Zeitgeist?

Zeitgeist was a YouTube which was very popular

especially among the younger generation.
Zeitgeist claimed to be an expose' of various issues
including an examination of the
Federal Reserve Bank. While having some informative
and useful parts to it, it followed
in the footsteps of several names in the expose' arena:
David Icke
Jordan Maxwell
Zechariah Sitchin
Michael Tsarion
All of these claim to be exposing the illuminist conspiracy,
while having some minor and
even a few major differences in their approach. While I
feel kindly disposed toward
David Icke as he has actually moved toward truth and
moderated his message--may
that journey continue--the rest of the names mentioned
promote a message of
purported resistance to an illuminist New World Order
globalist agenda. They
represent themselves as the polarized opposite of the
NWO. Yet they all include in

their expose' program certain concepts which move the

student/viewer on certain
key points; i.e., opposition to all religion, denigration of the
marriage contract and
the family unit, and the individual with regard to individual
property rights, individual
accumulation of wealth, individual influence, autonomous
action.
Truth Movement?
All on the list purport to be members of the TRUTH
MOVEMENT. But if one ascribes
to the concepts they promote one has accomplished key
goals for the very globalist
elites they are supposedly opposing.
This is also true of the movie Zeitgeist.
If one cuts to the chase it boils down to one essential:
Individual versus Collective
The Youth - The Key
Hard to not notice that the median age of those in the
meeting is rather high. Why?
Public education and the media have promoted socialism,
collectivism, to a point
that the youth in this country are predominantly socialist

without any awareness of it.

The Debate
The embarrassing debate that I got into on email over the
promoting of the movie
Zeitgeist; its use as a wakeup call--some of those
censuring my opposition were
actually JBS members longstanding (who will go unnamed
here-as this is not about
attacking anyone's character but about concepts). I was
identifying Zeitgeist as
"nefarious and dangerous" because of its promotion of
collectivism and its condemnation
of religion and other things mentioned. The main
spokesperson replied to my
objections, saying, "We need to wake people up to the
reality of 911. Once people
wake up to what was done; then we can decide what we
want. We need to preserve
choice." Choice? Choice for what? Choice for Karl
Marx?
So, my reply was, "Doesn't the Birch Society have good
wakeup material?"
No reply. End of discussion.

The Challenge
The challenge posed by Zeitgeist and its mentors is a
challenge for the minds of
the youth. This challenge is Individual versus Collective.
In it's simplest symbolic form this is represented by Staff &
Circle.
I believe the litmus test for success for the Birch Society is
the recapture of
the minds of youth. The Birch Society has many clear
agendas that have been
successful in the past. If they put their minds to it, with
effort, I am sure this
hurdle too can be overcome.