Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Atty Tizon
Lecture 2: 24 January 2014
4. Your friend told you, I will give you my MacBook if you pass the
bar. Meantime, somebody stole the macbook. You have the right of
action because you have an inchoate right to that object, although
the condition has not happened yet. You have a cause of action. Just
in case the eventuality happens, the corresponding obligation is
preserved.
a.
TYPES OF CONDITIONS
a) As to effect on obligation
1. Suspensive (condition precedent)
8. Coronel v CA (1996)
a.
of
resolutory
and
suspensive
ii. It is not the fact that Cirero and Hill sold the
property to Parks that is a violation of the contract.
it is the fact that a public school and a park was not
built on the property as originally agreed upon by
the parties. It should have been done within 6
months from the time of donation.
iii. The court did not grant the action fro revocation of
the donation.
11. Central Philippine University v CA (2005)
a.
2. Resolutory (condition
subsequent)
10. Parks v Province of Tarlac
a.
b. SC: The action having been filed after more than 10 years,
the heirs were already barred by prescription. After 6
months from the time of donation, the condition was not
complied with, they should have already demanded the
revocation of the donation.
i. Instead of doing that, the heirs let it pass for 10
years.
b. SC: the court discussed that, at the time Trinidad sold the
property, the donation was still in effect. The ownership of
the property is with the municipality. What Quijada could
have sold was her inchoate interest in the eventuality that
the condition is not complied with. However, what was sold
was the land itself.
i. Court applied the rules on sales, in such that, seller
sells a property which he does not own at the time
of sale but eventually acquires full ownership over
the property, the title passes to the buyer. This is
under Art 1434 of the civil code.
ii. Ownership was granted to Mondejar.
iii. The important aspect of this case is the explanation
how resolutory condition works. The effect is
restitution you give back what you received
from the contract.
b) As to effect on obligation
13. ORIGIN: Potestative, casual and mixed (Art 1182)
a. Potestative dependent on the will of the debtor/creditor
i. Depending on the debtor condition is void.
1. If the condition relates to the contract
being effective itself, the contract all
together is voided (see #2(a), p 1).
2. If the condition only related to the
fulfillment of the obligation, and there
is a pre-existing contractual relation
between parties, (meaning, the other party
has already delivered, and payment is
subject to the sole will of the payor), it is
deemed as if not imposed (see #2
(b), p 1)..
a. The effects are different.
b. If the obligation to pay depends
when the means of the debtor
permits him to fulfill his
obligation, it is deemed one with a
period. The court would have to fix
the period in such case (Art
1180).
ii. Depending on the creditor valid
b. Casual purely upon chance or upon the will of a third
person
i. Happening of the condition is beyond the control of
the parties.
c. Mixed Partly based on the will of the party and partly on
chance or will of a third person
1. Potestative
14. Lim v CA (1990): Potestative suspensive condition
a. FACTS: Respondent (lessee) and petitioner (lessor)
entered into a contract of lease to be renewed every 3 years.
The contract was renewed twice. When the lessee
manifested his intention to renew the contract for another
year, the lessor replied that he no longer wants to renew the
contract.
i. Lessee refused to vacate the premises, thus lessor
filed for an ejectment suit. Lessee counters that the
contract was a continuous one. The period of which
depended upon lessees need for the premises and
the their ability to pay.
b. SC: the condition is purely potestative condition because it
leaves the effectivity and enjoyment of leasehold right of he
sole and exclusive will of the lessee
i. The very reason that those kinds of stipulations are
not allowed, a renewal is actually a new contract in
itself. If it is dependent only on the sole will of the
lessee, it goes against the principle of
mutuality of contract.
ii. Case is similar to Encarnacio v Baldomar
15. Silos v PNB (2014) potestative suspensive condition
b.
SC: The court explained that the effect of the lifting of the
ceiling in the usury law does not give the parties unbridled
right to stipulate on very high interest to the point which
are already unconscionable, if not contrary to law.
i. more importantly, in this case, it was potestative on
the part of the bank. There is no consent of the
other party.
ii. Yes, you can agree on whatever interest. However,
this presupposes that both of the parties consented
to it. Without consent, the bank cannot unilaterally
impose upon the other party a new interest rate.
iii. Silos had several promissory note. He asked for an
accounting. SC said that only the interest in the
first set of promissory notes is valid. the other
promissory notes subject to the questioned
provision they are rendered void for lack of
consent. In default, the legal interest was applied.
2. Casual
16. NATELCO v CA (1994) Casual condition
a. FACTS: this is a case for rebus sic stantibus under 1267.
One of the defenses raise by NATELCO was the provision in
their contract which provides that the term or period for
the contract shall be as long as the NATELCO needs the
light post.
3. Mixed
17. Osmena v Rama (1909)
a. FACTS: Rama, the debtor, admitted her indebtedness to
Dona Osmena, which credit was later on transferred to
Respondent. Rama promised respondent that she will pay
her debt if the house of strong materials in which I live in
Pagina is sold.
b. SC: the condition is void as it depended upon her exclusive
will (Art 1115).
i. This case is discussed in some commentaries
because the court made a passing remark that that
condition is potestative thus void. However, if you
look at the decisions, it is more of a hypothetical
statement an obiter dictum.
ii. The condition of if her house is sold, it is not
purely dependent upon her. Even if she offers it for
sale, if there is no willing buyer, then the condition
e) As to expression
c) As to possibility
21. CONDITIONS AS TO POSSIBILITY
a.
Possible
d) As to Mode
Express
b. Implied
25. DIVISIBLE AND INDIVISIBLE
a.
b. Alternative
i. Ex: If it says, I will give you a car, provided that (1)
you pass the bar, or (2) you go to a lawfirm, or (3)
you become a senior associate in 3 years.
Happening of one of the conditions is sufficient.
a) As to effect on obligation
27. The main difference between with a term and with a condition is
certainty.
30. The period is presumed for the benefit of both parties, unless
from the tenor of the period or other circumstances it should
appear that the period was established in favor of one of the parties
(Art 1196).
a.
a.
Valid
Period
Dependent on
Dependent on
the sole will of
the sole will of
debtor
creditor
Court shall
fix the period
Valid
(1197)
29. Same as that in a condition, those that were paid by mistake can
also be recovered (Art 1195).
a.
Primordial consideration
33. 1198 gives you the enumeration of the instances when a debtor
would lose its right to the period. the obligation becomes
immediately due and demandable.
9
a.
b) As to effect on obligation
b. 50 years had lapsed. The court said that the general rule is
that the court would fix a period if there is no period
provided, subject to the intention of parties.
34. SOURCE:
a. Legal - These are the ones provided by law
i. Ex: reply to letters, you have a specific period based
on provisions
b. Voluntary these are the conventional, based on contracts
c. Judicial under 1197, the one fixed by court
c.
c) As to expression
See #11
the
parties
ii. Both parties were aware that the land was occupied
by the squatters. The court said that is precisely the
reason why they did not stipulate a specific period.
the understanding would have probably been that
37. EXPRESSION
a.
Express
b. Implied
d) As to expression
38. DEFINITENESS
a.
a.
Pure
b. Conditional
c.
With a period
i. Take note of the distinctions
ii. In the interim period, same rules apply to
conditional and with a period (1189).
Facultative
Choice to render substitute is given
to the debtor
42. LOSS/IMPOSSIBILITY
40. KIND
a. Simple alternative
i. The debtor is given several alternative obligations.
Complete fulfillment of one of those would
suffice to extinguish the obligation. Partial
fulfillment is not allowed
1.
a. Alternative
i. 1204 provides for rules in case of loss, the
valuation of the damage that has to be paid.
ii. The creditor shall have a right to indemnity
damages when, through fault of the debtor, all
things which are alternatively the object of
obligation have been lost, or the compliance of
obligation has become impossible.
for
the
the
the
Single
SOLIDARY
b. Joint
c.
b. Creditors
49. There can be a case of joint creditors and solidary debtors, and vice
versa. Look at the relation of debtors/creditors
Solidary
44. You can have a contract among 2 debtors and 3 creditors, or one
creditor and 3 debtors.
45. The obligation of the debtor/s or right to collect of the creditor/s
can be joint or solidary.
50. If it is demand from on of the solidary debtors, the debtor who paid
may seek for reimbursement from his co-debtors. That is an
internal arrangement already. But the creditor can go against any of
the debtors for the entire debt.
51. In case of insolvency
46. It does not follow that there are several subjects that there is
solidary. The presumption is joint.
a.
b. When the debtor who pay for the entire loan collects from
his co-debtors, everyone will share in the portion of the
insolvent debtor.
a.
If one of the co-debtor becomes insolvent, the other codebtors are liable in proportion.
Solidary
debtor
creditor
can
demand
the
entire obligation
from any of the
debtors.
With right of
reimbursement
Joint debtor
creditor can only
demand
the
proportionate
share of the
debtor from the
debt.
Solidary
creditor
any one of the
creditors
may
demand
the
entire obligation
against
the
debtor.
Joint creditor
a creditor can
only demand his
actual share in
the credit.
a.
53. 1221 provides that in case of loss, if it is without any fault on the
part of the debtor, the obligation is extinguished. But if there is fault
on the part of either of them, the obligation stands subject to
liability of the one at fault.
D. According to performance
55. According to performance:
a.
57. Just because the objects are physical divisible, it does not follow
that the obligation is divisible.
a.
Exception:
i. If there is a stipulation to the contrary or
ii. The party who should be liable for the penalty
refuse to pay the penalty or
iii. If he acted in bad faith.
1.
70. In case of penal clause, the debtor cannot opt to just pay the penalty
and forego with the compliance to the obligation. It happens when
there is best effort. Under provisions in human relations, one has to
exercise good faith in all ones dealings. Again, penal clause kicks in
when having tried, one cannot comply with the obligation. Obligor
cannot go straight to paying the penalty. The creditor can file a case
for specific performance or damages (actual and others, if there is
bad faith). See Art 1227
a. If the obligation is personal, a person cannot be compelled
to perform the obligation.
16