Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
David G. Terrell
May 28, 2010
Denys Hay, The Italian Renaissance in its Historical Background, xii + 218 pp., 24 ill., 2 maps
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1961.
Denys Hay‟s book appeared in the early 1960s, when social history and its proponents
had begun to transform western historiography. History, particularly medieval and “early modern
history,” was still much influenced by document-centric inquiry, still insisting on defining
unique periods, and still tending to think in terms of national contexts.1 Not many years later,
postmodernism‟s relativism would storm and rage against the “progress view of history” which,
during this interregnum that Hay writes his book, purposely intending “to provoke an unbiased
and fresh appeal of a phase in Italian and European history which has, more than most such
„periods‟, suffered from traditional and stereotyped treatment, above all by being dealt with as
Hay acknowledges that previous historians have suffered because of the large volume of
detailed critical work already extant. Any historian, he asserts—except perhaps the most
reasonable fraction of Renaissance history.3 Because of this “elephant in the room,” there is not a
1
Ernst Breisach, Historiography: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983),
356-357.
2
Denys Hay, The Italian Renaissance in its Historical Background, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1961), x.
3
David G. Terrell, "HIST535 K001 SPR 10 Discussion Board (Re: Historiography)," American Military University,
(May 7, 2010,
2
David G. Terrell
large corpus of fully-informed, completely holistic discussions of Renaissance history; and those
discussions that have occurred settled upon narrowly-defined and more easily mastered topics.
Hay tells us that limited by their scope and preferences, historians wrote these four types
of Renaissance history independently until the 1960s, when historians began to synthesize and
integrate their Renaissance-related historical perspectives. This reviewer believes the impetus
driving the change came from the fresh historical perspective provided by the Annales historians,
who launched more inclusive and analytical histories than previous schools preferred—or were
capable of producing.5
Before leaving his Preface, one knows where Hay stands with regard to his subject and its
history. In quick succession, he explicitly positions himself within the literature by claiming
Renaissance in Italy with approbation. Hay asserts the possibility that a single general history of
the period is possible, since “…the Renaissance is the last epoch when one man can hope to have
a direct view of most of the sources. … (as) … I here try to view the history of Italy from the
Hay then introduces his subject as one should—who intends to expound upon a period
known for its love of Aristotelian and Platonic thought—he sets forth his axioms and defines his
https://online.apus.edu/educator/student/threadcontent.cgi?lb1753*1048044*mpos=4&spos=0&slt=cSaP0fPMgMD
Qs*hist535k001spr10*dg003*0002*1*reply*Threaded** (accessed May 22, 2010)). Hay, 5.
4
Hay, 5. Terrell.
5
Terrell.
6
Hay, x-xii.
3
David G. Terrell
terms. His three axioms are: there was a “Renaissance” between the approximate years 1350 and
1700; this period began in Italy and later affected the rest of Europe; and, the period is
identifiable through a “difference in the style of living between the Renaissance and both what
In the subsequent chapters, Hay sets about providing evidence supporting the axioms he
asserts. His chosen method is to integrate the Renaissance‟s cultural history with the long extant
political and social histories of Italy, drawing no distinction between Italian history and the
history of the Renaissance in Italy. He acknowledges the difficulty of synchronizing the two,
labeling the period as “one of those paradoxical epochs where cultural change seems to be out of
step with economic change.” Interestingly, he also recognizes the existence of a hidden history
related to the commoner; and when he asserts that the defining cultural innovations that changed
the Europeans‟ styles of living were formed “in the castle rather than the cottage,” and required
centuries to finally disperse to “simple men and women,” he foresees the need for, and predicts
Hay then turns to the conceptualization and emergence of the term “Renaissance” and the
validity of the notion of its existence. He asserts the existence of the Renaissance, as a definable
period of history, based on the spread of new styles in art, architecture, letters, and politics within
Italy; and, the derivative and relatively rapid adoption of these styles throughout Europe. At the
same time, however, he is in critical disagreement with those historians who describe the
Renaissance as a transitional period between and dark medieval world and the modern era.9
7
Hay, 1-2, 7.
8
Hay, 8, 3-5.
9
Hay, 10-14.
4
David G. Terrell
In particular, Hay uses the following points as evidence for accepting Renaissance as a
period sui generis and dismissing the idea of its transitional role. Politically, the fifteenth and
sixteenth centuries were an age of ubiquitous monarchy and the ideology of divine right for king
and pope. The preceding era was definable by the prominence of landed magnates and
strongmen who took titles such as Duke, Landgrave, and Count; and, the lack of a supporting
political ideology. Economically and socially, the beginning of the renaissance saw the
religious, intellectual, literary and artistic standards shifted away from the Christian clergy and
curia towards the common or secular man in the “lay direction of Christian spirituality”
supported by the increased use of vernacular languages which decreased the sacral monopoly on
written learning.10
Hay then addresses the political and cultural climate in Italy that contributed to the birth
of the Renaissance. He sets himself a definition for the history of Italy that includes the way a
country acquires self-consciousness; the play of political, social, cultural interests within the
boundaries formed by language and geography; and, its relations with its neighbors. Beginning
with the physical environment, Hay briefly describes the geography of Italy that, in a literal
sense, made Italy. He describes the insulating effect of the Alps, whose protective arch around
the northern plain moderated the climate, slowed overland invaders, and formed a linguistic
barrier; and of the seas, whose unpredictability and dangers deterred all but the hardiest and most
determined of outsiders from visiting the peninsula for more than trade. Conversely, Hay asserts
that the Apennine ridge down the length of Italy worked against unifying forces by preventing
efficient internal communications between the two sides of the peninsula. Based on these
10
Hay, 15-25.
5
David G. Terrell
considerations, hay posits that the geography created forces that protected the peninsula from
external tampering, while insuring that local socio-cultural dynamics were never completely
static.11
By the fourteenth century, according to Hay, Italy had its first chance to go her own way
since the eleventh century. Along with the protections afforded by geography, pressures from
Emperors, Popes and outsiders were diminished by narcissistic concerns, which further
developments. The resulting dynamism changed the forces, ambitions, or fears that drove towns
and great lords to shift from the papal and imperial towards the regional.13
At the local level, the fourteenth century saw styles of governance change from those of
free communes to that of the signoria which invested power in a man and his extended family, a
mostly kinship-based structure reminiscent of early roman familial client-patron groupings. The
presence of these structures in Italian towns produced an insecure balance of parties formed as
families grouped themselves into mutually supporting factions through marriage and commercial
alliances. The principal weapons used in struggles for dominance between the factions drew on
roman traditions of proscribing families and seizing their property. These structures were
enlarged and empowered by popular support and the strength of commerce and industry. The
oligarchs excluded attempts by the traditional nobility to impose rule and Florence, Lucca and
However, the political dynamism was partially fueled by negative economic and
demographic factors. From the late thirteenth century, Italy was faced with an economic
11
Hay, 26-32.
12
Hay, 59.
13
Hay, 58-62.
14
Hay, 63-65.
6
David G. Terrell
recession, including significant numbers of bankruptcies and famine that were certainly
exacerbated, if not caused, by the severe disease outbreaks that reduced the population available
for agriculture and industry, and suppressed transportation and trade. Urban Italy and especially
Tuscany was seriously affected by the plagues. Nevertheless, a recovery was under way in Italy
by the late fifteenth century, after an identifiable period of serious strife in terms of conflict,
After thus considering the political sphere, Hay turns to discussing the cultural
development of the Renaissance through newly conceived educational programs and new
attitudes about literature and morality. He points out that, intellectually, the fourteenth century
was still a time of individuals. Hay names Dante, Petrarch and Boccaccio to illustrate his point—
granting Dante the role of summing up the past; to Petrarch, that of defining an image for a
European future; and, to Boccaccio, of defining the path (Latin and vernacular language) and the
sources (Roman, rather than Grecian or Germanic) through which that image could be made
real.16
Petrarch‟s paradigm describes a humanity trained to live a planned life that was
expansive, beautiful, and pleasing to God, as opposed to a life limited by the simple training that
produced tradesmen, clerks and clerics. The use of a common, vernacular linguistic medium was
meant to expand the number of people able to receive the necessary instruction; that was to be
drawn from those classical sources which wise men believed to provide more appropriate
guidance than was found in traditional western teachings, in spite of its variance to the Christian
embrace of renunciation.17
15
Hay, 67.
16
Hay, 75, 91, 95.
17
Hay, 80-84.
7
David G. Terrell
Hay then directs his view beyond the turbulent political events cresting between 1375 and
1385 to consider the post-Petrarch, post-Boccaccio environment. He indicates that while men of
letters became more numerous and more visible, they were less skilled—unlike the increasing
numbers of highly-skilled artisans. The spread of these classical ideals tended to simplify and
gentle the extremes of Italian political life while, at the same time, enriching its cultural life. 18
As mentioned, the Florence that emerges as the focus of change in the early fifteenth
century is dominated by oligarchic merchant families—power being vested in the industrial and
mercantile guilds. The resulting government promulgated some reasonable and forward-thinking
fiscal policies that kept the populace reasonably content for years. Hay asserts that the resulting
stability and prosperity allowed the gathering of the raw materials that produced the
sculpture and literary methods, style and content—all of which were pursued in search of moral
The Florentine paradigm Hay describes centers around an accommodation with mortality
based more on the Roman euphoria derived from the well-lived life, watched over by gods, not
so different from men, rather than from the medieval Christological model that exalted worldly
abnegation and renunciation. In this, Hay acknowledges his agreement with Burckhardt‟s views
concerning the expression of sentiment in the Renaissance through a new attitude towards
education, the enthronement of secular wisdom, the favoring of almost republican principles in
politics, and a revival of artistic literature. At the same time, Hay voices disagreement with
Burckhardt‟s assertion that the physical sciences had a parallel boost in the Renaissance;
18
Hay, 102-103.
19
Hay, 118-121.
8
David G. Terrell
pointing out that, excepting new ideas in optics and perspective—both related to developments in
The initial era of the Renaissance in Italy wound down in the late fifteenth and early
sixteenth centuries while Italian culture begins its expansion into the rest of Europe. Within Italy,
the political move towards republicanism had shifted and, by the end of the fifteenth century,
Florence had gotten itself a Prince, now the prevailing form of governance in Italy. Hay points
out that the humanist education many of the princes had received affected their choice of
servants. Humanist-trained men made excellent administrators and diplomats and, through the
favor of their noble former-students, they became such in many Italian principalities. This
included the Papal States where, by the early sixteenth century, humanists came to dominate the
papal entourage. Under their influence, Rome renewed its reputation as a center of art, literature
and scholarship—which had not been true since classical times. By the end of Hay‟s first age of
the Renaissance in Italy, the cultural and intellectual power it had engendered had become
subject to pope and prince; and in Florence, it had been suborned by the autocrat to flatter the
person of, and to politically protect the position of, its prince. Hay laments that while the cultural
unity of Italy was assured through the common styles in art and literature, the overall tone of
word and image had lost its revolutionary verve and become more plebian than patrician.21
After thus tracing the flowering of the Renaissance in Italy, Hay turns his attention to the
expansion of the new modes of thought and expression into the rest of Europe. He describes
Italy‟s offering to Europe as a mode of life revitalized by a turning away from Christianity‟s
asceticism, a common educational paradigm based on the Latin texts, and artistic developments
20
Hay, 131-134.
21
Hay, 102-103, 150-153, 157-161, 172-173.
9
David G. Terrell
enriched by the classical Latin symbolism and mythology. As evidence, he discusses the rising
prominence of men of law, the establishment of schools, and the standardization of English and
Nevertheless, Hay is careful to point out that it is not until the sixteenth century that we
really see the Renaissance take root in Central and northern Europe. He hesitates to conjecture at
to the reasons for the delay but believes that differences in social structures between Italy and the
In the name of maintaining a reasonable scope, Hay also limits his northern study to
events in France and England. He first addresses Petrarch‟s presence in Avignon, which likely
exposed France to the early influences of the Renaissance. He also attributes English exposure to
early Renaissance concepts through Chaucer‟s familiarity with Petrarch, which included a
possible meeting, and with Boccaccio‟s writings. Secondly, Hay asserts that the Councils of the
church provided major venues for cross-pollination between Italians and visiting prelates,
diplomats and counselors from the North. Thirdly and, to Hay, most importantly, Italy‟s shift
towards royalist forms of governance made Italy more comfortable to the ambassadors and
visitors from the nobility-ruled North. So the transmission to the north was, to Hay,
accomplished by Italian scholars and artists traveling north, by northern visitors to Italy, and by
The transmission of ideas tended to homogenize Europe in a final “courtly phase” of the
Italian Renaissance which centered around an education in Latin; the production of realistic art
tempered with heroic symbolism; and, an ideological emphasis on practical living in mortality
22
Hay, 179-181.
23
Hay, 183.
24
Hay, 186-189, 191-198.
10
David G. Terrell
rather that a pining for the hereafter. This uniformity eventually broke down at the start of the
eighteenth century when an industrial economy overtook the agrarian; nationalism overtook
autocratic allegiances; and, the physical sciences supplanted philosophy as the accepted model
for cognition.25
While the general historical community lauded Hay for a satisfactory treatment in a small
book, some objections to his work came from Art Historians. From their prospective, Hay failed
to devote enough attention to art, as opposed to politics and literature, and to art beyond the
boundaries of Florence, particularly to the detriment of Padua, Venice and Milan. Art historians
also took exception to Hay extending the Renaissance to about 1700, through the age they label
as the Baroque. Hay is criticized less about his assertions than for failing to mention particular
examples important to these other reviewers. This reviewer enjoyed receiving Hay‟s mentoring
hand. 26
David G. Terrell
Herndon, VA
25
Hay, 201-203.
26
Benard C. Weber, "Review of Denys Hay, 'The Italian Renaissance in its Historical Background'," (Italica
(American Association of Teachers of Italian) XL, no. 1 (March 1963): 85). Selma Pfeiffenberger, "Review of
Denys Hay, 'The Italian Renaissance in its Historical Background'," (Art Journal (College Art Association) XXIII,
no. 2 (Winter 1963-1964): 172, 176, 178). Alfred Neumeyer, "Review of Denys Hay, 'The Italian Renaissance in its
Historical Background'," (The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The
American Society for Aesthetics) XX, no. 3 (Spring 1962): 327).
11
David G. Terrell
Works Cited
Hay, Denys. The Italian Renaissance in its Historical Background. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1961.
Neumeyer, Alfred. "Review of Denys Hay, 'The Italian Renaissance in its Historical
Background'." The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (Blackwell Publishing on behalf of
The American Society for Aesthetics) XX, no. 3 (Spring 1962): 327.
Pfeiffenberger, Selma. "Review of Denys Hay, 'The Italian Renaissance in its Historical
Background'." Art Journal (College Art Association) XXIII, no. 2 (Winter 1963-1964): 172, 176,
178.
Terrell, David G. "HIST535 K001 SPR 10 Discussion Board (Re: Historiography)." American
Military University. May 7, 2010.
https://online.apus.edu/educator/student/threadcontent.cgi?lb1753*1048044*mpos=4&spos=0&s
lt=cSaP0fPMgMDQs*hist535k001spr10*dg003*0002*1*reply*Threaded** (accessed May 22,
2010).
Weber, Benard C. "Review of Denys Hay, 'The Italian Renaissance in its Historical
Background'." Italica (American Association of Teachers of Italian) XL, no. 1 (March 1963): 85.
© David G. Terrell, 2009-2010, except where otherwise noted, content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-
Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. For permission to reprint under terms outside the license, contact
davidterrell80@hotmail.com.