Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
High speed detection of potato and clod using an acoustic based intelligent system
Adel Hosainpour a,, Mohammad H. Komarizade b, Asghar Mahmoudi c, Mahrokh G. Shayesteh d
a
a r t i c l e
Keywords:
Acoustics
Clod
Discriminating
Neural networks
Potato
Separation
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Discriminating between potato tubers and clods is the rst step in developing an automatic separation
system on potato harvesters. In this study, an acoustic-based intelligent system was developed for high
speed discriminating between potato tubers and soil clods. About 500 kg mixture of potato tubers and
clods were loaded on a belt conveyer and were impacted against a steel plate at four different velocities.
The resulting acoustic signals were recorded, processed and potential features were extracted from the
analysis of sound signals in both time and frequency domains. A multilayer perceptron neural network
with a back propagation algorithm was used for pattern recognition. Altogether, 17 potential discriminating features were selected and fed as input vectors to the articial neural network models. Optimal network was selected based on mean square error, correct detection rate and correlation coefcient. At the
belt velocity of 1 m s 1, detection accuracy of the presented system was about 97.3% and 97.6% for potatoes and clods, respectively. Increasing the belt velocity resulted in the reduction of detection accuracy
and increase in the number of miss classied samples. By using this system, it is expected that a potato
harvester may operate at a capacity of 20 ton hr 1 with the accuracy of about 97%.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Potato is one of the most prominent crops in the world with an
estimated annual production of approximately 325 million ton
(FAO, 2008). This enormous amount of potato needs fully automated harvesters. For a long time, the agro-industry has attempted
to automate potato harvesting operations. Although the tasks of
digging, picking up potatoes and removing ne clods are performed mechanically, removing clods and probable stones are usually done manually. The clods and stones must be removed before
entry into the potato harvester container; because they occupy a
large space of the container and with their abrasive nature may
mechanically damage potato tubers. Accompanying mixture of potato also reduces the air circulation and prevents proper temperature and humidity control (Main, 1971). Discriminating between
potato tubers and clods is the rst step in developing an automatic
separation system on potato harvesters. Developing an automated
system for separating clods from potato tubers is more challenging,
because potato tubers have a wide diversity in shape, size and color. Moreover, the shape, size, and moisture content of clods are not
Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 4116671294, mobile: +98 9143002974.
E-mail addresses: a_hosainpour12@yahoo.com, a.hosainpour@urmia.ac.ir (A.
Hosainpour), m.komarizade@urmia.ac.ir (M.H. Komarizade), A_mahmoudi@tabrizu.ac.ir (A. Mahmoudi), m.shayesteh@urmia.ac.ir (M.G. Shayesteh).
0957-4174/$ - see front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.164
predictable in harvesting condition. Partially and completely muddy potatoes add another obstacle in developing automated separator systems.
Separating potatoes from its impurities has been investigated in
many research studies. Most researchers have examined mechanical methods to solve the problem (Brantley, Hamann, & Whiteld,
1975; Feller, Morgolin, Zacharin, & Pasternak, 1985; Gan-Mor,
Zacharin, Galili, Feller, & Margolin, 1986; Shyam, Singh, & Singh,
1990). Although some of these methods are being used in some potato harvesters, they cause surface damages and bruises on potato
tubers (McGechan, 1980). Moreover, large space occupancy and
high energy consumption are other main drawbacks of these systems. Story and Raghavan (1973) used infrared reectance to sorting potatoes from stones and soil clods. In recent years, some
machine vision based systems have been developed for discriminating between potato tubers and clods (Al-Mallahi, Kataoka, &
Okamoto, 2008; Marchant, Onyango, & Street, 1988; Morrow, Sommer, Heinemann, & Tao, 1990). Operational problems are most
likely to be faced, by using this system under eld conditions
(i.e. rain, moisture, dust, vibration). High price of the cameras
and other auxiliary devices as well as inefciency in detecting clod
and muddy potatoes are other disadvantages of this method.
Recently, non destructive acoustical experiments have been
increasingly implemented in detection and classication of agricultural products (Diezma-Iglesias, Ruiz-Altisent, & Barreiro,
12102
Table 1
Numbers and physical characteristic of used samples.
Samples
Variety
Number N
Stda (g)
Potato
Marfona
Agria
Kosima
Granola
378
443
446
625
1483
38
186
158
150
115
123
108
82
73
88
50
72
40
Clod
Stone
a
Standard deviation.
12103
Fig. 1. (a) Schematics of experimental apparatus. (b) Position of impact plate respect to feeding platform.
Table 2
Position of impact plate at different velocity of belt conveyer.
Belt velocity
Vms 1
Horizontal distance
X cm
Vertical distance
Y cm
Angle a
()
1
1.5
2
2.5
25
27
30
34
9
8
7
5
30
30
35
35
sets of features were utilized for PCA purposes: Amp, PSD and
NFFT. After normalization of data, PCA analysis was performed
on data using Matlab software. Table 3 shows the relation between
12104
Data
acquisition
Signal
processing
Feature
extraction
Detection
system
Interpretation
system
Output
Fig. 2. The block diagram of the detection system.
0.2
Table 3
Relation among eliminated components variance and number of selected principle
components.
Potato
Amplitude (V)
0.1
0
-0.1
2
0.5
0.1
-0.2
-0.3
a
-0.4
10
15
20
Time (ms)
Number of selected
features
Ampa
PSDb
NFFTc
9
28
98
1
4
34
1
3
11
Amplitude.
Power spectral density.
Normalized FFT magnitudes centered about the peak frequency.
0.3
Clod
Amplitude (V)
0.2
0.1
0
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
0
10
15
20
Time (ms)
Fig. 3. Typical digitized impact sound signals from potato and clod.
1.2
Potato
Clod
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
840
1680
2520
Frequency (Hz)
3360
4200
Fig. 4. Normalized frequency spectra obtained by FFT for potato and clod.
the network weights are adapted and employed for cross validation in order to determine overall performance of the ANN model.
Gradient descent with momentum (GDM) learning rule is an
improvement to the straight GD rule in the sense that a momentum term is used to speed up learning and stabilizing convergence
(Haykin, 1999). Therefore, the GDM method of learning was used
throughout this study.
12105
a
b
c
d
Features
Number of features
Ampa
Amp
PSDb
NFFTc
PFd
Amp + PSD
Amp + NFFT
PSD + NFFT
Amp + PSD + NFFT
Amp + PSD + PF
Amp + NFFT + PF
Amp + PSD + NFFT + PF
28
9
4
3
1
9+4
9+3
4+3
9+4+3
9+4+1
4+3+1
9+4+3+1
Clod
90.2
87.4
89.3
91.8
88.6
92.2
92.7
94.3
95.4
93.4
95.2
97.3
84.2
73.6
91.4
80.1
92.5
91.2
86.8
92.2
93.3
94.5
95.4
97.6
0.068
0.163
0.032
0.070
0.018
0.019
0.067
0.019
0.016
0.013
0.013
0.011
Amplitude.
Power spectral density.
Normalized FFT magnitudes centered about the peak frequency.
Peak frequency.
Table 5
Performance of optimal ANN model.
0.25
Training MSE
Performance
Potato
Clod
MSE
CDRa (%)
r
0.0113
97.3%
0.989
0.0105
97.6%
0.992
0.2
0.15
MSE
0.1
Table 6
Distribution of peak frequency values.
Samples
Potato
Clod
a
0.05
Maximum
Minimum
Mean
Stda
1455
3055
1180
1429
1260
1911
75
205
150
300
450
600
Number of epochs
750
900
Standard deviation.
Table 7
Detection accuracy of on-line system at different belt velocity.
Belt velocity (m s
Correct detection
Potato
1
1.5
2
2.5
Cross validation
MSE
Clod
Ratio
Ratio
176/
181
174/
182
162/
178
157/
184
97.2
79/
81
81/
84
77/
82
71/
81
97.5
0.011
96.4
0.018
93.9
0.045
87.6
0.165
95.6
91
85.2
Fig. 5 shows the neural network training procedure. It illustrates that in the rst 100 epochs of the training and cross validation, MSE reaches to an acceptable magnitude. Therefore, for
decreasing the training time we can consider only 100 epochs.
The number of used features in relation to the size and diversity
of the training sets indicated that, over-tting of the neural network was not possible.
The signal acquisition and computational procedures took
about 25 ms for a sample at throughput rate of 40 samples per second. However there were some mechanical disturbances that limited the detection capacity under 15 samples per second. A potato
harvester by using this system can perform at the eld capacity of
7.2 ton hr 1.
4. Conclusion
In this stage, data acquisition, signal processing and samples detection were performed at the same time. Table 7 shows the performance of on-line system at different belt conveyer velocities.
Increasing the belt velocity resulted in the reduction of detection
accuracy and increase in the number of miss classied samples.
Low detection accuracy in high velocity was caused by high sound
signal intensity. Although the distance between feeder and impact
plate had been adjusted before, saturated and weak sound signals
were likely at the high velocity of belt conveyor. Using only one
microphone does not seem to be sufcient in high speed
separation.
12106