Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Week 2 - Question 4
In a two economy, William can produce 6 watches (if he works only on watches) or 18 boxes per
day (if he works only on boxes), while Kate can produce 8 watches (if she works only on
watches) or 12 boxes per day (if she works only on boxes).Which of the following combinations of
watches and boxes can be produced by William and Kate if they work together, share their
produce and use all the available time in a day?
Answer:
b) is correct (note that the cost of one watch for William is 3 boxes)
Week 3 - Question 1
Assume that there are only two countries in the world and
they produce two goods, cars and cotton. The opportunity
cost of a car in Country A is 50 units of cotton and the
opportunity cost of a car in country B is 300 units of cotton.
In this example:
Week 3 - Question 2
Week 3 - Question 3
Week 3 - Question 7
Week 3 - Question 9
b) Suppose that April, Bert and Colin were the only worker on an island
and they all worker for 6 hours each. Also assume that April and Colin
produce only the goods for which they have a competitive advantage,
whereas Bert splits his time such that he spends 3 hours in weaving
rugs and 3 hours in weaving rugs and 3 hours in making pots. What is
the productive capacity of the economy in terms of rugs and pots?
a) We first need work out the costive making 1 pot. In Aprils case, the
opportunity cost of making 1 pot is 1/2 a rug. For Bert, it is 2 rugs and
for Colin it is 3 rugs. Thus April has a competitive advantage in
making pots.
b) April will specialise in pots. She can make 6 pots in an hour and thus
make 36 pots in 6 hours. Colin will specialise in rugs, he can make 3
rugs in an hour and thus make 18 rugs in 6 hours. Bert can make 4
rugs in an hour and in 3 hours he makes 12 rugs; he can also make 2
pots in an hour, thus he can make 6 pots in 3 hours. Summing it all up,
the total productive capacity of the economy is 42 pots and 30 rugs.
Assume 2 countries, Newland and Oldland. Each country produces 2 goods, nuts and
coffee, using only labour. The table below shows the number of labour hours needed in
each country to produce one unit of the good (nuts of coffee):
a) The opportunity cost of producing one more unti of nuts in Newland is 2 units of
coffee
b) The opportunity cost of producing one more unit of nuts in Newland is 2/3 unit of coffee
c) The opportunity cost of producing one more unit of coffee in Oldland is 1.5 units of nuts
d) The opportunity cost of producing one more unit of coffee in Oldland is 1/3 unit of nuts
Oliver and Nellie produces two products, cloth and wine. The rates of production is
summarised in the table below:
a) Re-express this table in terms of input labour requirements i.e. how much time does it
take to produce one meter of Cloth and one litre of Wine.
b) From the above table, find out which person has an absolute advantage in producing
cloth and which person has a comparative advantage in producing cloth. Remember
show how you derive the results to reinforce your answer (Hint: For comparative
advantage it may be useful to express things in terms of opportunity costs).
Week 4 - Question 1
a) the price is lower than the minimum average total cost and
higher than the minimum average variable cost
b) the price is lower than the minimum average variable cost and
higher than the minimum average fixed cost
c) the price is lower than the minimum average variable cost and
higher than the minimum marginal cost
d) the price is lower than the minimum marginal cost and higher than
the minimum average total cost.
Week 4 - Question 2
Week 4 - Question 3
Week 4 - Question 6
At the local ice-cream shop ice creams sell for $5 each. Consider the following
information:
Calculate the point at which the marginal costs begin to increase (i.e. the
increasing marginal cost sets in at the employment of the _ worker per day).
Answer: The first worker produces 25 units, the second worker produces 50
additional units, the third work produces 75 additional units, the fourth worker
produces 50, the fifth worker produces 5 additional units. The employment of
the 4th worker is when increasing marginal costs set in. To see this, calculate
the marginal costs and youll see that at the 4th employee the MC start to rise.
Week 4 - Question 7
The figures in the table below indicate the costs to a fast food enterprise producing
gourmet Pizza. Note that is the firm operates in a perfectly competitive industry. Use
the information to answer the following questions.
b) With the additional of what unit of labour do the marginal costs begin to increase?
c) Assuming all gourmet pizzas sell for $20 and the firm wants to maximise profits,
calculate number of employees the firm should employ and the profit the firm will earn
a)
b) The addition of the fourth unit of labour will result in an increase in marginal
costs
c) If pizzas sell for $20, nothing that the profit maximising rule occurs when P=MC,
the business should employ 5 units of labour since the employment of the 6h unit
will increase marginal costs to $40, thus reducing profits. At 5 units of labour we
know that 70 units of pizza will be produced. The revenue will be $1400; the cost
will be $1100. Thus profits will be $300
Week 5 - Question 1
Week 5 - Question 3
a) Something useful
Week 5 - Question 5
b) Assume that you derive utility from the consumption of two goods, CDs and hamburgers. The
utility you receive from each from each good at various levels of combustion is shown below:
Week 5 - Question 5
you have $40 to spend, and the price of CDs is $10, while the
price of hamburgers is $5
d) What does the information in the table tell you about the 9th and
10th hamburger?
b)
c) The first thing to note is the CDs are double the price of hamburgers. So, lets start by
analysing whether the buyer should purchase one CD or two hamburgers, i.e., the first $10
should be spent on what. If he/she purchases one CD, the buyer will obtain 48 units, if he/she
purchases 2 hamburgers, the buyer will obtain 48 units. So the first purchase should be a CD
since the marginal utility of the two options will be equal.
Now lets look at the decision in terms of the buyer budget, i.e., how should the buyer spend the
remaining $30. Should the buyer purchase one extra CD or 2 extra hamburgers? If he/she
purchases a CD, the buyer will receive 11 utils. If the buyer purchases 2 extra hamburgers the
buyer will receive 48 utils. Thus the buyer should purchase 2 hamburgers.
Moving on, were left with $20 and if we undertake the same analysis for the next $10, we find
that the optimal decision is again to purchase 2 extra hamburgers, since the additional utility is
36 utils, which is greater than 11 utils.
Were now left with $10 and hamburger is still the better decision since the marginal utility is 26
which is grater than 11. Thus the optimal bundle is 6 hamburgers and 1 CD.
d) Basically, it tells you that the buyer is receiving negative utility which means that the buyer is
actually worse off if he/she consumers any more hamburgers.
Week 5 - Question 6
Week 6 - Question 1
Week 6 - Question 2
Week 6 - Question 3
Week 6 - Question 4
Week 6 - Question 8
c) Calculate the net gain/loss in total surplus. Is this total surplus going to
be realised in the market?
a) At a price of $4 the quantity demanded is 10 million. The area above the price line and below
the demand curve is also equal to $10 millions, (10*2)/2, and it represents the consumer
surplus. (Verify this using a diagram; the area of the triangle formed by the price line and the
demand curve is indeed equal to 10).
At the new price of $3, the quantity demanded is 15 millions, which suggests that consumer
surplus is $22.5 million, (15*3)/2.
c) From the above, the gain in total surplus is $9 million. This total surplus will never be realised.
In fact, there is an excess demand that producers are not willing to satisfy at price $4 and $3.
Use a diagram to verify that the only equilibrium price where quantity supplied equals quantity
demanded is $5.
Week 6 - Question 9
b) We search for the price such that the quantity demanded equals
the quantity supplied. a quick look at the graph suggests that this
price is 20.
CS + PS = $2000
Week 7 - Question 1
Week 7 - Question 2
Week 7 - Question 3
c) Upward sloping
Week 7 - Question 7
Consider a perfectly competitive market. Suppose that the supply curve is perfectly elastic (i.e., the supply
curve is an horizontal line) at a price of $10. Demand is given by the following equation: P = 100 - Q
b) Suppose that there is an increase in demand where at every price there is 10 extra units demanded. Write
down the demand curve and re-calculate consumer and producer surplus.
Answer:
b) The demand curve becomes: Q = 100 - P +10. This can be rearranged as Q = 100 - P or P = 110 - Q.
Consumer surplus is $5000 and producer surplus is zero.
c) Intuitively, when the supply curve is perfectly elastic (i.e., the supply curve is an horizontal line) if there is a
change in price, the quantity supplied goes immediately to zero. Thus, the change in demand only affects
quantity. Since there is no change in price and the supply curve is perfectly elastic, then there is no change in
producer surplus.
Week 7 - Question 8
The demand for a product is given b the equation: Qd = 120 - 8P, while the supply is given by the
equation: Qs = 6P - 20 (P is measured in $)
a) Calculate the absolute value of the price elasticity of supply at the market equilibrium price and
the total producer surplus at this price
b) Calculate the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand at the market equilibrium price and
the total consumer surplus at this price.
Answer:
a) At the market equilibrium, the price will be $10 and the quantity is 40. Using the price elasticity
formula, we have (1/slope)*(P/Q)=6*(10/40), which suggests a price elasticity of supply of 1.5. The
producer surplus is (40*(10-20/6))/2=400/3
b) At the market equilibrium, the price will be $10 and the quantity is 40. Using the price elasticity
formula, we have (1/slope)*(P/Q)=8*(10/40), which suggests a price elasticity of supply of 2. The
producer surplus is (40*(15-10))/2=100
At the point where the two curves intersect which of the following is true?
d) Elasticity of demand for D1 equals 1 while the elasticity of demand for D2 is greater than 1
Answer:
150 - 3P = 5P - 10
P = 20
Qd = 150 - 3*20 = 90
Qs = 5*20 - 10 = 90
Assume that demand and supply curves for a particular chemical product are
given by the following equations: Demand: Qd = 150 - 15P; Supply: Qs = 5P - 30
Answer:
150 - 15P = 5P - 30
P=9
Qd = 150 - 15*9 = 15
Qs = 5 * 9 - 30 = 15
The equilibrium quantity for this market is 15 tons, and the price of that is $9
Week 8 - Question 1
Week 8 - Question 2
Week 8 - Question 5
Supply: P=Qs
Demand: P=10-Qd
a) Find the equilibrium price and quantity of this market. Then work out the
consumer surplus, producer surplus and total economic surplus at he market
equilibrium.
b) Suppose that the government has decided to provide a subsidy of $2 per unit to
suppliers. Write down the new supply curve for the suppliers. Then, work out the
new equilibrium quantity.
c) Given the new quantity produced and sold, calculate consumer surplus, producer
surplus and the cost of the subsidy. Then work out total economic surplus.
Week 8 - Question 6
d) There is no effect
Week 8 - Question 7
d) There is no effect
Week 8 - Question 9
The weekly demand for wool in Australia is given by: P = 800 - Qd, while the weekly of wool is
given by: P=Qs, where the P is Price, Qd is the quantity demanded and Qs is quantity
supplied. The world price of wool is set to $300 per bale.
a) Suppose that the country is not open to trade. What is the net gain/loss in total economic
surplus compared to the free trade case?
Answer:
If there was no trade, price would be $400 and consumers surplus would be
(400*400/2)=80000. In the free trade case, consumer surplus is (500*500/2)=125000, which
suggests a loss of $45000 in the no-trade case.
For producers, at the no-trade equilibrium, the surplus is (400*400/2)=80000; at the free trade
equilibrium, the surplus is $45000, which suggests a gain of $35000 in the no-trade case.
Thus, the net economic loss is $10000, in the no-trade case compared to free trade.
Week 8 - Question 9
b) Suppose there is a tariff of $50 per bale imposed by the Australian government on the import of wool. Use this information
to answer the following questions:
iv. What is the overall loss in economic surplus following the introduction of the tariff?
Answer:
i) The price before the tariff would have been $300m which suggests producer surplus of $(300*300/2)=$45000. Post-tariff
price goes up to $350, which suggests that the producer surplus is now (350*350/2)=$61250. Taking the difference this
suggests that producer surplus increased by $16250
ii) The price before the tariff would have been $300, which suggests a consumer surplus of (500*500/2) = $125,000. Post-tariff
price goes up to $350, which suggests that the consumer surplus is now (450*450/2) = $101,250. Taking the difference, this
suggests that consumer surplus decreases by $23,750.
iii) The government tariff is $50 per imported unit; at a price of $350, consumers demand 450 units and domestic suppliers
are willing to provide 350 units, which means 100 units needs to be imported. Thus, government revenue is $50*100=$5,000.
iv) We know that producers gain $16,250, consumers lose $23,750 and the government gains $5,000. Add these bits up and
we have a net loss of $2,500.
Week 9 - Question 1
Week 9 - Question 2
A cinema charges a lower admission price for nonworking patrons over the age of 60 (seniors) than for
other adults seeking entry to see a movie. This is an
example of:
a) no price discrimination
Week 9 - Question 3
Week 9 - Question 4
Week 9 - Question 7
b) Assuming that the marginal cost of production is constant and equal to $4, what is the profit maximizing level of output
in the short run (i.e., you can ignore the fixed cost)?
Answer
a)
Week 9 - Question 8
Consider a monopolist facing a demand curve given by: P =20-Q, where P is price and Q
is quantity.
Assume that the monopolists marginal cost is constant and equal to $10 per unit and
there are no other costs. If the monopolist engages in first degree price discrimination,
what is the deadweight loss? Explain your answer.
Answer
Given that we deal with first degree price discrimination, the deadweight loss is 0, since
the monopolist knows the willingness to pay of each consumer and is able to extract their
entire surplus. In this case, the Marginal Revenue Curve for the monopolist would be equal
to the Demand Curve. The monopolist sets the price and quantity where the Demand
Curve intersects the Marginal Cost curve => in this case P=$10 and Q=10 units.
It is easy to see that this is the quantity that maximizes total surplus (because at this
quantity the Marginal Benefit for society ---captured by the Demand Curve--- equals the
Marginal Cost for society); however, the monopolist obtains the entire surplus, while
consumers obtain zero surplus. So the distribution of surplus is hardly fair!
Week 10 - Question 1
Week 10 - Question 2
Week 10 - Question 3
Week 10 - Question 4
Nash equilibrium.
Week 10 - Question 7
Assume two rival car rental companies (Ace Rentals and Bobs Rentals) are considering whether to discount their rates as a
method of increasing market share. The following pay-off matrix gives the expected monthly profits (in $000) of each
company (Ace, Bobs) under alternative strategies. The payoffs and strategies for Bobs are in italics:
Answer
First note that the dominant strategy for both Bobs and Ace is to Discount. Here is why:
If Bobs chooses Discount, Ace would prefer to choose Discount (obtaining 12 instead of 8). If Bobs chooses Do Not
Discount, Ace would still prefer to choose Discount (obtaining 24 instead of 16). Thus Discount is a dominant strategy for Ace.
If Ace chooses Discount, Bobs will prefer to choose Discount (obtaining 10 instead of 6). If Ace chooses Do Not Discount,
Bobs would prefer chooses Discount (obtaining 20 instead of 14).
It is easy to note that a strategy profile composed by dominant strategies --- in this case (Discount, Discount) --- must also be
a Nash equilibrium. To verify this one needs to check that the only strategy profile where no player has an incentive to deviate
unilaterally is (Discount, Discount).
Week 11 - Question 1
b) No transaction costs.
Week 11 - Question 2
Week 11 - Question 3
Week 11 - Question 4
b) Driving
d) Over fishing
Week 11 - Question 5
a) Smoking
b) On-the-job training
c) Alcohol abuse
d) Over fishing
Week 11 - Question 10
Suppose that in the Sydney suburbs the demand for flowering plants is given by: P
= 60 Qd, where Qd represents quantity demanded (in thousands) and P is the
price of a plant. The supply for flowering plants is given by: P = 0.2Qs, where Qs
represents quantity supplied (in thousands).
a) What will be the market price and the quantity supplied of flowering plants?
b) Suppose that there is an external marginal benefit equal to $6 for each extra
flowering plant that is consumed. What is the socially optimal number of plants?
c) How does the socially optimal quantity from point (b) compare to the private
optimal quantity (i.e., the quantity that would be realized in a market with no
government intervention) from point (a)? Should the government impose a tax or
give a subsidy to ensure that the socially optimal outcome is achieved? Explain
your answer.
a) To work out the equilibrium quantity & price, we simply set Demand =
Supply. Thus we have: 0.2Q = 60 - Q => Q* = 50 =>P* = 10
b) To work out the socially optimal equilibrium quantity & price, we simply set
Social Demand = Supply. Remember that the vertical distance between the
Social Demand Curve and the Private Demand Curve is equal to the external
marginal benefit ($6). Thus, the Social Demand Curve is given by P=(60 QD)
+6. By setting Social Demand = Supply we obtain:
c) Comparing the private optimum with the social optimum we see that too few
units are produced in the market (50 instead of 55). As a result, the
government should provide a subsidy such that the private demand curve is
more closely aligned to the social demand curve. If the subsidy is set to be
equal to the external marginal benefit, the outcome is going to be socially
efficient.
Week 12 - Question 1
b) A hotdog
d) A lighthouse
Week 12 - Question 2
a) Non-excludability only
b) Non-rivalry only
Week 12 - Question 3
Week 12 - Question 4
Week 12 - Question 6
What is the free riding problem? Does the freeriding problem result in overprovision or under
provision relative to the social optimal? Explain.
Week 12 - Question 7
Fred and Ted each have the following individual demand curve for
urban parkland: P=10Q (Fred) and P=10.1Q (Ted)
a) To derive the aggregate demand for a public good, you need to sum the individual demand curves
vertically, and so Aggregate Demand: P=(10-Q)+(1-0.1Q)=11-1.1Q
b) To find the individual quantity demanded were substitute P=5 into the individual demand curves. Lets start
with Fred. We obtain 5=1-0.1Q. Rearrange to obtain Q=(1-5)/0.1=-40. Ted thinks that the price is so high that
he would prefer to consumer a negative quantity of the good! Clearly in this context a negative quantity would
be meaningless, so the optimal quantity for Ted is zero (to see this point just note that the marginal cost, $5, is
always above Teds demand curve, which in turn implies that Teds willingness to pay for any unit of the good
is less than $5). Hence, Fred will demand 0 units and the aggregate total quantity is 5 units.
c) The socially optimal quantity is the quantity at which the Marginal Cost (MC) equals the Social Marginal
Benefit (MB(social)), which is the sum of the individual Marginal Benefits (MB(Fred)+MB(Ted)). (This is the
Samuelson Condition.) Recall that the demand curve captures the marginal benefit (or reservation price).
Hence we can write MB(Fred)=P=10-Q; MB(Ted)=P=1-0.1Q and MB(social)=P=11-1.1Q.
In our example the marginal cost is the cost of maintaining the park, so MC=$5.
As a result, the optimal amount of public good is 5.45 units. This is higher than 5 units (see the previous
point), which is the quantity that the market would provided. This suggests that the market is under-providing
the public good. This is due to the face that Ted engages in free-riding and ultimately benefits from the good
without having to pay for it.
a) A tax on imports
b) A cap on imports
Supply: P=4Qs
Demand: P=12-2Qd
The publishers of two daily city newspapers, BUGLE and CLARION, compete vigorously for
sales. Each publishing company is considering whether to cut the price of its newspaper.
Assume that the strategy choices for each company can be modelled as a choice between
two alternative strategies: Cut Price or Maintain Price.
The following payoff matrix gives the expected monthly profits in ($000) for each
newspaper (BUGLE, CLARION) under alternative strategies (payoffs and strategies for
Clarion in italics)
What is