Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
No. 14-4453
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:12-cr-00228-FDW-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
March 2, 2015
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Tony Humphrey pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea
agreement, to two counts of Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of
18 U.S.C. 1951 (2012) (Counts One and Ten); two counts of
attempted Hobbs Act robbery (Counts Three and Eight); one count
of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2113(a), (d)
(2012) (Count Six); and two counts of brandishing a firearm in
furtherance of a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
924(c)(1)(A)(ii) (2012) (Counts Two and Four).
The district
other
sentences;
and
twenty-five
years
imprisonment
on
On
We affirm.
case,
and
have
found
no
meritorious
issues.
Before
P.
11
and
ensuring
that
2
Humphreys
plea
was
knowing,
See
United States v. DeFusco, 949 F.2d 114, 116 (4th Cir. 1991).
Moreover,
the
district
error at sentencing.
court
made
no
significant
procedural
(2007).
Counsel
questions
whether
substantively reasonable.
Humphreys
sentence
is
Any sentence
Such a presumption
can
the
only
be
unreasonable
rebutted
when
[(2012)] factors.
(4th
Cir.)
by
showing
measured
against
that
the
18
sentence
U.S.C.
is
3553(a)
(citation
omitted),
cert.
denied,
135
S.
Ct.
421
(2014).
After
careful
review
of
the
record,
we
conclude
that
and mental health problems, but concluded that these factors did
not excuse his violent crimes.
others
mitigating
from
factors
violent
and
that
crime,
but
Humphrey
3
also
was
recognized
making
efforts
the
to
improve
his
life.
We
therefore
conclude
that
Humphreys
sentence is reasonable.
Accordingly, we affirm the district courts judgment.
This
AFFIRMED