Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
No. 08-2091
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.
Norman K. Moon,
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00020-nkm-bwc)
Submitted:
Decided:
October 8, 2009
ASSOCIATES, LLC,
John
Loehr,
PER CURIAM:
Joseph
Mitchell
Miller,
Douglas
A.
Dye,
Jr.,
and
relief
on
their
complaint
against
Dogwood
Valley
Keith
Wynn,
and
Judith
Frances
McDavid.
Finding
no
error, we affirm.
The Appellants filed a complaint against the Appellees
seeking
treble
violation
damages
of
the
and
costs
Racketeering
and
attorneys
Influenced
fees
and
for
Corrupt
affects
interstate
commerce
through
pattern
of
1961(5)
(2006)
(pattern
of
racketeering
activity
the
extortion,
Appellants
in
alleged
violation
of
that
the
the
Hobbs
Appellees
Act,
18
engaged
U.S.C.
in
1951
See
18
U.S.C.
1961(1)
(2006)
(defining
racketeering
law
and
punishable
by
more
than
year,
and
any
act
his
consent,
induced
by
wrongful
use
of
actual
or
18 U.S.C. 1951(b)(2).
Extortion can be based on the fear of economic harm in
which
the
conduct
circumstances
rendered
that
surrounding
fear
the
reasonable.
alleged
extortionate
United
States
v.
Billups, 692 F.2d 320, 330 (4th Cir. 1982) (citations omitted);
see also United States v. Hairston, 46 F.3d 361, 365 (4th Cir.
1995).
legitimate
economic
threats
to
obtain
property,
defendant
Appellants contend
thoroughly
district
court
reviewed
did
not
the
err
record
in
and
finding
conclude
that
the
that
We
the
Appellees
omitted
facts
from
its
written
opinion.
We
have
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and