Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
No. 11-5201
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-cr-00058-BR-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
September 7, 2012
PER CURIAM:
Hilaria
Rodriguez
pled
guilty
to
conspiring
to
of
cocaine
base
(crack),
at
least
five
kilograms
of
court
complied
with
Fed.
R.
Crim.
P.
11
when
it
role
in
the
offense.
Rodriguez
filed
pro
se
The
We affirm.
regard
to
her
conviction
for
possession
of
210,
244
(4th
Cir.
2008)
(internal
quotation
marks,
could
accept
as
adequate
and
sufficient
to
support
United
States v. Taylor, 659 F.3d 339, 343 (4th Cir. 2011) (internal
924
of
924(c)(1)(A).
prohibits
drug
We
sufficient
evidence
to
including
Rodriguezs
possession
trafficking
conclude
that
support
each
participation
of
firearm
crime.
the
Government
element
in
18
of
the
drug
in
U.S.C.
offered
offense,
trafficking
possession
crime).
of
firearm
in
furtherance
of
drug
trafficking
court
reasonableness,
reviews
applying
Rodriguezs
the
sentence
abuse-of-discretion
for
standard.
This review
court
correctly
calculated
the
advisory
Guidelines
3553(a)
presented
by
the
selected sentence.
(2006)
parties,
factors,
and
analyzed
sufficiently
the
arguments
explained
the
If the sentence is
575; United States v. Pauley, 511 F.3d 468, 473 (4th Cir. 2007).
Rodriguez asserts that the enhancement for her role in
the
offense
was
improperly
applied.
This
court
reviews
the
United
manager,
or
supervisor.
U.S.
Sentencing
Guidelines
Cir. 2003).
factual
findings,
we
conclude
that
the
district
after
thorough
Rodriguezs
sentence
Rodriguezs
within-Guidelines
coupled
with
the
is
examination
of
procedurally
mandatory
We also
record,
reasonable
sentence
minimum
the
on
the
sentence
courts
and
that
that
drug
counts,
the
firearm
on
535
(A
F.3d
[mandatory
210,
224
minimum]
(4th
Cir.
sentence
2008)
.
5
is
statutorily
per
se
required
reasonable
. . . .);
Abu
Ali,
528
F.3d
at
261
([A]
sentence
located
in
We therefore
We deny counsels
writing,
of
the
right
to
petition
the
Supreme
If Rodriguez
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED