Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Chemical
Bonding I:
Lewis Theory
Bonding Theories
G.N. Lewis
(1875-1946)
Types of Bonds
We can classify bonds based on the kinds of
atoms that are bonded together
Types of Atoms
metals to
nonmetals
nonmetals to
nonmetals
metals to
metals
Tro: Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 2/e
Type of Bond
Ionic
Covalent
Metallic
5
Bond
Characteristic
electrons
transferred
electrons
shared
electrons
pooled
Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Types of Bonding
Ionic Bonds
When a metal atom loses electrons it becomes
a cation
metals have low ionization energy, making it
relatively easy to remove electrons from them
Covalent Bonds
loosely, and
Because chemical bonding involves the
transfer or sharing of electrons between two
or more atoms,
Valence electrons are most important in
bonding
Lewis theory focuses on the behavior of the
valence electrons
10
11
12
As
13
14
15
sharing electrons
Usually this results in all atoms obtaining an outer
shell with eight electrons
octet rule
there are some exceptions to this rulethe key to
remember is to try to get an electron configuration like a
noble gas
16
Octet Rule
When atoms bond, they tend to gain, lose, or share
Many exceptions
17
18
19
Li2O
20
21
Ca
Cl
Cl
Cl
Ca
Ca2+
CaCl2
Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
M3X2
22
Ionic Bonding
Model vs. Reality
23
Ionic Bonding
Model vs. Reality
Lewis theory implies that, in the liquid state or
when dissolved in water, the ions will have the
ability to move around
Lewis theory predicts that both a liquid ionic
compound and an ionic compound dissolved in
water should conduct electricity
Ionic compounds conduct electricity in the
liquid state or when dissolved in water
24
Lewis Theory of
Covalent Bonding
Another way atoms can achieve an octet of
25
Covalent Bonding:
Bonding and Lone Pair Electrons
Electrons that are shared by atoms are called
bonding pairs
Electrons that are not shared by atoms but
belong to a particular atom are called lone
pairs
aka nonbonding pairs
Bonding pairs
..
..
..
.. O .... S .. O ..
..
26
Lone pairs
H O
H
H O H
27
O
O
28
N N
29
Covalent Bonding
Model vs. Reality
30
H2
HCl
Tro: Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 2/e
31
O2
+
Tro: Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 2/e
H2 O
32
Covalent Bonding
Model vs. Reality
Lewis theory of covalent bonding implies that
the attractions between atoms are directional
the shared electrons are most stable between the
bonding atoms
33
Covalent Bonding
Model vs. Reality
Lewis theory predicts the melting and boiling points
of molecular compounds should be relatively low
involves breaking the attractions between the molecules,
but not the bonds between the atoms
the covalent bonds are strong, but the attractions
between the molecules are generally weak
34
Intermolecular Attractions
vs. Bonding
35
Covalent Bonding
Model vs. Reality
Lewis theory predicts that the hardness and
brittleness of molecular compounds should
vary depending on the strength of
intermolecular attractive forces
the kind and strength of the intermolecular
attractions varies based on many factors
36
Covalent Bonding
Model vs. Reality
Lewis theory predicts that neither molecular solids
nor liquids should conduct electricity
there are no charged particles around to allow the
material to conduct
37
Covalent Bonding
Model vs. Reality
Lewis theory predicts that the more electrons two
38
Covalent Bonding
Model vs. Reality
Lewis theory predicts that the more electrons two
atoms share, the shorter the bond should be
when comparing bonds to like atoms
39
40
HF
EN 2.1 H
EN 4.0
d+ H F d-
41
Bond Polarity
Most bonds have some degree of sharing and
some degree of ion formation to them
Bonds are classified as covalent if the amount
of electron transfer is insufficient for the
material to display the classic properties of
ionic compounds
If the sharing is unequal enough to produce a
dipole in the bond, the bond is classified as
polar covalent
Tro: Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 2/e
42
Electronegativity
The ability of an atom to attract bonding
43
Electronegativity Scale
44
0.4
100%
51%
2.0
Electronegativity Difference
45
4.0
Bond Polarity
ENCl = 3.0
3.0 3.0 = 0
Pure Covalent
ENCl = 3.0
ENH = 2.1
3.0 2.1 = 0.9
Polar Covalent
46
ENCl = 3.0
ENNa = 0.9
3.0 0.9 = 2.1
Ionic
stream of
water
attracted
to a
charged
glass rod
stream of
hexane not
attracted to
a charged
glass rod
47
48
49
Dipole Moments
50
51
52
Lewis Structures
of Molecules
Lewis theory allows us to predict the distribution
53
Beware!!
Lewis Theory predicts that atoms will be most stable
54
Lewis Structures
Generally try to follow the common bonding
patterns
C = 4 bonds & 0 lone pairs, N = 3 bonds & 1 lone pair,
O= 2 bonds & 2 lone pairs, H and halogen = 1 bond,
Be = 2 bonds & 0 lone pairs, B = 3 bonds & 0 lone pairs
often Lewis structures with line bonds have the lone pairs
left off
their presence is assumed from common bonding patterns
N
55
O
H O N O
N is central
not H
56
N=5
H=1
O3 = 36 = 18
Total = 24 e
Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
H3PO4
SeOF2
SO32
NO2
P2H4
57
16 e
H3PO4
32 e
SeOF2
SO32
NO2
P2H4
26 e
26 e
18 e
14 e
58
Formal Charge
During bonding, atoms may end with more or
fewer electrons than the valence electrons they
brought in order to fulfill octets
This results in atoms having a formal charge
FC = valence e nonbonding e bonding e
left OFC = 6 4 (4) = 0
S
FC = 6 2 (6) = +1
right O
FC = 6 6 (2) = 1
Sum of all the formal charges in a molecule = 0
in an ion, total equals the charge
Tro: Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 2/e
59
+1
0
+1
60
+
C
+
N
+
O
61
F
F
Incomplete octets
B, Al
Tro: Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 2/e
62
CO2
H3PO4
SeOF2
SO32
NO2
P2H4
63
CO2
H3PO4
all 0
P = +1
rest 0
SO32
SeOF2
S = +1
Se = +1
NO2
P2H4
all 0
64
Resonance
Lewis theory localizes the electrons between
65
Resonance Structures
When there is more than one Lewis structure for
..
..
..
.. O .... S .. O ..
..
Tro: Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 2/e
..
..
..
.. O .. S .... O ..
..
66
Resonance
67
number of electrons
Second row elements have a maximum of eight
electrons
bonding and nonbonding
third row can have expanded octet
68
69
1
1
+1
1
1
+1
Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
70
1
+2
71
Metallic Bonds
The low ionization energy of metals allows
72
Metallic Bonding
73
Metallic Bonding
Model vs. Reality
This theory implies that because the
Metallic Bonding
Model vs. Reality
Heat is a form of kinetic energy
Collisions between particles transfer Kinetic Energy
Metallic Bonding
Model vs. Reality
Metal ions get larger as you traverse down a
column
Since smaller metal ions should have higher
melting points, thus the melting points of
metals decrease down a column
76