Scribd Logo
Carica

Benvenuto in Scribd!

  • Stanley Zebulun v. United States, 907 F.2d 1141, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Caricato da

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 visualizzazioni2 pagine
    Stanley Zebulun appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its March 9, 1990 decision. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Descrizione originale:

    Filed: 1990-06-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 907 F.2d 1141 Docket: 90-6319

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Formati disponibili

    PDF o leggi online da Scribd

    Hai trovato utile questo documento?

    Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

    Segnala questo documento
    Stanley Zebulun appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its March 9, 1990 decision. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Scarica in formato PDF o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    6 visualizzazioni2 pagine

    Stanley Zebulun v. United States, 907 F.2d 1141, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Caricato da

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stanley Zebulun appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its March 9, 1990 decision. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Scarica in formato PDF o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    di 2

    907 F.

    2d 1141
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Stanley ZEBULUN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 90-6319.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 4, 1990.
    Decided June 15, 1990.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR No. 81-156-M; CA
    No. 90-585-S)
    Stanley Zebulun, appellant pro se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Stanley Zebulun appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Zebulun v. United States, CR-81-156-M; CA-90585-S (D.Md. Mar. 9, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    2

    AFFIRMED.

    Potrebbero piacerti anche