Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Key words: Flexor tendon repair; tendon sutures; core suture; peripheral suture; gap formation; yield force;
tensile strength; suture techniques; suture materials
Correspondence:
Anna Viinikainen, M.D.
Department of Hand Surgery
Helsinki University Central Hospital
P.O. Box 266
FIN - 00029 HUS
Helsinki, Finland
Email: anna.viinikainen@hus.
334
Two-strand repair techniques (Fig. 1) have been generally used in exor tendon repair. The strength of
the locking conguration of the modied Kessler repair (27) (also called as the Pennington modied
Kessler or Pennington repair) (Fig. 1C, Table 1) is
strong enough to withstand the forces of passive rehabilitation, but not early active motion, clinically
seen as increased rupture rates (28). The modied
Pennington conguration (Fig. 1D) has been intro-
335
Fig. 2. Multi-strand core suture techniques performed with single-stranded suture. A: Double modied locking Kessler (30), B: Cruciate
non-locked (31), C: Cruciate cross-stitch locked (32), D: 4-strand Savage (33), E: Augmented Becker (also called as MgH repair) (34),
F: 6-strand Savage (12), g: Modied Savage (35), H: Triple modied Kessler (30).
3S
3SB
Fig. 3. Multi-strand core suture techniques performed with doublestranded suture. A: Double loop suture (39), B: Triple loop suture
(39), C: Lim (42), D. Yoshizu (40).
LOOP CONFIgURATION
336
Core technique
Locking/
grasping
Core suture
Peripheral
technique
Peripheral
suture
Yield
force (N)
Stiffness
(N/mm)
Gap
force (N)
Ultimate
force (N)
Reference
Mod. Kessler
Locking
3-0 polyesther
Simple run.
6-0 polyprop.
26
9.5
21 (2mm)
35
23
Mod. Pennington
Locking
3-0 polyesther
Simple run.
6-0 polyprop.
47 (initial)
68
Tsuge
Locking
Simple run.
6-0 nylon
27
33
Mod. Kessler
Grasping
Locking
Locking
3-0 polyesther
3-0 polyesther
3-0 polyesther
Simple run.
6-0 polyprop.
48
6.4
6.8
11.8
20 (2mm)
25 (2mm)
57 (2mm)
38
46
68
16
16
23
Savage
Locking
Locking
3-0 polyesther
4-0 polyesther
Simple run.
Simple run.
6-0 polyprop.
6-0 polyprop.
45
50
12.5
11.4
56 (2mm)
36 (2mm)
68
56
23
23
Cruciate
Grasping
Grasping
Locking
Cross-stitch
4-0 polyesther
3-0 polyesther
3-0 polyesther
4-0 polyesther
Simple run.
Simple run.
6-0 polyprop.
6-0 nylon
5.9
6.7
10.2
44 (2mm)
20 (2mm)
22 (2mm)
52 (initial)
56
36
40
66
31
16
16
50
Double loop
Locking
Simple run.
6-0 polyprop.
41 (initial)
48
68
Mod. Kessler
Locking
Locking
3S 3-0 polyesther
3SB 3-0polyesther
Simple run.
Simple run.
6-0 polyprop.
6-0 polyprop.
44
55
10.3
10.8
47 (2mm)
58 (2mm)
53
66
25
25
Savage
Locking
4-0 polyesther
Simple run.
6-0 polyprop.
63
16.7
63 (2mm)
76
23
Mod. Becker
Locking
Locking
Locking
3-0 nylon
3-0 polyesther
3-0 polyethylene
Simple run.
Simple run.
Simple run.
5-0 nylon
5-0 nylon
5-0 nylon
48 (2mm)
58 (2mm)
60 (2mm)
69
82
124
24
24
24
Triple loop
Locking
Simple run.
6-0 polyprop.
56 (initial)
64
68
2-strand
4-strand
6-strand
The size of the gap at the measured force in parentheses. Mod. = modified, 3S = triple-stranded, 3SB = triple-stranded bound, simple run. = Simple
running, polyprop. = polypropylene.
formation increased (18). In the 4-strand cruciate repair the locking loops of 25% reached the highest gap
force, ultimate force, and stiffness (43).
CORE SUTURE PURCHASE
337
Previously, the volar placement of sutures was favored to avoid injury to the dorsally raising vasculature of the exor tendons. As diffusion from the synovial uid has been shown to be the major nutrient
pathway in all parts of the tendon (46), dorsal placement of sutures has also been advocated. In an in situ
testing model dorsally placed core sutures reached
signicantly higher breaking strength compared to
volar suture placement which was considered to be
due to the biomechanics of the joint and pulley system creating palmar compression and dorsal distraction at the repair (47).
PLACEMENT OF THE KNOTS
SUTURE CALIBRE
Despite numerous investigations on the tendon repair techniques, only a few have focused on the effect
of the suture calibre on the biomechanical properties
of exor tendon repairs. Increasing the suture calibre
has been shown to increase the ultimate force in static
testing (9, 14, 23, 49) and fatigue strength in dynamic
testing (13). However, it has not been shown to improve the yield force or gap resistance of the repairs
(23, 49).
The strength of the 4-0 suture has been reported to
be less than the holding capacity of several locking
and grasping repair techniques with failure occurring
predominantly by suture rupture (13, 14, 19, 23, 44,
50). With 3-0 suture failure both due to suture rupture
and pullout has been reported (9, 13, 14, 16, 23, 24).
The use of 3-0 suture has been recommended to offer
a margin of safety for the tendon repair through increased material strength (9, 13, 14), but it does not
improve the strength of the intact repair composite
(23).
SUTURE MATERIALS
338
Fig. 6. Peripheral suture techniques. A: Cross stitch (60), B: Lin (66), C: Halsted (64), D: Horizontal intraber (67), E: Simple running (63),
F: Simple running supercial and simple running deep (65).
339
340
55. Bourne RB, Bitar H, Andreae PR, Martin LM, Finlay JB, Marquis F: In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl,
Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS. Can J Surg 1988;31:4345
56. Kangas J, Paasimaa S, Mkel P, Leppilahti J, Trml P, Waris T, Ashammakhi N: Comparison of strength properties of
poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 and Polyglyconate (Maxon)
sutures: In vitro, in the subcutis, and in the Achilles tendon of
rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:121126
57. Kangas J, Pajala A, Leppilahti J, Ryhnen J, Lnsman S, Trml P, Waris T, Ashammakhi N: Histomorphometric analysis
of poly-L/D-lactide 96/4 sutures in the gastrocnemius tendon
of rabbits. Int J Artif Organs 2006;29:893899
58. Aoki M, Manske PR, Pruitt DL, Larson BJ: Tendon repair using
exor tendon splints: An experimental study. J Hand Surg
1994;19A:984990
59. gordon L, Tolar M, Rao KT, Ritchie RO, Rabinowitz S, Lamb
RP: Flexor tendon repair using a stainless steel internal anchor.
Biomechanical study on human cadaver tendons. J Hand Surg
1998;23B:3740
60. Silfverskild KL, Andersson CH: Two new methods of tendon
repair: An in vitro evaluation of tensile strength and gap formation. J Hand Surg 1993;18A:5865
61. Su BW, Solomos M, Barrow A, Senoge ME, gilberti M, Lubbers
L, Diao E, quitkin HM, Rosenwasser MP: Device for zone-II
exor tendon repair. A multicenter, randomized, blinded,
clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg 2005;87:923935
62. Wolfe SW, Willis AA, Campbell D, Clabeaux J, Wright TM:
Biomechanic comparison of the Teno Fix tendon repair device
with the cruciate and modied Kessler repairs. J Hand Surg
2007;32A:356366
63. Lister gD, Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Atasoy E: Primary exor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization.
J Hand Surg 1977;2:441451
64. Wade PJF, Wetherell Rg, Amis AA: Flexor tendon repair: Signicant gain in strength from the Halsted peripheral suture
technique. J Hand Surg 1989;14B:232235
65. Diao E, Hariharan JS, Soejima O, Lotz JC: Effect of peripheral
suture depth on strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg 1996;
21A:234239
66. Lin g-T, An K-N, Amadio PC, Cooney WP: Biomechanical
studies of running suture for exor tendon repair in dogs.
J Hand Surg 1988;13A:553558
67. Mashadi ZB, Amis AA: Strength of the suture in the epitenon
and within the tendon bres: development of stronger peripheral suture technique. J Hand Surg 1992;17B:171175
68. Labana N, Messer T, Lautenschlager E, Nagda S, Nagle D:
A biomechanical analysis of the modied Tsuge suture technique for repair of exor tendon lacerations. J Hand Surg
2001;26B: 297300