Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-8062

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER RAY PARRISH,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:08-cr-00099-FL-1; 5:11-cv-00166-FL)

Submitted:

February 27, 2014

Decided:

March 5, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Ray Parrish, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris Cowley,


Evan Rikhye, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:
Christopher Ray Parrish appeals the district courts
order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


court.

United

States

(E.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2013)

v.

Parrish,

No.

5:08-cr-00099-FL-1

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Potrebbero piacerti anche