Sei sulla pagina 1di 118

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 117

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Michael K. Friedland (SBN 157,217)


michael.friedland@knobbe.com
Lauren K. Katzenellenbogen (SBN 223,370)
lauren.katzenellenbogen@knobbe.com
Ali S. Razai (SBN 246,922)
ali.razai@knobbe.com
Samantha Y. Hsu (SBN 285,853)
samantha.hsu@knobbe.com
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 760-0404
Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OAKLEY, INC.

9
10
11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

OAKLEY, INC., a Washington


corporation,
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20

v.
TIME PLAZA, INC., a California
corporation,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. '16CV2029 LAB MDD


COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
INFRINGEMENT, TRADE DRESS
INFRINGEMENT, FALSE
DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN, AND
UNFAIR COMPETITION
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 2 of 117

1
2

Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. (Oakley) hereby complains of Time Plaza, Inc.


(Defendant) and alleges as follows:

3
4

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE


1.

This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the claims

in this action that relate to design patent infringement, trade dress infringement,

false designation of origin, and federal unfair competition pursuant to 35 U.S.C.

271 and 281, 15 U.S.C. 1116(a), 1125(a), and 28 U.S.C. 1331 and

1338 as these claims arise under the laws of the United States. This Court has

supplemental jurisdiction over the claims in this Complaint which arise under

10

state statutory and common law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a) because the

11

state law claims are so related to the federal claims that they form part of the

12

same case or controversy and derive from a common nucleus of operative facts.

13

2.

This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because

14

Defendant has a continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this

15

judicial district including by regularly doing and soliciting business and deriving

16

revenue from goods provided to individuals in this judicial district, including

17

but not limited to selling infringing eyewear directly to consumers and/or

18

retailers in this district and selling into the stream of commerce knowing such

19

eyewear products would be sold in California and this district, which acts form a

20

substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Oakleys claim.

21
22

3.

1390(d) and 1400(b).

23
24

Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b),

II. THE PARTIES


4.

Plaintiff Oakley is a corporation organized and existing under the

25

laws of the State of Washington, having its principal place of business at One

26

Icon, Foothill Ranch, California 92610.

27
28

5.

Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

Defendant Time Plaza, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the
-1-

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 3 of 117

laws of the State of California, having its principal place of business at 350 S.

Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, CA 90013.

6.

Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

Defendant regularly conducts business in, and has committed the acts alleged

herein, within this judicial district.

6
7

III. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS


7.

Oakley is one of the worlds most iconic brands. The company and

its products, particularly in the realm of eyewear, are instantly and universally

recognized for their innovative technology and distinctive style.

Since its

10

founding, Oakleys engineers and designers have worked continuously to bring

11

new technology and breakthrough designs to the market.

12

8.

Oakley has been actively engaged in the manufacture and sale of

13

high quality eyewear since at least 1985.

14

retailer of several lines of eyewear that have enjoyed substantial success and are

15

protected by various intellectual property rights owned by Oakley.

16

9.

Oakley is the manufacturer and

On February 12, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark

17

Office (U.S.P.T.O.) duly and lawfully issued United States Design Patent No.

18

D561,813 (the D813 Patent), titled EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS

19

FRONT. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in

20

the D813 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D813 Patent is attached hereto

21

as Exhibit 1.

22

10.

On December 11, 2007, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

23

United States Design Patent No. D557,325 (the D325 Patent), titled

24

EYEGLASS FRONT. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title,

25

and interest in the D325 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D325 Patent is

26

attached hereto as Exhibit 2.

27
28

11.

On December 11, 2007, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

United States Design Patent No. D557,326 (the D326 Patent), titled
-2-

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 4 of 117

EYEGLASS COMPONENTS. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all

right, title, and interest in the D326 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D326

Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 3.


12.

On November 6, 2007, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

United States Design Patent No. D554,689 (the D689 Patent), titled

EYEGLASS FRAME. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title,

and interest in the D689 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D689 Patent is

attached hereto as Exhibit 4.


13.

On June 5, 2012, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United

10

States Design Patent No. D661,339 (the D339 Patent), titled EYEGLASS.

11

Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D339

12

Patent. A true and correct copy of the D339 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit

13

5.

14

14.

On January 17, 2012, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

15

United States Design Patent No. D652,442 (the D442 Patent), titled

16

EYEGLASS.

17

interest in the D442 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D442 Patent is

18

attached hereto as Exhibit 6.

19

15.

Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and

On March 18, 2008, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

20

United States Design Patent No. D564,571 (the D571 Patent), titled

21

EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS COMPONENTS. Oakley is the owner by

22

assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D571 Patent. A true and correct

23

copy of the D571 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 7.

24

16.

On February 23, 2010, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

25

United States Design Patent No. D610,604 (the D604 Patent), titled

26

EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS COMPONENTS. Oakley is the owner by

27

assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D604 Patent. A true and correct

28

copy of the D604 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 8.


-3-

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 5 of 117

17.

On August 3, 2010, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United

States Design Patent No. D620,970 (the D970 Patent), titled EYEGLASS

COMPONENT. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and

interest in the D970 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D970 Patent is

attached hereto as Exhibit 9.

18.

On June 1, 2010, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United

States Design Patent No. D616,919 (the D919 Patent), titled EYEGLASS

FRONT. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in

the D919 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D919 Patent is attached hereto

10
11

as Exhibit 10.
19.

On June 28, 2011, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United

12

States Design Patent No. D640,725 (the D725 Patent), titled EYEGLASS

13

AND EYEGLASS COMPONENT. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all

14

right, title, and interest in the D725 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D725

15

Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 11.

16

20.

On February 5, 2013, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

17

United States Design Patent No. D675,666 (the D666 Patent), titled

18

EYEGLASS.

19

interest in the D666 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D666 Patent is

20

attached hereto as Exhibit 12.

21

21.

Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and

On February 19, 2013, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

22

United States Design Patent No. D676,479 (the D479 Patent), titled

23

EYEGLASS.

24

interest in the D479 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D479 Patent is

25

attached hereto as Exhibit 13.

26

22.

Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and

Defendant manufactures, uses, sells, offers for sale, and/or imports

27

into the United States eyewear that infringes Oakleys intellectual property

28

rights, including the D813 Patent, D325 Patent, D326 Patent, D689 Patent,
-4-

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 6 of 117

D339 Patent, D442 Patent, D571 Patent, D604 Patent, D970 Patent, D919

Patent, D725 Patent, D666 Patent, and D479 Patent (the Asserted Patents).
23.

3
4

Oakley has provided the public with constructive notice of its

patent rights pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 287.


24.

Oakley manufactures and sells sunglasses under the mark

HOLBROOK bearing distinctive trade dress in the overall design of the

sunglasses (HOLBROOK Trade Dress). An example of an Oakley product

bearing the distinctive HOLBROOK Trade Dress is depicted in the photograph

attached as Exhibit 14.


25.

10

As a result of Oakleys widespread use and display of the

11

HOLBROOK Trade Dress in association with its eyewear, (a) the public has

12

come to recognize and identify eyewear bearing the HOLBROOK Trade Dress

13

as emanating from Oakley, (b) the public recognizes that products bearing the

14

HOLBROOK Trade Dress constitute high quality products that conform to the

15

specifications created by Oakley, and (c) the HOLBROOK Trade Dress has

16

established strong secondary meaning and extensive goodwill.


26.

17

The HOLBROOK Trade Dress is not functional.

The design

18

features embodied by the HOLBROOK Trade Dress are not essential to the

19

function of the product, do not make the product cheaper or easier to

20

manufacture, and do not affect the quality of the product. The design of the

21

HOLBROOK Trade Dress is not a competitive necessity.


27.

22

Subsequent to Oakleys use and adoption of the HOLBROOK

23

Trade Dress, Defendant has developed, manufactured, imported, advertised,

24

and/or sold products that use trade dress that is confusingly similar to the

25

HOLBROOK Trade Dress.

26

///

27

///

28

///
-5-

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 7 of 117

28.

Defendants acts complained of herein have caused Oakley to

suffer irreparable injury to its business.

substantial loss and irreparable injury unless and until Defendant is enjoined

from its wrongful actions complained of herein.


29.

5
6

Oakley will continue to suffer

Oakley is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that

Defendants acts complained of herein are willful and deliberate.

30.

Defendants acts complained of herein have caused Oakley to

suffer irreparable injury to its business. Oakley will suffer substantial loss of

goodwill and reputation unless and until Defendant is preliminarily and

10

permanently enjoined from its wrongful actions complained of herein.

11
12
13
14

31.

IV. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF


(Patent Infringement)
(35 U.S.C. 271)
Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-30 of

this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

15

32.

This is a claim for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271.

16

33.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

17

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D813 Patent by

18

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

19

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

20

the claim of the D813 Patent, including for example, Defendants A135 and

21

A139 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

22

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
-6-

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 8 of 117

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A135

U.S. Patent No. D561,813

3
4
5
6
7
8
A139

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

34.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D813 Patent were

16

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

17

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

18

in the D813 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

19

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A135 and A139 model sunglasses are

20

nearly identical copies of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions

21

constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D813 Patent. Defendant

22

infringed the D813 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights.

23

Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that

24

its actions constituted infringement of the D813 Patent. Defendants acts of

25

infringement of the D813 Patent were not consistent with the standards of

26

commerce for its industry.

27
28

35.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D325
-7-

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 9 of 117

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially

similar to the claim of the D325 Patent, including for example, Defendants

A133 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A133

U.S. Patent No. D557,325

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

36.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D325 Patent were

15

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

16

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

17

in the D325 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

18

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A133 model sunglasses are a nearly

19

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

20

willful and intentional infringement of the D325 Patent. Defendant infringed

21

the D325 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

22

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

23

constituted infringement of the D325 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

24

of the D325 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

25

industry.

26

37.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

27

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D326

28

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear
-8-

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 10 of 117

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially

similar to the claim of the D326 Patent, including for example, Defendants

A133 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A133

U.S. Patent No. D557,326

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

38.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D326 Patent were

14

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

15

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

16

in the D326 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

17

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A133 model sunglasses are a nearly

18

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

19

willful and intentional infringement of the D326 Patent. Defendant infringed

20

the D326 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

21

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

22

constituted infringement of the D326 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

23

of the D326 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

24

industry.

25

39.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

26

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D689

27

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

28

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially


-9-

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 11 of 117

similar to the claim of the D689 Patent, including for example, Defendants

A141 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A141

U.S. Patent No. D554,689

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

40.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D689 Patent were

14

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

15

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

16

in the D689 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

17

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A141 model sunglasses are a nearly

18

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

19

willful and intentional infringement of the D689 Patent. Defendant infringed

20

the D689 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

21

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

22

constituted infringement of the D689 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

23

of the D689 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

24

industry.

25

41.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

26

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D339

27

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

28

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially


- 10 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 12 of 117

similar to the claim of the D339 Patent, including for example, Defendants

A137 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A137

U.S. Patent No. D661,339

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

42.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D339 Patent were

13

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

14

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

15

in the D339 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

16

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A137 model sunglasses are a nearly

17

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

18

willful and intentional infringement of the D339 Patent. Defendant infringed

19

the D339 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

20

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

21

constituted infringement of the D339 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

22

of the D339 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

23

industry.

24

43.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

25

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D442

26

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

27

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially

28

similar to the claim of the D442 Patent, including for example, Defendants
- 11 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 13 of 117

A136 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A136

U.S. Patent No. D652,442

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

44.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D442 Patent were

13

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

14

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

15

in the D442 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

16

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A136 model sunglasses are a nearly

17

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

18

willful and intentional infringement of the D442 Patent. Defendant infringed

19

the D442 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

20

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

21

constituted infringement of the D442 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

22

of the D442 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

23

industry.

24

45.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

25

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D571

26

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

27

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially

28

similar to the claim of the D571 Patent, including for example, Defendants
- 12 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 14 of 117

A132 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A132

U.S. Patent No. D564,571

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

46.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D571 Patent were

13

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

14

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

15

in the D571 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

16

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A132, model sunglasses are a nearly

17

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

18

willful and intentional infringement of the D571 Patent. Defendant infringed

19

the D571 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

20

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

21

constituted infringement of the D571 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

22

of the D571 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

23

industry.

24

47.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

25

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D604

26

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

27

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially

28

similar to the claim of the D604 Patent, including for example, Defendants
- 13 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 15 of 117

A066 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A066

U.S. Patent No. D610,604

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

48.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D604 Patent were

14

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

15

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

16

in the D604 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

17

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A066 model sunglasses are a nearly

18

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

19

willful and intentional infringement of the D604 Patent. Defendant infringed

20

the D604 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

21

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

22

constituted infringement of the D604 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

23

of the D604 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

24

industry.

25

49.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

26

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D970

27

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

28

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially


- 14 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 16 of 117

similar to the claim of the D970 Patent, including for example, Defendants

A066 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A066

U.S. Patent No. D620,970

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

50.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D970 Patent were

14

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

15

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

16

in the D970 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

17

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A066 model sunglasses are a nearly

18

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

19

willful and intentional infringement of the D970 Patent. Defendant infringed

20

the D970 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

21

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

22

constituted infringement of the D970 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

23

of the D970 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

24

industry.

25

51.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

26

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D919

27

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

28

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially


- 15 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 17 of 117

similar to the claim of the D919 Patent, including for example, Defendants

A066 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A066

U.S. Patent No. D616,919

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

52.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D919 Patent were

14

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

15

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

16

in the D919 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

17

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A066 model sunglasses are a nearly

18

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

19

willful and intentional infringement of the D919 Patent. Defendant infringed

20

the D919 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

21

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

22

constituted infringement of the D919 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

23

of the D919 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

24

industry.

25

53.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

26

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D725

27

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

28

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially


- 16 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 18 of 117

similar to the claim of the D725 Patent, including for example, Defendants

A081 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A081

U.S. Patent No. D640,725

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

54.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D725 Patent were

13

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

14

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

15

in the D725 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

16

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A081 model sunglasses are a nearly

17

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

18

willful and intentional infringement of the D725 Patent. Defendant infringed

19

the D725 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

20

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

21

constituted infringement of the D725 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

22

of the D725 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

23

industry.

24

55.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

25

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D666

26

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

27

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially

28

similar to the claim of the D666 Patent, including for example, Defendants
- 17 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 19 of 117

A130 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale

on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

A130

U.S. Patent No. D675,666

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

56.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D666 Patent were

12

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

13

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

14

in the D666 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

15

the eyewear industry, and Defendants A130 model sunglasses are a nearly

16

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

17

willful and intentional infringement of the D666 Patent. Defendant infringed

18

the D666 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

19

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

20

constituted infringement of the D666 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

21

of the D666 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

22

industry.

23

57.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

24

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D479

25

Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear

26

having a design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially

27

similar to the claim of the D479 Patent, including for example, Defendants

28

///
- 18 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 20 of 117

AR205 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for

sale on Defendants website, www.wholesales4u.net.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

AR205

U.S. Patent No. D676,479

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
58.

12

Defendants acts of infringement of the D479 Patent were

13

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

14

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

15

in the D479 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

16

the eyewear industry, and Defendants AR205 model sunglasses are a nearly

17

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

18

willful and intentional infringement of the D479 Patent. Defendant infringed

19

the D479 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

20

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

21

constituted infringement of the D479 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

22

of the D479 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

23

industry.

24

59.

As a direct and proximate result of Defendants acts of

25

infringement, Defendant has derived and received gains, profits, and advantages

26

in an amount that is not presently known to Oakley.

27

///

28

///
- 19 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 21 of 117

60.

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, Oakley is entitled to damages for

Defendants infringing acts and treble damages together with interests and costs

as fixed by this Court.


61.

4
5

attorneys fees for the necessity of bringing this claim.


62.

6
7

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289, Oakley is entitled to Defendants total

profits from Defendants infringement of Oakleys design patents.


63.

8
9

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285, Oakley is entitled to reasonable

Due to the aforesaid infringing acts, Oakley has suffered great and

irreparable injury, for which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.


64.

10

Defendant will continue to directly and/or indirectly infringe

11

Oakleys patent rights to the great and irreparable injury of Oakley, unless

12

enjoined by this Court.

13

V. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

14

(Federal Trade Dress Infringement)


(15 U.S.C. 1125(a))

15
16
17

65.

Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-30 of

this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

18

66.

19

1125(a).

20

67.

This is a claim for trade dress infringement under 15 U.S.C.

Subsequent to Oakleys use and adoption of the HOLBROOK

21

Trade Dress, Defendant has developed, manufactured, imported, advertised,

22

and/or sold products that use trade dress that is confusingly similar to the

23

HOLBROOK Trade Dress. As shown below, for example, Defendants A131

24

model sunglasses use trade dress that is confusingly similar to Oakleys

25

HOLBROOK Trade Dress.

26

///

27

///

28

///
- 20 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 22 of 117

Accused Product

A131

http://wholesales4u.net/product_info.php?cPat

HOLBROOK TRADE DRESS

4
5
6
7
8
9
h=24&products_id=72

10
11

68.

Defendants use of the HOLBROOK Trade Dress in connection

12

with its sunglasses is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to

13

deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of Defendant with

14

Oakley.

15

69.

Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

16

Defendants acts of trade dress infringement were undertaken willfully with the

17

express intent to cause confusion, and to mislead and deceive the purchasing

18

public.

19

70.

Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

20

Defendant has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,

21

gains, profits, and advantages from Defendants trade dress infringement in an

22

amount that is not presently known to Oakley.

23

actions, constituting trade dress infringement, Oakley has been damaged and is

24

entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

25

71.

By reason of Defendants

Due to Defendants actions, constituting trade dress infringement,

26

Oakley has suffered and continues to suffer great and irreparable injury, for

27

which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law.

28

///
- 21 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 23 of 117

72.

Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117, Oakley is entitled to damages for

Defendants infringing acts, up to three times actual damages as fixed by this

Court, and its reasonable attorneys fees for the necessity of bringing this claim.

VI. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(Federal Unfair Competition & False Designation of Origin)


(15 U.S.C. 1125(a))

6
7
8
9
10
11

73.

Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-30

and 66-72 of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.


74.

This is a claim for unfair competition and false designation of

origin arising under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).


75.

Defendants use of the HOLBROOK trade dress without Oakleys

12

consent constitutes a false designation of origin, false or misleading description

13

of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which is likely to cause

14

confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or

15

association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship,

16

or approval of his or her goods or commercial activities by another person in

17

violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

18

76.

Defendants use of the HOLBROOK trade dress without Oakleys

19

consent constitutes a false designation of origin, false or misleading description

20

of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which in commercial

21

advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or

22

geographic origin of his or her or another persons goods or commercial

23

activities in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).

24

77.

Such conduct by Defendant is likely to confuse, mislead, and

25

deceive Defendants customers, purchasers, and members of the public as to the

26

origin of the HOLBROOK Trade Dress or cause said persons to believe that

27

Defendant and/or its products have been sponsored, approved, authorized, or

28

licensed by Oakley or are in some way affiliated or connected with Oakley, all
- 22 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 24 of 117

in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) and constitutes unfair competition with

Oakley.
78.

Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

Defendants actions were undertaken willfully with full knowledge of the falsity

of such designation of origin and false descriptions or representations.


79.

Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

Defendant has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,

gains, profits, and advantages from Defendants false designation of origin, false

or

misleading

statements,

descriptions

of

fact,

false

or

misleading

10

representations of fact, and/or unfair competition in an amount that is not

11

presently known to Oakley. By reason of Defendants actions, constituting false

12

designation of origin, false or misleading statements, false or misleading

13

descriptions of fact, false or misleading representations of fact, and/or unfair

14

competition, Oakley has been damaged and is entitled to monetary relief in an

15

amount to be determined at trial.


80.

16

Due to Defendants actions, constituting false designation of origin,

17

false or misleading statements, false or misleading description of fact, false or

18

misleading representations of fact, and/or unfair competition, Oakley has

19

suffered and continues to suffer great and irreparable injury, for which Oakley

20

has no adequate remedy at law.


81.

21

Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117, Oakley is entitled to damages for

22

Defendants acts constituting false designation of origin, false or misleading

23

statements, false or misleading descriptions of fact, false or misleading

24

representations of fact, and/or unfair competition, up to three times actual

25

damages as fixed by this Court, and its reasonable attorneys fees for the

26

necessity of bringing this claim.

27

///

28

///
- 23 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 25 of 117

VII. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

(California Unfair Competition)

3
4
5
6
7

82.

Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-30

and 66-81 of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.


83.

This is a claim for unfair competition, arising under California

Business & Professions Code 17200, et seq. and California common law.
84.

Defendants acts of trade dress infringement, and false designation

of origin, complained of herein constitute unfair competition with Oakley under

the common law and statutory laws of the State of California, particularly

10
11

California Business & Professions Code 17200 et seq.


85.

Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

12

Defendant has derived and received, and will continue to derive and receive,

13

gains, profits, and advantages from Defendants unfair competition in an

14

amount that is not presently known to Oakley.

15

wrongful acts as alleged in this Complaint, Oakley has been damaged and is

16

entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.

17

86.

By reason of Defendants

By its actions, Defendant has injured and violated the rights of

18

Oakley and has irreparably injured Oakley, and such irreparable injury will

19

continue unless Defendant is enjoined by this Court.

20
21
22
23
24

WHEREFORE, Oakley prays for judgment in its favor against


Defendant for the following relief:
A.

An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed the

Asserted Patents under 35 U.S.C. 271;


B.

A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its

25

respective officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and

26

those persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from (1)

27

making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing any of the following

28

products shown above in the Complaint: Defendants A135, A139, A133, A141,
- 24 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 26 of 117

A137, A136, A132, A066, A081, A130, and AR205 products, and any products

that are not colorably different from these products, and (2) directly or indirectly

infringing the Asserted Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271;

C.

That Defendant accounts for all gains, profits, and advantages

derived by Defendants infringement of the Asserted Patents in violation of

35 U.S.C. 271, and that Defendant pays to Oakley all damages suffered by

Oakley and/or Defendants total profit from such infringement pursuant to 35

U.S.C. 289;

D.

That the Court find for Oakley and against Defendant on Oakleys

10

claims of trade dress infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair

11

competition under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a);

12

E.

That the Court issue a preliminary and permanent injunction

13

against Defendant, its agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors,

14

and assigns, and all persons, firms, or corporations in active concert or

15

participation with Defendant, enjoining them from engaging in the following

16

activities and from assisting or inducing, directly or indirectly, others to engage

17

in the following activities:

18

1. Manufacturing, importing, marketing, displaying, distributing,

19

offering to sell, and/or selling Defendants A131 product shown

20

above and any products that are not colorably different therefrom;

21

2. using Oakleys HOLBROOK Trade Dress, or any other trade dress

22

that is confusingly similar to either Oakleys HOLBROOK Trade

23

Dress;

24

3. falsely designating the origin of Defendants goods;

25

4. unfairly competing with Oakley in any manner whatsoever;

26

5. causing a likelihood of confusion or injuries to Oakleys business

27
28

reputation
6. manufacturing, importing, marketing, displaying, distributing,
- 25 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 27 of 117

offering to sell, and/or selling any goods that infringe

HOLBROOK Trade Dress; and

F.

That an accounting be ordered to determine Defendants profits

resulting from its trademark and trade dress infringement, false designation of

origin, and unfair competition, and that Oakley be awarded monetary relief in an

amount to be fixed by the Court in its discretion as it finds just as an equitable

remedy and as a remedy under 15 U.S.C. 1117, including:

1. all profits received by Defendant from sales and revenues of any

kind made as a result of its infringing actions, said amount to be


trebled;

10
11

2. all damages sustained by Oakley as a result of Defendants acts of

12

trade dress infringement, unfair competition, and false designation

13

of origin, and that such damages be trebled; and


3. punitive damages stemming from Defendants willful, intentional,

14

and malicious acts;

15
16
17
18
19
20

G.

That such damages and profits be trebled and awarded to Oakley

pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117;


H.

An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case, including each

of Oakleys patent infringement and Lanham Act claims;


I.

That, because of the exceptional nature of this case resulting from

21

Defendants deliberate infringing actions, this Court award to Oakley all

22

reasonable attorneys fees, costs, and disbursements incurred as a result of this

23

action, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117;

24
25
26
27

J.

That Oakley recover exemplary damages pursuant to California

Civil Code 3294;


K.

An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damages

because of Defendants willful conduct pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284;

28
- 26 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 28 of 117

1
2
3
4
5
6

L.

An award to Oakley of the attorney fees, expenses, and costs

incurred by Oakley in connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285;


M.

An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of

this action against Defendant; and,


N.

Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and

proper.

Respectfully submitted,

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Dated: August 11, 2016

By: /s/ Lauren Keller Katzenellenbogen


Michael K. Friedland
michael.friedland@knobbe.com
Lauren Keller Katzenellenbogen
lauren.katzenellenbogen@knobbe.com
Ali S. Razai
ali.razai@knobbe.com
Samantha Y. Hsu
samantha.hsu@knobbe.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OAKLEY, INC.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 27 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 29 of 117

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL


Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so

2
3

triable.

Respectfully submitted,

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

6
7
8

Dated: August 11, 2016

9
10
11
12
13

By: /s/Lauren Keller Katzenellenbogen


Michael K. Friedland
michael.friedland@knobbe.com
Lauren Keller Katzenellenbogen
lauren.katzenellenbogen@knobbe.com
Ali S. Razai
ali.razai@knobbe.com
Samantha Y. Hsu
samantha.hsu@knobbe.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OAKLEY, INC.

14
23793258

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 28 -

COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 30 of 117

TABLE OF EXHIBITS

Page #

Exhibit 1................................................................................................................ 1

Exhibit 2................................................................................................................ 6

Exhibit 3.............................................................................................................. 11

Exhibit 4.............................................................................................................. 17

Exhibit 5.............................................................................................................. 22

Exhibit 6.............................................................................................................. 27

Exhibit 7.............................................................................................................. 33

10

Exhibit 8.............................................................................................................. 38

11

Exhibit 9.............................................................................................................. 43

12

Exhibit 10............................................................................................................ 49

13

Exhibit 11............................................................................................................ 53

14

Exhibit 12............................................................................................................ 62

15

Exhibit 13............................................................................................................ 68

16

Exhibit 14............................................................................................................ 73

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

23990460

25

081116

26
27
28
TABLE OF EXHIBITS

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 31 of 117

EXHIBIT 1

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 32 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD561813S

(12)

United States Design Patent

(10)

Baden et al.

(45)

(54)

EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS FRONT

(75)

Inventors: Colin Baden, Irvine, CA (US); Jamin


Jannard, Ladera Ranch, CA (US); Lek
Thixton, Orcas, WA (US)

(73)

Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

(**)

Tenn:

(21)

Appl. No.: 291255,272

(22)

Filed:

(51)
(52)
(58)

LOC (8) Cl. ................................................. 16-06


U.S. Cl. ..................................... D16/325; D16/326
Field of Classification Search ....... DI6/300-330,
D16/101,332-338; D29/109-110; D241110.2;
351141,44,51-52,62, 158,92, 103-111,
3511156,61, 114-119, 121-123; 2/426-432,
2/447-449,441,434-437
See application file for complete search history.

Patent No.:
Date of Patent:

D335,133
D362,260
D372,726
D384,364
5,760,868
D423,035
6,233,342
D449,641
D464,669
D478,929
D484,173
D489,394
D508,515

14 Years

Mar. 6, 2006

S
S
S
S
A
S
Bl
S
S
S
S
S
S

4/1993
9/1995
8/1996
9/1997
6/1998
4/2000
5/2001
1012001
1012002
8/2003
12/2003
5/2004
8/2005

US D561,813 S
** Feb. 12, 2008

Langley ..................... D16/325


Lin
Simioni
Yee
Jannard et aI.
Yee et al.
Fernandez
Arnette
Thixton et al.
Baden et al.
Jannard et aI.
Teng
Yee et al.

OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Berthet-Bondet. B.B. sol 1968, Sunglass Catalogue, p. 2, 10.
Optical Journal & Review of Optometry, Nov. 1, 1971, p. 12.
Spy Sunglasses. Curtis Black Fade. www.spyoptic.com!
the_products/fashion_sunglasses/index.
cfm?ModeIName~Fashion/Curtis.

* cited by examiner
Primary Examiner-Raphael Barkai
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Gregory K. Nelson

References Cited

(56)

(57)

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


DI84,274
D190,884
D192,884
D198,939
0200,734
0200,735
0202,658
0205,419
D215,761
3,476,466
D218,569
3,689,136
D243,237
D309,149
D309,618
D313,236
4,976,530

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
A
S
A
S
S
S
S
A

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

111959
711961
511962
811964
311965
311965
1011965
811966
1011969
1111969
911970
911972
211977
711990
711990
1211990
1211990

Darr
Rose et al.
Pettito
Huggins
Zurich
Mitchell
Pettito
Griss
Mitchell .................... D16/325
Hopkins
McCracken ................ D16/325
Atamian .. ..... ... ... ... ...... 351144
Teufelhart .................. D16/325
Pouilloux .................. D16/326
Evans ....................... D16/325
Mackay ..................... D16/314
Mackay et al. ............... 351144

CLAIM

The ornamental design for an eyeglass and eyeglass front, as


shown and described.
DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of the eyeglass and the
eyeglass front of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a left-side elevational view thereof, the right-side
elevational view being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.

EXHIBIT 1
Page 1

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 33 of 117

u.s. Patent

Feb. 12,2008

Sheet 1 of 4

FIG.l

EXHIBIT 1
Page 2

US D561,813 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 34 of 117

u.s. Patent

Feb. 12,2008

Sheet 2 of 4

FIG. 2

FIG. 3

FIG. 4
EXHIBIT 1
Page 3

US D561,813 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 35 of 117

u.s. Patent

Feb. 12,2008

Sheet 3 of 4

FIG. 5
EXHIBIT 1
Page 4

US D561,813 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 36 of 117

u.s. Patent

Feb. 12,2008

Sheet 4 of 4

FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 1
Page 5

US D561,813 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 37 of 117

EXHIBIT 2

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 38 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD557325S

(12)

United States Design Patent

(10)

Jannard et al.

(45)

(54)

EYEGLASS FRONT

(75)

Inventors: James H. Jannard, Spieden Island, WA


(US); Hans Karsten Moritz, Foothill
Ranch, CA (US); Colin Baden, Irvine,
CA (US)

(73)

Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

(**)

Tenn:

(21)

Appl. No.: 291288,122

(22)

Filed:

D420,035
D425,103
6,233,342
D461,834
D462,375
D464,669
D470,166
D473,892
D484,173
D485,570
D489,394
D497,380
D505,151
D514,613
D523,461
7,182,459
D539,830
D542,330

14 Years

May 30,2007
Related U.S. Application Data

(62)
(51)
(52)
(58)

Division of application No. 29/262,974, filed on luI.


14,2006.
LOC (8) Cl. ................................................. 16-06
U.S. Cl. ..................................................... D16/326
Field of Classification Search ............... D161101,
D16/300-334, 335, 336-330, 332-338, 341,
D16/342; D211190; D241110.2; 2112,13,
2/426,432,434-437,441,447-449,453;
351/41,44,47,51,61-63,83,89,90,158;
D14/137, 156, 157, 168, 169, 188, 189-199,
D14/265,446; D271148; 359/618; 3811327
See application file for complete search history.
References Cited

(56)

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


DI84,274
D190,884
D192,884
D198,939
0200,734
0200,735
0202,658
D209,892
3,591,263
4,703,522
D372,726
D399,866

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
A
A
S
S

*
*
*
*

111959
711961
511962
811964
311965
311965
1011965
111968
711971
1111987
811996
1011998

Darr
Rose et al.
Pettito
Huggins
Zurich
Mitchell
Pettito
McCracken ................ D12/605
Esterson ...................... 351144
Schurle et al. ................. 2/432
Simioni
Yee ........................... D16/330

Patent No.:
Date of Patent:
S
S
Bl
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Bl
S
S

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

212000
5/2000
5/2001
8/2002
912002
1012002
212003
4/2003
1212003
112004
5/2004
1012004
5/2005
212006
6/2006
212007
4/2007
5/2007

US D557,325 S
** Dec. 11, 2007

Hartman .................... D16/325


Yee et al. .................. D16/326
Fernandez
Jannard et aI. ............ D16/326
Baden et al. .............. D16/326
Thixton et al. ............ D16/326
Yee et al. .................. D16/326
Thixton et al. ............ D16/314
Jannard et aI.
Teng ......................... D16/314
Teng
Thixton et al. ............ D16/326
Windham .................. D16/326
Jannard et aI.
Jannard et aI.
Chen .......................... 3511158
Saderholm et al. ........ D16/326
Elmore ...................... D16/326

OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 291227,719, filed Apr. 13,2005, Jannard, et
al.

(Continued)
Primary Examiner-T. Chase Nelson
Assistant Examiner-Barbara B Lohr
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Gregory K. Nelson

(57)

CLAIM

The ornamental design for an eyeglass front, as shown and


described.
DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of the eyeglass front of the
present invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left-side elevational view thereof, the right-side
elevational view being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof.

EXHIBIT 2
Page 6

1 Claim, 3 Drawing Sheets

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 39 of 117


US D557,325 S
Page 2
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Pending U.S. App!. No. 291262,974, Jannard, et a!.
Asia Pacific Trading Co., Inc. Fashion Plastic Collection IL Asia
Pacific Trading Co. Catalogue 1999-2000, p. 31.

Asia Pacific Trading Co., Inc. Metal & Plastic Combination V, Asia
Pacific Trading Co. Catalogue 1999-2000, p. 2.
Berthet-Bondet, B.B. sol 1968, Sunglass Catalogue, pp. 2, 10.
Optical Journal & Review of Optometry, Nov. 1, 1971, p. 12.

* cited by examiner

EXHIBIT 2
Page 7

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 40 of 117

u.s. Patent

Dec. 11, 2007

US D557,325 S

Sheet 1 of 3

..: ..

,',

.,~

FIG.l

EXHIBIT 2
Page 8

.:

',',','

.~., .. ....

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 41 of 117

u.s. Patent

Dec. 11, 2007

Sheet 2 of 3

FIG. 2

FIG. 3

FIG. 4
EXHIBIT 2
Page 9

US D557,325 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 42 of 117

u.s. Patent

Dec. 11, 2007

Sheet 3 of 3

FIG. 5

FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 2
Page 10

US D557,325 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 43 of 117

EXHIBIT 3

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 44 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD557326S
USO0D557326S

(12) United States Design Patent (10)


(10) Patent No.:
N0.:

(12)

Jannard
J annard et al.
a].

(45)

(54)
(54)

EYEGLASS COMPONENTS

(75)

Inventors: James H. Jannard, Spieden Island, WA


(US); Hans Karsten Moritz, Foothill
Ranch, CA (US); Colin Baden, Irvine,
CA (US)

(73)
(73)

Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

(**)
(**)

Tenn:
Term:

(21)
(21)

Appl. No.: 291288,607


29/288,607

(22)
(22)

Filed:

6,233,342
D461,834
D462,375
D462,375
D464,669
D470,166
D470,166
D473,892
D484,173
D485,570
D489,394
D497,380
D505,151
D505,151
D514,613
D523,461
7,182,459
D539,830
D542,330
D542,330

14 Years

Jun. 15, 2007


Related U.S.
US. Application Data

(62)
(62)

Division of application No. 29/262,974, filed


?led on luI.
Jul.
14,2006.
14, 2006.

(51)
(51)
(52)
(52)
(58)
(58)

LOC
LOC (8) Cl.
Cl. .................................................
............................................... .. 16-06
16-06
U.S.
US. Cl.
Cl. .....................................................
................................................... .. D16/326
D16/326
Field of Classification
Classi?cation Search ...............
............. .. D161101,
D16/ 101,
D16/300-334,
Dl6/300i334, 335, 336-330,
336*330, 332-338,
332*338, 341,
D16/342; D211190;
D21/190; D241110.2;
D24/110.2; 2112,13,
2/12,13,
2/426,432,434-437,441,447-449,453;
2/426, 432, 4344137, 441, 447*449, 453;
351/41,44,47,51,61-63,83,89,90,158;
351/41, 44, 47, 51, 61*63, 83, 89, 90, 158;
D14/137, 156,
157, 168, 169, 188, 189-199,
156,157,168,
189*199,
D14/265,446;
D14/265, 446; D271148;
D27/148; 359/618; 3811327
381/327
See application file
?le for complete search history.

Bl
B1
S **
S
S
**
S **
S
S
**
S **
S
S **
S
S **
S
S *
*
S
S
Bl
*
B1*
S **
S
S *
*

5/2001
8/2002
912002
9/2002
1012002
10/2002
212003
2/2003
4/2003
1212003
12/2003
112004
1/2004
5/2004
1012004
10/2004
5/2005
212006
2/2006
6/2006
212007
2/2007
4/2007
5/2007

Fernandez
JJannard
annard et aI.
a1. ............
.......... .. D16/326
Baden
Baden et
et al.
al. ..............
.....
. . . .. D16/326
D16/326
Thixton et al. ............ D16/326
Yee
Yee et
et al.
al. ..................
.........
. . . .. D16/326
D16/326
Thixton et al. ............
.......... .. D16/314
JJannard
annard et aI.
a1.
Teng .........................
....................... .. D16/314
Teng
Thixton et al. ............
.......... .. D16/326
Windham
Windham ..................
................ .. D16/326
JJannard
annard et aI.
a1.
JJannard
annard et aI.
a1.
Chen ..........................
........................ .. 3511158
351/158
Saderholm et al. ........
...... .. D16/326
Elmore
Elmore ......................
.................... .. D16/326

OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 291227,719,
29/227,719, filed
?led Apr. 13,2005,
13, 2005, Jannard et
al.

(Continued)
(Continued)
Primary ExaminerT. Chase Nelson
ExamineriT.
Assistant Examiner-Barbara
ExamineriBarbara B Lohr
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Gregory
FirmiGregory K. Nelson

(57)

CLAIM

The ornamental design for eyeglass components, as shown


and described.

References Cited

(56)
(56)

Date of Patent:

US D557,326
D557 ,326 S
*1, Dec. 11, 2007
**

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


DI84,274
D184,274
D190,884
D192,884
D198,939
0200,734
D200,734
0200,735
D200,735
0202,658
D202,658
D209,892
D209,892
3,591,263
3,591,263
4,703,522
4,703,522
D372,726
D399,866
D399,866
D420,035
D420,035
D425,103
D425,103

S
111959
1/1959 Darr
S
711961
7/1961 Rose et al.
S
511962
5/1962 Pettito
S
811964
8/1964 Huggins
311965
S
3/1965 Zurich
S
311965
3/1965 Mitchell
1011965
S
10/1965 Pettito
D12/605
111968
S
S *
*
1/1968 McCracken
McCracken ................
.............. .. D12/605
A
711971
351144
A *
*
7/1971 Esterson
Esterson ......................
.... ..
351/44
A
A *
* 1111987
11/1987 Schurle
Schurle et
et al.
al. .................
............... .. 2/432
2/432
S
811996
8/1996 Simioni
D16/330
S
S *
* 1011998
10/1998 Yee
Yee ...........................
......................... .. D16/330
212000
S
D16/325
S *
*
2/2000 Hartman
Hartman ....................
.................. .. D16/325
S
D16/326
5/2000
S *
*
5/2000 Yee
Yee et
et al.
al. ..................
................ .. D16/326

DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view
vieW of the eyeglass compocompo
nents of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left-side elevational view
vieW thereof, the right-side
elevational view
vieW being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view
vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view
vieW thereof.

EXHIBIT 3
Page 11

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 45 of 117


US D557,326 S
Page 2
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Pending U.S. App!.
Appl. No. 291262,974,
29/262,974, Jannard et a!.
a1.

Asia Pacific
Paci?c Trading Co., Inc. Fashion
Collection 11,
Fashion Plastic
Plastic Collection
IL Asia
Pacific
Paci?c Trading Co. Catalogue 1999-2000, p. 31.

Asia Pacific
Paci?c Trading Co., Inc. Metal & Plastic Combination V, Asia
Pacific
Paci?c Trading Co. Catalogue 1999-2000, p. 2.
Berthet-Bondet. B.B. sol 1968, Sunglass Catalogue, p. 2, 10.
Optical
Optical Journal
Journal &
& Review
Review of
of Optometry,
Optometry Nov.
NOV 1,
1 1971,
1971 p.
P' 12.
12'

** cited
Cited by examiner

EXHIBIT 3
Page 12

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 46 of 117

u.s.
U.S. Patent
Patent

Dec. 11,
2007
11,2007

Sheet 1 of
of44

FIG.l1
FIG.

EXHIBIT 3
Page 13

US D557,326 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 47 of 117

U.S.Patent
Patent
u.s.

Dec.
Dec.
11,11,2007
2007

Sheet
4
Sheet2 of
2 of4

usUSD557,326
D557,326S S

FIG. 22
FIG.

FIG. 33

. ",: .. ' '.'.'

.'.

:'. -:".':.:: "0: ....,>: . ", ";"';", :'::': ': :

b~~~~====\\
/;

... ; ....

FIG.
FIG. 44

EXHIBIT 3
Page 14

.,',' .. ,,;. :....... ~;:', ~:.':" \'. ,.'

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 48 of 117

u.s.
U.S. Patent
Patent

Dec. 11,
2007
11,2007

Sheet 3 of
of44

US D557,326 S

;.~!

,'.

,.~
~j

"

i{,
,;.;t

~;,

;i

,.".

.:1l1

lJj

......

FIG. 5

EXHIBIT 3
Page 15

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 49 of 117

u.s.
U.S. Patent
Patent

Dec. 11,
2007
11,2007

Sheet 4 of
of44

FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 3
Page 16

US D557,326 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 50 of 117

EXHIBIT 4

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 51 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD554689S
USO0D554689S

(12) United States Design Patent (10)


(10) Patent No.:
N0.2

(12)

Jannard et al.
a].

(45)

(54)
(54)

EYEGLASS
EYEGLASS FRAME
FRAME

(75)

Inventors: James H. Jannard, Spieden Island, WA


(US);
Moritz,
Foothill
(US); Hans
Hans Karsten
Karsten
_
Moritz,
Foothill
~
Ranch, CA (US); Colin Baden, Irvine,
221E265 ms) Coll Baden Imne
CA (US)

(73)
(73)
**

Tenn:
Tenn?

(21)
(21)

Appl.
No.: 291272,776
Appl. No.:
29/272,776

(22)

Filed:

14
14 Years
Years

(51)
(52)
(52)
(58)
(58)

Related
Related U.S.
U-S- Application
APPIICatIOII Data
Data
?led on Apr.
Division of application No. 29/227,719, filed
13,2005.
13, 2005.
(s) Cl.
C]. .................................................
............................................... .. 16-06
LOC (8)
us. Cl.
Cl. .....................................................
................................................... .. D16/326
1)16/326
U.S.
Field
Field of
of Classification
Classi?cation Search
Search .......
..... .. DI6/300-330,
Dl6/300i330,
D16/101,332-338;
D16/101,332*338; D29/109-110;
D29/l09ill0; D241110.2;
D24/110.2;
351141,44,51-52,62,
351/41 44 51452 62 158,92,
158 92 103-111,
1034111

3511156,61,
351/156, 61, 114-119,
1144119, 121-123;
1214123, 2/426-432,
2/4264432,
2/447-449,441,436,434-437
2/4474449, 441, 436, 4344437
See application file
?le for complete search history.

(56)

References Cited
U.S.
US. PATENT DOCUMENTS
D192,885
D192,885
D193,028
D199,150
0202,658
D202,658
0209,862
D209,862
0210,418
D210,418
0218,569
D218,569
0264,094
D264,094
0268,683
D268,683
0285,020
D285,020
D372,726
D390,589
D397,351

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S

**

511962
5/1962
611962
6/1962
911964
9/1964
1011965
10/1965
111968
1/1968
** 311968
3/1968
** 911970
9/1970
** 411982
4/1982
411983
4/1983
811986
8/1986
811996
8/1996
211998
2/1998
811998
8/1998

S
S
S
5
S
2
S
S
s
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
s
S
S
S
S
s

* 10/1998 Simioni .....................


................... ..
311999
3/1999 Wang
10/1999
10/ 1999 Arnette
Afnette
* 212000 Hartman ....................
i
21mg
ne e
....
~~~~ ..~~
* 1012001 Arnette ......................
* 4/2004 Mage ........................
.....
. . . . ..
** 112005
1/2005 Mage
Mage ........................
..
.... ..
** 4/2006
Teng
4/2006
Teng .........................
. ... ..
. . . . ..
11/2006 Mangum
Mangum ...................
____ __
* 1112006
** 112007
Teng
1/2007
Teng .........................
......
. . . . ..
1/2007 Mage ........................
.....
. . . . ..
** 112007
** 112007
1/2007 Paulson
Paulson .....................
..
.... ..
* 212007
2/2007 Teng .........................
....................... ..

D
16/3 26
D16/326

D16/325
D16/326
Dl6/326
D16/326
D16/326
D16/326
D16/326
D16/326
B16626
D16/326
D16/326
D16/326
Dl6/326
D16/326
D16/326
D16/326
D16/326

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

15,2007
Feb. 15,
2007
_

(62)

D399,238
D407,099
D414,796
13414396
D420,035
,
D449,641
D488,499
D500,781
D500,781
D518,847
D518,847
1353293
D532,033
D534,572
D534,572
D534,573
D534,573
D536,028
D536,028
D537,467

Assignee:
Assignee. Oakley,
Oakley, Inc.,
Inc., Foothill
Foothill Ranch,
Ranch, CA
CA (US)
(US)

(**)
(
)

Date of Patent:

US D554,689 S
4* Nov. 6,2007
6, 2007
**

Petitto
Petitto .......................
..................... ..
Petitto
Carmichael
Petitto
McCracken
Bloch
Bloch ........................
...................... ..
McCracken ................
..
Morris
Morris ......................
.................... ..
Tenny
Schmidthaler
Simioni
Simioni
Simioni

D16/329
D16/329

D16/326
D16/326
D16/325

D16/325
D16/325

Sunglass Hut, p. 5, 2002.*


2002*
US. App\.
Appl. No.
N0. 291227,719,
29/227,719, filed
?led Apr. 13,2005,
13, 2005, Jannard, Pending
U.S.
application.
apphcanon'

* cited by examiner
Primary
Primary Examiner-Raphael
ExamineriRaphael Barkai
Barkai
(74)
Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Gregory K.
(74)A0r"@y~4g@10rFirm*Greg1'Y
K- Nelson
Nelson

(57)

(57)

CLAIM

CLAIM

The ornamental design


for an eyeglass frame, as shown and

described
described.

DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view
vieW of the eyeglass frame of
the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a left-side elevational view
vieW thereof, the right-side
elevational view
vieW being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top elevational view
vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view
vieW thereof.
Phantom lining, where
Where utilized, is for illustrative purposes
only and is not intended to limit the claimed design to the
features shown
shoWn in phantom.
1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

-------~

\
I

EXHIBIT 4
Page 17

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 52 of 117

u.s.
U.S. Patent
Patent

Nov. 6,2007
6, 2007

Sheet 1 of
of44

FIG.l

EXHIBIT 4
Page 18

US D554,689 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 53 of 117

u.s.
U.S. Patent
Patent

Nov. 6,2007
6, 2007

Sheet 2 of
of44

US D554,689 S

------- --------------~---------------

---~

------ i

FIG. 2

FIG. 3

FIG. 4

EXHIBIT 4
Page 19

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 54 of 117

u.s.
U.S. Patent
Patent

Nov. 6,2007
6, 2007

Sheet 3 of
of44

FIG. 5
EXHIBIT 4
Page 20

US D554,689 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 55 of 117

u.s.
U.S. Patent
Patent

Nov. 6,2007
6, 2007

Sheet 4 of
of44

\ I

(I

\1II

II
I
I

US D554,689 S

(/
/

(//

I
I

I~\

III/

IIII

/11/

ll'i

II It
II II

II II
II II
11,11
11111
hili
11111
hili
III I
III
III
III
hll
1III

/1,11
11111
I1II1
IIII1

IIII1
I III
I III
I I~
I I~
1I11
II~

II'!

I'

II
II/
II
II

III

I I
I,
I

/11
/ 'I
/ I

I /
/ I

1,1

/'1

III

II/

III
III

1//
1//

Iii

II/

//1

III
,\
I \

I, \

\'
\

) 'I"

I (

\j

FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 4
Page 21

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 56 of 117

EXHIBIT 5

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 57 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD661339S
USO0D661339S

(12) United States Design Patent (10)


(10) Patent No.:
N0.:

(12)

Thixton et al.
a1.

(45)

(54)
(54)

EYEGLASS

(75)
(75)

Inventors: Lek Thixton, Eastsound, WA (US);


Peter Yee, Irvine, CA (US)

(73)
(73)

Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

(**)
(**)

Term:

(21)
(21)

Appl. No.: 29/407,957

(22)
(22)

Filed:

(51)
(51)
(52)
(52)
(58)
(58)

LOC (9) Cl. ..................................................


................................................ .. 16-06
U.S.
US. Cl.
Cl. ......................
.................... .. D16/321;
D16/321; D16/326;
D16/326; D16/335
D16/335
Field of Classification
Classi?cation Search .................
............... .. DI6/101,
D16/101,
D16/300-342,900;
D16/3004342, 900, D29/109-110;
D29/1094110, D24/110.2;
1324/1102,
351/41,44,51-52,62,158,92,103-123,
351/41, 44, 51452, 62, 158, 92, 1034123,
3511140,
351/140, 153,45-46;
153, 45446, 2/426-432,447-449,
2/4264432, 4474449,
2/441,434-437,13,15;
2/441, 4344437, 13, 15, D211483,659-661;
D21/483, 6594661;
D14/372
See application file
?le for complete search history.

14 Years

Dec. 5, 2011

(56)
(56)

References Cited

DI78,178
D178,178
D192,885
0210,418
D210,418
0218,569
D218,569
D380,766
D497,934
D539,833
D542,330
D545,868
D549,270
D550,272
D554,688
D554,689
D555,705
D561,809
D561,813
D569,412
D570,897
D575,323
D577,759

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


S
711956
7/1956 Fleming
S
511962
5/1962 Pettito
S
311968
3/1968 Bloch et al.
S
911970
9/1970 McCracken
S
711997
7/1997 Simioni
S
1112004
11/2004 Sheldon
S
4/2007 Chuang
S ** 5/2007 Elmore
Elmore ........................
...................... ..
S
7/2007 Chuang
S ** 8/2007 Daems etal.
et al. ................
.............. ..
S
912007
9/2007 Markovitz
MarkovitZ
S ** 1112007
11/2007 Elmore
Elmore ........................
...................... ..
S
1112007
annard et al.
11/2007 JJannard
S
1112007
11/2007 Chuang
S
212008
2/2008 Yee
S ** 212008
2/2008 Baden et aI
............... ..
a1.. .................
S
5/2008 JJannard
annard et al.
S
6/2008 Fuchs
S
8/2008 JJannard
annard et al.
S
912008
9/2008 Yee

UJ

Date of Patent:

D581,444 S
D585,475 S
D586,379
D586,379 S
S *
*
D599,838 S
D601,613 S
D601,614
D601,614 S
S *
*
D604,756 S
D604,758 S
D604,759 S
D607,040 S
D61O,603
D610,603 S
D61O,604
D610,604 S
D616,013 S
D616,919 S
D620,970 S
D622,302
D622,302 S
S *
*
D622,304 S
D633,550 S
D636,01O
D636,010 S
D648,771 S
D649,579 S
* cited by examiner

US D661,339 S

**

5, 2012
Jun. 5,2012

1112008
annard et al.
11/2008 JJannard
112009
1/2009 Yang
212009
2/2009 Thixton
ThiXton et
et al.
al. ...............
............. .. D16/325
912009
9/2009 Rohrbach
1012009
10/2009 Yee
1012009
10/2009 Moudier
Mouclier .....................
................... .. D16/321
1112009
11/2009 Shin et aI.
a1.
1112009
11/2009 Rohrbach et al.
1112009
11/2009 Rohrbach et al.
1212009
12/2009 Rohrbach
212010
2/2010 Thixton
ThiXton
212010
2/2010 Thixton
ThiXton
512010
5/2010 Reed
6/2010 Thixton
ThiXton
812010
8/2010 Thixton
ThiXton
812010
8/2010 Yee
Yee ..............................
............................ .. D16/314
812010
8/2010 Baden et aI.
a1.
3/2011 Chou
4/2011 Moritz
1112011
11/2011 Rohrbach
1112011
11/2011 Thixton
ThiXton

Primary Examiner -* Raphael Barkai


(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm -* Knobbe Martens Olson &
&
Bear, LLP
(57)
CLAIM
The ornamental design for an eyeglass, as shown
shoWn and
described.
DESCRIPTION

D16/326
D16/326
D16/321

D16/321

D16/326
D16/326

D16/325

D16/325

FIG. 1 is a front perspective view


vieW of an eyeglass of the present
invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevational view
vieW thereof, the right side
elevational view
vieW being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view
vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view
vieW thereof.
The broken line portions of the drawings are for illustrative
purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

EXHIBIT 5
Page 22

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 58 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Juo.5,2012
Jun. 5, 2012

Sheet 1 of
of44

',. 1

EXHIBIT 5
Page 23

US D661,339 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 59 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Juo.5,2012
Jun. 5, 2012

Sheet 2 of
of44

RII.'

1111.4

EXHIBIT 5
Page 24

US D661,339 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 60 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Juo.5,2012
Jun. 5, 2012

Sheet 3 of
of44

111l. Ii

EXHIBIT 5
Page 25

US D661,339 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 61 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Juo.5,2012
Jun. 5, 2012

Sheet 4 of
of44

1111. Ii

EXHIBIT 5
Page 26

US D661,339 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 62 of 117

EXHIBIT 6

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 63 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD652442S
USO0D652442S

(12) United States Design


DeSIgn Patent (10)
(10) Patent No.:

US D652,442 S

(12)

Yee et al.
a].
(54)

(45)

EYEGLASS
.

(75)

Yee, Irvine, CA (US); Lek


(75) Inventors:
Inventors. Peter
gilt-er
Yeei Irv1ne,CCAAI(JIS), Lek
Thixton, Irvine, CA (US)

lXtOIl, rvme,

(73)

Assignee:
Ass1gnee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill
Foothlll Ranch, CA (US)

(**)

Term:

(21)
(21)

Appl.
No.:_ 29/383,486
Appl' NO"
29/383486

(22)
(22)

Filed:
Filed:

(51)
(51)
(52)
(58)

_
LOC
LOC (9)
(9) Cl.
Cl. ..................................................
................................................ .. 16-06
16 06
U.S. Cl. ...................................................... D16/326
Field of Classification
Classi?cation Search .................
............... .. DI6/101,
D16/101,
D16/300-342,900;
D16/3004342, 900; D29/109-110;
1329/1094110; D24/110.2;
1324/1102;
351/41,44,51-52,62,158,92,103-123,
351/41, 44, 51452, 62, 158, 92, 1034123,
3511140,
351/140, 153,45-46;
153, 45446; 2/426-432,447-449,
2/4264432, 4474449,
2/441,434-437,
2/441, 4344437, 13, 15; D211483,659-661
D21/483, 6594661
See application file
?le for complete search history.

(56)

U-s-

Cl.

14 Years

Jan.
2011
Jan. 18,
18,2011

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..

4* Jan.17,2012
Jan. 17, 2012
**

Date of Patent:

D561,811 S
s
D561,813
D56l,8l3 S
D564,570
D564,570 S
S
D564,572
13564572 S
s
D572,747 S
D572,749
D572,749 S
S
D575,323 S
D585,928 S
D586,379 S
S
D595,333 S
D599,838
S
D599,838 S *
*
D606,113 Ss
D616,015
D616,015 S
S
D621,438 S
s **
D623,217
D623,217 S
S
D629A44
S
D629,444 S **
D629,830 S
D630,674
D630,674 S
S *
*
D645,076
13645976 S5
* cited by examiner
S

212008
2/2008
212008
2/2008
3/2008
3/2008
3/2008
7/2008
712008
712008
7/2008
8/2008
212009
2/2009
212009
6/2009
912009
9/2009
12/2009
1212009
512010
5/2010
8/2010
812010
912010
9/2010
12/2010
1212010
1212010
112011
1/2011
912011
WW

3/2008

Fox
FOX et al.
a1.
Baden et aI.
al.
Mage
Mage
Yee et al.
al
a1.
Baden et aI.
Yee
Yee
JJannard
annard et al.
a1.
Markovitz
MarkovitZ
Thixton
TthtOIl et al.
a1.
Markovitz et al.
a1.
Rohrbach
Rohrbach ....................
.................. ..
Daems et al.
a1.
Markovitz
Markovitz et
et al.
a1.
a1. ...........
......... ..
Markovitz et al.
Markovitz
Markovitz et
et al.
a1.
Akmaet
a1,

Akarra et al. ................H


Markovitz et al.
Markovitz
Markovitz ...................
................. ..
Markovitz
al.
Markov?z et
etal~
Markovitz

et

D16/326
Dl6/326

D16/326
D16/326
D16/326

al

D16/326
D16/326

'

Primary Examiner -* Raphael Barkai


Barkal
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm -* Knobbe Martens Olson &
&
Bear, LLP

References Cited
(57)
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
0210,418
311968
3/1968 Bloch et al.
a1.
D210,418 S
5,080,476 A
1/1992 Monin
111992
5,231,429 A
711993
7/1993 Kanda
5,359,370 A
1011994
10/1994 Mugnier
5,555,037 A
911996
9/1996 Canavan
D399,238 S
1011998
10/1998 Simioni
D407,099 S
311999
3/1999 Wang
6,231,181 Bl
5/2001 Swab
6,336,250 Bl
112002
al.
1/2002 Takeda et aI.
D534,573 S
112007
1/2007 Mage
D539,831 S
4/2007 Hsu
D539,833 S
4/2007 Chuang
D540,370 S
4/2007 Sheldon
D545,348 S
6/2007 Chen
D549,268 S
8/2007 Daems etal.
et a1.
D549,764 S
8/2007 Teng
D558,816 S
112008
1/2008 Yee

CLAIM

The ornamental design for an eyeglass, as shown and


described.
DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view
vieW of an eyeglass of the present
invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view
vieW of the eyeglass of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view
vieW of the eyeglass of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevational view
vieW of the eyeglass of FIG. 1,
the right side elevational view
vieW being a minor image thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view
vieW of the eyeglass of FIG. 1; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view
vieW of the eyeglass of FIG. 1.
1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

EXHIBIT 6
Page 27

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 64 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Jao.17,2012
Jan. 17, 2012

Sheet 11 of
0144

FIG. 1

EXHIBIT 6
Page 28

US D652,442 S
s

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 65 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Jao.17,2012
Jan. 17, 2012

Sheet 2 of
M44

FIG. 2

FIG. 3

FIG. 4

EXHIBIT 6
Page 29

US D652,442 S
s

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 66 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Jao.17,2012
Jan. 17, 2012

Sheet 3 of
0f44

FIG. 5

EXHIBIT 6
Page 30

US D652,442 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 67 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Jao.17,2012
Jan. 17, 2012

Sheet 4 of
M44

FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 6
Page 31

US D652,442 S
s

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 68 of 117


UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
PATENT No.
NO.
APPLICATION NO.
DATED
INVENTOR(S)

:: D652,442 S
s

Page 11 of 11

:: 29/383486
:: January 17, 2012
:: Peter Yee et al.
a1.

It is certified that error appears in the above-identified


above-identi?ed patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby corrected as shown below:

At Page 1, Column 2 (Description), Line 6, please change "minor"


minor to --mirror--.

Signed and Sealed this


Nineteenth Day of June, 2012

~J3:. t::~
David J. Kappos
Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office
0fthe
O?ice

EXHIBIT 6
Page 32

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 69 of 117

EXHIBIT 7

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 70 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD564571S
USO0D564571S

(12) United States Design Patent (10)


(10) Patent No.:
N0.2

(12)

Jannard
J annard et al.
a1.

(45)

(54)
(54)

EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS COMPONENTS

(75)

Inventors: James H. Jannard, Spieden Island, WA


(US); Lek Thixton, Orcas, WA (US);
Colin Baden, Irvine, CA (US); Peter
Yee, Irvine, CA (US)

(73)
(73)

Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

(**)
(**)

Term:

(21)
(21)

Appl. No.: 291266,786


29/266,786

(22)
(22)

Filed:

(51)
(51)
(52)
(52)
(58)
(58)

LOC
LOC (8) Cl.
C1. .................................................
............................................... .. 16-06
16-06
U.S.
US. Cl.
Cl. .....................................
................................... .. D16/326;
D16/326; D16/335
D16/335
Field
Field of
of Classification
Classi?cation Search
Search .......
..... .. DI6/300-330,
Dl6/300i330,
D16/101,332-338;
D16/101,332*338; D29/109-110;
D29/109*110; D241110.2;
D24/110.2;
351141,44,51-52,62,
351/41, 44, 5152, 62, 158,92,
158, 92, 103-111,
103*111,
3511156,61,
114-119, 121-123; 2/426-432,
351/156,61,114*119,121*123;
2/426i432,
2/447-449,441,434-437
2/4474149, 441, 434*437
See application file
?le for complete search history.

14 Years

Sep. 27, 2006

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


2,397,243
D168,903
D196,000
3,565,517
3,838,914
4,787,730
4,951,322
D468,337
D468,337
D469,459
D476,354
D476,354
D478,929
D483,392
D483,392
D508,515
D508,515

A
311946
3/1946 Cooper
S
211953
2/1953 Neary
S
811963
8/1963 McNeill
A
211971
2/1971 Gitlin et a!.
al.
A
1011974
10/1974 Fernandez
A
1111988
11/1988 Bristol
A
811990
8/1990 Lin
S
112003
S *
*
1/2003 Chen
Chen .........................
....................... ..
S
112003
1/2003 Moritz
6/2003
S
S *
*
6/2003 Chen
Chen .........................
....................... ..
S
8/2003 Baden et a!.
al.
S
S *
* 12/2003
12/2003 Chen
Chen .........................
....................... ..
S
8/2005
S *
*
8/2005 Yee
Yee et
et a!.
al. ..................
................ ..

D545,351 S ** 6/2007 Jannard et aI


al..............
.......... .. D16/326
2006/0238700 Al
* 1012006
A1*
10/2006 Del Vecchio ...............
............. .. 3511103
351/103

OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Pending U.S. App!.
Appl. No. 291215,624,
29/215,624, filed
?led Oct. 20, 2004, Thixton.
ThiXton.
Pending U.S. App!.
Appl. No. 291222,726,
29/222,726, filed
?led Feb. 2, 2005, Yee et a!.
al.
Oakley, Inc., "Oakley
Oakley Eyewear Catalog, 2005-2006,"
2005-2006, published
2005, pp. 12, 22, and 23, "Half
Half Wire,"
Wire, "Half
Half Jacket,"
Jacket, and
"Bottlecap"
Bottlecap models, Foothill Ranch, California.
"Nike
Nike Skylong EXP"
EXP sunglass, printed from www.sunglasshut.com
wwwsunglasshutcom
on Mar. 25, 2005, unknown publication date.
"Bolle
Bolle Mongel"
Mongel sunglass, printed from www.sunglasshut.com
wwwsunglasshutcom on
Mar. 25, 2005, unknown publication date.

* cited by examiner

References Cited

(56)
(56)

Date of Patent:

US D564,571 S
*1, Mar. 18,2008
18, 2008
**

Primary Examiner-Raphael
ExamineriRaphael Barkai
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Gregory
FirmiGregory K. Nelson
(57)

CLAIM

The ornamental design for eyeglass and eyeglass compocompo


nents, as shown
shoWn and described.
DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view
vieW of the eyeglass and the
eyeglass components of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left-side elevational view
vieW thereof, the right-side
elevational view
vieW being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view
vieW thereof; and,

D16/314
D16/314
D16/315
D16/315

FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view


vieW thereof.
Phantom lining, where
Where utilized, is for illustrative purposes
only and is not intended to limit the claimed design to the
features shown
shoWn in phantom.

D16/315
D16/315
D16/335
D16/335

EXHIBIT 7
Page 33

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 71 of 117

u.s.
U.S. Patent
Patent

Mar. 18,2008
18, 2008

Sheet 1 of
of44

FIG.l

EXHIBIT 7
Page 34

US D564,571 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 72 of 117

U.S. Patent
Patent
u.s.

Mar.
Mar. 18,2008
18,2008

US
US D564,571
D564,571 SS

Sheet
Sheet 22 of
0f 44

I
I

" '--

--- -----------

,,---------------

",/

FIG. 2

\1
\1

--

"
'/

\\,-.,
... .... - - -- - -:.'":..-=.-=.-:.~,:,::.::.:::::,::.;,

;.

~:oo.

~~==========----

FIG. 3

\,

',-----

"
_-_.-=::"""

FIG. 4

EXHIBIT 7
Page 35

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 73 of 117

u.s.
U.S. Patent

Mar. 18,2008

Sheet 3 of
0f 4

FIG. 5
EXHIBIT 7
Page 36

US D564,571 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 74 of 117

u.s.
U.S. Patent
Patent

Mar. 18,2008
18, 2008

Sheet 4 of
of44

FIG.

EXHIBIT 7
Page 37

US D564,571 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 75 of 117

EXHIBIT 8

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 76 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
11111111111
USOOD610604S
USO0D610604S

(12) United
Unlted States Design
Deslgn Patent (10)
(10) Patent No.:
N0.2

US D610,604 S

(12)

Thixton

(45)

(54)

EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS COMPONENTS

(75)

Inventor:

(73)

Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

**
(**)
( )

.
Term:
Term

(21)
(21)

Appl.
No.:_ 29/315,956
APPLNO"
29/315956

(22)
(22)

Filed:
Flled:

(51)
(52)
(58)
(58)

LOC (9) Cl. .................................................. 16-06


U.S. Cl. ..................................... D16/326; D16/335
... ... ... ........ D
1611 01,
Field
Field of
of Classification
Classi?cation Search
Search ...............
D16/101,
D16/300-342;
D16/3004342; D29/109-110;
D29/1094110; D24/110.2;
351/41,44,51-52,62,158,92,103-123,
351/41 44 51*52 62 158 92 103*123
3511140,
351/140 153,45-46,
153 45*46 157;
157; 2/426-432,447-449,
2/426T432 447*449
2/441,434-437,
2/441, 4344437, 13, 15; D211483,659-661
D21/483, 6594661
See application file
?le for complete search history.

(52)

14
14 Years
Years

U.S.Cl.

Aug.
10, 2009
Aug-10,2009

...................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . D16/326;D16/335
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..

(56)
56

References Cited

( )

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


0204,812
D204,812
D210,418
0210,418
D377,803
13377303
D378,375
133781375
D390,589
D390,589
13397351
D397,351
D400,230
13400230
D406,858
D406 858
134113560
D411,560
13415515
D415,515
D420,035
13420935
D422,010
D422,010
13430591
D430,591
D488,499
D500,781
D500,78l

D534,573
D536,027
D539,830
13539330
D547,794
13547,794
D550,272
135507272
D552,665
13552,665
D554,689
13556,818
D556,818
D558,816
13558,816
13561,810
D561,81O
D575,813
13575813
13594,052
D594,052
D599,838
D599,838
D604,757
D604,759

Lek Thixton, Eastsound, WA (US)

S
S
S
S
5
S
S
S
S
S
S
5
S
S
S
S
S
S
5
S
S
S
S
S
S

511966
5/1966
3/1968
311968
211997
2/ 1997
311997
3/1997
211998
2/1998
8/1998
811998
1011998
10/1998
311999
3/1999
6/1999
611999
10/1999
1011999
212000
2/2000
3/2000
3/2000
9/2000
912000
4/2004
112005
l/2005

Shindler
Bloch
Bloch
Wilson
Wi1_S0I1
Tsai
Tsal
Simioni
Simioni
Simioni
Arnette
Afnette
Arnette
Ar
tt
A32:
Arnette
Amette et al.
a1
Arnette
Hartman
Arnette
Arnette
Amette
Arnette
Mage
Mage

D604,759

11* Feb. 23, 2010


**

Date of Patent:
S
S
s
S
5
S
s
S
S
S
s
S
s
s
S
S
s
s
S
S
s
s
S
S
s
S
S
s
S

112007
1/2007
112007
1/2007
4/2007
4/2007
7/2007
912007
9/2007
912007
9/2007
1112007
11/2007
12/2007
1212007
112008
1/2008
2/2008
212008
8/2008
8/2008
6/2009
6/2009
912009
9/2009
1112009
1112009

**
**
**
*
*
>l<
*

Mage
Paulson
Saderholm
Sadefholm et
et aI.
?1~
Jannard et al.
a1.
Markovitz
Markovltz
Mage
Jannard
et al.
Jannardet
a1.
Jannardetal.
Jannard
et al.
Yee
FOX et
et al.
a1.
Fox
Li
Li .............................
........................... ..
Yang .........................
......
. . . . ..
Yang
Rohrbach
Rohrbach ..................
................ ..
Yee ...........................
Rohrbach et al. ..........

11/2009

Rohrbachetal.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ........
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..
~~

D16/326
Dl6/326
Dl6/326
D16/326
D16/326
Dl6/326
D16/326
D16/326

Dl6/326

** cited
clted by
by examiner
examlner

Primary Examiner-Raphael
ExamineriRaphael Barkai
Barkai
Primary
Firm4Gregory K. Nelson
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Gregory
(57)
(57)

CLAIM
CLAIM
.

The ornamental design


deslgn for an eyeglass and eyeglass compocompo
nents, as shown.
shoWn.
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view
View of the eyeglass and eyeglass
components of the present invention;
'

'

'

FIG.
FIG. 22 is
1s aa front
front elevational
elevat1onal view
V1eW thereof;
thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view
View thereof;
.
.
.
.
.
.
FIG.
4
is
a
left-side
elevational
view thereof,
FIG. 1s a left-slde eleVat1onal~V1eW
thereof, the
the right-side
r1ght-s1de
elevational
elevatlonal view
V1eW being
bemg aa mirror
m1rror image
1mage thereof;
thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view
View thereof; and,
.
.
is
a
bottom
plan
FIG.
6
FIG. 6 1s a bottom plan view
V1eW thereof.
thereof.
1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

EXHIBIT 8
Page 38

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 77 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Feb. 23, 2010

Sheet 1 of
of44

FIG. 1
1

EXHIBIT 8
Page 39

US D610,604 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 78 of 117

US.
Patent
u.s.
Patent

Feb.
2010
Feb.
23,23,
2010

4
Sheet
Sheet
2 of2 of4

FIG. 2

FIG. 3

~FIG. 4

EXHIBIT 8
Page 40

US D610,604 S
US D610,604 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 79 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Feb. 23,2010
23, 2010

Sheet 3 of
of44

FIG. 5

EXHIBIT 8
Page 41

US D610,604 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 80 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Feb. 23,2010
23, 2010

Sheet 4 of
of44

FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 8
Page 42

US D610,604 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 81 of 117

EXHIBIT 9

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 82 of 117


111111

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD620970S
USO0D620970S

(12) United States Design Patent (10)


(10) Patent No.:
N0.:

US D620,970 S

(12)

Thixton
(54)

(45)

EYEGLASS COMPONENT

D548,269 S

(75)

Inventor:

Lek Thixton, Eastsound, WA (US)

(73)

Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

(**)

Term:

(21)
(21)

Appl.
No.: 29/348,088
APP1-NO-I
29/348,088

(22)
(22)

Filed:
Flled:

Nov. 25, 2009

NW'252009

8/2007 Baden et al. ............... D16/326

31322121 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ " B16626

D550,272 S

912007 Markovitz

D552,665
D552665 SS

912007
9/2007 Mage
Mage

S
1112007
annard et al.
11/2007 JJannard
1212007
annard et al.
S
12/2007 JJannard
a1.
112008
S
l/2008 Yee
s
2/2008 Fox
FOX et
etal.
212008
al.
S
S
5/2008
S *
*
5/2008 Chen
Chen .........................
....................... ..
s ** 8/2008
8/2008 Jannard
Jannard et
etal.
........... ..
S
al. .............
D575,813
8/2008
D575,8l3 S
S *
*
8/2008 Li
Li .............................
........................... ..
D577,759
13577,?59 S
s
9/2008 Yee
Yee ...........................
......................... ..
** 912008

Related U.S.
U_s_APPlicati0n
Data
Related
Application Data
_

7/2007 JJannard
annard et
al.
etal.

**

D554,689
D556,818
D558,816
D558,8l6
D561,810
D561,81O
D568,371
D568,37l
13575323
D575,323

14 Years

4* Aug. 3, 2010
**

Date of Patent:

D547,794 S

(62)

Division
D1v1s1on of application
appl1cat1on No. 29/315,956, filed
?led on Aug.
10,2009,
10, 2009, now
noW Pat. No. Des. 610,604.

(51)
(51)
(52)
(52)
(58)

LOC
LOC (9)
(9) Cl.
Cl. ..................................................
................................................ .. 16-06
16-06
U.S.
US. Cl.
Cl. .....................................................
................................................... .. D16/326
D16/326
Classi?cation Search ....
..............
D16/101,
...... ........ D
1611 01,
Field of Classification
D16/300-342;
1316/3004342; D29/109-110;
1329/1094110; D24/110.2;
1324/1102;
351/41,44,51-52,62,158,92,103-123,
351/41, 44, 5152, 62, 158, 92, 103*123,
3511140,
153,45-46; 2/426-432,447-449,
351/140,153,45446;
2/4264432, 4474449,
2/441,436,434-437,13,15;
2/441, 436, 434*437, 13, 15; D21/483,659-661
D21/483, 659*661
See application file
?le for complete
Complete search
Search history.
history'

11111111111

D16/323
Dl6/323
D16/335
D16/335
D16/326
Dl6/326
D16/326
D16/326

(Continued)
(Continued)

Primary
Primary Examiner-Raphael
ExamineriRaphael Barkai
Barkai
(74)
Attorney, Agent,
(70141100162
Age/11, or
0r Firm-Gregory
Firm%regory K.
K- Nelson
Nelson
CLAIM
CLAIM

(57)
(57)

The
The ornamental
ornamental design
deslgn for
for an
an eyeglass
eyeglass component,
component, as
as shown
shoWn
and described.

References Cited

(56)

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


0204,812
D204,812
0210,418
D210,418
D377,803
D378,375
D390,589
D397,351
D400,230
D406,858
D411,560
D415,515
D420,035
D422,010
D430,591
D488,499
D500,781
D534,573
D536,027
D539,830

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S

511966
5/1966
311968
3/1968
211997
2/1997
311997
3/1997
211998
2/1998
811998
8/1998
1011998
10/1998
311999
3/1999
611999
6/1999
1011999
10/1999
212000
2/2000
3/2000
912000
9/2000
4/2004
112005
1/2005
112007
1/2007
112007
1/2007
4/2007

Shindler
Bloch
Wilson
Tsai
Simioni
Simioni
Arnette
Arnette
Arnette
Arnette et al.
Arnetteetal.
Hartman
Arnette
Arnette
Mage
Mage
Mage
Paulson
Saderholm et al.

DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view
vieW of the eyeglass component
of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left-side lateral elevational view
vieW thereof, the rightright
side lateral elevational view
vieW being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right-side medial elevational view
vieW thereof, the
left-side medial elevational view
vieW being a mirror image
thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan view
vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom elevational view
vieW thereof.
1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

EXHIBIT 9
Page 43

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 83 of 117


US D620,970 S
Page
Page22
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
u.s.
D585,928 S
s *
*
D585,928
D594,052
D594,052 S
s *
*
D595,333 S *
*

2/2009 Markovitz
Markovitz .................
............... ..D16/326
212009
D16/326
D16/326
6/2009
6/2009 Yang
Yang .........................
........... ..
.. D16/326
6/2009 Markovitz et al.
D16/321
a1. .........
....... .. Dl6/321

D604,759 S ** 1112009
11/2009 Rohrbach et al.
a1. ..........
........ .. D16/335
Dl6/335
D606,113
et al. ..............
D606113 S
S *
* 1212009
12/2009 Daems
Daemsetal'
~~~~~~~~~~~~ " D16/326
B16626

** cited by examiner

EXHIBIT 9
Page 44

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 84 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

Sheet 1 of
of44

EXHIBIT 9
Page 45

US D620,970 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 85 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

Sheet 2 of
of44

US D620,970 S

V
FIG. 2

" - - - - - -V

FIG. 3

-=~

FIG. 4

EXHIBIT 9
Page 46

-V

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 86 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

Sheet 3 of
of44

US D620,970 S

~-------------V ------------_/
FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 9
Page 47

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 87 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

Sheet 4 of
of44

US D620,970 S

~---------V - - - - - - - - - )
FIG. 7

EXHIBIT 9
Page 48

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 88 of 117

EXHIBIT 10

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 89 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD616919S
USO0D616919S

(12) United States Design Patent (10)


(10) Patent No.:
N0.:

US D616,919 S

(12)

Thixton

(45)

(54)

EYEGLASS FRONT

(75)

Inventor:

(73)

Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

**
(**)
( )

.
Term:
Term

(21)
(21)

Appl.
No.:_ 29/348,087
Appl.No..
29/348,087

(22)
(22)

Filed:
Flled:

(62)

- - Division
of application
No. 29/315,956, filed on Aug.
1135125631;
oioegpglctatliloongg2243156356?led
OnAug'
10,2009, now Pat. No. Des. 610,604.

(51)
(51)
(52)
(58)

LOC (9)
(9) Cl.
Cl. ..................................................
................................................ .. 16-06
16-06
LOC
US. Cl. .....................................................
................................................... .. D16/326
U.S.
Classi?cation Search ...............
D16/101,
... ... ... ........ D
1611 01,
Field of Classification
D16/300-342;
D16/300*342; D29/109-110;
D29/109*110; D24/110.2;
351/41,44,51-52,62,158,92,103-123,
351/41, 44, 51452, 62, 158, 92, 1034123,
3511140,
153,45-46; 2/426-432,447-449,
351/140,153,45446;
2/42644324474449,
2/441 436 434*437 13 15, D21/483,659-661
132N483 659*661
2/441,436,434-437,13,15;
See application file
?le for complete search history.

D422,01O
D422,010
D430,591
D488,499
D488,499
D500,781
D534,573
135341573
D536,027
D539,830
D547,794
D547,794
D550,272
13552665
D552,665
D554,689
D556,818
D558,816
13561310
D561,81O
D575,323
D575,323
D604,759

Lek Thixton, Eastsound, WA (US)

14
14 Years
Years

Nov. 25, 2009


NOV-25,2009
Related
Related U.S.
U-S. Application
APPllCatlOIl Data
Data

(62)

S
S
s
S
S
S
s
S
S
S
s
S
s
S
S
s
S
S
S
5
s
S
S
s
S
S
s
S
s

3/2000
912000
9/2000
4/2004
4/2004
112005
1/2005
112007
1/2007
112007
1/2007
4/2007
7/2007
7/2007
912007
9/2007
90007
912007
1112007
11/2007
12/2007
1212007
112008
1/2008
2/2008
212008
8/2008
8/2008
1112009
11/2009

**
*

1, 2010
Jun. 1,2010

Arnette
Arnette
Mage
Mage
Mage
Mage
Mage
Paulson
Saderholm
et aI.
Saderholmet
a1.
a1.
JJannardet
annard et al.
Markovitz
Mage
Mage
JJannardet
annard et al.
a1.
a1.
JJannardet
annard et al.
Yee
FOX et al.
a1
Fox
JJannardet
annard et al.
a1. .............
........... .. D16/326
D16/326
Rohrbach et al.
a1. ..........
........ .. D16/326

't db
'
* cited
by examiner

ole

yexammer

Primary Examiner-Raphael
ExamineriRaphael Barkai
(74)
Attorney, Agent,
(70141100162
Age/11, or
0r Firm-Gregory
Firm%regory K.
K- Nelson
Nelson
(57)
(57)

CLAIM
CLAIM
.

The
The ornamental
ornamental design
design for
for an
an eyeglass
eyeglass front,
front, as
as shown
shoWn and
and
described.
descnbed'

References Cited

DESCRIPTION

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

FIG. 1 is a front perspective view


vieW of the eyeglass front of the
present invention;

(56)

0204,812
D204,812
D21O,41S
D210,418
D377,803
D378,375
D390,589
D397,351
D400,230
D406,858
D411,560
D415,515
D420,035

4*
**

Date of Patent:

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S

511966
5/1966
31196S
3/1968
211997
2/1997
311997
3/1997
211998
2/1998
811998
8/1998
1011998
10/1998
311999
3/1999
611999
6/1999
1011999
10/1999
212000
2/2000

Shindler
Bloch
Wilson
Tsai
Simioni
Simioni
Arnette
Arnette
Arnette
Arnette et al.
a1.
Hartman

FIG. 2 is a front elevational view


vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left-side elevational view
vieW thereof, the right-side
elevational view
vieW being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view
vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom elevational view
vieW thereof.
1 Claim, 3 Drawing Sheets

- --------~;---:.:..":>..-- ---

;
I

EXHIBIT 10
Page 49

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 90 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Juo.l,2010
Jun. 1, 2010

Sheet 1 of
0133

US D616,919 S

-- ----;-.::----~~ - ---

i
/

FIG. 1

EXHIBIT 10
Page 50

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 91 of 117

u.s.

Patent
US. Patent

1,2010
Jun. 1,
2010

of 3
Sheet 2 of3

FIG. 2

FIG. 3

FIG. 4
EXHIBIT 10
Page 51

US D616,919 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 92 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Jun. 1,2010
1, 2010

Sheet 3 of
of33

FIG. 5

FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 10
Page 52

US D616,919 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 93 of 117

EXHIBIT 11

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 94 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD640725S
USO0D640725S

(12) United States Design Patent (10)


(10) Patent No.:
N0.:

(12)

Moritz et al.
a].

(45)

(54)
(54)

EYEGLASS AND
AND EYEGLASS
EYEGLASS COMPONENT
COMPONENT
EYEGLASS

(75)

Inventors: Hans Karsten Moritz, Foothill Ranch,


CA (US);
(U S); Anthony Gerald Kern,
Vie'o,
S
Mission Viejo,
J CA (US)

(73)

Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

(**)

Term:

(21)

Appl. No.: 29/370,712

(22)

Filed;
Filed:

(51)
(51)
(52)
(58)
(58)

LOC
LOC (9)
(9) Cl.
Cl. ..................................................
................................................ .. 16-06
16-06
U.S.
US. Cl. ......................................
.................................... .. D16/315; D16/335
Field of
of Classification
Classi?cation Search
Search .................
............... .. DI6/101,
D16/101
Field
D16/300i342 D29/109-110;
D29/109i110 D24/110.2;
D24/110 2f
D16/300-342;

'
351/41,44,51-52,62,158,92,103-123,
351/41 44 51*52 62 158 92 103*123
3511140,
351/140, 153,45-46;
153, 45*46; 2/426-432,447-449,
2/426482, 447*449,
2/441,434-437,
2/441, 434*437, 13, 15; D211483,659-661
D21/483, 659*661
See application file
?le for complete search history.

Aug, 25, 2010


Aug.

References Cited

D196,000
D469,459
D476,354
D483,392
D511,540
D543,572
D543,572
7,222,958
D545,868
D564,568
D564,568
D564,571
D583,851
D584,330
7,497,569

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


S
811963
8/1963 McNeill
S
S
S
S
S
S *
*
Bl
B1
S
S
S *
*
S
S
S
B2

112003
1/2003
6/2003
1212003
12/2003
1112005
11/2005
5/2007
5/2007
5/2007
7/2007
3/2008
3/2008
3/2008
1212008
12/2008
112009
1/2009
3/2009

D600,269
13600169
D622,755
D622,755
2006/0238700
* .

**
*1, *Jun.28,2011
*Jun. 28, 2011

S
5 ** 912009
9/2009 Masui
Masui ..........................
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ D16/315
1316/315
S
812010
S *
*
8/2010 Yee
Yee ..............................
............................ .. D16/315
Al
1012006
A1
10/2006 Del Vecchio
.

* cited by examiner

Primary
Primary Examiner -* Raphael
Ra P hael Barkai
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm -* Knobbe Martens Olson &
&
Bear,
Bear, LLP
LLP

CLAIM
(57)
The ornamental design for an eyeglass and eyeglass compocompo
nent, as shown
shoWn and described.
DESCRIPTION

14 Years

(56)

Date of Patent:

US D640,725 S

Moritz
Chen
Chen
Hsu
Yee
D16/315
Yee et
et al.
a1. .....................
................... .. D16/315
Chiou
Chuang
Moritz
D16/315
Moritz .........................
....................... .. D16/315
JJannardetal.
annard et al.
Lane
Chen
Webb

FIG. 1 is a front perspective view


vieW of the eyeglass and eyeglass
component of the present invention;
FIG 22 is
is aa front
from elevational
elevational view
View thereof;
thereof;
FIG.
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view
vieW thereof;
FIG.
FIG 44 is
is aa left-side
left-Side elevational
elevational view
View thereof,
thereof, the
the right-side
?ght-Side
elevational
elevational view
vieW being
being aa mirror
mirror image
image thereof;
thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view
vieW thereof;
vieW thereof;
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view
vieW of an alternative embodiembodi
FIG. 7 is a front perspective view
ment of the eyeglass and eyeglass component of the present
invention;
inVenIiOn;
FIG. 8 is a front elevational view
vieW of the eyeglass and eyeglass
component
Component of
Of FIG.
FIG 7;
FIG. 9 is a rear elevational view
vieW of the eyeglass and eyeglass
component of FIG. 7;
FIG. 10 is a left-side elevational view
vieW of the eyeglass and
eyeglass component of FIG. 7, the right-side elevational view
vieW
being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 11 is a top plan view
vieW of the eyeglass and eyeglass
component of FIG. 7; and,
FIG. 12 is a bottom plan view
vieW of the eyeglass and eyeglass
component of FIG. 7.
Phantom lining, where
Where utilized, is for illustrative purposes
only and is not intended to limit the claimed design to the
features shown
shoWn in phantom.
1 Claim, 8 Drawing Sheets

....

EXHIBIT 11
Page 53

)~

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 95 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Jun. 28, 2011

Sheet 1 of
of88

FIG. 1

EXHIBIT 11
Page 54

US D640,725 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 96 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Jun. 28, 2011

Sheet 2 of
of88

FIG. 2

(r

FIG. 3

EXHIBIT 11
Page 55

US D640,725 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 97 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Jun. 28, 2011

Sheet 3 of
of88

FIG. 5

EXHIBIT 11
Page 56

US D640,725 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 98 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent

Jun. 28, 2011

Sheet 4 of
0f 8

FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 11
Page 57

US D640,725 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 99 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Juo.28,2011
Jun. 28, 2011

"

Sheet 5 of8

,"
II

'~~

-----------------

-~

FIG. 7

EXHIBIT 11
Page 58

US D640,725 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 100 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Juo.28,2011
Jun. 28, 2011

Sheet 6 of8

US D640,725 S

\
\
\

I
I

"-

I
I

-------//

,
\

,
"

FIG. 8

FIG. 9

FIG. 10

EXHIBIT 11
Page 59

~/

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 101 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Juo.28,2011
Jun. 28, 2011

Sheet 7 of8

FIG. 11

EXHIBIT 11
Page 60

US D640,725 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 102 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Juo.28,2011
Jun. 28, 2011

Sheet 8 of8

FIG. 12

EXHIBIT 11
Page 61

US D640,725 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 103 of 117

EXHIBIT 12

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 104 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD675666S

(12)

United States Design Patent

(10)

Thixton et al.

(45)

(54)

EYEGLASS

(75)

Inventors: Lek Thixton, Eastsound, WA (US); Jae


Shin, Irvine, CA (US)

(73)

Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

(**)

Term:

(21)

Appl. No.: 29/412,206

(22)

Filed:

(51)
(52)
(58)

LOC (9) Cl. .................................................. 16-06


U.S. Cl. ...................................... D16/326; D16/335
Field of Classification Search ................. DI6/101,
D16/300-342,900; D29/109-110; D24/110.2;
351/41,44,51-52,62,158,92,103-123,
3511140, 153,45-46; 2/426-432,447-449,
2/441,434-437,13,15; D211483,659-661;
D14/372
See application file for complete search history.

14 Years

Jan. 31, 2012

(56)

References Cited

D150,924
D158,963
D192,885
0202,658
0218,569
D300,226
D309,149
D309,618
D330,395
D342,080
5,537,161
D380,766
5,712,697
D390,864
D399,238
D409,222
D427,622
D457,182
D468,337
D514,615
D536,027
D539,831

U.S.
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
A

S
A

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S

PATENT DOCUMENTS
911948 Bright
611950 Jonassen
511962 Petitto
1011965 Petitto
911970 McCracken
311989
711990
711990
1011992
1211993
711996
711997
111998
211998
1011998
511999
7/2000
5/2002
112003
212006
112007
4/2007

Patent No.:
Date of Patent:

D539,833
D545,348
D547,359
D556,818
D558,816
D561,811
D561,813
D564,572
D565,088
D570,899
D572,747
D572,749
D575,323
D577,759
D581,450
D586,379
D595,333
D599,838
D61O,604
D616,015
D621,438
D622,302
D623,217

**

Feb. 5, 2013

S
4/2007 Chuang
S
6/2007 Chen
S
7/2007 Krako ff et al.
S
1212007 Jannard et al.
S
112008 Yee
S
212008 Fox et al.
S
212008 Baden et aI.
S
3/2008 Yee et al.
S
3/2008 Baden et aI.
S * 6/2008 Lee .............................. D16/326
S * 712008 Baden et aI. ................. D16/326
S
712008 Yee
S
8/2008 Jannard et al.
S
912008 Yee
S
1112008 Moritz
S
212009 Thixton et al.
S
6/2009 Markovitz et al.
S * 912009 Rohrbach .................... D16/326
S
212010 Thixton
S
512010 Markovitz et al.
S
812010 Markovitz et al.
S
812010 Yee
S
912010 Markovitz et al.
(Continued)

Primary Examiner - Raphael Barkai


(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm - Knobbe Martens Olson &
Bear, LLP
CLAIM
(57)
The ornamental design for an eyeglass, as shown and
described.

Ramp

Pouilloux
Evans
Simioni
Cargle
Monroe
Simioni
Walton
Mage
Simioni
Raub
Conway
Rask
Chen
Mangum
Paulson
Hsu

US D675,666 S

DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of an eyeglass of the present
invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevational view thereof, the right side
elevational view being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
The broken line portions of the drawings are for illustrative
purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

EXHIBIT 12
Page 62

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 105 of 117


US D675,666 S
Page 2

u.s. PATENT DOCUMENTS


D629,444
D629,830
D645,076
8,020,988

S
S
S
B2

1212010
1212010
912011
912011

Akarra et al.
Markovitz et al.
Markovitz et al.
Ogren et al.

D650,825
D652,442
D659,182
D664,183

S
S
S
S

1212011 Yee et al.

*
*

* cited by examiner

EXHIBIT 12
Page 63

112012 Yee et al.


5/2012 Shin et al ..................... D16/326
7/2012 Stepan et al. ................ D16/309

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 106 of 117

u.s. Patent

Feb. 5,2013

Sheet 1 of 4

FIG. 1

EXHIBIT 12
Page 64

US D675,666 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 107 of 117

u.s. Patent

Feb. 5, 2013

Sheet 2 of 4

FIG. 2

FIG. 3

IG.4

EXHIBIT 12
Page 65

US D675,666 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 108 of 117

u.s. Patent

Feb. 5,2013

Sheet 3 of 4

FI

EXHIBIT 12
Page 66

US D675,666 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 109 of 117

u.s. Patent

Feb. 5,2013

Sheet 4 of 4

FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 12
Page 67

US D675,666 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 110 of 117

EXHIBIT 13

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 111 of 117


111111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD676479S
USO0D676479S

(12) United States Design Patent (10)


(10) Patent No.:
N0.:

(12)

Yoo
Y00

(45)

(54)

EYEGLASS

(75)
(75)

Inventor:
Inventor:

(73)

Assignee:
Ass1gnee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill
Footh1ll Ranch, CA (US)

(>14)
(**)

Term:
Term:

(21)
(21)

Appl.
No.: 29/427,258
APPLNO-Z
29/427,258

(22)

Jul. 16, 2012


LOC
LOC (9)
(9) CI.
Cl. ..................................................
................................................ .. 16-06
16-06
U.S.
US. CI.
Cl. ......................................
.................................... .. D16/326;
D16/326; D16/335
D16/335
Field of Classification
Classi?cation Search .................
............... .. DI6/101,
D16/101,
D16/300-342,900;
Dl6/300i342, 900; D29/109-110;
D29/l09ill0; D24/110.2;
351/41,44,51452,62,158,92,1034123,
351/41,44,51-52,62,158,92,103-123,
3511140,
351/140, 153,45-46;
153, 45446; 2/426-432,447-449,
2/426i432, 4474449,
2/441,434-437,13,15;
2/441, 4344437, 13, 15; D211483,659-661;
D21/483, 6594661;
D14/372
See application file
?le for complete search history.

- George
Yoo, Aliso
Viejo,
CA
GeorgeYoo,
Al1soV1e]o,
CA (US)
(US)

14 Years
Years
14

(51)
(51)
(52)
(52)
(58)

Filed:
F1led:

Date of Patent:

D577,759
13577,?59
D5S1,449
D581,449
D5S1,450
D581,450
D581451
D5S1,451
D5S4,335
D584,335
D5S6,379
13586379
D5S6,3S0
D586,380
D604,759
D607,040
D607,040
D61O,603
D610,603
D6l0,604
D61O,604
D61S,271
D618,271
D620,970
D64S,771
D648,771
13649579
D649,579
13650325
D650,S25
D652,442
D659,179

D659,lS2

US D676,479 S
11* Feb. 19, 2013
**

S
91200S
s
9/2008 Yee
S
111200S
11/2008 Yee
S
111200S
S
11/2008 Moritz
M 't
S
110008 Yee
YeZnZ
S
111200S
S
112009
S
1/2009 Baden
Baden et
et al.
a1.
212009
S
2/2009 Thixton et
er al.
a1,
212009
S
2/2009 Yee
al. ............
S
s ** 1112009
11/2009 Rohrbach et
etal.
.......... ..
S
S *
* 1212009
12/2009 Rohrbach
Rohrbach ....................
.................. ..
S
212010
Thixton
2/2010 ThiXton
s
2/2010 Thixton
S
212010
6/2010
S
S *
*
6/2010 Chen
Chen ............................
.......................... ..
S
S12010
s
8/2010 Thixton
S
1112011
11/2011 Rohrbach
S
110011 Thixton
Thixton
S
1112011
5
12/2011 Yee et al.
a1,
S
1212011
S
112012 Yee
g
)Tiel? et
et al.
a1~
S
5/2012 Thixton
.lXtOn
S
5/2012 Shin et al.

13659482 S
* cited by examiner

D16/326
Dl6/326
D16/326

D16/326
D16/326

5/2012 $111 31'

Primary Examiner -* Raphael Barkai


(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm -* Knobbe, Martens, Olson &
&
Bear, LLP

References Cited

(56)

CLAIM
(57)
The ornamental design for an eyeglass, as shown
shoWn and
described.

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


D545,S71
D545,87l
D547,793
D547,794
D54S,269
D548,269
D550,755
D550,755
D556,246
D556,SlS
D556,8l8
D55S,S16
D558,8l6
D561,S10
D56l,8l0
D561,Sl1
D56l,8ll
D561,S12
D56l,8l2
D561,S13
D56l,8l3
D565,OSS
D565,088
D565,090
D572,747
D575,323
D575,323

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S

**

**
**
**

7/2007
7/2007
7/2007
S/2007
8/2007
912007
9/2007
1112007
ll/2007
1212007
12/2007
1I200S
l/2008
21200S
2/2008
21200S
2/2008
21200S
2/2008
21200S
2/2008
3/200S
3/2008
3/200S
3/2008
7/200S
7/2008
S/200S
8/2008

Yee
Baden et al.
a1.
JJannard
annard et al.
Baden et al.
a1.
Fuchs
Fuchs ..........................
........................ ..
Yee
JJannard
annard et al.
Yee
Fox et al.
Fox et al.
Fox
Fox et
et al.
al. .....................
................... ..
Baden
Baden et
et al.
a1. .................
............... ..
Baden et al.
a1.
Yee
Baden et al.
a1.
JJannard
annard et
et al.
al. ...............
............. ..

DESCRIPTION
D16/326
Dl6/326

D16/325
Dl6/325
D16/325
Dl6/325

FIG. 1 is a front perspective view


View of an eyeglass showing an
embodiment of my new
neW design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view
View thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view
View thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevational view
View thereof, the right side
elevational view
View being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view
View thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view
View thereof.

D16/326
Dl6/326

EXHIBIT 13
Page 68

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 112 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Feb. 19,2013
19, 2013

Sheet 11 of
0144

FIG. 1

EXHIBIT 13
Page 69

US D676,479 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 113 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Feb. 19,2013
19, 2013

US D676,479 S

Sheet 2 of
of44

FIG.
FIG, 2
31

43.152};

FIG. 3

FIG. 4

EXHIBIT 13
Page 70

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 114 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Feb. 19,2013
19, 2013

Sheet 3 of
of44

FIG. 5

EXHIBIT 13
Page 71

US D676,479 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 115 of 117

u.s.
US. Patent
Patent

Feb. 19,2013
19, 2013

Sheet 4 of
of44

FIG. 6

EXHIBIT 13
Page 72

US D676,479 S

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 116 of 117

EXHIBIT 14

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 117 of 117

EXHIBIT 14
Page 73

Case 3:16-cv-02029-LAB-MDD Document 1-1 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 1

CIVIL COVER SHEET

-6 5HY

7KH-6FLYLOFRYHUVKHHWDQGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQQHLWKHUUHSODFHQRUVXSSOHPHQWWKHILOLQJDQGVHUYLFHRISOHDGLQJVRURWKHUSDSHUVDVUHTXLUHGE\ODZH[FHSWDV
SURYLGHGE\ORFDOUXOHVRIFRXUW7KLVIRUPDSSURYHGE\WKH-XGLFLDO&RQIHUHQFHRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLQ6HSWHPEHULVUHTXLUHGIRUWKHXVHRIWKH&OHUNRI&RXUWIRUWKH
SXUSRVHRILQLWLDWLQJWKHFLYLOGRFNHWVKHHW(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

I. (a) PLAINTIFFS

DEFENDANTS
TIME PLAZA, INC., a California corporation

OAKLEY, INC., a Washington corporation


&RXQW\RI5HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG'HIHQGDQW

Orange

(b)&RXQW\RI5HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG3ODLQWLII

(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)

Los Angeles

(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)


127( ,1/$1'&21'(01$7,21&$6(686(7+(/2&$7,212)
7+(75$&72)/$1',192/9('

$WWRUQH\V(If Known)

(c)$WWRUQH\V(Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number)

'16CV2029 LAB MDD

Michael K. Friedland, Lauren K. Katzenellenbogen, Ali S. Razai,


Samantha Hsu; Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP
2040 Main St., 14th Floor, Irvine, CA 92614; (949) 760-0404

II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION(Place an X in One Box Only)


u  86*RYHUQPHQW
3ODLQWLII

u  )HGHUDO4XHVWLRQ
(U.S. Government Not a Party)

u  86*RYHUQPHQW
'HIHQGDQW

u  'LYHUVLW\
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)

III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff


(For Diversity Cases Only)
PTF
&LWL]HQRI7KLV6WDWH
u 

DEF
u 

and One Box for Defendant)


PTF
DEF
,QFRUSRUDWHGor3ULQFLSDO3ODFH
u 
u 
RI%XVLQHVV,Q7KLV6WDWH

&LWL]HQRI$QRWKHU6WDWH

u 

u 

,QFRUSRUDWHGand3ULQFLSDO3ODFH
RI%XVLQHVV,Q$QRWKHU6WDWH

u 

u 

&LWL]HQRU6XEMHFWRID
)RUHLJQ&RXQWU\

u 

u 

)RUHLJQ1DWLRQ

u 

u 

IV. NATURE OF SUIT(Place an X in One Box Only)


CONTRACT

TORTS

u
u
u
u

,QVXUDQFH
0DULQH
0LOOHU$FW
1HJRWLDEOH,QVWUXPHQW
5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW
 (QIRUFHPHQWRI-XGJPHQW
0HGLFDUH$FW
5HFRYHU\RI'HIDXOWHG
6WXGHQW/RDQV
 ([FOXGHV9HWHUDQV
5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW
RI9HWHUDQV%HQHILWV
6WRFNKROGHUV6XLWV
2WKHU&RQWUDFW
&RQWUDFW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
)UDQFKLVH

u
u
u
u
u
u

REAL PROPERTY
/DQG&RQGHPQDWLRQ
)RUHFORVXUH
5HQW/HDVH (MHFWPHQW
7RUWVWR/DQG
7RUW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
$OO2WKHU5HDO3URSHUW\

u
u
u
u
u
u
u

 PERSONAL INJURY


u $LUSODQH
u $LUSODQH3URGXFW
/LDELOLW\
u $VVDXOW/LEHO
6ODQGHU
u )HGHUDO(PSOR\HUV
/LDELOLW\
u 0DULQH
u 0DULQH3URGXFW
/LDELOLW\
u 0RWRU9HKLFOH
u 0RWRU9HKLFOH
3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
u 2WKHU3HUVRQDO
,QMXU\
u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\
0HGLFDO0DOSUDFWLFH
CIVIL RIGHTS
u 2WKHU&LYLO5LJKWV
u 9RWLQJ
u (PSOR\PHQW
u +RXVLQJ
$FFRPPRGDWLRQV
u $PHUZ'LVDELOLWLHV
(PSOR\PHQW
u $PHUZ'LVDELOLWLHV
2WKHU
u (GXFDWLRQ

FORFEITURE/PENALTY

PERSONAL INJURY
u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\
3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
u +HDOWK&DUH
3KDUPDFHXWLFDO
3HUVRQDO,QMXU\
3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
u $VEHVWRV3HUVRQDO
,QMXU\3URGXFW
/LDELOLW\
 PERSONAL PROPERTY
u 2WKHU)UDXG
u 7UXWKLQ/HQGLQJ
u 2WKHU3HUVRQDO
3URSHUW\'DPDJH
u 3URSHUW\'DPDJH
3URGXFW/LDELOLW\
PRISONER PETITIONS
Habeas Corpus:
u $OLHQ'HWDLQHH
u 0RWLRQVWR9DFDWH
6HQWHQFH
u *HQHUDO
u 'HDWK3HQDOW\
Other:
u 0DQGDPXV 2WKHU
u &LYLO5LJKWV
u 3ULVRQ&RQGLWLRQ
u &LYLO'HWDLQHH
&RQGLWLRQVRI
&RQILQHPHQW

u 'UXJ5HODWHG6HL]XUH
RI3URSHUW\86&
u 2WKHU

BANKRUPTCY
u $SSHDO86&
u :LWKGUDZDO
86&
PROPERTY RIGHTS
u &RS\ULJKWV
u 3DWHQW
u 7UDGHPDUN

u
u
u
u
u
u

LABOR
)DLU/DERU6WDQGDUGV
$FW
/DERU0DQDJHPHQW
5HODWLRQV
5DLOZD\/DERU$FW
)DPLO\DQG0HGLFDO
/HDYH$FW
2WKHU/DERU/LWLJDWLRQ
(PSOR\HH5HWLUHPHQW
,QFRPH6HFXULW\$FW

u
u
u
u
u

SOCIAL SECURITY
+,$ II
%ODFN/XQJ 
',:&',::  J
66,'7LWOH;9,
56,  J

FEDERAL TAX SUITS


u 7D[HV 863ODLQWLII
RU'HIHQGDQW
u ,567KLUG3DUW\
86&

OTHER STATUTES
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

)DOVH&ODLPV$FW
6WDWH5HDSSRUWLRQPHQW
$QWLWUXVW
%DQNVDQG%DQNLQJ
&RPPHUFH
'HSRUWDWLRQ
5DFNHWHHU,QIOXHQFHGDQG
&RUUXSW2UJDQL]DWLRQV
&RQVXPHU&UHGLW
&DEOH6DW79
6HFXULWLHV&RPPRGLWLHV
([FKDQJH
2WKHU6WDWXWRU\$FWLRQV
$JULFXOWXUDO$FWV
(QYLURQPHQWDO0DWWHUV
)UHHGRPRI,QIRUPDWLRQ
$FW
$UELWUDWLRQ
$GPLQLVWUDWLYH3URFHGXUH
$FW5HYLHZRU$SSHDORI
$JHQF\'HFLVLRQ
&RQVWLWXWLRQDOLW\RI
6WDWH6WDWXWHV

IMMIGRATION
u 1DWXUDOL]DWLRQ$SSOLFDWLRQ
u 2WKHU,PPLJUDWLRQ
$FWLRQV

V. ORIGIN(Place an X in One Box Only)


u  2ULJLQDO
3URFHHGLQJ

u  5HPRYHGIURP
6WDWH&RXUW

u 

5HPDQGHGIURP
$SSHOODWH&RXUW

u  5HLQVWDWHGRU
5HRSHQHG

u  7UDQVIHUUHGIURP
$QRWKHU'LVWULFW

u  0XOWLGLVWULFW
/LWLJDWLRQ

(specify)

VI. CAUSE OF ACTION

&LWHWKH86&LYLO6WDWXWHXQGHUZKLFK\RXDUHILOLQJ(Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity)


15 U.S.C. 1125(a); 35 U.S.C. 271
%ULHIGHVFULSWLRQRIFDXVH

Patent Infringement. Federal Trade Dress Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition & False Designation of Origin

u &+(&.,)7+,6,6$CLASS ACTION
VII. REQUESTED IN
81'(558/()5&Y3
COMPLAINT:
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
(See instructions):
IF ANY
-8'*(
'$7(

DEMAND $

To be determined

&+(&.<(6RQO\LIGHPDQGHGLQFRPSODLQW
u <HV
u 1R
JURY DEMAND:
'2&.(7180%(5

6,*1$785(2)$77251(<2)5(&25'

/s/ Lauren K. Katzenellenbogen

08/11/2016
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
5(&(,37

$02817

$33/<,1*,)3

-8'*(

0$*-8'*(

Potrebbero piacerti anche