Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
INTRODUCTION
An oil-source rock correlation definitively an individual
source rock sample to an individual crude oil using
genetically-based, internally consistent parameter matches.
The importance of these correlations as risk reduction tools
in exploration of mature sedimentary basins (Waples and
Curiale, 1999). Although petroleum geochemists can cite
several accepted oil-source rock involved chemically and
geologically consistent correlative relationship is subjective
to an extent that would be unacceptable in other areas of
organic geochemistry. My objectives are to outline the
reasons for the inherent subjectivity of oil-source
correlations, and to recommend conceptual and practical
approaches for improving them as an approach toward
reducing exploration risk.
An oil-source rock correlation is a causal relationship
established between the two components which are
consistent with all known chemical, geochemical and
geological information established by Hunt et al. (1954).
Specifically: (a) the oil must arise at least in part from the
specified source rock; (b) chemical data used in the
correlation must be comparable and the elemental,
molecular and isotopic data derived from the source rock
must be of the same type as that derived from the oil; and
(c) all available geological data must be supportive and
clear geological evidence must exist which allows the
proposed source rock to have sourced the oil.
In the present work geochemical correlations of oils and
extracts are based on the ability to recognize distinct
physical and chemical similarities, or differences, between
the hydrocarbons in a reservoir and the extractable
bitumen plus the residual in the original source rock
(Williams, 1974). Oil-source rock correlations are more
difficult than oil-oil correlations, due to many problems in
their sampling, analyses and/or interpreting the available
data. Such interpretations must be confirmed by different
parameters, e.g. gross composition of oil and source rock
extracts, biomarker analyses, environmental analysis..
Many parameters for oil-source correlation as, saturates
(%), saturates/aromatics, Cmax, C21+C22/C28+C29, CPI,
and
pristane+npristane/phytane,
pristane/n-C17
1
Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Nasr City, Hei Al-Zehour, Cairo11727, Egypt.
E-mail: melnady2021@yahoo.com
*Corresponding author
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Table 1: Geochemical Parameters of Oil: Source Rocks Correlation of Oilfields in the North Western Desert, Egypt
Sat
%
Arom
%
Saturate/
Aromatic
NSO
%
Cmax
C21+C22/
C28+C29
Oils
Meleiha oilfied
Qarun oilfied
Misaada oilfied
28.58
72.15
69.56
15.50
18.45
15.23
1.84
3.91
5.11
55.92
9.40
15.12
15
16
16
1.10
1.1
2.3
Source rocks
Kharita Fm.
Bahariya Fm
Khatatba Fm
13.45
64.59
50.82
22.15
30.12
22.50
0.64
2.14
2.26
64.40
05.29
26.68
29
17
16
2.84
3.33
3.50
Samples
Pr/
ph
Pr/
n-C17
Ph/
n-C18
Pr+n-C17/
ph+n-C18
1.04
0.941.02
3.00
0.63
2.00
0.40
0.28
0.10
0.18
0.47
0.10
1.17
0.90
1.08
2.00
0.92
0.95
1.41
0.42
0.60
0.72
0.41
0.13
0.45
0.45
0.13
2.84
3.33
3.50
CPI
NSO%: (Asphaltenes + resins) percent; Pr/Ph: Pristane/ Phytane ratio. Pr/n-C17: Pristane/normal alkane ratio. Ph/n-C18: Phytane/ normal alkane ratio.
CPI: Carbon preference index = Odd carbon atom/ Even carbon atom
Table 2: A Degree Assessment of Oil: Source Rocks Correlation of Oilfields in the North Western Desert, Egypt
Sat
%
>50
Sat/
Arom
>2.00
Cmax
<22
C21+C22/
C28+C29
>2.00
CPI
1.0+0.1
Pr/ ph
2.0+0.6
Pr/
n-C17
0.7+0.6
Pr+n-C17/
ph+n-C18
1.2+0.6
Score
+=5
0=Nil
P. M
>4/8
C. R
>50
Oils
Meleiha
Qarun
Misaada
0
+++
+++
0
+
+
++
++
++
0
0
+++
+
0
+
0
+++
+++
++
++
++
+++++
+++++
+++++
50
80
100
4/8
6/8
8/8
Nil
Good
Good
Source rocks
Kharita
Bahariya
Khatatba
0
+++
+++
0
++
++
0
+
+
+++
+++
+++
+
0
+
++
0
0
++
++
++
0
0
0
40
55
60
4/8
5/8
6/8
Nil
Good
Good
Samples
TECHNIQUES
x About 200g of rock samples were powdered to 250mesh size and then extracted with chloroform by using
Soxhlet extractor.
x The crude oils and extracts samples were separated into
saturate,
aromatics
and
resins
by
column
chromatography. The column was packed with 1:1 (by
weight) alumina overlying silica gel such that the weight
of the sample (asphaltenes free) was about 2% of the
combined weight of the packed materials. Successive
elution with n-heptane, toluene and chloroform yielded
saturates, aromatics and resins component fractions,
respectively. The results are expressed as weight
percent to the whole oils and extracts.
x The saturate fractions of oils and extracts were
analyzed by gas chromatography using (Perkin Elmer
Instrument Model 8700) provided with a flame
ionization detector (FID). Oven temperature was
programmed for 100 to 320C at 5C/min.
n- Alkanes
The carbon distribution of crude oils and source rock extracts
(Figure 2) show that clear similarities in their molecular
distribution between Qarun and Misaada oils and Bahariya
and Khataba extracts indicate a genetic relationship. On the
other hand, Meleiha oil and extract of Kharita source rocks
extracts seem to be similar with each other and dissimilar
with the crude oils of Qarun and Meleiha oilfields.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Figure 1: Location map of the studied oilfields in North Western Desert, Egypt
Figure 2: Carbon distribution of crude oil and extract samples of some oilfields in the North Western Desert, Egypt
Figure 3: Plot of Pr/n-C17 versus Ph/n-C18 of crude oil and extract samples of some oilfields in the North Western Desert, Egypt
Degree of Assessment
The assessments degree of the correlation between crude
oil and source rocks has been determined by studying the
correlation score for both oils and extracts. Eight
correlation parameters have been studied for this purpose
includes, saturates (%), ratio, Cmax, C21+C22/C28+C29, CPI,
and
pristane+npristane/phytane,
pristane/n-C17
C17/phytane+n-C18, saturates/aromatics (Table 1). The
score points, which have been allotted to different
mentioned parameters according to Alexander et al.,
RESEARCH ARTICLE
(1981) are 5 score points for each, saturates/aromatics
ratios and CPI, 10 points for each pristane/n-C17 and
carbon maximum (Cmax), 15 points for each saturates (%),
C21+C22/C28+C29 and pristane/phytane ratio, and 25 point
to pristane+n-C17/phytane+n-C18 (Table 2). This is
depending on their powers, which reflect the genetic
relations between oils and potential source rocks.
Based on the above correlation parameters, an overall
correlation score was obtained for each oil and extract by
summing up the contribution from each parameter. The
ratio of correlation parameter to the total parameters
(parameter match) has been also considered in evaluating
the correlation rate. The samples show a score 50 points
and 5/8-parameter match or more, indicating good
correlation. Samples with a score 40-50 points and 4/8parameter match are considered as not correlated.
Table (2) shows the parameters and score points
allotted to the studied oil and source rock extract samples.
From the results we show that the crude oil from Meleiha
oilfield has score point equal 50 and parameter match 4/8
indicates not correlated oil. While the crude oils from
Qarun and Misaada oilfields have score point ranging from
80 to 100 and parameters matches ranging from 6/8 to
8/8, respectively was reflecting good correlated oils. On the
other hand, the extract samples of Kharita source rocks
also is not correlated where it has score point and 4/8
parameters match. Consequently, the extracts of Bahariya
and Khatatba source rocks have score points ranging from
55 to 60 and parameters match are 5/8 and 6/8,
respectively) indicate a good correlations.
Therefore, by correlation between the studied source
rocks and crude oils show that there is a good correlation
between the extract samples of Bahariya and Khatatba
source rocks and oils from Qarun and Misaada oilfields.
While the extract of Kharita source rocks and Meleiha oil
shows no correlation with the previous samples.
CONCLUSIONS
Correlation between the studied source rocks and crude
oils of Qarun, Misaada and Meleiha oils and Bahariya,
Khatatba and Kharita source rocks in the North Western
Desert suggest the following:
x The oils and extracts of Qarun and Misaada oilfields and
extracts of Bahariya and Khatatba source rocks are
genetically related as they are sourced from marine
organic sources and deposited under reducing conditions
the oil and extracts samples show a degree of maturation
x The Meleiha oil and extract of Kharita source rocks are
genetically related, sourced from mixed organic sources
deposited under transitional conditions
x The extract of Kharita source rocks and Meleiha oil
shows no correlation with the previous samples.
Therefore, these evidences indicate that Bahariya and
Khataba source rocks seem to be act as a source and
reservoirs for oil generation in the Qarun and Misaada
oilfields. Consequently, the oil generation of Meleiha
oilfield may be migrated from other source rocks.