who believe that an academic evaluation reflects
Page 4
Page 5