Scribd Logo
Carica

Benvenuto in Scribd!

  • Abdullah v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Caricato da

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 visualizzazioni2 pagine
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Malcolm Omawale Abdullah under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied Abdullah relief and he appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion denying Abdullah's claims.

    Descrizione originale:

    Filed: 1997-09-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7927

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Formati disponibili

    PDF o leggi online da Scribd

    Hai trovato utile questo documento?

    Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

    Segnala questo documento
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Malcolm Omawale Abdullah under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied Abdullah relief and he appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion denying Abdullah's claims.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Scarica in formato PDF o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    2 visualizzazioni2 pagine

    Abdullah v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Caricato da

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Malcolm Omawale Abdullah under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied Abdullah relief and he appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion denying Abdullah's claims.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Scarica in formato PDF o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    di 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7927

    MALCOLM OMAWALE ABDULLAH,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL B. MOORE; OMAR SHAHEED; WILLIAM D.
    CATOE; RALPH S. BEARDSLEY; TOM SMITH,
    Detective,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. William B. Traxler, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-96-1028-10-21BD)
    Submitted:

    September 11, 1997

    Decided:

    September 18, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Malcolm Omawale Abdullah, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Cleveland Batson,
    Robert Eric Petersen, William Ansel Collins, Jr., Byron Ronald
    Roberts, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's
    recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
    on the reasoning of the district court. Abdullah v. Moore, No. CA96-1028-10-21BD (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Potrebbero piacerti anche